Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/31335
|
| Title: | 省電燈泡在台灣現代零售通路之價格策略研究─以個案公司為例 |
| Authors: | 林宜縉 |
| Contributors: | 張愛華
林宜縉 |
| Keywords: | 省電燈泡 |
| Date: | 2007 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-14 09:49:05 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 省電燈泡在台灣現代零售通路之價格策略研究─以個案公司為例
Abstract
A Case Study of Energy Savers Pricing Strategy
in Taiwan Modern Retail Channels
By
Misha Lin
The intensive competition, strong bargain power of channels and diversified marketplace has made the pricing management more and more complicated nowadays. Marketing managers have to keep pace with the fast changing markets and equipped with abundant knowledge. Pricing is viewed as the primary driver for short-run revenue and the key factor to impact both top line and bottom line; the pricing decision is critical for sustainability.
Premium brands in modern retail channels are getting difficult to dominant the market because of retailers start to invest their own low- priced Private Labels. The case study of research, Philips energy savers, is facing the challenge from price attack from Private Labels and losing market share gradually.
This research objective is to find a suitable price range for Philips to react with Private Labels and to maximize the market share, by adopting methodologies include sales transaction data, Price Elasticity, Direct Questioning, Price Sensitive Meter and Brand-Price- Trade Off. The research is expected to be a reference for all premium brands of commodities to approach pricing strategy in modern retail channel.
TABLE OF CONTENT
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Research motive 1
1.2 Research objective 2
1.3 Research organization 2
Chapter 2 Literature Review 3
2.1 Definition of price 3
2.2 Consumer psychology and pricing 4
2.2.1 Reference price and promotion price 4
2.2.2 Price cues 5
2.2.3 Fairness 6
2.2.4 Price-quality 6
2.3 Pricing determinates 7
2.3.1 Internal determinates 7
2.3.2 External determinates 8
2.4 Pricing objectives 10
2.4.1 Survival 10
2.4.2 Maximum current profit 11
2.4.3 Maximum market share 11
2.4.4 Maximum market skimming 11
2.4.5 Product-quality leadership 12
2.4.6 Other objectives 12
2.5 Pricing methods 12
2.5.1. Markup pricing 12
2.5.2 Target –return pricing 13
2.5.3 Customer perceived value pricing 13
2.5.4 Value pricing 20
2.5.5 Going Rate pricing 21
2.5.6 Auction-type pricing 21
2.6 Pricing adjustment 22
2.6.1. Promotional tactics 22
2.6.2. Price discrimination 23
2.6.3. Price reaction to competitors change 25
Chapter 3 Energy Savers Briefing 27
3.1 Introduction of lighting industry 27
3.1.1 Lighting product range 28
3.1.2 Energy savers development 28
3.1.3 Energy savers innovation direction 33
3.1.4 Energy Savers Competition 35
3.2 Energy savers in Taiwan 36
3.2.1 Energy saver market size and distribution 36
3.2.2 Energy savers product portfolio 38
3.3 Philips lighting pricing management 40
3.3.1 Philips product line 40
3.3.2 Philips pricing policy 42
3.3.3 Price waterfall in modern retail channel 43
Chapter 4 Research Framework and Methodology 45
4.1 Conceptual framework 45
4.2 Research proposition 46
4.3 Research scope 47
4.3.1 Leader Panel transaction data details 47
4.3.2 Quantitative Survey details 51
4.4 Research methodology 52
4.4.1 Questionnaire development 52
4.5 Data collection 54
4.6 Validity and reliability 55
Chapter 5 Data Analysis 58
5.1 Review Pricing Strategy 58
5.2 Competition intensity 59
5.3 Customer Perceived Value - Actual transaction data 60
5.3.1 Cross elasticity 61
5.3.2 Arc elasticity 64
5.4 Customer Perceived Value - Quantification survey 66
5.4.1 Direct Questioning 66
5.4.2 Price Sensitivity Meter 67
5.4.3 Brand-Price-Trade-Off 70
5.5 Price gap and market share 75
Chapter 6 Research Finding and Future Research 78
6.1 Conclusion 78
6.2 Recommendation for Philips energy savers pricing strategy 79
6.3 Limitation and future research 81
6.3.1 Limitation 81
6.3.2 Future research suggestion 82
References 84
Appendixes 1
A. Questionnaire 1
B. Questionnaire in Chinese version 13
C. Direct Questioning purchase intention detail 24
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 2.1 PRICE-VALUE-CONTEXT 3
FIGURE 2.2 THE VALUE CHAIN BY PORTER 7
FIGURE 2.3 PRICING SCENARIOS 9
FIGURE 2.4 PSM EXAMPLE 17
FIGURE 2.5 BPTO EXAMPLE 19
FIGURE 2.6 STRATEGIC PRICE REACTION FOR PRICE CUT 26
FIGURE 3.1 VISIBLE LIGHT SPECTRUM 27
FIGURE 3.2 PRIMARY LIGHT SOURCES 28
FIGURE 3.3 THE FIRST COMPACT FLUORESCENT LAMP AND COMPACT FLUORESCENT LAMP-INTEGRATED 29
FIGURE 3.4 ELEMENTS OF ENERGY SAVER 30
FIGURE 3.5 BRAND MARKET SHARE IN UNIT IN MODERN RETAIL CHANNEL 37
FIGURE 3.6 VARIETY OF ENERGY SAVERS 38
FIGURE 3.7 ENERGY SAVERS FEATURE ANALYSIS IN MODERN RETAIL- BY SHAPE, UNIT SHARE 39
FIGURE 3.8 ENERGY SAVERS PRICE RANGE BY BRAND IN MODERN RETAIL 40
FIGURE 3.9 PRICE WATERFALL IN MODERN RETAIL CHANNEL 43
FIGURE 4.1 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK: ROOT CAUSES FOR MARKET SHARE RESULT 45
FIGURE 4.2 BRAND SHARE MOVEMENT IN DIFFERENT PRODUCT TYPES 49
FIGURE 4.3 WATTAGE SALES PERFORMANCE IN MODERN RETAILS 49
FIGURE 4.4 ENERGY SAVERS MONTHLY SALES PATTERN IN MODERN RETAIL CHANNEL 50
FIGURE 4.5 QUALITY CONTROL FLOW OF GFK LEADER PANEL DATA 55
FIGURE 5.1 RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN PRICE AND MARKET SHARE MOVEMENT OF 23-25W 61
FIGURE 5.2 DIRECT QUESTIONING PURCHASE INTENT – INCANDESCENT LAMP USERS 67
FIGURE 5.3 PRODUCT BENEFITS CARD IN PSM 67
FIGURE 5.4 PSM RESULT: ACCEPTABLE PRICE RANGE AND OPP 68
FIGURE 5.5 BPTO TEST DEMONSTRATION 70
FIGURE 5.6 PURCHASE INTENTION SHARE FOR FIXED PRICE AMONG BRANDS 72
FIGURE 5.7 SCENARIO FOR MOVING PRICE AND SHARE OF PURCHASE INTENTION 73
FIGURE 5.8 BRAND VALUE OF BPTO 75
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 2.1 PRICE DISCOUNT AND ALLOWANCES 23
TABLE 2.2 PRICE DISCRIMINATIONS DEGREES 24
TABLE 3.1 EFFICACY COMPARISON BETWEEN ENERGY SAVERS AND INCANDESCENT LAMP 31
TABLE 3.2 CORRESPONDENT BRIGHTNESS OF ENERGY SAVERS AND INCANDESCENT LAMPS 31
TABLE 3.3 TOTAL COST OF OWNERSHIP COMPARISON 32
TABLE 3.4 ENERGY SAVERS TOTAL MARKET VALUE IN TAIWAN-BY CHANNEL 36
TABLE 3.5 ENERGY SAVERS CATEGORY BY FEATURES 38
TABLE 3.6 PHILIPS ENERGY SAVER PRODUCT LINE 41
TABLE 3.7 PHILIPS ENERGY SAVER PRICE LIST 42
TABLE 4.1 STORES COVERAGE IN TRANSACTION DATA 47
TABLE 4.2 STRUCTURE OF QUESTIONNAIRE 53
TABLE 4.3 RESPONDENT DISTRIBUTION CRITERIA 55
TABLE 5.1 CROSS ELASTICITY OF PHILIPS WITH PRIVATE LABEL AND TOA 23-25W 62
TABLE 5.2 CROSS ELASTICITY OF PHILIPS WITH PRIVATE LABEL AND TOA 23-25W –ABSOLUTE VALUE 63
TABLE 5.3 ARC ELASTICITY OF PHILIPS AND PRIVATE LABEL 23W~25W 64
TABLE 5.4 ARC ELASTICITY OF PHILIPS AND PRIVATE LABEL 23W~25W –ABSOLUTE VALUE 65
TABLE 5.5 DIRECT QUESTIONING AND PSM SUMMARY 70
TABLE 5.6 PRICE GAP AND RELATION WITH MARKET SHARE 75 |
| Reference: | References
Allen, R. G. D., & Lerner, A. P. (1934). The Concept of Arc Elasticity of Demand. The Review of Economic Studies, 1(3), 226-230.
Anderson, E. T., & Simester, D. I. (2003). Effect of $9 Price Endings on Retail Sales: Evidence from Field Experiments. Quantitative Marketing and Economics 1(March), 93-110.
Baker, J., Parasuraman, A., Grewal, D., & Voss, G. B. (2002). The influence of multiple store environment cues on perceived merchandise value and patronage intentions. Journal of Marketing, 66(2), 120-141.
Bolton, L. E., Warlop, L., & Alba, J. W. (2003). Consumer Perceptions of Price (Un)Fairness. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(March), 474-491.
Bordley, R. F. (1985). Relating Elasticities to Change in Demand. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 3(2), 156-158.
Briesch, R. A., Krishnamurthi, L., Mazumdar, T., & Raj, S. P. (1997). A Comparative Analysis of Reference Price Models Journal of Consumer Research, 24(September), 202-214.
Campbell, M. C. (1999). Perceptions of Price Unfairness: Antecedents and Consequences. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(May), 187-199.
Chang, T.-Z., & Wildt, A. R. (1994). Price, Product Information, and Purchase Intention: An Emprical Study. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science (Winter), 16-27.
Dean, J. (1969). Pricing Pioneering Products. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 17(3), 165-179.
Dickson, P. R., & Sawyer, A. G. (1990). The Price Knowledge and Search of Supermarket Shoppers. Journal of Marketing, 54(July), 42-53.
Dobney.Com. (2007). Brand Price Trade-Offs (BPTO). Retrieved June 20, 2008, from http://www.dobney.com/Research/Brand_equity_research.htm
Emery, F. (1970). Some Psychological Aspects of Price. In B.Taylor & G. Wills (Eds.), Pricing Research (pp. 98-111). Princeton, N.J.: Brandon/Systems.
Gabor, A., & Granger, C. W. J. (1964). Price Sensitivity of the Consumer. Journal of Advertising Research 4, 40-44.
Gallarza, M. G., & Gil Saura, I. (2006). Value dimensions, perceived value, satisfaction and loyalty: an investigation of university students` travel behaviour. Tourism Management, 27(3), 437-452.
Helson, H. (1964). Adaptation-Level Theory. New York: Harper & Row.
Haneman, W. M. (1994). Valuing the Environment Through Contingent Valuation. The Journal of Economics Perspectives, 8(Autumn), 19-43.
Janiszewski, C., & Lichtenstein, D. R. (1999). A Range Theory Account of Price Perception. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(March), 353-368.
Kardes, F. R., Cronley, M. L., Kellaris, J. J., & Posavac, S. S. (2004). The Role of Selective Information Processing in Price-Quality Inference. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(September), 368-374.
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2008). Developing Pricing Strategies and Programs. In Marketing Management (13 ed., pp. 416-446). New Jersey: Pearson Education Ltd.
Leavitt, H. J. (1954). A Note on Some Experimental Findings about the Meaning of Price. Journal of Business, 27(July), 205-210.
Marn, M. V., Roegner, E. V., & Zawada, C. C. (2004). The Price Advantage. from http://www.mckinsey.com/ideas/books/priceadvantage/booksummary/index.asp
Monroe, K. B. (1990). Pricing: Making Profitable Decisions (2 ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Neslin, S. A. (2002). Sales Promotion. Cambridge, Mass: Marketing Science Institute.
Nielsen. (2006). Every Day Low Price - An Emerging Trend. Retrieved June 20, 2008, from http://www2.acnielsen.com/pubs/2003_q3_ap_edlp.shtml#top
Philips. (1988). Philips: Correspondence Course Lighting Application. Eindhoven: Philips.
Philips. (2004). Basic of Light - Philips internal training material.
Philips. (2006). Philips Internal Research.
Philips. (2007). 2007/2008 Philips Lamps Catalogue. Retrieved June 20, 2008, from www.lighting.philips.com.tw
Porter, M. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: The Free Press.
Rajendran, K. N., & Tellis, G. J. (1994). Contextual and Temporal Components of Reference Price. Journal of Marketing, 58(January), 22-34.
Rao, A. R., & Monroe, K. B. (1989). The Effect of Price, Brand Name, and Store Name on Buyers` Perceptions of Product Quality: An Integrative Review. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(August), 351-357.
Sawyer, M. C. (1985). The Economics of Michal Kalecki. New York: M E Sharpe Inc.
Schindler, R. M., & Kirby, P. N. (1997). Patterns of Rightmost Digits Used in Advertised Prices: Implications for Nine-Ending Effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(September), 192-201.
Scitovsky, T. (1944-45). Some Consequences of the Habit of Judging Quality by Price. Review of Economic Studies, 12, 100.
Simon, H. (1989). Price Management In. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
Spann, M., Skiera, B., & Schäfers, B. (2004). Measuring Individual Frictional Costs and Willingness-to-Pay via Name-Your-Own-Price Mechanisms Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(Autumn), 22-36.
Stiving, M., & Winer, R. S. (1997). An Empirical Analysis of Price Endings with Scanner Data. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(June), 57-68.
Sweeney, J. C., & Soutar, G. N. (2001). Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. Journal of Retailing, 77(2), 203-220.
Tellis, G. J., & Wernerfelt, B. (1987). Competitive Price and Quality under Asymmetric Information. Marketing Science, 6(3), 240-253.
TNS-Asia. (2005). Brand-Price-Trade-Off. Retrieved June 20, 2008, from http://www.tns-aisa.cz/valuepricer.asp?lg=en
Utterback, J. M., & Abernathy, W. J. (1975). A Dynamic Model of Product and Process Innovation. Omega, 3(6), 639-656.
Van Westendrop, P. (1976). NSS-Price Sensitivity of Meter: A New Approach to the Study of Consumer Perception of Prices. Amsterdam: ESOMAR Congress.
Vanhuele, M., & Drèze, X. (2002). Measuring the Price Knowledge Shoppers Bring to the Store. Journal of Marketing, 66(October), 72-85.
Wertenbroch, K., & Skiera, B. (2002). Measuring Consumers` Willingness to Pay at the Point of Purchase. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(May), 228-241.
Wied-Nebbeling, S. (1985). Das Preisverhalten in der Industrie—Ergebnisse einer erneuten Befragung. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck
Wikipedia. (2003). Value chain. Retrieved June 20, 2008, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Value_chain
Wikipedia. (2005). Lighting. Retrieved June 20, 2008, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lighting
Winer, R. S. (1988). Behavioral Perspectives on Pricing: Buyers` Subjective Perceptions of Price Revisited. In Issues in Pricing: Theory and Research (Timothy Devinney ed., pp. 35-57). Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.
Winer, R. S. (2005). Pricing. Cambridge: Marketing Science Institute.
Xia, L., Monroe, K. B., & Cox, J. L. (2004). The Price is Unfair! A Conceptual Framework of Price Fairness Perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 68(October), 1-15.
Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22.
許佳鳴. (民國89年). 消費者價格敏感度-品質認知與廠商定價策略之關係研究. 私立文化大學, 台北市.
陳慧明. (民81). 估計價量關係之方法. 台北市: 清華管理科學圖書中心 |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
國際經營管理碩士班(IMBA)
94933018
96 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094933018 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [國際經營管理英語碩士學程IMBA] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| index.html | 0Kb | HTML2 | 329 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
