English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 111321/142230 (78%)
Visitors : 48415192      Online Users : 752
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/30271
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30271


    Title: 景氣循環與分析師預測偏差程度之關係
    none
    Authors: 蔡佳臻
    Contributors: 張清福
    none
    蔡佳臻
    Keywords: 景氣循環
    分析師預測
    Business Cycle
    Analysts` Forecasts
    Date: 2002
    Issue Date: 2009-09-11 17:34:27 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究探討分析師盈餘預測偏差程度是否受到景氣循環的影響。首先以美國股市大盤指數的漲跌趨勢判定景氣循環的高峰時點,並藉此區分景氣循環由上往下反轉與否之依據。其次,探討當景氣由上往下反轉時,分析師盈餘預測的偏差程度是否有明顯增加的現象。最後,探討預測該公司之分析師人數、公司盈餘變動程度、公司發生損失及分析師盈餘預測的分散程度與分析師盈餘預測偏差程度之相關性,於景氣由上往下反轉時期與景氣穩定成長時期是否會有顯著差異。
    實證結果顯示:(1)分析師盈餘預測偏差程度的確會受到景氣循環的影響。當景氣由上往下反轉時,分析師未能掌握景氣循環的脈動,立即修正其盈餘預測,而是傾向發佈具樂觀性偏差的盈餘預測。(2)處於景氣由上往下反轉時期,預測該公司之分析師人數、公司發生損失及分析師預測盈餘分散程度對分析師盈餘預測的偏差程度之影響會產生強化效果。然而,本研究並無充足證據顯示,公司盈餘變動程度與分析師盈餘預測偏差程度之相關性會受到景氣由上往下反轉而有所不同。
    This study investigates whether business cycle affects bias in analysts’ earnings forecasts. Based on NASDAQ market index, an economic sudden slump is selected for examining whether the bias in analysts’ earnings forecasts is more obvious during the period of the economic slump. On top of this, the association between the bias in analysts’ earnings forecasts and some economic factors including number of analysts following, change in earnings, firm loss and forecast dispersion in the economic sudden slump is also explored.
    The empirical results show that business cycle in analysts’ earnings forecasts indeed influences bias. When the economic sudden slump happens, analysts are not aware of business cycle’s fluctuation in time to revise their earnings forecasts; instead they trend to issue optimistic bias in earnings forecasts. In the economic sudden slump, the number of analysts following, firm loss and forecast dispersion deeply affect bias in analysts’ earnings forecasts. However, this study does not find sufficient evidence that the association between change in earnings and bias in analysts’ earnings forecasts is more obvious during the period of economic sudden slump.
    Reference: 一、中文部份
    王心瑩,1999,企業經營績效與產業景氣循環之關連:以台灣半導體產業為例,國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
    王文箴,2000,台灣半導體製造業之景氣循環與經營績效分析,國立交通大學科技管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    吳心儀,2002,分析師預測誤差與公司特性的關聯性,立元智大學管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    林玟君,2002,分析師預測誤差與長短期股價的關聯性,私立元智大學管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    林靜如,1996,管理當局盈餘預測與財務分析師預測修正之關連性研究,私立文化大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
    夏光宇,2002 ,台灣股市報酬波動與景氣循環關係之研究,私立長庚大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    許敏政,2001,盈餘品質對分析師預測及審計意見之影響,彰化師範大學未出版碩士論文。
    楊承澔,2002,景氣循環與企業經營績效、盈餘管理關聯性之探討,國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
    二、英文部份
    Amato, L. and R. Wilder. 1990. Firm and industry effects in industrial economics. Southern Economic Journal 57 (July): 93-105
    Bamber, L.,O. Barron, and T. Stober. 1997. Trading volume and different aspects of disagreement coincident with earnings announcements. The Accounting Review 72 (October): 575-597
    Bhardwaj, R. K. and L. D. Brooks. 1993. Dual betas from bull and bear markets:reversal of the size effect. The Journal of Financial Research 16 (Winter): 269-283
    Bhushan, R. 1989. Firm characteristics and analyst following. Journal of Accounting and Economics 11 (July): 255-274
    Brown, L.D., R. Hagerman, P. Griffin, and M. Zmijewski. 1987. Security analyst superiority relative to univariate time-series models in forecasting quarterly earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 9 (April): 61-78
    -----, G. Richardson, and S. Schwager. 1987. An information interpretation of financial analyst superiority in forecasting earnings. Journal of Accounting Research 25 (Spring): 49-67
    -----. 1993. Earnings forecasting research: Its implications for capital market research. International Journal of Forecasting 9 (November): 295-320
    -----. 2001. A temporal analysis of earnings surprises: Profits versus losses. Journal of Accounting Research 39 (September): 221-242
    Butler, K. C. and L. H. P. Lang. 1991. The forecast accuracy of individual analysts: evidence of systematic optimism and pessimism. Journal of Accounting Research 29 (Spring): 150-156
    Das, S., C. B. Levine, and K. Sivaramakrishnan. 1998. Earnings predictability and bias in analysts` earnings forecasts. The Accounting Review 73 (April): 277-294
    Duru, A. and D. M. Reeb. 2002. International diversification and analysts` forecast accuracy. The Accounting Review 77 (April): 415-433
    Eddy, A. and B. Seifert. 1992. An examination of hypotheses concerning earnings forecast errors. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics 31 (Spring): 22-37
    Hayes, R. M. and C. B. Levine. 2000. An approach to adjusting analysts` consensus forecasts for selection bias. Contemporary Accounting Research 17 (Spring): 61-83
    Kang, S., J. O`Brien, and K. Sivaramakrishnan. 1994. Analysts` interim earnings forecasts: evidence on the forecasting process. Journal of Accounting Research 32 (Spring): 103-112
    Kim, M. K. and D. A. Burnie. 2002. The firm size effect and the economic cycle. The Journal of Financial Research 25 (Spring): 111-124
    Kross, W., B. T. Ro, and D. Schroeder. 1990. Earnings expectations: The analysts’ information advantage. The Accounting Review 65 (April): 461-476
    Lang, M., and R. Lundholm. 1996. Corporate disclosure policy and analyst behavior. The Accounting Review 71 (October): 467-492
    Lim, T. 2001. Rationality and analysts’ bias. Journal of Finance 56 (February): 369-385
    Matolcsy, Z. P. 2000. Executive cash compensation and corporate performance during different economic cycles. Contemporary Accounting Research 17 (Winter): 671-692
    Mcnichols, M. and P. C. O`Brien. 1997. Self-selection and analyst coverage. Journal of Accounting Research 35: 167-199
    Mitchell, W. C. 1927. Business Cycles: The Problem and Its Setting. New York, National Bureau of Economic Research.
    O’Brian, P. C., and R. Bhushan. 1990. Analyst following and institutional ownership. Journal of Accounting Research 28 (Spring): 55-82
    Gu, Z., and J. Wu. 2001. Earnings skewness and analysts’ forecast bias. Working Paper, Carnegie Mellon University.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    90353006
    91
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0903530061
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2263View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback