English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 87956/117187 (75%)
Visitors : 23347670      Online Users : 146
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 理學院 > 心理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/32551
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32551


    Title: 意識在軀體標記假說中涉入情形之檢驗
    Examining Consciousness Involvement in Somatic Marker Hypothesis
    Authors: 陳冠華
    Contributors: 顏乃欣
    陳冠華
    Keywords: 軀體標記假說
    意識
    情緒
    決策判斷
    somatic marker hypothesis
    consciousness
    emotion
    decision making
    Date: 2006
    Issue Date: 2009-09-17 13:23:46 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究檢視軀體標記假說與意識之關係。研究中使用一修改版愛荷華賭博作業,其中與各副牌所連結的情緒為由閾下呈現的情緒圖片在意識下所引發,而意識上每副牌輸贏的訊息則加以控制。本研究透過此作業以及實驗設計上不同的操弄,結果發現:意識應為軀體標記運作時的必要條件。此外,即使是與作業無關的情緒也可以被當作軀體標記加以被處理。再則,軀體標記的運作可以在具有衝突的作業情境下發生。最後,本研究提出了一個軀體標記運作的可能機制。
    The present study aimed to examine the relation between Somatic Marker (SM) Hypothesis and consciousness. A revised Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) was created in which emotions attached to different decks are activated unconsciously by subliminally presenting different emotional pictures. On the other hand, conscious information coming from task outcomes is controlled. Based upon this task, and with some variances in experimental designs, it was found that consciousness might be necessary in SM operation. In addition, even emotions that are irrelevant the ongoing task can be taken as SMs. Furthermore, the SM operation can be taken place when the task or situation is with conflict. A possible mechanism for SM operation is also proposed in the study.
    Reference: Adinoff, B., Devous Sr., M. D., Cooper, D. B., Best, S. E., Chandler, P., & Harris, T. (2003). Resting regional cerebral blood flow and gambling task performance in cocaine-dependent subjects and healthy comparison subjects. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160(10), 1892-1894.
    Bechara, A., & Damasio, A. R. (2005). The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decision. Games and Economic Behaviour, 52(2), 336-372.
    Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R., & Damasio, H. (2000). Emotion, decision making, and the orbitofrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 10(3), 295-307.
    Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., & Anderson, S. W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50, 7-15.
    Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Damasio, A. R., & Lee, G. P. (1999). Different contributions of the human amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex to decision-making. The Journal of Neuroscience, 19(13), 5473-5481.
    Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., & Anderson, S. W. (1998). Dissociation of working memory from decision making within the human prefrontal cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 18(1), 428-437.
    Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (1997). Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science, 275, 1293-1295.
    Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (2005). The Iowa gambling task and the somatic marker hypothesis: Some questions and answers. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9(4), 159-162.
    Bechara, A., Tranel, D., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. R. (1996). Failure to respond autonomically to anticipated future outcomes following damage to prefrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 6, 215-225.
    Beer, J. S., Shimamura, A. P., & Knight, R. (2004). Frontal lobe contributions to executive control of cognitive and social behavior. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Eds.), The cognitive neurosciences (3rd ed.)(pp.1091-1104). MA: MIT Press.
    Carter, S. & Pasqualini, S. (2004). Stronger autonomic response accompanies better learning: A test of Damasio’s Somatic Marker Hypothesis. Cognition and Emotion, 18(7), 901-911.
    Chen, K. H. , Yen, N. S., Chang, Y. C., Chen, P. T. , & Liao, K. M. (2005, October). Testing somatic marker hypothesis with manipulating suboptimal emotional stimuli. Paper presented at the 44th Annual Meeting of the Taiwanese Psychological Association, Chung Li, Taiwan.
    Chen, K. H., Yen, N. S., Liao, K. M., & Chang, Y. C. (2006, August). Somatic marker hypothesis is not replicated with unconscious manipulations. Poster presented at the 114th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, New Orleans, LA, USA.
    Cuthbert, B. N., Schupp, H. T., Bradley, M. M., Birbaumer, N., & Lang, P. J. (2000). Brain potentials in affective picture processing: Covariation with autonomic arousal and affective report. Biological Psychology, 52(2), 95-111.
    Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reasoning, and human brain. NY: Grosset/Putnam.
    Damasio, H., Bechara, A., & Damasio, A. R. (2002). Reply to “Do somatic markers mediate decisions on the gambling task?” Nature Neuroscience, 5(11), 1104.
    Dunn, B. D., Dalgleish, T., & Lawrence, A. D. (2006). The somatic marker hypothesis: A critical evaluation. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(2), 239-271.
    Elliott, R., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2000). Dissociable functions in the medial and lateral orbitofrontal cortex: Evidence from human neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex, 10(3), 308-317.
    Hinson, J. M., Jameson, T. L., & Whitney, P. (2002). Somatic markers, working memory, and decision making. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 2(4), 341-353.
    Jameson, T. L., Hinson, J. M., & Whitney, P. (2004). Component of the working memory and somatic marker in decision marking. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11(3), 515-520.
    Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2005). International affective picture system (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Technical Report A-6. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
    Loewenstein, G., & Lerner, J. S. (2003). The role of affect in decision making. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp.187-211). NY: Oxford Press.
    Maia, T. V., & McClelland, J. L. (2004). A reexamination of the evidence for somatic marker hypothesis: What participants really know in the Iowa gambling task. The National Academy of Science of the U. S. A., 101, 16075-16080.
    Murphy, S. T., & Zajonc, R. B. (1993). Affect, cognition, and awareness: Affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(5), 723-739.
    Peters, E., & Slovic, P. (2000). The springs of action: Affective and analytical information processing in choice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(12), 1465-1475.
    Rolls, E. T. (2005). Emotion explained. NY: Oxford University Press.
    Suzuki, A., Hirota, A., Takasawa, N., & Shigemasu, K. (2003). Application of the Somatic Marker Hypothesis to individual differences in decision making. Biological Psychology, 65, 81-88.
    Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
    Wiens, S., & Öhman, A. (2007). Probing unconscious emotion process: On becoming a successful musketeer. In J. A. Coan, & J. J. B. Allen (Eds.), Handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment (pp. 65-90). NY: Oxford Press.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    心理學研究所
    93752003
    95
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0937520031
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[心理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    003101.pdf12KbAdobe PDF722View/Open
    003102.pdf59KbAdobe PDF737View/Open
    003103.pdf31KbAdobe PDF716View/Open
    003104.pdf30KbAdobe PDF739View/Open
    003105.pdf270KbAdobe PDF1297View/Open
    003106.pdf33KbAdobe PDF812View/Open
    003107.pdf80KbAdobe PDF721View/Open
    003108.pdf129KbAdobe PDF767View/Open
    003109.pdf68KbAdobe PDF744View/Open
    003110.pdf29KbAdobe PDF763View/Open
    003111.pdf20KbAdobe PDF1104View/Open
    003112.pdf84KbAdobe PDF854View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback