English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46309602      Online Users : 1402
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/30146
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30146


    Title: 作業制管理制度對時間、成本、品質持續性改善之實證研究—以銀行業為個案
    Authors: 許雪芬
    HSU, HSUEH FEN
    Contributors: 吳安妮
    Wu, Anny
    許雪芬
    HSU, HSUEH FEN
    Keywords: 成本制度
    作業制成本制度
    作業
    銀行
    ABC
    ABM
    Date: 2005
    Issue Date: 2009-09-11 17:20:26 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 為提升營運財務績效,在營運管理上,不少企業會採行節約成本與裁減員工等迅速明快的措施來提升生產力。但其作法不僅往往會造成許多不愉快,且即使在短時間內的成本控制頗見成效,但不久又會故態復萌,生產力停滯不前,甚至下降,直到下一波的成本削減措施推出為止。因此針對其關鍵作業流程進行持續性改善,才可謂真正達到減少營運成本卻又不降低品質之方法。又在規模越大的公司中,通常成本交叉補貼的情況會越嚴重,越是有必要實施作業制成本管理制度來增加作業及資源分配的透明度。為達此目標,推行作業制成本管理制度(Activity-based costing Management)以獲得必要之作業相關資訊極為重要,而作業制管理遂成為提升競爭力及達到持續性改善之有效制度。
    筆者會以個案公司為例,採實地實證之研究方式,探討作業制管理制度實施後,個案公司在作業時間、成本、品質面之持續性改善效果。根據研究假說與實證模型,以t統計量檢定或複迴歸分析(Multiple Regression)的方式,進行橫斷面之資料分析,探討作業制成本管理制度資訊釋放前後期,對於公司在策略面及營運面之各種效益變化。
    In order to improve the operational performance quickly, many enterprise cut down staff to economize cost without modifying the process. This method is just a temporary solution to a problem. It may cause a lot of unhappiness and would not do any help to increase productivity. Continuing improving critical process works for long-term cost down. And In most of the large-scale companies, the problem of cost cross-subsidization is usually more serious. So it is necessary to implment the the cost allocation management system to make cost transparency. In order to reach this goal, it’s extremely important to imply Activity-based costing Management. And it is the effective system that helps to improve business competition.
    The author will take a bank to do case study and the evidence research to compose this thesis. And this research discusses the effect on time,cost and quality after implementing Acitivty-based costing. Besides that, the author also discuss the benefit on strategy and operation before and after the acitivity-based-costing information is released.The author take t-test and the Multiple Regression to examine the study hypothesis and evidence research model.
    Reference: 中文部分
    1、張簡仕豐,2003,採行作業制成本管理制度產品成本、品質成本與附加價值之影響-某民生用品製造公司之個案研究,國立政治大學會計學系碩士論文。
    2、林祐任,2002,作業制成本制度資訊對公司生產績效影響之研究—以某半導體公司為個案,國立政治大學會計學系碩士論文。
    3、陳忍,1999,品質成本影響因素之實地實證研究—以某通信電纜公司為個案,國立政治大學會計學系碩士論文。
    4、潘茹婷,2001,獲利基礎的顧客區隔模型之研究,國立臺灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。
    5、周文賢,2001,多變量統計分析SAS/STAT之應用,智勝文化。
    6、鄭智仁,2000,影響我國採用成本制度之關鍵因素—以作業基礎成本制為例,國立台灣大學會計學系碩士論文。
    7、吳安妮、劉俊儒、張育琳,1997,「作業基礎成本制度之整體內容及未來研究方向」,會計研究月刊第98 期,頁102-105。
    8、王鶴松,2003,「我國銀行業的現況與未來努力方向」,台灣金融財務季刊第四輯第四期,頁123-146。
    英文部分
    1. Banker, R., G. Potter, and R. Schroeder. 1993. Manufacturing performance reporting for continuous quality improvement. Management International Review. 33: p. 69-86.
    2. ______, G. Potter, and R. Schroeder. 1995. An empirical analysis of manufacturing overhead cost drivers. Journal of Accounting & Economics. 19(1): 115-138.
    3. Baxendale, S. 1999. Activity-based costing for a claims processing operation society of chartered property and casualty underwriters. CPCU Journal. 52(2): 84-89.
    4. Campbell, R. 1995. Steeling time with ABC or TOC. Management Accounting. 76(7):31-37.
    5. Coburn, S. 1997. How ABC was used in capacity budgeting. Management Accounting. 78: 38-44.
    6. Cooper, R. 1987. The two-stage procedure in cost accounting: part one. Journal of Cost Management. 1(2): 43-51.
    7. ______, and R. Kaplan. 1988. Measure costs right: make the right decisions. Harvard Business Review. Boston. 66(5): 96-104.
    8. ______. 1996. Activity-based costing and the lean enterprise. Cost management. 9(4):6.
    9. ______, and R. Kaplan. 1998. The promise--and peril--of integrated cost systems. Harvard Business Review. 76(4): 109-120.
    10. Deming, W. 1981-1982. Improvement of quality and productivity through action by management. National Productivity Review. 1(1):12-23.
    11. Edmondson, A., A. Winslow, R. Bohmer, and G. Pisano. 2003. Learning how and learning what: effects of tacit and codified knowledge on performance improvement following technology adoption. Decision Sciences. 34(2):197-224.
    12. Eldenburg, L. 1994. The use of information in total cost management. The Accounting Review. 69(1): 96-122.
    13. ______, and S. Kallapur. 2000. The effects of changes in cost allocations on the assessment of cost containment regulation in hospitals. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy. 19(1): 97.
    14. Foster, G., and M. Gupta. 1990. Manufacturing overhead cost driver analysis. Journal of Accounting & Economics. 12(1-3): 309-138.
    15. Gering, M. 1999. Activity based costing lessons learned implementing ABC. Management Accounting. 77(5): 26-28.
    16. ______. 1999. Activity based costing ad performance improvement. Management Accounting. 77(3): 24-26.
    17. Greenwood, T., and I. Reeve. 1991. Activity-based cost management for continous improvement:a process design frame. Journal of Cost Management. 22-40.
    18. ______, and J. Reeve. 1994. Process cost management. Cost Management. 7(4): 4.
    19. Hiromoto, T. 1988. Another hidden edge -- Japanese management accounting. Harvard Business Review. 66(4): 22-26.
    20. Hixon, M. 1995. Activity-based management: its purpose and benefits. Management Accounting. 73(6): 30-32.
    21. Holmen, J. 1995. ”ABC vs TOC:it’s matter of time”. Management Accounting. 37-40.
    22. Hong, J. 2000. Improving production decisions: a case for activity-based costing. Cost Management. 14(1): 31.
    23. Hussain, M., and A. Gunasekaran. 2002. Management accounting and performance measures in Japanese banks.
    Managing Service Quality. 12(4): 232-246.
    24. Ittner, C. 1999. Activity-based costing concepts for quality improvement. European Management Journal. 17(5): 492-501.
    25. ______, and D. Larcker. 2001. Assessing empirical research in managerial accounting: a value-based management perspective. Journal of Accounting & Economics. 32(1-3): 349.
    26. ______, W. Lanen, and D. Larcker. 2002. The association between activity-based costing and manufacturing performance. Journal of Accounting Research. 40(3): 711-727.
    27. Kaplan. R., and R. Cooper. 1988. Measure costs right:make the right decision. Harvard Business Review. 96-103
    28. Kiani, R., and M. Sangeladji. 2003. An empirical study about the use of the ABC/ABM models by some of the Fortune 500 largest industrial corporations in the USA. Journal of American Academy of Business.
    3: 174.
    29. Lambert, D., and J. Stock. 1982. Using advanced order processing systems to improve profitability. Business. 32(2): 23-30.
    30. Madu, C., C. Kuei, and R. Jacob. 1996. An empirical assessment of the influence of quality dimension on organizational performance. Internal Journal of Production Research. 34(7): 1943-1962.
    31. Miller, J. 1992. Tools and techniques - a current responsibility. CMA. 66(1): 34.
    32. ______. 1992. Manage costs? Manage activities! CMA. 66(2): 35.
    33. Miller, W. 1989. An ABA Banking Journal/Price Waterhouse survey: what banks say and do about operating costs. ABA Banking Journal. 81(10): 84.
    34. Page, M. 1996. The free factory: cutting cycle time and gaining output. IEEE/SEMI advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing
    Conference.146-150.
    35. Raffish, N. 1991. How much does that product really cost? Management Accounting. 72(9): 36-40.
    36.Sjoblom, L. 1995. Financial information and quality mnagement—i there a role for accountants? Management Accounting. 7: 37-40.
    37. Smith, W., T. Orr, and W. Dorn. 1991. Optimizing Wet End Chemistry iproves lerboard poduction, Sheet Quality. Pulp & Paper. 65(6): 117 -120.
    38. Steve, C., H. Grove, and C. Fukami. 1995. Benchmarking with ABCM. Management Accounting. 76(7): 56-61.
    39. ______, H. Grove, and W. Ortega. 1998. Business processs reengineering using activity-based management. Cost Management.
    1(5): 41.
    40. Turney, P., and B. Anderson. 1989. Accounting for continuous improvement. Management Review. 30(2): 37-48.
    41. ______., 1992. Activity-based management. Management Accounting. 73(7): 20-26.
    42. ______. 1992. Common cents: the ABC performance breakthrough. Cost Technology.
    43. ______, and A. Stratton. 1992. Using ABC to support continuous improvement. Management Accounting. 74(3): 46-51.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    91353011
    94
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0091353011
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2220View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback