English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 81039/110467 (73%)
造訪人次 : 20964133      線上人數 : 402
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32418


    題名: The comparison of semiconductor industry between Taiwan and South Korea
    作者: 趙智勳
    Cho, Ji Hoon
    貢獻者: 黃仁德
    Hwang, Jen Te
    趙智勳
    Cho, Ji Hoon
    關鍵詞: 半導體
    台灣
    韓國
    semiconductor
    Taiwan
    Korea
    日期: 2008
    上傳時間: 2009-09-14 13:56:27 (UTC+8)
    摘要: -
    This study aims at analyzing the causes of the different policy outcomes in the semiconductor industry between Taiwan and South Korea. Taiwan and South Korea have been considered two successful cases in developing the semiconductor industry, which is essential in all high-tech industries.
    Taiwan and South Korea have been regarded as archetype of the capitalist developmental state, and both countries, the government has utilized various policy instruments to influence the pattern of resource allocation to accelerate the pace of industrial development.
    Taiwan and South Korea have followed similar paths of economic development. Taiwan went through the ‘Primary Import Substitution’ was in 1950-62, the ‘Primary Export Substitution’ was in 1962-70, and the ‘Secondary Import Substitution’ was in 1970-83. Taiwan entered into the ‘Secondary Export Substitution’ phase in mid-1980s. In South Korea, the ‘Primary Import Substitution’ in 1953-64, and the ‘Primary Export Substitution’ in 1964-72. The ‘Secondary Import Substitution’ occurred in 1973-83, and the ‘Secondary Export Substitution’ began in 1984. In both countries, the government has intervened in the allocation of investment funds.
    However, in spite of this structural similarity between Taiwan and South Korea, each approached the semiconductor industry differently. The state in South Korea has been more cooperative with the private sector than Taiwan. In order to explain the causes of this variation, this paper examined the differences in business structure, state structure, and international political economy, by adopting a comparative institutional approach as its theoretical framework.
    First, from the business structure perspective, South Korea consists of a few “Chaebols,” whereas Taiwan Small- & medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Thus, big Korean electronics firms were able to enter the semiconductor industry with large financial and organizational capacity of the conglomerate. On the other hand, small-size private firms in Taiwan could not enter the semiconductor industry easily. Second, in the state structure, the bureaucratic cleavage between the liberalization and technology in South Korea made science and technology policy-making system incoherent, and limited the state’s ability to help the semiconductor industry, while Taiwan was able to have an autonomous science and technology policy-making system thanks to personal involvement of politically powerful figures, which supported the semiconductor industry. Third, South Korea has suffered from United States pressure due to the mass production capability of Dynamic Random Access Memories (DRAMs), whereas Taiwan has not due to the absence of a mass production capacity.
    In sum, this study argued that Taiwan and South Korea have taken different policies due to the institutional differences caused by differences in business, state, and international political economy. It means different institutions affect the interaction between the policy-making process and the interest group, with different political and economic outcomes.
    參考文獻: REFERENCES
    Ahn, B. J. and S. Nakamura (eds.) (1993), Studies in the Industrialization of Korea, 1930-45. Seoul: Ilchogak Publishing Co.
    Amsden, A. (1985), “The State and Taiwan’s Economic Development,” in P. B. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer, and T. Skocpol (eds.), Bringing the State Back In (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press), pp. 34~81.
    APEC (1994), “The APEC Survey on Small and Medium Enterprises,” in Member Report of Chinese Taipei, APEC Export Group Meeting on Small and Medium Enterprises, Jakarta, Indonesia, unpublished.
    APEC (1994), “Forming a Financing Assistance System to Small and Medium Enterprises: The Chinese Taipei’s Experience,” in Member Report of Chinese Taipei, APEC Export Group Meeting on Small and Medium Enterprises, Jakarta, Indonesia, unpublished.
    Balassa, B. (1981), The Newly Industrializing Countries in the World Economy. New York: Pergamon Press.
    Barshefsky, C. (2001), America Trade Policy in Korea 1993~2001: Its Record, Its Lessons and the Road Ahead. Washington D.C.: George Washington Univ. Press.
    Bates, R. (1989), Beyond the Miracle of the Market: The Political Economy of Agrarian Development in Kenya. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
    Block, F. (1977), “The Ruling Class Does Not Rule: Notes on the Marxist Theory of the State,” Socialist Revolution, 33, pp. 6~28.
    Chan, S. (1987), “The Mouse That Roared: Taiwan’s Management of Trade Relations with the United States,” Comparative Political Studies, 20:3, pp. 251~292.
    Cheng, T. J. (1990), “Political Regimes and Development Strategies: South Korea and Taiwan,” in G. Gereffi and D. Wyman (eds.), Manufacturing Miracles: Path of Industrialization in Latin America and East Asia (Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press), pp. 134~153.
    Choi, B. S. (1987), “Institutionalizing a Liberal Economic Order in Korea: The Strategic Management of Economic Change,” Ph. D. Diss., Harvard University.
    Chu, Y. H. (1987), “Authoritarian Regimes Under Stress: The Political Economy of Adjustment in the East Asian NICs,” Ph. D. Diss., University of Minnesota.
    Clark, C. (1989), Taiwan’s Development: Implications for Contending Political Economy Paradigms. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
    Deyo, F. (1987), The Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism. Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press.
    EIAK (Electronic Industry Association of Korea) (1981), Twenty Years’ History of the Electronics Industry. Seoul: Electronic Industry Association of Korea. (In Korean)
    Fields, G. S. (1984), “Employment, Income Distribution and Economic Growth in Seven Small Open Economies,” Economic Journal, 94, pp. 74~83.
    Foss, N. J. (1996), “Research in Strategy, Economics, and Michael Porter,” Journal of Management Studies, 33, pp. 1~24.
    Galenson, W. (ed.) (1979), Economic Growth and Structural Change in Taiwan: The Postwar Experience of the Republic of China. Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press.
    Gold, T. B. (1986), State and Society in the Taiwan Miracle. Armonk, N.Y.: M. E. Sharpe.
    Haggard, S. and C. I. Moon, (1990), “Institutions and Economic Policy: Theory and a Korean Case Study,” World Politics, 17:2, pp. 210~237.
    Ho, S. P. S. (1978), Economic Development in Taiwan, 1860~1970. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
    Hong, S. G. (1992), “The Politics of Industrial Leapfrogging: The Semiconductor Industry in Taiwan and South Korea,” Ph. D. Diss., Northwestern University.
    Hong, W. T. (1989), “Comparative Study of the Industrialization Experience of Korea and Taiwan,” Proceedings of the International Conference on the Future Industrial and Trade Development in Hong Kong, Center of Asia Studies, University of Hong Kong.
    Hsueh, L. M. (1990), “The Development of Small and Medium Sized Enterprises in Taiwan,” Occasional Paper Series of Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research, No. 9002.
    Hwang, J. (1990), “Information Power,” Free China Review, December, pp. 16~23.
    ITRI (Industrial Technology Research Institute) (1994), Yearbooks of Semiconductor Industry. Taiwan, ROC: ITRI. (In Chinese)
    Jacobsson, S. (1984), “Industrial Policy for the Machine Tool Industries of Korea and Taiwan,” Institute of Development studies Bulletin, 15:2, pp. 44~49.
    Jo, G. J. (1973), The Entrepreneurial History of Korea. Seoul: Pakyoungsa Publishing Co. (In Korean)
    Jones, L. P. and I. Sakong (1980), Governments, Business, and Entrepreneurship in Economic Development: The Korean Case. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
    Kim, E. M. (1987), “From Dominance to Symbiosis: State and Chaebol in the Korean Economy, 1960-1985,” Ph. D. Diss., Brown University.
    Kim, H. K. (1988), “The Political Economy of Industrial Adjustment Strategies in South Korea: A Comparative Study of the Textile, Steel and Semiconductor Industries,” Ph. D. Diss., Duke University.
    Koo, H. (1984), “World-system, Class, and State in Third World Development: Toward and Integrative Framework of Political Economy,” Sociological Perspectives, 27, pp. 33~52.
    Koo, H. (1984), “The Political Economy of Income Distribution in South Korea: The Impact of the State’s Industrialization Policies,” World Development, 12, pp. 1029~1037.
    Lee, C. H. (1995), The Economic Transformation of South Korea: Lessons for the Transition Economies. Paris, France: OECD Development Center.
    Lee, C. S. (1980), “South Korea 1979: Confrontation, Assassination, and Transition,” Asian Survey, 20, pp. 63~76.
    Li, K. T. (1976), The Experience of Dynamic Economic Growth on Taiwan. Taipei: Mei Ya Publications.
    Lim, Y. T. (1999), Korea in the 21st Century. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
    Lin, C. Y. (1973), Industrialization in Taiwan 1946~1972. New York: Praeger Publishers.
    Little, Ian M. D. (1979), “An Economic Reconnaissance,” in W. Galenson (ed.), Economic Growth and Structural Change in Taiwan: The Postwar Experience of the Republic of China (Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press), pp. 448~507.
    Mathews, J. A. (1997), “A Silicon Valley of the East: Creating Taiwan’s Semiconductor Industry,” California Management Review, 39:4, pp. 26-54.
    Mizoguchi, T. (1975), Economic Growth of Taiwan and Korea. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten Publishers. (In Japanese)
    Okimoto, D. I. (1986), “Regime Characteristics of Japanese Industrial Society,” in Hugh Patrick (ed.), Japan’s High Technology Industries: Lessons and Limitations of Industrial Policy (Seattle: University of Washington Press), pp. 71-88.
    Scitovsky, T. (1985), “Economic Development in Taiwan and Korea: 1965~1981,” Food Research Institute Studies, 19:3, pp. 264-325.
    Suh, S. C. (1978), Growth and Structural Change in the Korean Economy, 1910~1940. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
    Tanzer, A. (1998), “Silicon Valley East,” Forbes, September, pp. 25-29.
    Wade, R. (1985), “East Asian Financial System as a Challenge to Economics: Lessons from Taiwan,” California Management Review, 27:4, pp. 106~137.
    Woo, J. E. (1990), “The Political Economy of Industrial Leapfrogging: The Semiconductor Industry in Korea,” paper presented at the 1990 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, August 30.
    Wu, Y. L. (1985), Becoming an Industrialized Nations: ROC’s Development on Taiwan. New York: Praeger Publishers.
    Yang, Y. H. (1994), “A Study of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Financial System in Taiwan,” CIER Occasional Paper, No. 9401.
    Yoffie, D. B. (1983), Power and Protectionism: Strategies of the Newly Industrializing Countries. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    臺灣研究英語碩士學程
    95924010
    97
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095924010
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[台灣研究英語碩士學程(IMTS)] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    沒有與此文件相關的檔案.



    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋