English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46282417      Online Users : 1263
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 財務管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/30966
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30966


    Title: Order Imbalance and Abcdrmal Return around Seasoned Equity Offerings in TSE-Listed Firms
    Authors: 曾瑜萍
    YU-PING TSENG
    Contributors: 劉玉珍
    Yu-Jane Liu
    曾瑜萍
    YU-PING TSENG
    Keywords: Seasoned Equity Offerings
    Order Imbalances
    Abcdrmal Returns
    Negative Information Effects
    Information Asymmetry
    Date: 2002
    Issue Date: 2009-09-14
    Abstract: Traditionally, volume has provided the link between trading activity and returns. This study attempts to not only investigate the trading behavior of all aspects of investors by daily order imbalances, the better index than dollar volume, around firm-specific news releases, but also explore the relation between order imbalances and daily returns. This study contributes to the shot-run market reactions and trading behaviours from different three or five kinds of investors around seasoned equity offerings announcement in Taiwan. We have examined 306 SEOs listed on Taiwan stock exchanges from 1995 to 1998, and test five subsequent SEO-related signaling dates, such as the shareholders’ conventions date, the formal announcement date, the ex-right date and the listed date. Our findings indicated the anomalies on returns and order imbalance did exist with the publication of SEO news in Taiwan. The negative information effect is significant on the shareholders’ convention date. Further we find a strong relation between order imbalance from individuals and daily return in the five day window. We infer that individual investors are extreme sensitivity to any news released and that the majority of traders in TSE are comprised by individual can explain the phenomenon. Finally, we also find not only correlation among different type of traders but also that returns, cash per share and the interest rate influence trading decision deeply.
    Traditionally, volume has provided the link between trading activity and returns. This study attempts to not only investigate the trading behavior of all aspects of investors by daily order imbalances, the better index than dollar volume, around firm-specific news releases, but also explore the relation between order imbalances and daily returns. This study contributes to the shot-run market reactions and trading behaviours from different three or five kinds of investors around seasoned equity offerings announcement in Taiwan. We have examined 306 SEOs listed on Taiwan stock exchanges from 1995 to 1998, and test five subsequent SEO-related signaling dates, such as the shareholders’ conventions date, the formal announcement date, the ex-right date and the listed date. Our findings indicated the anomalies on returns and order imbalance did exist with the publication of SEO news in Taiwan. The negative information effect is significant on the shareholders’ convention date. Further we find a strong relation between order imbalance from individuals and daily return in the five day window. We infer that individual investors are extreme sensitivity to any news released and that the majority of traders in TSE are comprised by individual can explain the phenomenon. Finally, we also find not only correlation among different type of traders but also that returns, cash per share and the interest rate influence trading decision deeply.
    Reference: Armitage, S., “Seasoned equity offers and rights issues: a review of the evidence”, European Journal of Finance, Vol. 4, 1998, pp. 29-59.
    Asquith, P. and D. Mullins, “Equity issues and offering dilution,” Journal of Financial Economics, 1986, pp. 61-89.
    Bamber, Linda Smith, Orie E. Barron, and Thomas L. Stober, “Trading volume and different aspects of disagreement coincident with earnings announcements,” The Accounting Review, Vol. 72, No. 4, October 1997, pp. 575-597.
    Bartov, Eli, Itzhak Kirinsky, and Suresh Radhakrishnan, “Investor sophistication and patterns in stock returns after earnings announcements,” The Accounting Review, Vol. 75, No. 1, January 2000, pp. 43-63.
    Bayless, M., and S. Chaplinsky, “Expectations of security type and the informational content of debt and equity offers,” Journal of Financial Intermediation, Vol. 1, 1991, pp. 195-214.
    Benston, G. J. and Hagerman, R. L., “Determinants of bid-asked spreads in the over-the-counter market,” Journal of Financial Economics, 1974, pp. 353-364.
    Bhattacharya, Nilabhra, “ Investors’ trade size and trading responses around earnings announcements: an empirical investigation,” The Accounting Review, Vol. 76, No. 2, April 2001, pp. 221-244.
    Choe, Hyuk., Ronald Masulis, and Vikram Nanda, “Common sock offerings across the business cycle: theory and evidence,” Journal of Empirical Finance, Vol.1, 1993, pp. 3-33.
    Cooney, J., and A. Kalay, “Positive information from equity issue announcements,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 33, 1993, pp. 149-172.
    Chordia, Tarun, Richard Roll, and Avanidhar Subrahmanyam, “Order imbalance, liquidity, and market returns,” Journal of Financial Economics, 2002.
    DeAngelo, Harry, and Ronald Masulis, “Optimal capital structure under corporate and personal taxation,” Journal of financial economics, 1980, pp. 3-29.
    Dierkins, N., ‘Information asymmetry and equity issues’, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 26, 1991, pp. 181-199.
    Eckbo, B. Espen and Ronald W. Masulis, “Seasoned Equity Offerings: A Survey", Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Finance, Vol.9, 1995, pp.1017-1072.
    Fama, E., and K. French, “Business conditions and expected returns on stocks and bonds,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 25, 1989, pp.23-50.
    Gallant, R., P. Rossi and G. Tauchen, “Stock prices and volume,” Review of Financial Studies, vol. 5, 1992, pp. 199-242.
    Galai, D. and Masulis, R. W., “The option pricing model and the risk factor of stock,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, 1976, pp. 53-81.
    Healy, Paul M., Franco Modigliani, and Sidney Davidson. "Dividend Decisions and Earnings; Discussion." Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 5.1 (1990): 3-32.
    Hiemstra, C. and J. D. Jones, “Testing for linear and nonlinear Granger causality in the stock price-volume relation,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 49, 1994, pp. 1639-1664.
    Hong, H. and J. C. Stein, “A unified theory of underreaction, momentum trading and overreaction in asset markets,“ Journal of Finance, Vol. 54, 1999, pp. 2143-2184.
    Jensen, M.C. and W.H. Meckling, “Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, pp.305-360.
    Jung, K., Y. Kim and R.M Stulz, ‘Timing, investment opportunities, managerial discretion, and the security issue decision’, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 42, 1996, pp. 159-185.
    Karpoff, J. M., “The relation between price changes and trading volume: a survey,” Journal of financial and quantitative analysis, Vol. 22, 1987, pp. 109-126.
    Kyle, A. S., “Continuous auctions and insider trading,” Econometrica, Vol. 53, 1985, pp 1315-1335.
    Lee, Yi-Tseung, Yu-Jane Liu, Richard Roll, and Avanidhar Subrahmanyam, “Order imbalances and market efficiency: evidence form the Taiwan stock exchange,” http://repositories.cdlib.org/anderson/fin/20-01, 2001.
    Lo, Andrew, and Jiang Wang, “Trading volume: definition, data analysis and implication of portfolio theory,” Review of financial studies, vol. 13, 2000, pp. 257-300.
    Loughran, Tim and Jay R. Ritter, “The new issues puzzle,” The Journal of Finance, Vol. 50, 1995, pp. 23-52.
    Loughran, Tim and Jay R. Ritter, “The operating performance of firms conducting seasoned equity offerings,” The Journal of Finance, Vol. 52, 1997, pp. 1823-1850.
    Lucas, Deborah and MacDonald, Robert, “Equity issues and stock price dynamics,” Journal of Finance, 1990, pp. 1019-1043.
    Masulis, Ronald and Korwar, “Seasoned equity offerings: an empirical investigation,” Journal of Financial Economics, 1986, pp. 91-118.
    Mikkelson, W., and M. Partch, “Valuation effects of security offerings and the issuance process.” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.15, 1986, pp. 31-60.
    Miller, M. and K. Rock, “Dividend policy under asymmetric information,” Journal of Finance, 1985, pp. 1031-1051.
    Myers, S., and N. Majluf, “Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 13, 1984, 187-222.
    Nofsinger, John T., “The impact of public Information on Investors,” Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 25, 2001, pp.1339-1336.
    Odean, Terrance, “Do Investors Trade Too Much?” American Economic Review, Vol. 89, 1999, 1279–98.
    Schipper, Katherine and Abbie Smith, “A comparison of equity carve-outs and seasoned equity offerings: Share price effects and corporate restructuring,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 15, 1986, pp. 153-186.
    Shefrin, H. and M. Statman, “The disposition effect to sell winners too early and ride losers too long: theory and evidence,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 40, 1985, pp. 777-790.
    Shivakumar, Lakshmanan, “Do firm mislead investor by overstating earnings before seasoned equity offerings?,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 29, 2000, 339-371.
    Sias, Richard W. and Sheridan Titman, “The price impact of institutional trading,” August 2001.
    Soucik, David E. Allen, “Long run underperformance of seasoned equity offerings: fact or an illusion?,” School of Finance and Business Economics Working Paper Series, February 2000.
    Spiess, D. K. and J. Affleck-Graves, “Underperformance in long-run stock returns following seasoned equity offerings,” Journal of Financial Economics, 1995, pp. 243-67.
    Stigler, G., “A theory of oligopoly,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 72, 1964, pp. 44-61.
    Utama, Siddharta and William M. Cready, “Institutional ownership, differential predisclosure precision and trading volume at announcement date,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 24, 1997, pp.129-150.
    Welker, Michael, H. and Charles Sparks, “Individual, institutional, and specialist trade patterns before and after disclosure,” Journal of Financial Research, Vol. XXIV, No. 2, Summer 2001, pp.261-287.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財務管理研究所
    90357020
    91
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090357020
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[財務管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2305View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback