政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/30128
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 109952/140903 (78%)
造访人次 : 46049610      在线人数 : 584
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/30128


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30128


    题名: 產業及策略對智慧資本之影響--以我國資訊電子業及金融服務業為研究對象
    作者: 洪仲瑜
    贡献者: 王文英
    洪仲瑜
    关键词: 智慧資本
    策略
    資訊電子業
    金融服務業
    日期: 2002
    上传时间: 2009-09-11 17:18:28 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 網際網路的盛行及普及，使得客戶的消費觸角由區域性伸展到全球無遠弗屆之處，激烈的競爭環境使得今日企業經營的重點轉為「客戶導向」，企業必須針對客戶的需求提供適當的產品和服務，以確保其在市場上的地位。而顧客對產品或服務的需求相當多元化，企業資源有限無法同時滿足，因此必須選擇其欲提供給顧客的主要價值，依據其所選擇之主要價值不同而採取不同的策略類型。
    工欲善其事，必先利其器，企業為落實其策略且配合其所屬產業環境及特性之不同，須具備一定的能力及資源。而在此新知識經濟型態下，企業的競爭要素已由實體資產轉為無形的知識財，即許多學者所稱之智慧資本。因此本研究主要在探討產業及策略對智慧資本之影響。在某種產業或策略下所應具備且加強之重要智慧資本為何?又不同產業及策略下，所重視之智慧資本是否會有所不同?
    本研究採取問卷調查法，以我國上市之資訊電子業及上市、櫃之金融服務業為研究對象。首先，根據相關文獻探討及企業實訪談之結果完成問卷設計，並發放大規模問卷，接著以回收之問卷進行分析，以了解各產業及策略類型下所重視之智慧資本為何，再進一步分析各產業及各策略類型下所重視之智慧資是否有所異同，經整理分析，做出以下結論：
    一、資訊電子業及金融服務業共同重視之智慧資本項目為關係面中的「回應客戶問題的迅速性」、「售後服務的完善性」、「公司回應市場的能力」、「客戶重購率」及人力面的「員工對品質要求的意識」。產品領導策略、營運卓越策略及顧客親近策略共同重視之智慧資本為「回應客戶問題的迅速性」、「售後服務的完善性」、「公司回應市場的能力」。
    二、產業別會影響智慧資本項目之重視程度，資訊電子業較重視創新面及其相關之智慧資本；策略類型之不同會影響智慧資本之重視程度，產品領導策略者較重視創新面及其相關智慧資本，顧客親近策略者較重視關係面及其相關之智慧資本。
    三、企業應考量其所屬之產業及所選擇之策略類型，辨認重要之智慧資本，並進一步加以創造、累積及維持。
    參考文獻: 一、中文參考文獻
    1. 司徒達賢，1995，資源基礎理論與企業競爭優勢關係之探討，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。
    2. 李洋昇，1999，台灣資訊電子廠商核心專長與競爭策略之研究，國立東華大學國際企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    3. 吳思華，1988，產業政策與企業策略，中國經濟企業研究所。
    4. 吳青松，1993，台灣資訊電子業關鍵成功因素之探討，管理科學學報，第10卷第1期(5月)：6-21。
    5. 吳秀娟，2000，企業市場價值與淨值差異影響因素之研究－以我國資訊電子業為例，國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。
    6. 范祥雲，1994，不同策略型態之關鍵成功因素研究：以資訊電子業為例，國立中正大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    7. 馬秀如，1999，資訊軟體業無形資產鑑價制度之研究，台灣證券交易所委託之研究計畫。
    8. 黃俊英，1991，多變量分析，台北：華泰書局。
    9. 資策會，2001，我國產業智慧資本先導性個案研究，財團法人資訊工業策進會分包學術機構研究計畫期末報告。
    二、英文參考文獻
    1. Aaker, D. A. 1989. Managing assets and skills：The key to a sustainable competitive advantage. California Management Review (Winter)：91-106.
    2. Amit, R., and P. J. H. Schoemaker. 1993. Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal 14(January)：33-46.
    3. Barney, J. B. 1986a. Organizational culture：Can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review(November)：656-665.
    4. Barney, J. B. 1986b. Strategic factor markets：Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Science 42：1231-1241.
    5. Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17：99-120.
    6. Brooking, A., P. Board, and S. Jones. 1998. The predictive potential of intellectual capital. International Journal of Technology Management 16：115-125.
    7. Buren, M. E. V. 1999. A yardstick for knowledge management. Training & Development Alexandria 53(May)：71-78.
    8. Bukh, P. N., H. T. Larsen, and J. Mouritsen. 2001. Constructing intellectual capital statements. Journal of Management 17：87-108.
    9. Chatterjee, S., and B. Wernerfelt. 1994. The link between resources and type of diversification：Theory and evidence. Strategic Management Journal 15(summer)：131-148.
    10. Collis, D. J.1991. A resources-based analysis of global competition：The case of the bearing industry. Strategic Management Journal 12(summer)：49-68.
    11. Collis, D. J., and C. A. Montgomery. 1995. Competing on resources：Strategy in the 1990s. Harvard Business Review 73(4)：118-129.
    12. Conner, K. R. 1991. A historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organization economics：Do we have a new theory of the firm. Journal of Management 17(March)：121-154.
    13. Dzinkowski, R. 2000. The measurement and management of intellectual capital. Management Accounting(February)：32-36.
    14. Edvinsson, L., and M. S. Malone. 1997. Intellectual capital：Realizing your company’s true value by finding it’s hidden brainpower. New York：HarperCollins Publishers, Inc.
    15. Edvinsson, L., and P. Sullivan. 1996. Developing a model for managing intellectual capital. European Management Journal 14(August)：356-364.
    16. Fiegenbaum, A., J. McGee, and H. Thomas. 1987. Exploring the linkage between strategic groups and competitive strategy. International Studies of Management & Organization 18：6-25.
    17. Financial Management Accounting Committee (FMAC). 1998. The measurement and management of intellectual capital：An introduction. New York：International Federation of Accountants.
    18. Fiol, C. M. 1991. Management culture as a competitive resource：An identity-based view of sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17：191-211.
    19. Grant, R. M. 1991. The resources-based theory of competitive advantage： Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review 33(Spring)：114-135.
    20. Hall, R. 1992. The strategic analysis of intangible resource. Strategic Management Journal 13(February)：135-144.
    21. Hall, R. 1993. A framework linking intangible resource and capabilities to sustained competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal 14(November)：607-618.
    22. Hamel, G. 1994. The concept of core competence. Competence-based Competition：11-33.
    23. Harrison, J. S., E. H. Hall, and R. Nargundkar. 1993. Resource allocation as an outcropping of strategic consistency：Performance implication. Academy of Management Journal 36：1026-1051.
    24. Hope, J., and T. Hope. 1997. Competing in the third wave：The ten key management issues of the information age. Harvard Business School Press.
    25. Horibe, F. 1999. Managing knowledge workers：New skill and attitudes to unlock the intellectual capital in your organization. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
    26. Itami, H., and T. Roehl. 1987. Mobilizing invisible assets. Harvard University Press.
    27. Jao, Y. C. 1996. The determinants of enter-partner learning in cross-border contract manufacturing alliance-A study of Taiwanese IT firms. Unpublished Ph. D. thesis. London Business School.
    28. Joia, L. A. 2000. Measuring intangible corporate assets：Linking business strategy with intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital1：68-84.
    29. Kaplan, R. S., and D. P. Norton. 2001. The strategy-focused organization：How balanced scorecard companies thrive in the new business environment. Boston：Harvard Business School Press.
    30. Lippman, S. A., and P. R. Rumelt. 1982. Uncertain imitability：An analysis of interfirm differences if efficiency under competition. Bell Journal of Economics 13：418-438.
    31. Long, C., and V. M. Koch. 1994. Using core capabilities to create competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics：7-22.
    32. Miles, R., and C. Snow. 1978. Organizational strategy, structure, and process. New York：McGraw-Hill.
    33. Nunally, J. C. 1978. Psychometric theory. New York：McGraw-Hill.
    34. Peteraf, N. A. 1993. The cornerstones of competitive advantage：A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal 14(March)：179-191.
    35. Petrash, G. 1996. Dow’s journey to a knowledge value management culture. European Management Journal 14：365-373.
    36. Porter, M. 1980. Competitive strategy. New York：Free Press.
    37. Porter, M. 1985. Competitive advantage：Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York：Free Press.
    38. Porter, M. E. 1991. Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategic Management Journal 12：95-117.
    39. Reed, R., and R. J. DeFillippi. 1990. Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Mmanagement Review 15：88-102.
    40. Roos, J., G.. Roos, N.C. Dragonetti, and L. Edvinsson. 1997. Intellectual capital：Navigating in the new business landscape. New York：New York University Press.
    41. Roos, G.., A. Bainbridge, and K. Jacobsen. 2001. Intellectual capital analysis as a strategic tool. Strategy & leadership 29(July/August)：21-26.
    42. Salter, M. S., and W. A. Weinhold. 1978. Diversification via acquisition：Creating value. Harvard Business Review 56：166.
    43. Slater, S. F., E. M. Olson, and V. K. Reddy. 1997. Strategy-based performance measurement. Business Horizons 40(July-August)：37-44.
    44. Sveiby, K.E. 1997. The new organizational wealth-managing and measuring knowledge-based. New York：Berrett-Koehler Publishing Group Inc.
    45. Stewart, T. A. 1997. Intellectual capital：The new wealth of organizations. New York：Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc.
    46. Treacy, M., and F. Wiersema. 1995. The discipline of market leaders：Choose your customers, narrow your focus, dominate your market. MA：Addison-Wesley.
    47. Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 5：171-180.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    90353007
    91
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090353007
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[會計學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML2236检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈