English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109951/140892 (78%)
Visitors : 46197105      Online Users : 797
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/31445


    Title: NATO and CEEC Security in the Post Cold War Era
    Authors: 康爾珊
    Kamberi,Elsa
    Contributors: Chiang,Alex
    康爾珊
    Kamberi,Elsa
    Keywords: NATO
    Date: 2006
    Issue Date: 2009-09-14 10:12:16 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: After the collapse of the Soviet Union and the Warsaw Pact which marked the end of the Cold War the security arrangements in Europe like the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE) , the North Atlantic Cooperation Council (NACO) etc, all appeared to be leading to peace and CEEC security. In light of these historic events, there were many who questioned the need for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and called for the creation of new security arrangements with new leadership roles. This thesis argues that NATO will continue to form the cornerstone of stability, security and dialogue in the "New Europe”.
    The argument will center on the following assertions 1) The collapse of Warsaw Pact which brought about a condition of instability in Central Europe 2) NATO has proven to be more effective than other security organizations in terms of the capability to solve and address the issues that emerged after the Cold War in CEEC. It has also become involved in security tasks beyond its original mission, which was the defense of the member states from outside attack 3) NATO remains available and will continue to be an indispensable forum in the future in order to bring stability to CEEC.The analysis in this thesis shows that NATO’s specific long-standing functions have remained remarkably unquestioned and even been reaffirmed by the system-change in Europe 1989-1991.
    Reference: Books
    Aldershot, Hants The Operational Role of the OSCE in South-Eastern Europe. Contributing to Regional Stability in the Balkans. Burlington, Vt: Ashgate, 2001.
    Arnswald, Sven. The Implications of Baltic States EU Membership: Institute of Europaische Politic, 2001.
    Batt, Judy and Lew, G.Paul. Developments in Central and Eastern European Politics: Duke University Press, 2003.
    Cummings, Sally NOil. Transition and Security in Central Asia: New York, N.Y. Routledge, 2003.
    Croft, Stuart, Terriff, Terry. Critical Reflections on Security and Change. London: Portland, OR. : Frank Cass, 2000.
    Dawisha, Karen The International Dimension of Post-Communist Transitions In Russia and the New States of Eurasia: New York: M.E.Sharpe, 1997.
    Derleth, J.William. The transition in Central and Eastern European Politics. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall, c2000.
    Eliassen, Kjell A. Foreign and Security Policy in the European Union. London Thousand Oaks, Ca: SAGE Publications, 1998.
    Gilpin, Robert. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
    Gasteyger, Curt Walter. An Ambiguous Power: The European Union in a Changing World: Strategies for Europe.Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Foundation Publishers, 1996.
    Goldman, Marshall I. What went wrong with Perestroika?. New York : W.W. Norton, 1992.
    Howard, Marc Morje. The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe.Cambridge, Cambridge Universtiy Press,2003.
    Hyde-Price and Aggestam, Lisbeth Adrian. Security and Identity in Europe: Exploring the New Agenda (Southampton Studies in International Policy) Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2000.
    Ikenberry, G. John. After victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order After major wars. Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press, 2001.
    Judy Batt and Paul G.Lew. Developments in Central and Eastern European Politics: Durham, NC, 2003.
    Laqueur, Walter. 1921.European Security in the 1990s.Deterrence and Defense After the INF Treaty New York: Plenum Press,1990.
    Leonard ,Dick and Leonard Mark. The pro-European Reader. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave, 2002.
    Lehne, Stefan. The Vienna Meeting of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, 1986-1989: A Turning Point in East-West relations. Boulder, Westview Press, 1991.
    Mayhew, Alan. Recreating Europe: The European Union’s Policy Towards Central and Eastern Europ.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
    Nagle, John. D. Democracy and Democratization: Post-Communist Europe in Comparative Perspective. London: CA: Sage, 1999.
    Ola. Baev, Pavel K. Einagel, Victoria Ingrid. Geopolitics in Post-Wall Europe: Security, Territory and Identity.Oslo, International Peace Research Institute,1997.
    Pinder, John. The European Community and Eastern Europe. New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press,1991.
    Pickles,J.Smith and Adrian.Theorising Transition: The Political Economy of Post-Communist Transformations.London:Routledge,1998.
    Eastern European Journalism: Before, During and After Communism. Cresskill, N.J.: Hampton Press, 1999.
    Smith, Karen Elizabeth. The Making of EU Foreign Policy: The Case of Eastern Europe. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1998.
    Tsinisizelis J. Michael, Stavridis Stelios, Ifantis Kostas and Chryssochoou N. Dimitris.
    Theory and reform in the European Union. Manchester ; Manchester University Press, 1999.
    E M Dwards Geoffrey, and Regelsberger,Elfriede. The European Community and Inter-regional cooperation. London: Pinter Publishers, 1990.
    McFaul, Michael, and Stoner-Weiss, Kathryn. After the Collapse of Communism: comparative lessons of transitions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
    Wyatt-Walter, Holly. The European Community and the security dilemma, 1979-92.
    New York : St. Martin`s Press, in association with St. Antony`s College, Oxford, 1997.
    Westview special studies on the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. The Soviet Union, 1988-1989: perestroika in crisis? Boulder : Westview Press, 1990.
    White Stephen, Alex, Pravda, Zvi Gitelman. Developments in Russian Politics. Durham, N.C. : Duke University Press, 4th ed.1997.
    Journal Articles
    Arnold, Jason and Samuel Grier. “NATO Enlargement: Issues and Answers.” Airpower Power Journal 12. (Summer 1998): 71-83.
    Baldwin E. Richard.” The Eastern Enlargement of the European Union.” European Economic Review 39 (April 1995): 474-481.
    Batt, Judy.” Impact of EU Enlargement on Regions on The EU’s New Eastern Border.”
    Audition to Governance WG6, (March 2001):20.
    Cooley, Alexander. “Western Conditions and Domestic Choices: The Influence of External Actors on the Post-Communist Transition. Nations in Transit 2003: Democratization in East Central Europe and Eurasia. New York: Freedom House, 2003.
    Charles A. Kupchan, Clifford A. Kupchan. “Concerts, Collective Security, and the Future of Europe. International Security16.(Summer,1991):114-161.
    Cornish, Paul. ”European Security: The end of Architecture and the New NATO.”
    International Affairs Royal Institute of International Affairs 72, (October 1996):751-769.
    Dunay, Pal. “Stability in East Central Europe.” Journal of Peace Research .29, (February 1992):1-16.
    Duffield S. John. “NATO’s Functions after the Cold War.” Political Science Quarterly 109. (Winter 1994-1995):763-787.
    Fadok, S. David. “Assessing NATO Enlargement in Light of Europe’s Past and Asia’s Future.” USAF Institute for National Security Studie.( March 1999):1-30.
    Glaser, L. Charles. “Why NATO is Still Best: Future Security Arrangements for Europe.” International Security.18 (Summer 1993): 5-50.
    Gnesotto, Nicole.” European Union after Minsk and Maastricht International Affairs.” Royal Institute of International Affairs 68 (April 1992):223-231.
    Hettne, Bjorn. “Security and Peace in Post-Cold War Europe.” Journal of Peace Research 28. (August 1991): 279-294.
    Haerpfer W. Christian W.”Old and New Security Issues in Post-Communist Eastern Europe: Results on 11 National Study.” Europe-Asia Studies 51 (September 1999):989-1011.
    Ibrayamova, Nuray. “Eastern Enlargement and the European Security Agenda.” Jean Monnet/ Robert Schuman Paper Series 4 (August 2004): 2-20.
    Krasnov V.Gregory and Brada C. Josep.”Implicit Subsidies in Russian-Ukrainian Energy Trade.” Europe-Asia Studies 49 (July1997):825-843.
    Kupchan, Charles and Clifford, Kupchan.“Concerts, Collective Security, and the Future of Europe”, International Security 16 (Summer 1991):114-61.
    Koslowski, Rey and Kratochwil V. Friedrich. “Understanding Change in International Politics: The Soviet Empire’s Demise and the International System.” International Organization 48.(Spring, 1994):215-247.
    Kupchan, A. Charles and Kupchan A. Clifford. “The Promise of Collective Security”
    International Security Vol.20, No.1 (Summer, 1995): 52-61.
    Larrabee, F. Stephen. “NATO Enlargement: Prague and Beyond.” Prepared for IISS/CEPS European Security Forum (9 July 2001):1-10.
    Layne,Christopher.”The Unipolar Illusion:Great Powers Will Rise.” International Security 17 (Spring 1993):5-51.
    Lepgold,Joseph.“NATO’s Post-Cold War Collective Action Problem. “International Security 23 (Summer, 1998): 78-106.
    Light, Margot and White, S.; Lowenhardt.”A Wider Europe: The View from Moscow and Kyiv.” International Affairs .76 (Jan., 2000): 77-78.
    McCalla B. Robert. “NATO’s Persistence after the Cold War.” International Organization, 50(Summer 1996):445-475.
    Mearsheimer, J. John.” Back to the Future, Part III: Realism and Realities of European Security.” International Security Vol. 15, No.3. (Winter, 1990-1991):216-22.
    Mearsheimer, John (1990)”Back to the Future: Instability in Europe After the Cold War”, International Security 15(Summer 1990):5-56.
    Michael,Mastanduno. “Preserving the Unipolar Moment: Realist Theories and U.S Grand Strategy after the Cold War”, International Security 21 (Spring 1997):49-88.
    Moller, Bjorn. “Security Cooperation in Southern Africa: Lessons From the European Experience (NATO, EU, OSCE).” Copenhagen Peace Research Institute(September 2000):1-15.
    Motyl. J. Alexander. “Structural constraints and Starting Points: The logic of systematic change in Ukraine and Russia.” Comparative Politics 29(July 1997):443-447.
    Morrison, John. “Pereyaslav and After: The Russian-Ukrainian Relationship.” International Affairs 69(October 1993):677-703.
    Muresan, Liviu. “Non Military Risks to the International Security in Central and Eastern Europe after the Cold War: The Partnership for Future for a Sustainable Security System.” NATO Research Fellowshi (June 1998):1-45.
    Nelson N. Daniel and Bentley Samuel. The Comparative Politics of Eastern Europe
    Political Science and Politics 27 (March 1994):45-52.
    Politi, Alessandro. “European Security: The new Transnational Risks.” EU-ISS Chaillot, Paper 29, Alencon, France, (October 1997):2-25.
    Ries, Tomas.”NATO Enlargement-A European View.” Prepared for the IISS/CEPS European Security Forum, (9 July 2001).
    Ruggie John Gerard” The False Premise of Realism.” International Security 20 (Summer 1995): 62-70.
    Sivonne, Pekka. “European Security: New, Old and Borrowed.” Journal of Peace Research 27(November 1990):385-397.
    Smith, Alasdair and Wallace Helen. “The European Union: Towards a Policy for Europe.” International Affairs 70(July 1994): 429-444.
    Spinant, Daniela. “NATO Enlargements:Towards a Pan-European Security System?” Final Report Submitted to NATO, office of Information Press, (June 30 2000): 1-62.
    Schimmelfenning. Frank. “The Double Puzzle of EU Enlargement: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Decision to Expand to the East.” Arena Working Paper series, Technische Universitat Darmasta 7 (July 1999).
    Schake, Kori. “Europe after NATO Expansion: The Unfinished Security Agenda.” Institute of Global Conflict and Cooperation, University of California, Multi-Campus Research Unit. (1998).
    Sheetz S. Mark and Mastunduno Michael. “Debating the Unipolar Moment.” International Security, Vol.22, No.3 (Winter 1997/1998):168-174.
    Vincent E. Jack. “Capability Theory and the Future of NATO’s Decision-making Rules.” Journal of Peace Research, 38 (Jan.2001):67-86.
    Wallance, William. “From the Atlantic to the Bug, from the Arctic to the Tigris:Where Does it Begin and Ends?” International Affairs 76 (July 2000):475-493.
    Welsh, A. Helga. ”Political Transition Process in Central and Eastern Europe.”Comperative Politics 26 (July1994):379-394.
    Wilkinson, David. “Unipolarity without Hegemony.” International Studies Review 1 (Summer 1999) :141-172.
    Internet Resources
    North Atlantic Treaty Organization: http://www.nato.int/
    The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe: http://www.osce.org/
    Western European Union: http://www.weu.int/
    Economic Reconstruction and Development in South East Europe: http://www.seerecon.org/
    Russian Economic Regional Report: http://www.isn.ethz.ch/
    Warsow Pact:http://www.warsawpact.org/
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    外交研究所
    92253036
    95
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0922530362
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[外交學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2385View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback