English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109927/140876 (78%)
Visitors : 45968772      Online Users : 799
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/30326
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30326


    Title: 財務槓桿、自由現金流量與過度投資關聯性之研究
    The Association between Financial Leverage, Free Cash Flows and Overinvestment
    Authors: 葉柏廷
    YEH,PO-TING
    Contributors: 陳錦烽
    葉柏廷
    YEH,PO-TING
    Keywords: 自由現金流量
    過度投資
    代理成本
    債務控制
    Free cash flows
    overinvestment
    agency costs
    debt control
    Date: 2005
    Issue Date: 2009-09-11 17:40:16 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究之主要目的在於探討公司自由現金流量與其過度投資之關聯性,並設法瞭解內外部機制是否有助於減緩公司過度投資之代理問題。此外,本研究亦探究公司自由現金流量與債務控制之關聯性,以及債務控制與公司之其他監督機制間之關聯性。本研究發現,公司自由現金流量愈大時,愈可能有過度投資之現象,且此種現象較集中於自由現金流量為正之公司。此外,相較於高成長公司,低成長公司自由現金流量之代理問題較為嚴重,更傾向於過度投資。而在減緩代理問題之機制上,管理階層及機構投資人之持股並無法有效減緩代理成本,或抑制公司過度投資之現象,但或許可藉由債務控制減緩過度投資之問題。再者,本研究推論過度投資之公司可能會傾向於提前適用資產減損之會計處理,以認列其投資損失。最後,公司代理問題愈嚴重時,並不一定會藉由債務控制方式減緩過度投資。而在降低代理成本的作用上,管理者持股、機構投資人持股與債務控制之間具有明顯的互補關係。
    The main purpose of this study is to examine the association between a firm’s free cash flows and its overinvestment. In addition, I also examine the interrelationships between free cash flow, managerial ownership, institutional investors, and debt .The empirical results suggest that overinvestment is concentrated in firms with higher levels of free cash flows and lower opportunities for growth. Further tests find that a firm’s managerial ownership, institutional investors’ ownership may not effectively mitigate its overinvestment. However, debt appears to control overinvestment. Besides, I infer that firms with overinvestment may choose to adopt the accounting standards for asset impairment earlier to recognize their investment losses. Finally, I find evidence that firms may not be using debt control to mitigate their overinvestment, and a firm’s managerial ownership, institutional investors’ ownership and debt may serve as substitutes in controlling its agency costs.
    Reference: 一、中文部分
    汪瑞芝、陳明進,2004,兩稅合一前後上市公司股利發放之實證研究,管理學報,第二十一卷,第二期:257-277。
    林政衛,2004,公司治理結構、資訊透明度與股票報酬變異關聯性之研究,
    國立政治大學會計學系碩士論文。
    林燈煤,1999,股權結構、投資與公司價值之關係---以台灣上市公司為例,國立中正大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
    邱毅、張訓華,1991,股權結構、董事會組成與企業財務績效,台北市銀月刊,第二十二卷,第五期,11-32。
    許至榮,1997,代理成本、股利政策、負債比率與管理者持股比率之關係研究,雲林技術學院企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    張明峰,1990,股權結構對公司績效影響之研究,政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    黃勝平,2005,負債、代理問題與審計公費關聯性之探討,國立政治大學
    會計學系碩士論文。
    詹家昌,2002,經理人固守職位、 誘因與專屬投資決策,2002年財務金融學術研討會發表論文。
    董秋梅,1999,機構投資人對企業R&D活動之影響,交通大學經營管理研究所碩士論文。
    楊燿禎,2000,管理者持股、風險與財務決策關聯性之研究,政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    鄭筱凡,2001,全球股權結構與經營績效之研究,東吳大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    戴淵明,1986,公司控制型態與其經營績效關係之研究-台灣地區上市公司之實證分析,中興大學企研所碩士論文。
    二、英文部分
    Agrawal, A., and C. Knoeber. 1996. Firm performance and mechanism to control agency problem between managers and shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 31 : 377-397.
    _________, Mandelker, and N. Gershon 1990. Large shareholders and the monitoring of managers: The case of antitakeover charter amendments. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 25 : 143-162.
    Barnea, A., R. A. Haugen, and L. W. Senbet. 1981. Market imperfections, agency problems and capital structure: a review. Financial Management 10 : 7-21.
    Berle, and Means. 1932. The modern corporation and private property, New York, N.Y: Mac-Millan.
    Berger, P., E. Ofek, and D. Yermack. 1997. Managerial entrenchment and capital structure decisions. Journal of Finance 52 : 1411-1438.
    Brickley, J. A., R. C. Lease, and C. W. Smith. 1988. Ownership structure and voting on antitakeover amendments. Journal of Financial Economics 20 : 267-292.
    Chaganti, R., and F. Damanpour. 1991. Institutional ownership, capital structure, and firm perform. Strategic Management Journal 12: 479-491.
    Crutchley, C. E., Jensen, and Marlin R. H. 1996. Changes in corporate debt policy: Information asymmetry and agency factors. Managerial Finance 22 : 1-16.
    ____________, M. R. H. Jensen, J. S. Jahera, and J. E. Raymond. 1999. Agency problems and the simultaneity of decision making: The role of institutional ownership. International Review of Financial Analysis 8: 177- 197.
    DeAngelo, H., Masulis, and W. Ronald. 1980. Optimal capital structure under corporate and personal taxation. Journal of Financial Economics 8 : 3-29.
    Duggal, R., and J. A. Millar. 1999. Institutional ownership and firm performance: The case of bidder returns. Journal of Corporate Finance 5: 103-117.
    Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review 14: 57-74.
    Fluck, Z. 1999. The dynamics of management-shareholder conflict. Review of Financial Studies 12: 347-377.
    Guesneric, R., P. Piard, and P. Rey. 1988. Adverse selection and moral hazard with risk neutral agents. European Economic Review 33: 807-823.
    Gul, F., and J. Tsui. 1998. A test of the free cash flow and debt monitoring hypotheses: Evidence from audit pricing. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24 : 219-237.
    Harford, J. 1999. Corporate cash reserve and acquisitions. Journal of Finance 54 : 1969-1997.
    Hessel, C. A., and M. Norman. 1992. Financial characteristics of neglected and institutionally held stocks. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Financing 7: 313-330.
    Jensen, G.. D. Solberg, and T. Zorn. 1992. Simultaneous determination of insider ownership, debt and dividend policies. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 27 : 247-263.
    Jensen, M. C. 1986. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economics Review 76 : 323-329.
    __________, Meckling, and H. William. 1976. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Management 3 : 305-360.
    __________, and R. Ruback. 1983. The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. Journal of Financial Economics 11: 5-50.
    John. K., and W. S. Lemma. 1998. Corporate governance and board effectiveness. Journal of Banking & Finance 22: 371-430.
    Kester, C. W. 1986. Capital and ownership structure: A comparison of united states and Japanese manufacturing corporations. Financial Management 15 : 5-16.
    Klock, M., and C. F. Thies. 1995. A test of Stulz`s overinvestment hypothesis. The Financial Review 30: 387-398.
    Lang, L., E. Ofek, and R. M. Stulz. 1996. Leverage, investment, and firm growth. Journal of Financial Economics 40 : 3-29.
    Lang, L. H. P., R. Stulz, and R. H. Litzenberger. 1989. Dividend announcement: Cash flow signaling vs. free cash flow hypothesis? Journal of Financial
    Economics 24: 181-191.
    Lehn, K., and A. Poulsen. 1989. Free cash flow and stockholder gains in going private transactions. Journal of Finance 44 : 771-787.
    Leland, H., and D. Pyle. 1977. Informational asymmetries, financial structure, and financial intermediation. Journal of Finance 32: 371-389.
    McConnell, J. J., and H. Servaes. 1990. Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. Journal of Financial Economics 27: 595-612.
    Miller, M. H., and F. Modigliani. 1958. The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. American Economics Review 48: 261-929.
    Morck, R., A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny. 1988. Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 293-315.
    Myers, S. C. 1977. Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics 5 : 147-175.
    Myers, S. C., Nicholas, and S. Majluf. 1984. Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics 13 : 187-221.
    O’Brien, P., and R. Bhushan. 1990. Analyst following and institutional ownership. Journal of Accounting Research 28: 55-76.
    Oswald, S. L., and Jr. Jahera. 1991. The influence of ownership on performance:An empirical study . Strategic Management Journal 12: 321-326.
    Oviatt, B. M. 1988. Agency and transaction cost perspectives on the manager-shareholder relationship: Incentive for congruent interests. Academy of Management Review 13 (2): 214-225.
    Pound, J. 1988. Proxy contests and the efficiency of shareholder oversight. Journal of Financial Economics 20 : 237-265.
    Prowse, S. D. 1990. Institutional investment patterns and corporate financial behavior in the United States and Japan. Journal of Financial Economics 27 : 43-66.
    Rozeff, and S. Michael. 1982. Growth, beta, and agency costs as determinants of dividend payout ratio. Journal of Financial Research: 249-259.
    Safieddine. A., and T. Sheridan. 1999. Leverage and corporate performance: Evidence form unsuccessful takeovers. Journal of Finance 65 : 547-581.
    Scott A, Richardson. 2006. Over-investment of free cash flow. Review of Accounting Studies, forthcoming.
    Shleifer, A., and R. Vishny. 1986. Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy 94 : 461-488.
    Smith, C. W., and R.L. Watts. 1992. The investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend, and compensation policies. Journal of Financial Economics 32 : 263-292.
    Stulz, R. 1988. Management control of voting right: Financing policies and the market for corporate control. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 431-460.
    ______. 1990. Managerial discretion and optimal financing policies. Journal of Financial Economics 26 : 3-27.
    Wald, J. K. 1999. How firms characteristics affect capital structure: an international comparison. Journal of Financial Research 22 (2) : 161-187.
    Wahal S. and J. J. McConnell. 2000. Do institutional investors exacerbate managerial myopia. Journal of Corporate Finance 6: 307-329.
    Williamson, O. E. 1963. Managerial discretion and business behavior. The American Economic Review 53: 1032-1057.
    Wu, L. 2004. The impact of ownership structure on debt financing of Japanese firms with the agency cost of free cash flow. Working paper, Department of Economics and Finance, City University of Hong Kong.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    93353034
    94
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0933530341
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2431View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback