English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109951/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46277723      Online Users : 1423
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33449


    Title: 台灣高中英文教師對教授英文寫作之信念與實踐
    Taiwan`s High School English Teachers` Beliefs and Practicesin Writing Instruction
    Authors: 吳美滿
    Wu, Mei-man
    Contributors: 余明忠
    Yu, Ming-chung
    吳美滿
    Wu, Mei-man
    Keywords: 英文寫作教學
    教師信念
    English writing instruction
    teachers` beliefs
    Date: 2005
    Issue Date: 2009-09-17 16:37:24 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究旨在探討高中英文教師對於英文作文教學的信念與其實際教學情形。文獻回顧內容涵蓋英文作文教學理論以及教師信念與實踐。
    本研究的對象為台北市的高中英文教師,研究方法採用量化的教師問卷輔以質化的教師訪談,問卷回收171份,採用兩種統計方法分析:描述性統計及單因子變異數分析;訪談人數為6人,訪談結果用來支持、解釋問卷結果。研究重點如下:(一)教師信念及教學情形:包含教學目標、教師角色、教學內容及教學方式、(二)教師信念與實踐的符合度與造成不相符合的原因以及(三)影響教師信念與實踐的因素。
    本研究的主要發現如下:
    1. 大考會左右老師的教學方向,但老師教學時目標不只侷限於此。
    2. 老師的教學信念與實踐皆綜合成果導向與過程導向的教學法原則,而非單一教學法。
    3. 教師教學上面臨課程、學生、教學準備及批閱作文等方面的困難,這些困難會阻礙老師遵循其信念教學。
    4. 教師背景經驗確實會對其信念與實踐有所影響。
    本研究有助於認識高中英文教師教寫作的信念與教學情形。研究者根據研究發現,分別對高中英文教師、教師培育機構、教育部及作文教學教材編寫者提出建議,以期讓高中英文作文教學更進一步。
    The purpose of this study was to explore what beliefs senior high school English teachers hold toward writing instruction and their practices of the beliefs. Literature review covered the approaches of ESL/EFL writing instruction and teachers’ beliefs and practices.
    The participants of this study were senior high school English teachers in Taipei city. Two data collection instruments were adopted, the quantitative questionnaire and the qualitative interview. In total, 171 questionnaires were gathered and analyzed by means of descriptive statistics and one-way ANOVA. In addition, six interviews were conducted, whose results were utilized to further support and explain the questionnaire results. There were three research focuses. The first one was on teachers’ beliefs and practices in the goals of writing instruction, the roles they played, and the content as well as the teaching procedures of writing instruction. The second one was on the consistency between teachers’ beliefs and practices and possible reasons for the inconsistency. The third one was on influential factors on teachers’ beliefs and practices.
    Based on the results of this study, major findings are summarized. First, for the teachers in this study, entrance exams were approaching, so the test-oriented trend seemed to be inevitable. However, teachers believed that to familiarize students with English writing structure and to enable them to express in written English could also be possible goals, and they did teach accordingly. Second, the goals, roles teachers played, content, and teaching procedures reflected a mixture of product-oriented and process-oriented approaches. Third, the difficulties originating from curriculum, students, teaching preparation, and composition evaluation might hinder teachers’ practices of their beliefs. Finally, teachers’ background experiences were found to play a part in influencing teachers’ beliefs and practices.
    It is hoped that this study can contribute to more understanding of senior high school English teachers’ beliefs and practices in writing instruction. With the results of this study in mind, the researcher further made suggestions toward senior high school English teachers, teacher education institutes, the Ministry of Education, and writing instruction material designers. This might help refine senior high school English writing instruction.
    Reference: Almarza, G. G. (1996). Student foreign language teachers’ knowledge growth. In D. Freeman & J. C. Richards (Eds.), Teacher learning in language teaching (pp. 50-78). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Blanton, L. L. (1992). Talking students into writing: Using oral fluency to develop literacy. TESOL Journal, 1(4), 23-26.
    Borg, S. (1998). Teachers’ pedagogical systems and grammar teaching: A qualitative study. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 9-38.
    Breen, M. P., Hird, B., Milton, M., Oliver, R., & Thwaite, A. (2001). Making sense of language teaching: Teachers` principles and classroom practices. Applied Linguistics, 22(4), 470-451.
    Brophy, J. E., & Good, T. L. (1974). Teacher-student relationships: Causes and consequences. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed.). White Plains, N.Y.: Longman.
    Bulmer, M. (Ed.). (2004). Questionnaires (Vol. 2). London: SAGE.
    Burns, A. (1996). Starting all over again: From teaching adults to teaching beginners. In D. Freeman & J. C. Richards (Eds.), Teacher learning in language teaching (pp. 154-177). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Byrne, D. (1988). Teaching writing skills. London; New York: Longman.
    Calderhead, J. (1996). Teachers: Beliefs and knowledge. In D. C. Berliner, & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 709-725). New York: Macmillan.
    Chang, H. (2004). A descriptive study of TVE teachers’ and students’ perspectives on English writing instruction. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology.
    Zamel, V. (1992). Writing one’s way into reading. TESOL Quarterly, 26 (3), 463-485.
    Chang, H. R. (2005). A study of junior high school EFL teachers’ beliefs and practices on listening instruction in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Changhua University of Education.
    Chang, Y. C. (2003). A study of senior high school EFL teachers’ beliefs in methodological decision-making. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Changhua University of Education.
    Chang, Y. T. (1998). A study of pedagogical content knowledge for teachers of English in junior high schools. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.
    Chao, T. C. (1998). They all write English: Empowering ESL students’ writing abilities in a whole language classroom. Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on English Teaching, Vol. 1 (pp. 173-183). Taipei: Crane.
    Chen, D. W. (1997). The state of college EFL composition instruction—A survey of college EFL composition instructors’ professional background and views. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China (pp. 355-366). Taipei: Crane.
    Chen, D. W. (1998). Understanding the two sources of EFL writing performances as the means to improve EFL writing instruction. Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on English Teaching, Vol. 1 (pp. 197-207). Taipei: Crane.
    Chen, D. W. (2000). Finding clues, not detecting errors: A different approach to EFL composition. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China (pp. 412-423). Taipei: Crane.
    Chen, D. W. (2001). The identity crisis of EFL composition instruction in Taiwan. Proceedings of the Eighteenth Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China (pp. 41-58). Taipei: Crane.
    Chen, S. L. (2005). A study of junior high school EFL teachers’ beliefs and classroom practices in vocabulary instruction. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Changhua University of Education.
    Chen, Y. M. (1998). Reviews and the future development of Taiwan’s English composition instruction. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China (pp. 331-344). Taipei: Crane.
    Chiou, C. A. (2003). Literature and English teaching: Perceptions and practices of senior high school English teachers in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.
    Chung, M. C. (2003). A study of senior high school EFL teachers’ beliefs in materials compilation, selection, and use. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Changhua University of Education.
    Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers’ thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching, (3rd ed., pp.255-296). New York: Macmillan.
    Cooper, S., & Patton, R. (2001). Writing logically, think critically (3rd ed.). New York: Longman.
    Crandall, J. (2000). Language teacher education. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, 34-55.
    Dey, I. (1993). Qualitative data analysis: A user-friendly guide for social scientists. London: Routledge.
    Dobson, R. L., & Dobson, J. E. (1983). Teacher beliefs-practice congruency. Viewpoints in Teaching and Learning, 59(1), 20-27.
    Duffy, G.., & Anderson, L. (1984). Teachers’ theoretical orientations and the real classroom. Reading Psychology, 5(2), 97-104.
    Fang, Z. (1996). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices. Educational Research, 38(1), 47-65.
    Feng, H. P. (2000). Four major teaching methods on English composition. English Teaching and Learning, 24(3), 44-56.
    Freeman, D. (1996). Renaming experience/Reconstruction practice: Developing new understandings of teaching. In D. Freeman & J. C. Richards (Eds.), Teacher learning in language teaching (pp. 221-241). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Freeman, D., & Johnson, K. E. (1998). Reconceptualizing the knowledge-base of language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 397-417.
    Gatbonton, E. (1999). Investigating experienced ESL teachers’ pedagogical knowledge. The Modern Language Journal, 83, 35-50.
    Golombek, P. R. (1998). A study of language teachers’ personal practical knowledge. TESOL Quarterly, 3, 447-464.
    Goodenough, W. (1963). Cooperation in change. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
    Graden, E. C. (1996). How language teachers’ beliefs about reading instruction are mediated by their beliefs about students. Foreign Language Annals, 29, 387-395.
    Graves, K. (2000). Designing language courses: A guide for teachers. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
    Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.
    Groves, R. M., Fowler, F. J., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. M., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (2004). Survey methodology. Hoboken, NJ: J. Wiley.
    Hall, D., & Birkerts, S. (1994). Writing well. New York: Harper Collins.
    Hansen, J. G., & Liu, J. (2005). Guiding principles for effective peer response. ELT Journal, 59(1), 31-38.
    Harmer, J. (1998). How to teach English: An introduction to the practice of English language teaching. Harlow, Essex, England: Longman.
    Holaday, L. (1997). Writing students need coaches, not judges. In Stephen Tchudi (Ed.), Alternatives to grading student writing (pp. 35-46). Urbana, Il,: NCTE.
    Hsieh, C. M. (2005). A study of junior high school English teachers’ beliefs and practices in grammar instruction. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Changhua University of Education.
    Hsieh, H. J. (2002). Teachers’ beliefs about EFL learning: A study of elementary school English teachers in Taipei County. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taipei Teachers’ College.
    Hsu, J. Y. (2005). A study of senior high school English teachers’ practices and beliefs about writing instruction. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Sun Yat-sen University.
    Huang, I. C. (1996). The relationship of free reading and writing proficiency in second language acquisition. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China (pp. 133-143). Taipei: Crane.
    Huang, L. M., & Tang, J. J. (1997). A case study on using writing conferences and peer-group review in teaching English composition in senior high school. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on English Teaching (PP. 263-292). Taipei: Crane.
    Jackson, P. W. (1968). Life in classrooms. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    Johnson, K. E. (1994). The emerging beliefs and instructional practices of preservice English as a second language teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10(4), 439-452.
    Kagan, D. M. (1990). Ways of evaluating teacher cognition: Inferences concerning the Goldilocks principles. Review of Educational Research, 60(3), 419-469.
    Kagan, D. M. (1992). Implications of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 65-90.
    Kao, S. F. (2002). The pedagogical context and the theoretical bases of EFL writing instruction in a public school in Taiwan. Abstract from: UMI ProQuest Dissertation: Publication Number: AAT 3054484.
    Kaplan, R. B. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in inter-cultural education. Language Learning, 16, 1-20.
    Kroll, B. (2001). Considerations for teaching an ESL/EFL writing course. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language. MA: Heinle & Heinle.
    Kuo, J. H. (2004). A survey of the academic preparedness of Taiwanese high school English teachers for the teaching of writing. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Tsing Hua University.
    Lai, S. J. (2004). High school English teachers’ beliefs on grammar instruction in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.
    Lai, Y. J. (2004). A study of college English writing teachers’ beliefs and practices. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Changhua University of Education.
    Liao, W. W. (2003). Senior high school English teachers’ beliefs towards Communicative Language Teaching and their classroom practice. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.
    Lin, C. T. (1990). A study of educational beliefs of Taiwan`s elementary school teachers. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Chengchi University.
    Lin, Y. C. (2003). Phonics instruction: A survey of elementary school English teachers’ beliefs and practices. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taipei Teachers’ College.
    Liu, J. J. (2004). A study of EFL teachers’ beliefs and strategies used in coping with students’ expectations in four-year technological colleges. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Changhua University of Education.
    Lockhart, C. (1996, Autumn). Teachers’ beliefs about writing in Hong Kong secondary schools. Perspectives, 8, 45-79.
    Lockhart, C., & Ng, P. (1995). Analyzing talk in ESL peer response groups: Stances, functions, and content. Language Learning, 45, 605-655.
    Lu, A. Y. (2003). Teachers’ beliefs and classroom assessments: A case study of two university instructors of English. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.
    Martinez, C. (2000). Constructing meaning: A study of teacher’s educational beliefs and literacy practices in a first grade bilingual classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California.
    Ministry of Education, R.O.C. (2006, June). Temporary curriculum guidelines of the elective course, English composition. Retrieved June 13, 2006, from http://english.tyhs.edu.tw/xoops/html/modules/dms/file_retrieve.php?function=view&obj_id=5
    Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(4), 317-28.
    Nien, Y. H. (2002). Teacher beliefs and their influence on classroom practice: A case study of a senior high school English teacher. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.
    Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. D. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332.
    Patton, M. J. (1991). Qualitative research on college students: Philosophical methodological comparisons with the quantitative approach. Journal of College Student Development, 32(5), 389-396.
    Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications.
    Peterson, R. A. (2000). Constructing effective questionnaires. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
    Raimes, A. (1983). Techniques in teaching writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Raimes, A. (1996). Out of the woods: Emerging traditions in the teaching of writing. In Bruce Leeds (Ed.), Writing in a second language: Insights from first and second language teaching and research (pp. 10-26). White Plains, N.Y.: Longman.
    Raimes, A. (1998). Teaching writing. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 142-167.
    Reid, J. (1987, April). ESL composition: The expectations of the academic audience. TESOL Newsletter, 34.
    Richards, J. C. (2002). 30 years of TEFL/TESL: A personal reflection. The Selected Papers from the Eleventh International Symposium on English Teaching/Fourth Pan-Asian Conference (pp. 141-161). Taipei: Crane.
    Richards, J. C., & Lockhart, C. (1994). Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula, T. J. Butterfly, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 102-119). New York: Macmillan.
    Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, attitudes and values: A theory of organization and change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Ross, J., & Dereshiwsky, M. (1993). An overview of identifying a community college English department’s beliefs about writing instruction: A qualitative study. Paper Presented at the 6th Arizona Educational Research Organization Conference, Tucson, AZ. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED377497)
    Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (1995). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
    Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
    Shi, L., & Cumming A. (1995). Teachers’ conceptions of second language writing instruction: Five case studies. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(2), 87-111.
    Sokolik, M. (2003). Writing. In D. Nunan (Ed.), Practical English language teaching (pp. 87-108). New York, N.Y.: McGraw-Hill.
    Susser, B. (1994). Process approaches in ESL/EFL writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(1), 31-47.
    Tang, R. Y. (1993). A study of the relationship between elementary school teachers’ teaching belief and behavior. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.
    Tseng, C. Y. (1999). A predictive study of teachers’ instructional beliefs, students’ subjective perceptions to students’ adjustment to school: Hierarchical linear model (HLM) approach. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.
    Weissberg, B. (1994). Speaking of writing: Some functions of talk in the ESL composition class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5, 121-139.
    Williams, J. D. (1998). Preparing to teach writing: Research, theory, and practice (2nd ed.). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Williams, M., & Burns, R. (1997). Psychology for language teachers: A social constructive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Winterowd, W. S., & Murray, P. Y. (1985). Discovering the writing process. English: Writing and skills (pp. 1-25). San Diego: Coronado Publishers.
    Woods, D. (1996). Teacher cognition in language teaching: Beliefs, decision-making, and classroom practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Wu, C. F. (2002). The study on high school trainees’ theoretical orientations toward reading instruction and reading instructional practices. Unpublished master’s Thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.
    Yi, C. C. (1998). A strategic process approach towards writing in cooperative learning. Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on English Teaching, Vol. 1 (pp. 941-952). Taipei: Crane.
    You, Y. L. (2001). To write well is to think clearly: Suggestions for teaching EFL writers how to write logically. Proceedings of the Eighteenth Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China (pp. 391-404). Taipei: Crane.
    Zamel, V. (1982). Writing: The process of discovering meaning. TESOL Quarterly, 16(2), 195-209.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    英國語文學系英語教學碩士在職專班
    92951004
    94
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0929510042
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[英國語文學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    51004201.pdf43KbAdobe PDF2923View/Open
    51004202.pdf12KbAdobe PDF2894View/Open
    51004203.pdf14KbAdobe PDF2853View/Open
    51004204.pdf11KbAdobe PDF2890View/Open
    51004205.pdf69KbAdobe PDF2959View/Open
    51004206.pdf13KbAdobe PDF2846View/Open
    51004207.pdf22KbAdobe PDF21203View/Open
    51004208.pdf52KbAdobe PDF21785View/Open
    51004209.pdf35KbAdobe PDF2953View/Open
    51004210.pdf60KbAdobe PDF2991View/Open
    51004211.pdf50KbAdobe PDF21146View/Open
    51004212.pdf34KbAdobe PDF22297View/Open
    51004213.pdf234KbAdobe PDF22063View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback