English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 20 |  Items with full text/Total items : 90058/119991 (75%)
Visitors : 24105963      Online Users : 1731
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33177


    Title: 台 灣 數 位 無 線 電 視 共 同 傳 輸 公 司 的 建構內涵與發展類型:一個新制度論觀點的探究
    Authors: 李洋
    Lee,Yang
    Contributors: 曾國峰
    程宗明



    李洋
    Lee,Yang
    Keywords: 新制度論
    數位無線電視
    共同傳輸公司
    共同營運公司
    公共廣電媒體
    New Institutionalism
    Digital terrestrial television
    Transmission Company
    public service broadcasting.
    Date: 2003
    Issue Date: 2009-09-17 15:41:46 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 做為新制度流派之一的歷史制度論認為:一政策的成形,乃為情境中各要角(actor)勢力的競逐過程。研究者則在探討,做為競逐場域的共同傳輸公司,各要角勢力的競逐態勢,又將對未來台灣數位無線電視的樣貌,產生什麼樣的影響?

    本研究提出,要探討台灣共同傳輸公司的建構意涵,需回到歐洲公共廣電媒體數位化的發展脈絡進行考察,並再回到台灣的情境脈絡中,定義共同傳輸公司於台灣的建置意涵為何。

    研究者從八國(英國、瑞典、西班牙、法國、荷蘭、芬蘭、愛爾蘭、義大利)歐洲公共廣電媒體數位化的過程,歸納出三套共同傳輸公司的類型,包括:「既有獨佔型」、「準公共事業型」,及「市場競爭型」。本研究除分析這三種傳輸公司類型移植台灣的意義為何,並進一步評估其移植的可行性。另外,本研究亦針對共同傳輸公司議題,對未來「NCC作用法」的修法方向提出建議。
    The goal of Historical Institutionalism is one of the sects of New Institutionalism. It focus on finding, measuring and tracing patterns and sequences of social, political, economic behavior and change across time and space. Historical Institutionalism argue that the actors involved in the social context are the important variables for understanding political outcomes.

    This study try to find out the process of transmission company construction in Taiwan based on the viewpoint of historical institutionalism. Taiwan government plans to switch of the analog terrestrial television before 2010. Government try to stop the vertical integration of terrestrial television. Then also plan to construct the transmission company.

    This study compares with the process of digitalization of European public service broadcasting, and typologies 3 forms of transmission company, including ‘Existing-monopoly Type’, ‘Quasi-public service Type’ and ‘Market-competition Type’. After that, continuing thinking about the adaptability of three types in Taiwan. And also interprets the connotation of development of transmission company in Taiwan.
    Reference: 〈中文部分〉
    中國時報社論(2001):〈評議「黨政軍退出三台」與「公共化」爭
    議〉,《中國時報》,2版。
    行政院新聞局(2002):挑戰2008:國家發展重點計畫(2002-2007)。台
    北,行政院。
    戎撫天(2004):〈無線數位電視發展五大困境〉,《經濟日報》,2
    版。
    江煒琪(2004a):〈數位電視是無線台的機翻身機會〉,《財訊》,117
    期,頁154-158。
    江煒琦(2004b):〈數位電視發展出線重大隱憂 無線台合作仍是紙上談
    兵〉,《財訊》,117期,頁156-157。
    余俊穎(2003):《以價值網觀點探討數位電視產業之競爭優勢—無線、
    有線、電信網路及衛星四類平台之比較》。私立元智大學資訊傳播研究
    所碩士論文。
    吳光中(2004/08/28):〈4無線台將集資10億成立共同營運公司〉,《民
    生報》,B1版。
    李秀珠、趙子宏(2001):《電視數位化後頻道之使用及管理研究》。
    行政院新聞局委託研究。
    李順德(2004/06/09):〈94年度編20億 收購華視台視股權〉,《聯合
    報》,A11版。
    呂雪彗(2004/11/09):〈共同傳輸平台 將與五業者共構〉,《工商時
    報》,2版。
    吳庚(2000):《行政法之理論與實用》。台北:三民。
    許仟(1991):《歐洲文化與歐洲聯盟文化政策》。台北:樂學書局。
    莊文忠(2003):〈制度的研究:「新制度論」觀點的比較與「後現代制
    度論」的發展〉,《理論與政策》,第十六卷第四期,頁15-44,
    林瑩秋(2004):〈林家龍「漲停打開」公共集團構想是個深水炸彈〉,《財訊》,117期,頁124-125。
    林淑玲(2001/12/24):〈公共化理想建國 路途遙遠〉,《中國時
    報》,5版。
    林麗雲(2001):〈公共化不是「政府化」,更不應是「綠化」〉,收錄
    於正智大學傳播學院媒體素養研究室(2002)《電視改革 針鋒相
    對?》。台北:政大傳研中心。
    洪儀芳(2002):《台灣與日本數位電視的發展與困境》。國立台灣大學
    新聞研究所碩士論文。
    馮建三(1999):〈國家主權與廣電管制:一個動態觀點從歐洲聯盟「電
    視無疆界」十年史談起〉,《傳播文化》,第八期,頁 317-338。
    馮昭台(2004/06/18):〈台視華視公共化方案本週送政務委員審議〉,《中央社》。
    陳民峰(2003/05/06):〈數位電視 96年底開播〉,《民生報》,B1版。
    陳炳宏(2002):〈當公共化議題被貼上標籤後〉,《自由時報》,15
    版。
    徐秋華(2000):《英國數位電視發展現況》,台北:公共電視研發部。
    郭承天(2000):〈新制度論與政治經濟學〉,收錄於何思因、吳玉山主
    編,《邁入廿一世紀的政治學》,台北:中國政治學會,頁171-201。
    黃兆璽(2004-11-09):〈新聞局回收類比頻道 TV內建數位接收功能 2010
    年 電視全面數位化〉,《星報》,B1版。
    黃其福(2001):〈黨政軍退出媒體 在野從預算動刀〉,《聯合晚
    報》,2版。
    黃國師(2004):〈製播分離政策對我國無線電視產業營運的影響〉,發
    表於《數位產業的發展趨勢與經營管理 台灣數位廣播電視傳播論
    壇》。 台北:台灣藝術大學。
    管中祥(2004):〈公共廣電集團不是媒體改造萬靈丹〉,《目擊者》,
    41期。
    程宗明(2002):〈電視政策對制度形塑的回顧與前瞻:四十年的荒原,
    曠野中的呼聲〉,發表於《台灣電視四十年回顧與前瞻研究》。台北:
    國立政治大學傳播學院。
    -(2003):《判台灣的電視政策,2000-2002:無線電視台公共化與數
    位化之思辯》。國立政治大學新聞研究所博士論文。
    -(2004):〈突破數位電視發展瓶頸之呼籲〉,《數位視訊月刊》,七
    月號。
    -(2005):〈數位廣播時代製播分離的第一步:傳輸網路之公共化〉,《公視研究季刊》,創刊號。
    蔡慧貞、劉宜(2005/8/25):〈2年92億建構公視集團〉,《中國時
    報》,A2版。
    鄭明樁(1992):〈高解析電視的政經難題〉收錄於Ithiel de Sola
    Pool(1992)原著,卜大中(1992)等譯:《第八類接觸》。台北:時
    報。
    鄭陸霖(2000)。〈是誰惹毛沈睡中的貓?台灣有線電視場域中的權利競
    爭〉,《台灣產業研究研究》,3: 225-261。
    聯合晚報社論(2001):〈先創造公共化共識〉,《聯合報》,2版。
    詹婷怡(1999):〈電信普及服務之制度與內涵〉,《通訊雜誌》,7月
    號,頁22-25。
    羅莊鵬(2004):〈無線電頻譜的配用模式--政府管制、市場機制與共用
    模式之探討〉。國立中正大學電訊傳播研究所論文。
    鍾起惠(2003):《節目品質與優質電視- 兼論當前台灣電視節目產製的
    困境與出路》。台北:財團法人廣播電視事業發展基金。
    Burstein & Kline(1995)原著, 查修傑(1997)譯:《決戰資訊高速公路
    決戰資訊高速公路-第二波資訊革命的契機與反思》。台北:遠流。
    Downey, J. and McGuigan (1999)原著,江淑玲譯(2003):《科技新城
    鎮》。台北:韋伯文化。
    Lyon, D.等人(1988)原著,馮建三等譯(1988):《未來的省思》。板
    橋:駱駝出版社。
    May, C.(2004).原著,葉欣怡譯(2004):《質疑資訊社會》。台北:韋
    伯文化。
    Pool(1992)原著,卜大中等(1992)譯:《第八類接觸》。台北:時報。
    Webster, F.(1995)原著,馮建三譯(1999):《資訊社會理論》。台
    北:遠流。
    Williams(1990)原著,馮建三(2002)譯:《電視:科技與文化型式》。
    台北:遠流。
    〈英文部分〉
    Alberico, G.(2003). The launch of DTT in Italy. RAI
    Bangemann Report (1995). European information society: Recommendations to the European Council. Brussels: European
    Commission
    Bell, D.(1973). The coming of the post-industrial society: A
    venture in social forecasting. NY: Basic.
    Bourreau, M. (2004). Digital terrestrial television in France:
    An attempt to enhance competition in an oligopolistic market.
    In Brown, A. Picard, R. G. (Ed.) (2004). Digital Terrestrial
    Television in Europe. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc Inc.
    Bruin, D. Ronald and Smits, J. (1999). Digital Video
    Broadcasting: Technology, Standards, and Regulations. London:
    Artech House.
    CMT(Telecommunications Market Commission), (2002). Annual
    report, Spain.
    Collins R.(1998). Back to the future--Digital television and
    convergence in the United Kingdom. Telecommunications Policy,
    22(4-5): 383-396.
    -(1999). European Union media and communication policies in
    Jane Stokes and Anna Reading, The media in Britain: Current
    debates and developments Houndsmills: Palgrave.
    -.(2002). Digital television in the United Kingdom.
    Javnost/The Public, 9:4, 5-18.
    The Council of European Union (2002). Group of specialists on
    the democratic and social implications of digital
    broadcasting. Brussels, Belgium.
    - (2002). Report on media diversity in Europe. Brussels: The
    Council of Europe.
    deLeon, P.(1992). The Democratization of the Policy Science.
    Public Administration Review. 52(2):125-129.
    DLM (2000). Position of the DLM on the EU Commission's proposal
    for a new regulatory framework for electronic communications
    networks and services. Germany.
    EBU(European Broadcasting Union)(2000). EBU comments on the EU
    commission’s proposals for directives regarding the review of
    the regulation framework for communications. EBU, Switzerland.
    EPRA(European Platform of Regulatory Authorities)(2004).
    Working on digital terrestrial television in EPRA countries.
    Germany: Secretary of the EPRA.
    European Commission (1993). White Paper on Growth,
    Competitiveness and Employment: The challenge and ways forward
    in 21st Century. Brussels: European Commission
    -(1997). Green paper on the convergence of the
    telecommunications , media and information technology sectors,
    and the implications for regulation: Towards an information
    society. Brussels, Belgium.
    - (1998). Green paper on radio spectrum policy. Brussels,
    Belgium.
    - (1999a). Next Steps in Radio Spectrum Policy: Results of the
    Public Consultation on the Green Paper. Brussels, Belgium.
    - (1999b). Towards a new framework for Electronic
    Communications infrastructure and associated services.
    Brussels, Belgium.
    European Parliament (1996). Tongue report. Brussels: European
    Parliament.
    Fischer, F.(1993). Citizen participation and the
    democratization of policy expertise: From theoretical inquiry
    to practical cases. Policy Sciences 26(3): 165-187.
    Freshfieds Bruckhaus Deringer (2001). Significant market power:
    It’s impact on telecommunication operator in the EU.
    Freshfieds.com.
    Galperin, H.(2004). Beyond interests, ideas, and technology: An
    Institutional approach to communication and information
    policy. The Information Society, 20: 159-168.
    -(2004b). New TV, Old Politics: The Transition to Digital TV
    in the United States and Britain. Cambridge University Press.
    Habermas, J. (1981). Structural transformation of the public
    sphere. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
    Hall, P. A. and C. R. Taller, (1996). Political science and the
    three new institutionalism. Political Studies 45:936-957
    Hundt, E. (2000). You Say You Want a Revolution: A story of
    information age politics. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University
    Press.
    IDATE (2000). Development of Digital TV in Europe- Sweden.
    【Online】Available: http://europa.eu.int/ISPO/infosoc/
    telecompolicy
    King, C. , Feltey, K. and Susel, B.(1998). The question of
    participation: Toward authentic public participation in public
    administration. Public Administration Review 58(4),317-326.
    Koelble, A.(1995). The new institutionalism in political
    science and sociology, Comparative Politics 27(2):231-243.
    Kubicek, H. , Dutton, W. and Williams, R. (Ed.)(1997). The
    social shaping of information superhighway: European and
    American roads to the information society. Frankfurt
    [Germany] ; New York : Campus Verlag ; New York : St. Martin's
    Press
    Levy, D (1999). Europe’s Digital Revolution—Broadcasting
    regulation, the EU and the nation state. London: Routledge
    March, G. and Olsen P. (1989). Recovering institutionalism,
    Polity 28(1):107-115.
    Marsden, C. and Verhulst, S. (1999). Convergence in European
    Digital TV Regulation. Blackstone Press.
    Mitomo, H. and Ueda, Y. (2003). Vertical separation between
    program production and transmission: Network sharing in the
    Japanese broadcasting industry. Communications & Strategies, 52
    (4): 239-255.
    Murphy, K. (2004). Ireland, RT□ and the digital transition:
    Policy navigation in a small European state. Trends in
    Communication 12(4), 193-210.
    NRAs(European Regulators of Group of National Regulatory
    Authorities)(2004). ERG Common Position on the approach to
    Appropriate remedies in the new regulatory framework.
    Brussels, Belgium.
    Neuman, W. Russell (1999). Broadcasting and bandwidth. In
    Gerbarg, Darcy (ed.). The economics, technology and content of
    digital TV. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Nordenstreng, K, (1997).The citizen moves from the audience to
    the arena. Nordicom Review(2): 13-20
    Noveck, B. (1999). Analogue thinking; Digital television:
    Recrafting content regulation. In Marsden, C. and Verhulst, S.
    (Ed.)(1999). Convergrnce in European digital TV regulation.
    UK:Black Stone Press Limited.
    Pontusson, J. (1995). From Comparative Public Policy to
    Political Economy: Putting Political Institutions in Their
    Places and Taking Interests Seriously, Comparative Political
    Studies 28(1): 117-147. Screen Digest, 2000: 105-106
    Price, Monroe E. and Marc Raboy (2001). Public service
    broadcasting in transition: A documentary reader. Dusseldorf:
    European Institute for the Media.
    R. Craufurd Smith (2005).〈Public Service Broadcasting in the
    European Union: No longer simply a matter of domestic
    concern.〉,《傳媒透視》,九月號 頁10-11。香港:香港電台。
    Raboy, M. (1997). Cultural sovereignty, public participation,
    and democratization of the public sphere: The Canadian debate
    on the new information infrastructure. In Kahin, B. and Wilson, E. J. (Ed.)(1997). National information infrastructure
    initiatives : vision and policy design. Cambridge, Mass. : MIT
    Press.
    - (1999). The world situation of public service broadcasting,
    In AMIC (Ed.). Public service broadcasting in Asia: Surviving
    in the new information age. (pp. 3-24). Singapore: AMIC
    Scannell, P (2002). Public service broadcasting: The history of
    a concept. In Toby Miller (Ed.). Television: Critical
    concepts in media and cultural studies. Volume IV, London:
    Routledge, 212-226.
    Schierbeck, P. (2001). Regulatory schemes and practices
    concerning the licensing of digital broadcasting services -
    the Swedish experience.
    【Online】available:
    http://www.humanrights.coe.int/media/events/2000/digital%
    20platforms/ACONF-AD%20(2000)%207%20Rapport%
    20SCHIERBECK.doc
    Teracom (1998). Annual Repor t 1998. Sweden: Teracom.
    - (2001). Annual Repor t 2001. Sweden: Teracom.
    - (2003). Annual Repor t 2003. Sweden: Teracom.
    - (2004). Annual Repor t 2004. Sweden: Teracom.
    Wamsley, G.(1990). Refunding public administration, Thousand
    Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Wbeeler, M.( 2004). Supranational regulation: Television and
    the European Union. European Journal of Communication, 19(3):
    349-369.
    Wilson, E. J.(1998). Introductory scenarios for interactive
    television. EBU Technical Review ,275. Switzerland: European
    Broadcasting Union.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    廣播電視學研究所
    92453004
    92
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0924530042
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[廣播電視學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    53004201.pdf115KbAdobe PDF1173View/Open
    53004202.pdf233KbAdobe PDF1309View/Open
    53004203.pdf339KbAdobe PDF1629View/Open
    53004204.pdf380KbAdobe PDF1424View/Open
    53004205.pdf399KbAdobe PDF1545View/Open
    53004206.pdf272KbAdobe PDF1348View/Open
    53004207.pdf233KbAdobe PDF1411View/Open
    53004208.pdf73KbAdobe PDF1049View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback