English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109948/140897 (78%)
Visitors : 46074080      Online Users : 662
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/30186
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30186


    Title: 我國上市(櫃)公司財稅差異與企業評價之研究
    Authors: 楊秉芳
    Contributors: 陳明進
    楊秉芳
    Keywords: 財稅差異
    課稅所得
    資訊意涵
    Ohlson模型
    Book-tax differences
    Taxable income
    Information content
    Ohlson model
    Date: 2005
    Issue Date: 2009-09-11 17:24:55 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究以我國上市(櫃)公司89年至92年財務報表資訊及營利事業所得稅申報資料進行實證研究,探討造成我國財務會計所得與課稅所得差異之原因及財稅差異與企業評價之關係。在探討造成財稅差異原因方面,實證結果顯示除折舊費用未達統計上顯著水準外,呆帳費用、投資損失、存貨跌價損失及負債比率與財稅差異呈顯著負向關係,而投資利得、證券期貨交易所得、出售土地增益、企業規模、資產報酬率、電子業及營建業與財稅差異呈顯著正向關係。在探討財稅差異與企業評價之關係方面,本文援用Ohlson模型進行分析,結果發現財稅差異殘差項與股價呈正向關係,顯示投資人視未預期之財稅差異可能具有傳遞未來樂觀之財務會計所得或可節省稅負支出之租稅利益等資訊意涵因而反應於股價之上。依據實證結果,本文發現獲利能力越好或規模越大的公司越有可能透過租稅規劃,減少租稅上之負擔,此發現可作為稅務主管機關未來選案之參考;又本文也發現財稅差異具有資訊意涵,然現今財務報表揭露所得稅相關資訊有限,因此本研究建議證券主管機關應適度加強企業所得稅相關資訊之揭露與規範。
    Using 2000 to 2003 financial statement data and tax return data of listed and OTC companies in Taiwan, this study explores the sources of difference between tax income and financial reporting income and the relationships between book-tax differences and business valuation. The empirical results show that except for depreciation expense, bed debt expense, losses on investments, loss due to market decline of inventory, and financial leverage are negatively related with book-tax differences. However gains on investments, gains on securities transactions, gains in land transactions, business size, return on assets, the electronics industry, and the building industry are positively related with book-tax differences. The results also show that the regression residuals of book-tax differences are positively related with stock prices. This means that investors regard unexplained residuals as future earnings or income tax savings which are then reflected on the stock prices. The empirical results indicate that firms with greater profitability or large firms have greater incentives to conduct tax-planning which tend to reduce taxable income relative to income for financial reporting purposes. Our findings provide evidence for the Taxation Agency when doing audit adjustments and lend support for book-tax differences contain information that is relevant to firms’ valuation. However, in practice disclosure of information about income tax in financial statements is still limited, thus restricting investors in estimating book-tax differences. The security authority should devise appropriate accounting policies to improve disclosures on firms’ income tax information.
    Reference: 一、 中文參考文獻
    行政院金融管理委員會銀行局,2006年,「金融服務產業佔GDP之比率」,http://www.banking.gov.tw/public/data/boma/stat/ms_gdp.xls。
    林世銘與楊朝旭,1994,上市公事營利事業所得稅負擔之研究,財稅研究,第26卷,第6期,第34-52頁。
    周添城、徐偉初與李新仁,1989,不同企業規模、組織之稅負分配研究,財政部賦稅改革委員會專題報告。
    程心瑤與蔡宜芬,2006,分析師預測與管理當局預測對於企業評價之相對有用性:發佈時機與先後順序,會計評論,第42期,第81-107頁。
    張青霞,2001年,兩稅合一制度下「股東可扣抵稅額」於企業評價之角色-Ohlson模型之應用,國立政治大學未出版碩士論文。
    黃淑惠,1994,我國財務會計與稅務會計差異性之探討,台中商專學報,第26期(6月),第1-33頁。
    經濟日報,2005.2.22,最低稅負制鎖定長期免稅企業:稅率初訂12%逐步推定立法 7,000家企業將被課稅(A2版)。
    蔡宜芬,2002年,分析師預測與管理當局預測於企業評價之相對有用性研究- Ohlson模型之應用,國立政治大學未出版論文。
    薛明玲,1991,如何減少財稅差異,產業金融季刊,第73期(12月),第2-11頁。
    二、 英文參考文獻
    Amir, E. and B. Lev. 1996. Value-relevance of nonfinancial information: The wireless communications industry. Journal of Accounting Economics 22(1): 3-30.
    Amir, E., M. Kirschenheiter. and K. Willard. 1997. The valuation of Deferred Taxes. Contemporary Accounting Research 14(4): 597-622.
    Ballas, A. A. and D. L. Hevas. 2005. Differences in the valuation of earnings and book value: Regulation effects or industry effects? The International Journal of Accounting 40(4): 363-389.
    Ball, R., A. Robin and G. Sadka. 2005. Is accounting conservatism due to debt or share markets? a test of “contracting” versus “value relevance” theories of accounting. Working Paper, University of Chicago Graduate School of Business. http://gsbwww.uchicago.edu/fac/ray.ball/research/Papers/.
    Bankman, J. 1999. The new market in corporate tax shelters. Tax Notes Today 83: 1775-1795.
    Barch, A. E. and G. Clinch. 1998. Revalued financial, tangible, and intangible assets: associations with share prices and non-market based value estimates. Journal of Accounting Research 36: 199-233.
    Basu, S. 1997. The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting & Economics 24(1): 2-37.
    Bernard, V.L. 1995. The Feltham-Ohlson Framework: implications for empiricists. Contemporary Accounting Research 11(spring): 733-747.
    Collins, D. W., E. L. Maydew, and I. S. Weiss. 1997. Changes in the value-relevance of earnings and book values over the past forty years. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24(1): 39-67.
    Dechow, P., R. Sloan, and A. Sweeney. 1995.Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review 70(2): 193-225.
    Dechow, P. M., S. A. Richardson, and I. Tuna. 2003. Why are earnings kinky? an examination of the earnings management explanation. Review of Accounting Studies 8(2-3): 355-384.
    Desai, M. A. 2002. The corporate profit base, tax sheltering activity, and the changing nature of employee compensation. Working paper, NBER and Harvard University, Boston,MA. http://www.nber.org/papers/w8866.pdf.
    Feltham, G. A., and J. A. Ohlson. 1995. Valuation and clean surplus accounting for operating and financial activities. Contemporary Accounting Research 11(spring): 689-732.
    Feltham, G. A., and J. A. Ohlson. 1996. Uncertainty resolution and the theory of depreciation measurement. Journal of Accounting Research 34(Autumm): 209-234.
    Francis, J., and K. Schipper. 1999. Have financial statements lost their relevance? Journal of Accounting Research 37(Supplement): 319-352.
    Frank, M. M., L. J. Lynch, and S. O. Rego. 2006. Does aggressive financial reporting accompany aggressive tax reporting (and vice versa)? Working Paper, University of Virginia. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=647604.
    Grassley, C. 2002. Grassley raises public disclosure of some corporate tax returns. Press Release, Washington, D.C.
    Hanlon, M. 2003. What can we infer about a firm’s taxable income from its financial statements? National Tax Journal 56 (December): 831-863.
    Hanlon, M. 2005a. The persistence and pricing of earnings, accruals, and cash flows when firms have large book-tax differences. The Accounting Review 80(1): 137-166
    Hanlon, M. and T. Shevlin. 2002. Accounting for tax benefits of employee stock options and implications for research. Accounting Horizons 16(1): 1-16
    Hanlon, M., S. Kelly, and T. Shevlin. 2005b. Evidence on the possible information loss of conforming book income and taxable income. Journal of Law & Economics 48(October): 407-442.
    Healy, P. 1985. The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions/comment. Journal of Accounting and Economics 7(1-3): 85-107.
    Heflin, F. and W. Kross. 2005. Book versus taxable income. Working Paper, Kellogg School of Management. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=604528.
    Heltzer, W. 2006. Conservatism and book-tax differences. Working Paper, University of Chicago. http://accounting.cba.uic.edu/Department/Sp06-papers/Heltzer_paper.pdf.
    Jacob, J. 1996. Tax and transfer pricing: income shifing and the volume of intrafirm transfers. Journal of Accounting Research 34(2): 301-310.
    Joint Committee on Taxation. 1984. Study of 1983 Effective Tax Rates of Selected Large U.S. Corporations. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
    Lev, B. and D. Nissim. 2004. Taxable income, future earnings, and equity values. The Accounting Review 79(4): 1039-1074.
    Manzon, G. B. and G. A. Plesko. 2002 The Relation Between Financial and Tax Reporting Measures of Income. Tax Law Review 55: 175-214
    Mills, L. F. 1998. Book-tax differences and internal revenue service adjustments. Journal of Accounting Research 36(2): 343-356.
    Mills, L. F. and K. J. Newberry. 2001. The influence of tax and nontax costs on book-tax reporting differences: public and private firms. The Journal of The American Taxation Association 23(1): 1-19.
    Mills, L. F., K. Newberry, and W. B. Ttrutman. 2002. Trends in book-tax income and balance sheet differences. In Proceedings of the 2002 IRS Research Conference.
    Mills, L. F. and G. A. Plesko. 2003. Bridging the reporting gap: a proposal for more informative reconciling of book and tax income. National Tax Journal 56 (December): 865-893.
    Ohlson, J.A. 1995. Earnings, book values, and dividends in equity valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research 11(spring): 661-687.
    Phillips, J., M. Pincus, and S. O. Rego. 2003.Earnings management: new evidence based on deferred tax expense. The Accounting Review 78(2): 491-521
    Phillips, J. D., M. Pincus, S. O. Rego, and H. Wan. 2004. Decomposing changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities to isolate earnings management activities. The Journal of The American Taxation Association 26(supplement): 43-66.
    Plesko, G. A. 1999. Book-tax differences and the measurement of corporate income. In Proceedings of the Ninety-Second Annual Conference on Taxation: 171-176. Washington DC: National Tax Association, 2000.
    Porcano, T. M. 1986. Corporate tax rates: Progressive, proportional, or regressive. Journal of the American Taxation Association 7: 17-31.
    Shevlin, T. 1987. Taxes and off-balance-sheet financing: Research and development limited partnerships. The Accounting Review 62 (July): 480-509.
    Spooner, G. M. 1986. Effective tax rates from financial statements. National Tax Journal 39 (September): 293-306.
    Stickney, C. P. and V. E. McGee. 1982. Effective corporate tax rates – The effect of size, capital intensity, leverage and other factors. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 1: 125-152.
    U.S. Department of the Treasury. 1999. The problem of corporate tax shelters: discussion, analysis and legislative proposals. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Press.
    Watts, R. 2003. Conservatism in accounting partⅠ: explanations and implications. Accounting Horizons 17(3): 207-221.
    Watts, R. 2003. Conservatism in accounting partⅡ: explanations and implications. Accounting Horizons 17(4): 287-301.
    Wilkie, P. 1988. Corporate average effective tax rates and inferences about relative tax preferences. The Journal of the American Taxation Association 10: 75-88.
    Zimmerman. J. 1983. Taxes and firm size. Journal of Accounting and Economics 5(2): 119-149.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    93353052
    94
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093353052
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2220View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback