English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 89327/119107 (75%)
Visitors : 23840546      Online Users : 132
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33354


    Title: 丹‧布朗小說《達文西密碼》中的權力、抵抗與越界
    Power, Resistance, and Boundary Crossing in Dan Brown's The Da Vinci Code
    Authors: 黃耀弘
    Huang,Yao-Hung
    Contributors: 羅狼仁
    林茂松

    Phillips,Brian David
    Lin,Maosung

    黃耀弘
    Huang,Yao-Hung
    Keywords: 達文西密碼
    丹布朗
    傅科
    權力
    慾望
    克莉斯提娃
    抵抗
    越界
    The Da Vinci Code
    Dan Brown
    Foucault
    Power
    Desire
    Kristeva
    Resistance
    Bounary corssing
    Date: 2006
    Issue Date: 2009-09-17 16:21:11 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 《達文西密碼》這部作品在成為最暢銷的小說後,吸引了世界上許多各式各樣不同的讀者。然而在暢銷市場之外,這部作品卻被許多評論家認為是一部扭曲史實的作品;幾乎所有的評論家都一致認為這是一部充滿歷史錯誤與邏輯矛盾的創作。不過令人訝異的是,幾乎沒有任何評論家是從文學理論批評的角度來檢視這份虛擬的小說創作。 因此,本文除盡可能檢視過去所有探討及批評《達文西密碼》的文章外,筆者將探討文中引含的兩種能量:權力與抵抗。這兩種力量其實在此書中一直是兩股此起彼落的流動能量,筆者將採取文學理論的角度去探索此書裡的權力與抵抗互動脈絡;而且,在這之後,筆者會試著從理論面向,深入檢視造成《達文西密碼》一書全球風潮之因。
    本論文將分作四個章節,在首章中,我會回顧其他批評及評論家對《達文西密碼》一書的見解,第二章則是對應用於此書中的文學理論的鋪陳及探討,第三
    章則是則分別討論傅科 (Michael Foucault) 的權力、克里多娃 (Julia Kristeav) 的母性抵抗,以及以瑟 (Wolfgang Iser) 的越界 (Boundary crossing ) 理論,如何運作在《達文西密碼》一書當中。最末章的總結則點出此本小說其實不僅僅
    是許多評論家眼中的一本充滿不實與問題的作品;相反的,它不但揭露出權力及抵抗兩種能量的運作和依存關係,而且也解釋了這本書造成閱讀風潮的原因,也就是讀者心中的那份永不滿足的失落。
    Having been one of the most popular recent works of fiction, The Da Vinci Code has attracted readers throughout the world. Yet, many critics have commented that The Da Vinci code is a work full of historical mistakes. Almost no critic analyzes the reason for its success from a theoretical perspective.
    The novel enchants readers because it suggests the unexpected ways that the meaning of the sacred feminine has been repressed throughout history. As the reader decodes the clues that are hidden throughout the novel, an undiscovered history is suggested: the myth of the Holy Grail. In The Da Vinci Code, the Holy Grail stands for Mary Magdalene, who carried and conceived Jesus Christ’s child. In the novel Mary carries a significant symbolic meaning because she is portrayed as the wife of Jesus as well as the mother of His daughter. This stunning premise is responsible for making The Da Vinci Code not only popular, but also very controversial. Critics vary in their reaction to the ‘subversive’ ideas in The Da Vinci Code, but there are two predominant kinds of reaction to the novel. The first type reflects the view that The Da Vinci Code is a popular work that encourages feminine, independent thinking that works in opposition to conventional and social power. The second views it as a fictitious work fraught with historical inaccuracies. Generally speaking, both types mention the issues of power and resistance in The Da Vinci Code.
    This thesis consists of four chapters that focus respectively on the search for power, feminine resistance, and boundary crossing narrative techniques. Chapter one introduces how critics analyze their conventional elements. In the second chapter, I intend to employ Michael Foucault, Julia Kristeva, and Wolfgang Iser’s theories in an analysis of The Da Vinci Code. In the third chapter, I will employ textual evidence to support my theoretical analysis. In the conclusion of my thesis, I will claim that only through the dialectic oscillation between transgression and law can the individual escape the symbolic control and discover resistance. Furthermore, the narrative technique of boundary crossing is the key that has made the book a runaway success throughout the world and that also renders the reader eager to explore their own world further. Finally I reach the conclusion that The Da Vinci Code is not merely a work full of errors and conspiracies, but also a novel that exposes the violence, resistance and sense of loss in contemporary society.
    Reference: Barthes, Roland. The Pleasure of the Text. Trans. Richard Miller. New York: Farrar,Straus, and Giroux,1975.
    Barker, Chris. Cultural Studies: Theories and Practice. Sage Publications, 2000.
    Bethune, Brian. “Cracking The Da VinCi Code.” Maclean’s 117 (2004): 36-39.
    Bernhauer, J. Michel Foucault’s Force of Flight: Toward an Ethics for Thought. London: Humanities Press International, 1990.
    Bock, Darrell L. Breaking The Da Vinci Code. Thomas Nelson, 2004.
    Braidotti, R. Patterns of Dissonance: A Study of Women in Contemporary Philosophy. Trans. Elizabeth Guild, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991.
    Brooker, Peter. A Concise Glossary of Cultural Theory. Arnold, 1999.
    Brown, Dan. The Da Vinci Code. Doubleday. 2003.
    Burstein, Dan. Et al. Secrets of the Code: The Unauthorized Guide to the Mysteries Behind The Da Vinci Code. Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2004.
    De Certeau, Michel. The Practice of Everyday Life. Trans. Steven Rendall, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.
    Diemert, Brain. “Pursuit of Justice: Graham Greene’s Refiguring of the Detective Story in It’s a Battlefild.” Paper on Language and Literature 30 (1994): 285- 297.
    Eagleton, Terry. Literary Theory: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell, 1983.
    Easthope, Antony. Literature into Cultural Studies. London and New York, 1991.
    Eco, Umberto. Foucault’s Pendulum. Ballantine Books, 1990.
    Ehrman, Bart D. Truth and Fiction in The Da Vinci Code. Oxford University Press, 2004.
    Foucault, M. Discipline and Punishment: The Birth of the Prison. Trans. A. Sheridan, New York: Vintage Books,1979.
    - - -. History of Sexuality. Pantheon Books, 1984.
    Gramsci, A. Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1968.
    Hull, Richard. “The Purloined Letter: Poe’s Detective Story V.S. Panoptic Foucauldian Theory.” Style, 1990.
    Hall, S. “For All on White: Metaphor of Transformation.” Critical Dialogue in Cultural Studies, London: Routlefge, 1996.
    Iser, Wolfgang. The Fictive and the Imaginary: Charting Literary Anthropology. Baltimore: John Hopkins Up, 1993.
    Kantrowitz Barbara, et al. “The Bible’s Lost Stories.” Newsweek 142 (2003): 48-56
    Klinghoffer, David. “Religious Fiction.” National Review 55 (2003): 48-49
    Kristeva, J. “Stabat Mater.” Tales of Love. Trans., Leon Roudiez. New York: Columbia University Press, 1987.
    - - -. The Kristeva Reader. ed. Tori Moi. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.
    - - -. Tales of Love. Trans. Leon Roudiez. New York: Columbia University Press, 1987.
    - - -. Desire in Language: The Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. Ed. Léon
    Roudiez. Trans. Alice Jardine, Thomas Gora and Léon Roudiez. New York, Columbia University Press, London, Basil Blackwell, 1980.
    - - -. Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. Trans. Leon S. Roudiez. New York : Columbia University Press, 1982.
    - - -. Revolutionary in Poetic Language. Trans. Margaret Waller. Columbia University Press, 1984.
    Kulman, Linda, Jay Tolson, and Katy Kelly. “Jesus in America: Behind the Wild Success of a Theological Thriller Lies a Centuries-old Urge to Rapture the Original Jesus.” US. News & World Report 135 (2003).
    Lacy, Norris J. “The Da Vinci Code: Dan Brown and the Grail that Never was.” Arthuriana 14 (2004): 81-93.
    Linhart, Robert. The Assembly Line. Trans. Margaret Crosland, London: John Calder, 1981.
    Macherey, Pierre. “A Theory of Literary Production.” Reading Popular Narrative: A Source Book. Ed., Bob Ashley, Leicester University Press: London and Washington, 1997.
    Makinen, Merja. Feminist Popular Fiction. New York: Palgrave, 2001.
    McCormick, Patrick “Painted out the Picture: Part of the Best-selling Appeal of The
    Da Vinci Code is a Conspiracy that Has Kept Women from Taking Their Rightful Place in the Church.” U.S. the Catholic 68(2003): 36-39.
    McNay, Lois. Foucault and Feminism: Power, Gender, and the Self. Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1992.
    McGuigan, J. Cultural Populism. London: Routledge, 1992.
    McHale, Brain. Postmodernist Fiction. New York: Methuen, 1987.
    Moretti, Franco. “Clues.” Signs Taken for Wonders: Essay in the Sociology if Literary Forms. Trans., Susan Fischer, David Forgacs, David Miller.Verso, 1988.
    Miller, D. A. The Novel and the Police. Berkeley: U of California P, 1988.
    Nealon, Jeffery T. “Work of the Detective, Work of the Writer.” Detecting Texts. Ed., Patricia Mervale, Susan Elizabeth. PENN, 1999.
    Newman, Sharan. The Real History Behind The Da Vinci Code. Berkley Books, 2005.
    O’Grady, Kathleen. “An Interview with Kristeva.” Parallax 8 (1998):5-16.
    Oliver, Kelly. Reading Kristeva: Unraveling the Double-bind. Indiana University, 1993.
    Parry, Alan. “Deconstruction and Theory Revisited: Including the Excluded.” Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 20-24 August 1999. 1-51.
    Pederson-Krag, Geralding “Detective Stories and the Primal Scene.” Psychoanalytic Quarterly 13 (1949):203-14.
    Putnam, Bill, and John Edwin Wood. “Unravelling The Da Vinci Code: Bill Putman and John Edwin Wood Peel Away the Evidence to Find an Extraordinary Hoax at the Heart of Dan Brown’s Best Selling Novel.” History Today 55 (2005):18-20.
    Rolvsjord, Randi. “Music as a Poetic Language.” Online. Internet. 11 May. 2006.
    Voices: A World Forum for Music Therapy Retrieved. May 14, 2006.
    <http://www.voices.no/mainissues/mi40004000138.html>
    Sauer, Geoffrey. “Review of Foucault’s Pendulum.” Online. Internet. 12 Feb. 1990. The Modern World. Nov 20, 2003.
    <http://www.themodernword.com/eco/eco_humanitas90.html>
    Schor, N. “Dreaming Dissymmetry: Barthes, Foucault, and Social difference.” Men in Feminism. Ed., A. Jardine and Paul Smith, New York : Routledge, 1989.
    Seltzer, Mark. Henry James and the Art of Power. Ithaca: Cornell Up, 1984.
    Sheridan, Alan. Michel Foucault: The Will to Truth. Tavistock, 1980.
    Smart, Barry. Michel Foucault. Tavistock, 1985.
    Smith, Philip. Cultural Theory: An Introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2001.
    Spanos, William V. Repetitions: The Postmodernism Occasion in Literature and Culture. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State UP, 1987.
    Swope, Richard. “Approaching the Threshold(s) in Postmodernism Detective fiction : Hawthrone’s ‘Wakefild’ and Other Missing Persons.” Critique 39 (1998): 207-228.
    Todorov, Tzvetan. The Poetics of Prose. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1977.
    Wiliams, Raymond. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. New York: Oxford University Press, 1976.
    William, Raymond. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. London: Fontana, 1976.
    Wilson, Robert Anton. “Mary Mary, Quite Contrary.” Online. Internet. 16 Sep. 2004. Conspiracy Coincidence & Code. <http://72.14.235.104/search?q=cache:z6fTFkGUdM4J:maybelogic.org/coincidancecode/modules.php%3Fname%3DNews%26file%3Darticle%26sid%3D2+Roberto+Anton+Wilson,+The+Widow%27s+Son,+Magdalene&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=24>
    - - -. The Widow’s Son. New Falcon Publications, 2004.
    Wilson-Smith, Anthony, “God and those Details.” Maclean’s 117 (2004): 4.
    Zizek, Slavoj. “Two Ways to Avoid the Real of Desire.” Looking Away: An Introduction to Jacques Lacan Trough Popular Culture. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1992.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    英國語文學研究所
    92551003
    95
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0925510031
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[英國語文學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    51003101.pdf48KbAdobe PDF947View/Open
    51003102.pdf12KbAdobe PDF883View/Open
    51003103.pdf102KbAdobe PDF1022View/Open
    51003104.pdf11KbAdobe PDF847View/Open
    51003105.pdf41KbAdobe PDF3354View/Open
    51003106.pdf116KbAdobe PDF3131View/Open
    51003107.pdf155KbAdobe PDF2063View/Open
    51003108.pdf22KbAdobe PDF2109View/Open
    51003109.pdf40KbAdobe PDF1846View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback