English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 112721/143689 (78%)
Visitors : 49524455      Online Users : 816
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32285


    Title: 利與義孰為重?以中共對台水果統戰為例
    Is the Carrot Mightier than the Stick?Assessing the Effectiveness of China`s Fruit Offensive
    Authors: 蔣靜萍
    Chiang, Ching Ping
    Contributors: 冷則剛
    耿曙

    Leng, Tse Kang
    Keng, Shu

    蔣靜萍
    Chiang, Ching Ping
    Keywords: 兩岸經貿關係
    零關稅
    經濟槓桿理論
    理性與感性理論
    統戰作為
    cross-Strait economic relations
    tariff-free policy
    economic leverage
    sense and sensitivity
    united front
    Date: 2006
    Issue Date: 2009-09-14 13:35:00 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 近年中共在逐漸認知到台灣中南部民眾為擁護民進黨當局獨立訴求之強大力量後,相繼透過與台灣在野政黨合作、牽線,以及「放權讓利」式的大批「惠台措施」,冀求爭取農民好感與向心,進而潛移其政治意向。本論文的目的,乃是嘗試由最基層民意的觀點切入,探討中共此番作為的可操作性。作者以深度訪談 (in-depth interview)方式分析,農業貿易「惠台措施」的過程中,誰是真正的贏家? 再者,讓利措施是否真為解決台灣農產品產銷困境的及時雨?其真正意含為何?最後,農民對「中國」(中共)觀感能否因此變移?又是如何轉變?冀以跳脫一般的思維與視角,看待此一頗為特殊之兩岸經貿議題。
    Relations across the Taiwan Strait are complicated by “a deep political divide, but close socioeconomic integration.” China recently is aware of Taiwan farmers integrate huge power in the DPP’s independence advocacy, thus tries to sway their political tendency by utility of economic leverage in the form of tariff-free in fifteen species of Taiwan-grown fruit. Not knowing the effectiveness, this thesis aims at searching the truth by way of in-depth interviews with people of agricultural professional; and the narration reveals Taiwanese farmers are not the direct beneficiaries, sometimes even sufferers, in the whole process. Is fruit policy a carrot for Taiwanese farmers or a stick for the ruling government? The answer is hard to define. Other maneuvering tactics between the KMT and CCP and interests of fruit agents were hidden behind China’s so-called “good will” behavior.
    Reference: 1. Drezner, Daniel W., 1999/2000, “The Trouble with Carrots: Transaction Costs, Conflict Expectation, and Economic Inducement.” Security Studies 9, no.1-2:, 188-218.
    2. Kahler, Miles & Scott L. Kastner. 2006. “Strategic Uses of Economic Interdependence: Engagement Strategies on the Korean Peninsula and across the Taiwan Strait.” Journal of Peace Research 43, no. 5:523-41.
    3. Kuo, Cheng-tian. 1993. “Economic Statecraft across the Taiwan Strait.” Issues & Studies 29, no. 10 (October): 19-38.
    4. Leng, Tse-Kang, 1995, “State, Business, and Economic Interaction across the Taiwan Strait,” Issues & Studies 31: 11 (Nov.), pp.40-58.
    5. Leng, Tse-Kang, 1998, “Dynamics of Taiwan-Mainland China Economic Relations: The Role of Private Firms,” Asian Survey, 38: 5 (May), pp.494-509.
    6. Tian, Qun-jian. 2004. “Agrarian Crisis, WTO Entry, and Institutional Change in Rural China.” Issues & Studies 40, No. 2: 47-77.
    7. Wu, Yu-Shan, 2005. “From Romantic Triangle to Marriage? Washington-
    Beijing -Taipei Relations in Historical Comparison” Issues & Studies 41, No. 1 (March): 113-59.
    Books
    1. Cheng, Tun-jen, Chi Huang and Samuel S.G.Wu ed., 1995, Inherited Rivalry: Conflict Across the Taiwan Straits, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1995.
    2. Drezner, Daniel W. 1999, The Sanctions of Paradox: Economic Statecraft and International Relations, Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
    3. Gilpin, Robert, 2001, Global Political Economy: Understanding the International Economic Order, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    4. Mainland Affairs Council, 2006, Important Documents on the Government’s Mainland Policy, Mainland Affairs Council, The Executive Yuan.
    5. Mainland Affairs Council, 2006, Know Thyself, Know Others: The Neglected Risks of China, Mainland Affairs Council, The Executive Yuan.
    6. Tanner, Murry Scot. 2007, Chinese Economic Coercion against Taiwan: A Tricky Weapon to Use, Santa Monica, CA. RAND.
    Chinese-language sources
    1. Chiang, Lie-fen. 2005. A Study on Subsidize Policy and Execute Mechanisms of Agricultural Co-operatives (wuoguo nongye hezhuo shechang buju zhengtse ji chishing jiche chi yengjio). Master’s thesis, School of Management Development, Feng-chia University.
    2. Hsiung, Cheng-i. 2002. “Zhongguo dalu shuiguo shichang poxi” (An analysis of China’s fruit market). Agriculture Policy & Review no. 117: 89-95.
    3. Keng, Shu and Zhongsheng Lin, 2005, “The Political Role of the Taiwan Businessmen in Cross-Strait Integration,” (Quanqiuhua Beijingxia de liang’an guanxi yu taishang jiaose), Mainland China Studies, 48: 1, pp. 1-28.
    4. Liao, Kun-jung. 2005. “Moral Hazard of Credit Department of Farmers Associations in Taiwan” (Taiwan nonghui shingyuny bu jinging guanli de diode weisheng yengjio). Journal of Public Administration, No. 17: 83-112.
    5. Liu, Chao-lung. 1995. Agricultural sector under the Taiwan Miracle (Taiwan Qiji Xiade Nongye Bumen). Master’s thesis, Department of Political Science, National Chung-cheng University.
    6. Ni, Po-chia. 2005. “The implication of China-Thailand Zero Tariff Fruit and Vegetable Agreement for cross-Strait trade of agricultural produce” (Zhongtai shuguo lingguanshui xieyi dui liang’an nongchanpin maoyi de qishi). Agriculture Policy & Review no. 156: 51-55.
    7. Shi, Ze-yu, On Cross-Taiwan Strait Relations (lian’an guangxi gailung),Yangze: Taipei, 1998.
    8. Shong, Jieng, Industrial Management in the Cross-Strait Agriculture (haixia lian’an nongye chiyehua jinging yu guangli), He-fei Industrial University, 2005.
    9. Soong, Jenn-Jaw & Hong-Ming Huang 2006, “The Development, Challenge, and Prospect of Current Cross-Strait Political and Economic Relations: Constructing a New Thinking for Cross-Strait Relations,” Prospect and Exploration, Vol.4 No.10, pp.21-34.
    10. Tsai, Hong-jin, 2003.Taiwan New Rural Sociology (Taiwan shing shangtsun shehui xue) Chuanhua: Taipei.
    11. TPFA. 2006. Farmers’ Associations Yearbook in Taiwan District (Taiwan chu geji nonghui niengbao). Taichung: TPFA.
    12. Wan, Chung-wen, A study on the competitive advantage for branded fruit (Pinpai shuiguo shichang jingzheng youshi zhi yanjiu,). Taipei: COA. 2000
    13. Wang, Cheng-Hsu, 2006, “Analyzing The Hu Jin-Tao and Wen Jia-Bao’s Political Incremental Reform,” Prospect and Exploration, Vol.4 No.10, pp.1-3.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    中國大陸研究英語碩士學程(IMCS)
    94925015
    95
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094925015
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[中國大陸研究英語碩士學程(IMCS)] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2503View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback