政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/30967
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109948/140897 (78%)
Visitors : 46095454      Online Users : 825
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30967


    Title: 銀行往來關係對中小企業借款條件與授信風險之影響
    Authors: 唐于雅
    Contributors: 劉玉珍
    張元晨
    none

    唐于雅
    Keywords: 中小企業
    銀行往來關係
    借款條件
    授信風險
    Date: 2002
    Issue Date: 2009-09-14
    Abstract: 中小企業大多屬於未公開發行公司，只能以非公開融資方式取得資金，銀行借款就成為中小企業相當重要的資金來源，然而中小企業由於資訊不對稱問題相對較嚴重，許多中小企業可能無法順利向金融機構獲取足夠資金，過去已有許多國外文獻支持銀行往來關係有助於減輕借貸市場資訊不對稱現象，此種現象可能對中小企業而言尤其重要，因此本文針對台灣已取得銀行授信的中小企業，探討銀行往來關係會如何影響中小企業的擔保要求、與融資額度等借款條件，並討論銀行進行授信時，是否可由企業既有的銀行關係的選擇觀察出企業的授信風險，同時驗證企業與銀行業務往來越密切，對於銀行控管企業授信風險是否能有顯著助益。
    本文的銀行關係的討論著重在借款集中度、往來銀行規模、與銀行監督能力三方面，實證結果發現與單家銀行往來的企業，被要求提供擔保的機會較高，但單家銀行關係的企業比較不會受到融資限制，說明中小企業集中借款，往來銀行由於獨享企業可能帶來的業務利益，私人資訊價值較大，會願意滿足企業的融資需求，然而基於中小企業尋求另一家銀行認可的困難度較高，單一銀行資訊獨佔的優勢，使企業可能反而被要求提供較多擔保品，而多家銀行關係的企業，擔保要求比例雖較低，但是企業卻必須承擔未來申請再融資時，個別銀行貸放意願較低落的風險。在銀行規模的選擇上，由於中小企業對大型銀行的議價能力相對更弱，受到融資限制的可能性較高。在銀行監督能力方面，企業與銀行授信業務項目越多、企業與個人和相同銀行往來，都能顯著降低企業被要求提供擔保的機會，此外，潛在競爭銀行的存在可能可以減輕資訊閉鎖問題，也能降低企業擔保提列的機會。
    在授信風險方面，實證結果發現與單家銀行往來的企業，發生異常授信的可能性較低，多家銀行關係且借款來源分散可能是企業品質低落的訊號；企業與銀行授信業務項目越多，能有助於銀行控管企業授信風險，企業發生異常授信的可能性較低，但是企業、個人是否與相同銀行往來並無法做為觀察企業授信風險的指標。
    Reference: 中文部份
    1.李婉慈 (民89)，銀行往來關係與公司經營績效及財務危機關聯性分析，中正大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
    2.李樑堅、張志向 (民88)，中小企業授信評估模式建立之研究，臺大管理論叢 9，69-100。
    3.汪逸真 (民86)，企業選擇銀行融資方式之研究，臺灣大學財務金融研究所博士論文。
    4.俞海琴 (民81)，資訊不對稱下本國銀行放款市場之研究，政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
    5.柯承恩、葉銀華 (民85)，中小企業財務結構與經營績效關係之研究，第二屆中小企業發展學術研討會論文集。
    6.胡忠慈 (民91)，取法國際經驗，強化我國中小企業融資環境與政策，台灣金融財務季刊第三輯第二期，141-155。
    7.殷乃平 (民80)，中小企業融資問題與財務結構改善之研究，經濟部中小企業處編印。
    8.張宮熊 (民78)，台灣信用分配下民間金融體系對中小企業經營績效之影響—以製造業為例，中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    9.張麗娟 (民87)，中小企業如何與銀行建立良好往來關係，台北銀行月刊第二十七卷第九期，77-89。
    10.梁玲菁 (民 87)，台灣金融體系與中小企業融資之關係，企銀季刊第二十一卷第三期，73-81。
    11.郭憲章、黎法寬 (民88)，中小企業信用分析模式之研究，台灣銀行季刊第五十卷第三期，91-113。
    12.陳錦村 (民87)，競爭、往來關係與銀行授信行為之研究，中國財務學刊，第五卷第三期，61-90。
    13.陳家彬、賴怡洵 (民90)， 台灣地區銀行放款有無擔保之決定因素-Logistic 模型之實證分析，管理評論，第二十卷第一期，129-159。
    14.陳萬清 民87，往來關係、監督結構與銀行授信行為之研究，朝陽科技大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
    15.黃重菁 (民87) ，銀行對中小企業授信考量因素之研究，政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    16.楊雅惠 (民88)，化解中小企業的資金困境，經濟前瞻，72-75。
    17.葉子謀 (民87)，銀行如何爭取與中小企業負責人往來，台北銀行月刊第二十七卷第三期，68-71。
    18.劉玉皙 (民90)，銀行往來關係對中小企業信用評等之影響，政治大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。
    19.劉凌峰 (民87) ，中小企業之財務問題研究—以電子零組件貿易商為例，中山大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。
    20.鄭必群 (民89)，中小企業融資實務篇---如何與銀行廣結善緣，會計研究月刊第175期，122-124。
    21.中小企業白皮書，民國91年，經濟部發行。
    22.經濟部，中小企業融資指南，台北，經濟部中小企業處，民國八十八年。
    23.「銀行對企業授信規範」，金融研訓中心出版，民國八十八年。
    24.「中小企業融資及市場行銷之研究」，經濟部中華經濟研究院主編，民國八十二年。
    英文部份
    1. Ang J.S., Lin J.W. and Tyler F., 1995, “Evidence on the lack of separation between business and personal risks among small businesses”, The Journal of Small Business Finance, 197-210.
    2. Avery R.B , Bostic R. W and Samolyk K. A, 1998, “The role of personal wealth in small business finance”, Journal of Banking and Finance 22 , 1019-1061.
    3. Berger A. and Udell G., 1990, “Collateral, loan quality, and bank risk”, Journal of Monetary Economics 25, 21-42.
    4. Berger A. and Udell G., 1995, “ Relationship lending and lines of credit in small firm finance ”, Journal of Business 68, 351-381.
    5. Berger A. and Udell G., 2002, “Small business credit availability and relationship lending: the importance of bank organizational structure”, Working Paper, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
    6. Bester H., 1985, “Screening vs. rationing in credit markets with imperfect information ” , American Economic Review 57, 850-855.
    7. Blackwell D. W. and Winters D.B., 1997, “ Banking Relationships And The Effect of Monitoring on Loan Pricing ”, Journal of Financial Research, 275-289.
    8. Biais B. and Gollier C., 1997, ” Trade credit and credit rationing”, The Review of Financial Studies 10, 903-937.
    9. Bodt E.D, Lobez F. and Statnik J.C, 2001, “Credit Rationing, Customer Relationship and the number of banks: an empirical analysis”, Working Paper University catholique de Louvain.
    10. Boot A.W.A., and Thakor A.V., 1994, “ Moral Hazard and Secured Lending in an Infinitely Repeated Credit Market Game”, International Economic Review 35, 899-920.
    11. Boot A.W.A., 2000, ” Relationship Banking: What do we know?”, Journal of Financial Intermediation 9, 7-25.
    12. Boot A.W. A., Thakor A.V and Udell G. F, 1991 , “ Secured lending and default risk: equilibrium analysis, policy implications and empirical results”, The Economic Journal, 458-472.
    13. Brau J.C. , 2002, “Do banks price owner-manager agency costs? an examination of small business borrowing”, Journal of small business management , 273-286.
    14. Bulow J. and Shoven J., 1978, “The bankruptcy decision”, Bell Journal of Economics 9, 437-456
    15. Cavalluzzo K. and Wolken J.D. , 2002, “Small business loan turndowns, personal wealth and discrimination”, Working Paper Georgetown University.
    16. Cavalluzzo K. and Cavalluzzo L., 1998, “Market structure and discrimination: the case of small businesses”, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 30, 771-792.
    17. Cavalluzzo K., Cavalluzzo L.,and Wolken J.D., 2002, “Competition, small business financing, and discrimination: Evidence form a new survey”, Journal of Business, 641-679.
    18. Cole R.A., 1998, “The importance of relationships to the availability of credit ”, Journal of Banking and Finance 22 , 959-977.
    19. Cukierman A., 1978, “The Horizontal Integration of the Banking Firm, Credit Rationing and Monetary Policy”, The Review of Economic Studies 45, 165-178.
    20. Degryse H. and Van Cayseele P., 2000 , “Relationship lending within a bank-based system: evidence form European small business data”, Journal of Financial Intermediation 9, 90-109.
    21. Detragiache, E., Garella P., and Guiso L., 2000, “ Multiple versus Single Banking Relationships ”, Journal of Finance , 1133-1159.
    22. Diamond D. W., 1984, “ Financial intermediation and delegated monitoring ”, Review of Economic Studies 51, 393-414.
    23. Diamond, D. W., 1991, “ Monitoring and reputation: the choice between bank loans and directly placed debt ”, Journal of Political Economy 99, 689-751.
    24. Ennew C. T. and Binks M. R., 1995, “The provision of finance to small businesses: does the banking relationship constrain performance”, Journal of Small Business Finance, 57-73.
    25. Elsas R. and Krahnen J. P., 1998, “ Is relationship lending special? evidence form credit-file data in Germany “ , Journal of Banking and Finance 22 , 1283-1316.
    26. Elsas R. and Krahnen J. P., 2000, “Collateral, default risk, and relationship lending: an empirical study on financial contracting” , Working Paper Goethe-University Frankfurt.
    27. Fama E., 1985, “ What’s different about banks? ”, Journal of Monetary Economics 15, 29-39.
    28. Farinha L. and Santos J. A., 2000, “ Switching form single to multiple bank lending relationships: determinants and implications”, Working Paper. Bank for international settlements (BIS).
    29. Fluck, Z. D., Holtz-Eakin, and Rosen H.S., 1997 ,”Where does the money Come from? the financing of small entrepreneurial enterprises ” Working Paper , New York University.
    30. Foglia A., Laviola S. and Reedtz M., 1998 , “ Multiple banking relationships and the fragility of corporate borrowers “, Journal of Banking and Finance 22, 1441-1456.
    31.Gardner M.J. and Mills D.L., 1989, “Evaluating the likelihood of default on delinquent loans”, Financial Management, 55-63.
    32. Harhoff D. and Korting T. 1998, “Lending relationships in Germany: empirical evidence from survey data”, Journal of Banking and Finance 22, 1317-1353.
    33. Haubrich J. G., 1989, “Financial intermediation delegated monitoring and long-term relationships”, Journal of Banking and Finance 13, 9-20.
    34. Hodgman D.R., 1960, “Credit risk and credit rationing”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 258-278.
    35. Hoshi, T., Kashyap, A., and Scharfstein, D., 1991, “ Corporate structure, liquidity, and investment evidence from Japanese industrial groups”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 33-60.
    36. Johnston J. and DiNardo J., 1997, ”Econometric Methods” , p412-426, 436-441
    37. Mester, L. J., Nakamura L., and Renault M., 1998, “Checking accounts and bank monitoring ”, Mimeo Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
    38. Merton R.C., 1992, “Operation and regulation in financial intermediation: a functional perspective ”, Working paper No. 93-020.
    39. Ongena S. and Smith D., 2000, “What determines the number of bank relationships? cross-country evidence”, Journal of Financial Intermediation 9, 26-56.
    40. Petersen M. A. and Rajan R., 1994, “The benefits of lending relationships: evidence from small business data ”, Journal of Finance 49, 3-37.
    41. Padilla A. J. and Pagano M., 1997, “Endogenous Communication among lenders and entrepreneurial incentives”, Review of Financial Studies 10, 105-236.
    42. Rajan R., 1992, “ Insiders and outsiders: the choice between informed and arm’s length debt ”, Journal of Finance 47, 1367-1400.
    43. Sharpe S., 1990, “ Asymmetric information, bank lending, and implicit contracts: a stylized model of customer relations ”, Journal of Finance 45, 1069-1087.
    44. Stiglitz J. and Weiss A., 1981, “Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information ”, American Economic Review 71, 393-410.
    45. Thakor A. V., 1996, “Capital requirements, monetary policy, and aggregate bank lending: Theory and empirical evidence”, Journal of Finance, 279-324.
    46 Von Thadden, Ernst-Ludwig, 1994, “The commitment of finance, duplicated monitoring, and the investment horizon”, Unpublished manuscript, Basel University.
    47. Von Thadden.,1995,“Long-term contracts, short-term investment and monitoring”, Review of Economic Studies 62, 557-575.
    48. Yosha O., 1995, “ Information disclosure costs and the choice of financing source”, Journal of Financial Intermediation 4, 3-20.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財務管理研究所
    90357021
    91
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090357021
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Finance] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2318View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback