政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/33465

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/33465

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文笔数/总笔数 : 109948/140897 (78%)
造访人次 : 46094803 在线人数 : 814

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜寻范围

查询小技巧：

您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果

若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据

进阶搜寻

主页 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上传 ‧ 说明 ‧ 关于政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手机版

政大機構典藏 > 文學院 > 哲學系 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/33465

请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33465

题名:	世界與主體：麥克道爾哲學的幾個主題 World and Subject: Themes from McDowell
作者:	鄭會穎 Cheng, Huei-Ying
贡献者:	林從一 Lin, Chung-I 鄭會穎 Cheng, Huei-Ying
关键词:	主體性世界自然麥克道爾 Subjectivity World Nature McDowell
日期:	2007
上传时间:	2009-09-17 16:48:38 (UTC+8)
摘要:	這篇哲學論文是對約翰．麥克道爾(John McDowell)對「主體性」(subjectivity)看法的一個探究。這個計畫由兩部分所組成。一方面，我將討論麥克道爾如何理解並回應他所處理的諸多議題；另一方面，我將藉由考慮主體性的不同面向來進行相關的討論：一個主體是一個存在世界中的知覺者、知識者、思想者、說話者、行動者、具人格者(person)、以及(自我)意識者。我藉由指出並消解一個出自於「理性動物」這個概念的緊張關係來開始這個探究：人類是自然的，卻也同時是理性的。稍後這個探究藉由考慮麥克道爾的「第二自然∕天性」(second nature)概念如何使我們成為具有多重面貌的人類主體來推進。透過細究麥克道爾的診斷與回應，現代與當代哲學中的兩個中心錯誤–狹窄的自然觀以及「笛卡兒式的內在空間」(Cartesian inner space)–將被指出並且拒斥。在導論章裡我首先建議我們應該為某個對「世界」的看法留下空間。我進一步論證「心靈性」(mentality)具有許多面向，而了解這些面向便是去了解人類主體的多重面貌。在第一章裡，我解釋為了消解「理性動物」這個概念所產生的緊張關係，亞里斯多德(Aristotle)的「第二自然∕天性」概念如何被引進。其後我回應一些對這個策略的擔憂，包括萊特(Crispin Wright)及其它哲學家的批評。高達美(Hans-Georg Gadamer)的「世界∕環境」區分也被引介並關聯到麥克道爾的思想。第二章討論知覺與知識；麥克道爾的主要標的–笛卡兒式的內在空間–被引進並批評。我也對史卓(Barry Stroud)與布雷克本(Simon Blackburn)的相關立場進行評價。稍後我把心靈與世界(Mind and World)的主題和現有的脈絡關聯起來；具體來說，我討論麥克道爾對戴維森(Donald Davidson)與康德(Immanuel Kant)的引用與延伸。然後我討論一個常被提及的「觀念論」指控，以及布蘭登(Robert Brandom)的「殘餘笛卡兒主義」(residual Cartesianism)批評。第三章專注於庫律普基(Saul Kripke)的維根斯坦(Ludwig Wittgenstein)，指出在規則依循背後的一個主要論題是內在空間模型的一個版本，而且庫律普基的維根斯坦其實並不是真正的維根斯坦。我回應來自庫許(Martin Kusch)的許多批評；達美特(Michael Dummett)對化約論的要求也被駁斥。其後，我考慮戴維森的「無語言」宣稱，並討論麥克道爾在多大的程度上同意他。第四章我衡量來自德雷弗斯(Hubert Dreyfus)關於行動和行動者的批評。我討論麥克道爾如何論證德雷弗斯與梅洛龐蒂(Maurice Merleau-Ponty)都犯了「無身體的智性主體迷思」(the Myth of the Disembodied Intellect)。討論當中也回應了艾爾斯(Michael Ayers)的智性主義指控。其後我引入麥克道爾對帕菲特(Derek Parfit)人格看法、以及對戴維森對心物關聯說法的批評。在第五章我專注於意識和自我意識。麥克道爾將他對帕菲特的論證應用在康德身上，但基尼斯弗(Maximilian de Gaynesford)認為麥克道爾誤讀了康德。我為麥克道爾回應這些批評。我進一步把這個討論關聯到麥克道爾對「概念架構–內容二元論」(scheme-content dualism)的攻擊。這把我們帶領到麥克道爾式看法對「感質」(qualia)的拒斥，並進一步到錯覺論證脈絡下「意向主義」(intentionalism)和「選言主義」(disjunctivism)的爭論。我批評克瑞(Tim Crane)設想意向主義以及錯覺論證的方式。我也討論了許多版本的選言主義。在結論章裡，我表達了對麥克道爾「自我決定主體性」(self-determining subjectivity)這個概念的疑慮。根據麥克道爾，人類的自由為「理由空間中的因果關係」(causations in the space of reasons)所構成，但如同賈斯金(Richard Gaskin)所指出，對它的一個完整說明尚未被提供。我以一些關於要如何填滿這個麥克道爾式圖像的約略想法來作結。 This essay is an inquiry into John McDowell’s thinking on ‘subjectivity.’ The project consists in two parts. On the one hand, I will discuss how McDowell understands and responds to the various issues he is tackling; on the other, I will approach relevant issues concerning subjectivity by considering different aspects of it: a subject as a perceiver, knower, thinker, speaker, agent, person and (self-) conscious being in the world. The inquiry begins by identifying and resolving a tension generated by the very idea of ‘rational animal’: human beings are at the same time natural and rational. Later the inquiry proceeds by considering how McDowell’s notion of ‘second nature’ enables us to be human subjects with many faces. By going through the diagnoses and responses of McDowell, two central problems in modern and contemporary philosophy – the narrow conception of nature and the Cartesian inner space model – are identified and repelled. In Episode N I first urge that we should leave room for a certain notion of ‘world.’ I further argue that mentality has many aspects, and to understand those aspects is to understand the many faces of human subject. In Episode Ⅰ the Aristotelian notion of ‘second nature’ is discussed in order to resolve the tension in the very idea of ‘rational animal.’ Later I reply to some worries about this maneuver, including the objection from Crispin Wright. Hans-Georg Gadamer’s distinction between world and environment is introduced and related to McDowell’s thinking. Episode Ⅱ discusses perception and knowledge; McDowell’s main target – the Cartesian inner space – is introduced and criticized. Barry Stroud’s and Simon Blackburn’s positions are evaluated. Later I connect the main theme of Mind and World to the present context; in particular, I discuss McDowell’s invocation of Donald Davidson and Immanuel Kant. And then I discuss a common accusation of idealism, and Robert Brandom’s accusation of ‘residual individualism.’ Episode Ⅲ concentrates on Saul Kripke’s Wittgenstein, arguing that the master thesis behind the rule-following paradox is a version of the inner space model, and that Kripke’s Wittgenstein is not Wittgenstein. Martin Kusch’s objections are answered; Michael Dummett’s demand of reductionism is rebutted. After this, I turn to Davidson’s ‘no language’ claim, and discuss to what extent McDowell agrees with him. In Episode Ⅳ I evaluate objections from Hubert Dreyfus concerning action and agency. I discuss how Dreyfus and Maurice Merleau-Ponty commit ‘the Myth of the Disembodied Intellect’ identified by McDowell. I answer Michael Ayer’s charge of intellectualism in passing. Later I bring in McDowell’s objections to Derek Parfit on personhood and to Davidson on the mind-body relation. In Episode Ⅴ I focus on consciousness and self-consciousness. McDowell applies his argument against Parfit to Kant, but Maximilian de Gaynesford dissents. I reply to his objections on McDowell’s behalf. I further connect this to McDowell’s attacks on the dualism of scheme and content. This leads to my McDowellian rejection to the existence of qualia, and further brings me to the debate between intentionalism and disjunctivism in the context of the argument from illusion. I argue against Tim Crane’s ways of conceiving issues about intentionalism and the argument from illusion. Varieties of disjunctivism are also discussed. In my Epilogue, I express my worry about McDowell’s notion of ‘self-determining subjectivity.’ According to McDowell, human freedom consists in causations in the space of reason, but as Richard Gaskin points out, a satisfying story of it is yet to be provided. I close this essay with some rough ideas about how to fill in the details of the McDowellian picture.
參考文獻:	Alweiss, Lilian. (2005) ‘The Myth of the Given,’ in János Boros (ed.), Mind in World, Brambauer Pécs, pp.39-65 Ayers, M. (2004) ‘Sense Experience, Concepts, and Content – Objections to Davidson and McDowell,’ in Ralph Schumacher (ed.), Perception and Reality: From Descartes to the Present, Paderborn, pp.239-62 Bartha, P. and Savitt, S. (1998) ‘Second-Guessing Second Nature,’ Analysis 58, pp.252-63 Bird, G. (1996) ‘McDowell’s Kant: Mind and World,’ Philosophy 71, pp.219-43 Blackburn, S. (1981) ‘Rule-Following and Moral Realism,’ in Steven Holtzman and Christopher Leich (eds.) Wittgenstein: To Follow a Rule, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, pp.163-87 Blackburn, S. (1983) Spreading the Word, Clarendon Press, Oxford Blackburn, S. (1984) ‘The Individual Strikes Back,’ Synthesis 58, pp.281-301 Block, N. (2007a) ‘Mental Paint,’ in his Consciousness, Function, and Representation, MIT Press, pp. 533-70 Block, N. (2007b) ‘Is Experiencing Just Representing?’ in Consciousness, Function, and Representation, pp.603-10 Brandom, R. (1994a) Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment, Harvard University Press Brandom, R. (1994b) ‘Perception and Rational Constraint,’ in Enrique Villanueva (ed.), Perception, Ridgeview Publishing Company, pp. 241-59 Brandom. R. (2002) Tales of the Mighty Dead Historical Essays in the Metaphysics of Intentionality, Harvard University Press Brentano, F. (1973) Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint, Routledge and Kegan Paul Byrne, A. (2001) ‘Intentionalism Defended,’ The Philosophical Review 110, pp.199-240 Byrne, A. and Logue, H. (2008) ‘Either / Or,’ in Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, Knowledge, pp.57-94 Chalmers, D. (2004) ‘The Representational Character of Experience,’ in Brian Leiter (ed.) The Future for Philosophy, Oxford University Press, pp. 153-81 Cheng, H-Y. (2006) ‘An Initial Defense of Semantic Primitivism,’ unpublished Cheng, H-Y. (2007) ‘On Meaning Skeptics’ Cartesian Model,’ presented at Philosophy Graduate Conference of National Cheng-Chi University 10 Cheng, H-Y. (2008a) ‘Evaluating Williamson’s Anti-Skepticism,’ Sorites 21 Cheng, H-Y. (2008b) ‘Scheme-Content Dualism, Experience, and Self,’ presented at Philosophy Graduate Student Forum Cheng, H-Y. (2008c) ‘Self, Action, and Passivity,’ under review Cheng, H-Y. (2008d) ‘The Skeptical Paradox and the Nature of the Self,’ under review Cheng, H-Y. and Lin, C-I (2008) ‘Openness and the Social Initiation into the Space of Reasons,’ presented at Conference on Brandom’s Philosophy,’ March 2008 Chisholm, R. (1942) Perceiving: A Philosophical Study, Cornell University Press Collins, A. (1998) ‘Beastly Experience,’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58, pp. 375-80 Crane, T. (2005) ‘The Problem of Perception,’ Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/perception-problem/ Crane, T. (2006) ‘Is There a Perceptual Relation?’ in Tamar Szabó Gendler and John Hawthorne (eds.) Perceptual Experience, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp.126-46 Crane, T. (forthcoming) ‘Intentionalism,’ in Ansgar Beckermann and Brian McLaughlin (eds.) Oxford Handbook to the Philosophy of Mind (forthcoming), Oxford University Press de Gaynesford, M. (2003) ‘Kant and Strawson on the Firs Person,’ in Hans-Johann Glock (ed.) Strawson and Kant, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp.155-67 de Gaynesford, M. (2004a) John McDowell, Polity Press de Gaynesford, M. (2004b) ‘On Referring to Oneself,’ Theoria 70, pp.121-61 deVries, W. and Triplett, T. (2000) Knowledge, Mind, and the Given: Reading Wilfrid Sellars’s ‘Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind, Hackett Publishing Company, Inc Dancy, J. (2006) ‘Acting in the Light of the Appearances,’ in C. MacDonald and G. MacDonald (eds.), McDowell and His Critics, pp. 121-34 Davidson, D. (1974) ‘On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme,’ in Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 47; reprinted in his Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation (2001), Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp.183-198 Davidson, D. (1983) ‘A Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge,’ in Kant oder Hegel? (1983); reprinted in his Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective (2001), Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp.137-153 Davidson, D. (1984) ‘Communication and Convention,’ Synthesis 59, pp.3-17; reprinted in his Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, pp.265-80 Davidson, D. (1986) ‘A Nice Derangement of Epitaphs,’ in Richard E. Grandy and Richard Warner (eds.) Philosophical Grounds of Rationality, Oxford University Press; reprinted in his Truth, Language, and History (2005), Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp.89-107 Davidson, D. (1988) ‘The Myth of the Subjective,’ in Michael Benedikt and Rudolf Berger (eds.) Bewusstein, Sprache und die Kunst, Edition S. Verlag der Österreichischen Staatsdruckerei; reprinted in his Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective, pp.39-52 Davidson, D. (1991) ‘Three Varieties of Knowledge,’ in A. Phillips Griffiths (ed.) A. J. Ayer Memorial Essays: Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 30, Cambridge University Press; reprinted in his Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective, pp.205-20 Davidson, D. (1992) ‘The Second Person,’ in Peter A. French, Theodore E. Uehling, and Howard K. Wettstein (eds.) Midwest Studies in Philosophy 17: The Wittgenstein Legacy, Indianapolis: University of Notre Dame Press; reprinted in his Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective, pp.107-21 Davidson, D. (1994) ‘The Social Aspect of Language,’ in B. F. McGuinness and Gianluigi Oliveri (eds.) The Philosophy of Michael Dummett, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp.1-16; reprinted in his Truth, Language, and History, pp.109-25 Davidson, D. (1999) ‘Reply to John McDowell,’ in Lewis Edwin Hahn (ed.) The Philosophy of Donald Davidson, Open Court, , pp.105-08 Dennett, D. (1987) The Intentional Stance, MIT Press Dennett, D. (1988) ‘Quining Qualia,’ in A. Marcel and E. Bisiach, (eds.), Consciousness in Modern Science, Oxford University Press; reprinted in David Chalmers (ed.) Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings, Oxford University Press, pp.226-46 Dingli, S. M. (2005) On Thinking and the World: John McDowell’s Mind and World, Ashgate Publishing Dretske, F. (1995) Naturalizing the Mind, MIT Press Dreyfus, H. (2001) ‘Todes’s Account of Nonconceptual Perceptual Knowledge and Its Relation to Thought,’ in Body and World, MIT Press, pp.xv-xxvii Dreyfus, H. (2006) ‘Overcoming the Myth of the Mental: How Philosophers can Profit from the Phenomenology of Everyday Expertise,’ in Topoi 25, pp.43-49; also http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~hdreyfus/pdf/Dreyfus%20APA%20Address%20%2010.22.05%20.pdf Dreyfus, H. (2007a) ‘The Return of the Myth of the Mental,” Inquiry 50, pp.352-65 Dreyfus, H. (2007b) ‘Response to McDowell,’ Inquiry 50, pp.371-77 Ducasse, C. J. (1942) Moore’s Refutation of Idealism, ‘ in Arthur Schilpp (ed.) The Philosophy of G. E. Moore, Northwestern University Press, Chicago, pp.225-51 Dummett, M. (1981) ‘Frege and Wittgenstein,’ in Irving Block (ed.) Perspectives on the Philosophy of Wittgenstein, Blackwell, Oxford Dummett, M. (1989) ‘Language and Communication,’ in Alexander George (ed.) Reflections on Chomsky, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp.192-212 Fodor, J. (1989) Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind, MIT Press Gadamer, H-G. (2004) Truth and Method, Continuum Publishing Group, (rev. trans.) Joel Weinsheimer and Donald Marshall Gaskin, R. (2006) Experience and the World’s Own Language, Oxford University Press, USA Gendler, T. S. and Hawthorne, J. ‘Introduction: Perceptual Experience,’ in Perceptual Experience, pp.1-30. Gibson, J. J. (1979) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, Houghton Mifflin Ginsborg, H. (2006) ‘Reasons for Belief,’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72, pp.286-318 Gupta, A. (2006) Empiricism and Experience, Oxford University Press, USA Haddock, A. and Macpherson, F. (2008) ‘Introduction: Varieties of Disjunctivism,’ their (eds.) Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, and Knowledge, Oxford University Press, pp. 1-24 Hornsby, J. (1980-1) ‘Which Physical Events are Mental Events?’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 81, pp.73-92; reprinted in her Simple Mindedness: in Defense of Naïve Naturalism in the Philosophy of Mind (1997), Harvard University Press, pp.63-97 Husserl, E. (2001) Analyses Concerning Passive and Active Synthesis: Lectures on Transcendental Logic, Springer Jackson, F. (2004) ‘Mind and Illusion,’ in Peter Ludlow, Yujin Nagasawa, and Daniel Stoljar (eds.) There is Something about Mary: Essays on Phenomenal Consciousness and Frank Jackson’s Knowledge Argument, MIT Press, pp.421-42 Johansson, J. (2007) ‘What is Animalism?’ Ratio 20, pp.194-205 Kant, I. Critique of Pure Reason, Paul Guyer and Allen Wood (trans.), Cambridge University Press Kripke, S. (1982) Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language, Harvard University Press Kusch, M. (2006) A Sceptical Guide to Meaning and Rules: Defending Kripke’s Wittgenstein, McGill-Queen’s University Press Leibniz, G. W. (1991) Monadology, Nicholas Rescher (trans.), London, Routledge Leibniz, G. W. (1999) New Essays on Human Understanding, Peter Remnant and Jonathan Bennett (trans.), Cambridge University Press Locke, J. (1999) An Essay concerning Human Understanding, Tom L. Beauchamp (ed.), Oxford University Press, USA McCulloch, G. (2002) ‘Phenomenological Externalism,’ in Nicholas H. Smith (ed.) Reading McDowell: on Mind and World, Routledge, pp.123-39 McDowell, J. (1978) ‘On “The Reality of the Past”,’ in Christopher Hookway and Philip Pettit (eds.), Action and Interpretation: Studies in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp.127-44; reprinted in his Meaning, Knowledge, and Reality (1998), Harvard University Press, pp.295-313 McDowell, J. (1981) ‘Anti-Realism and the Epistemology of Understanding,’ in Herman Parret and Jacques Bouveresse (eds.) Meaning and Understanding, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp.225-48; reprinted in his Meaning, Knowledge, and Reality, pp.314-43 McDowell, J. (1982) ‘Criteria, Defeasibility, and Knowledge,’ Proceedings of British Academy 68, pp.455-79; reprinted in his Meaning, Knowledge, and Reality, pp.369-94 McDowell, J. (1984) ‘Wittgenstein on Following a Rule,’ Synthesis 58; reprinted in his Mind, Value, and Reality (1998), Harvard University Press, pp.221-62 McDowell, J. (1985) ‘Functionalism and Anomalous Monism,’ in Ernest LePore and Brian McLaughlin (eds.) Actions and Events: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson, Blackwell, Oxford, pp.387-98; reprinted in his Mind, Value, and Reality, pp.325-40 McDowell, J. (1986) ‘Singular Thought and the Extent of Inner Space,’ in Philip Pettit and John McDowell (eds.), Subject, Thought, and Context, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 137-68; reprinted in his Meaning, Knowledge, and Reality, pp.228-59 McDowell, J. (1987) ‘In Defense of Modesty,’ in Barry Taylor (ed.) Michael Dummett: Contributions to Philosophy, Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp.59-80; reprinted in his Meaning, Knowledge, and Reality, pp.87-107 McDowell, J. (1989) ‘One Strand in the Private Language Argument,’ Grazer Philosophische Studien 33/34, pp.285-303; reprinted in his Mind, Value, and Reality, pp.279-96 McDowell, J. (1991) ‘Intentionality and Interiority in Wittgenstein,’ Klaus Puhl (ed.) Meaning Scepticism, De Gruyter, Berlin and New York, pp.148-69; reprinted in his Mind, Value, and Reality, pp.297-321 McDowell, J. (1993) ‘Meaning and Intentionality in Wittgenstein’s Later Philosophy,’ Peter A. French, Theodore E. Uehling, Jr., and Howard K. Wettstein (eds.) Midwest Studies in Philosophy, vol. 17: The Wittgenstein Legacy, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, pp.40-52; reprinted in his Mind, Value, and Reality, pp.263-78 McDowell, J. (1994) ‘The Content of Perceptual Experience,’ The Philosophical Quarterly 44, pp.190-205; reprinted in his Mind, Value, and Reality, pp.341-58 McDowell, J. (1995) ‘Knowledge and the Internal,’ in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55, pp.877-93; reprinted in his Meaning, Knowledge, and Reality, pp.395-413 McDowell, J. (1996a) Mind and World, Harvard University Press McDowell, J. (1996b) ‘Two Sorts of Naturalism,’ in Rosalind Hursthouse, Gavin Lawrence, and Warren Quinn (eds.) Virtues and Reasons: Philippa Foot and Moral Theory, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp.149-79; reprinted in his Mind, Value, and Reality, pp.167-97 McDowell, J. (1997) ‘Reductionism and the First Person,’ in Jonathan Dancy (ed.) Reading Parfit, Blackwell, Oxford, pp.230-50; reprinted in his Mind, Value, and Reality, pp.359-82 McDowell, J. (1998a) ‘Response to Crispin Wright,’ in Crispin Wright, Barry C. Smith, and Cynthia Macdonald (eds.) Knowing Our Own Minds, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 47-62 McDowell, J. (1998b) ‘Reply to Commentators,’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58, pp.403-31 McDowell, J. (1998c) ‘The Woodbridge Lecture 1997: Having the World in View: Sellars, Kant, and Intentionality,’ Journal of Philosophy 95, pp.431-91 McDowell, J. (1999) ‘Scheme-Content Dualism and Empiricism,’ in Philosophy of Donald Davidson, pp.87-104 McDowell, J. (2002a) ‘Gadamer and Davidson on Understanding and Relativism,’ in Jeff Malpas, Ulrich Arnswald, and Jens Kertscher (eds.) Gadamer’s Century: Essays in Honor of Hans-Georg Gadamer, MIT Press, pp.173-93 McDowell, J. (2002b) ‘Responses,’ in Reading McDowell: on Mind and World, pp.269-305 McDowell, J. (2002c) ‘Knowledge and the Internal Revisited,’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64, pp.97-105 McDowell, J. (2003a) The Apperceptive I and the Empirical Self: Towards a Heterodox Reading of “Lordship and Bondage” in Hegel’s Phenomenology,’ Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 47/48, pp. 1-16 McDowell, J. (2003b) ‘Hegel and the Myth of the Given,’ in Wolfgang Welsch and Klaus Vieweg (eds.), Das Interesse des Denkens: Hegel aus heutiger Sicht, München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, pp. 75-88 McDowell, J. (2004) Naturalism in the Philosophy of Mind,’ in Mario de Caro and David Macarthur, (eds.) Naturalism in Question, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, pp.91-105 McDowell, J. (2005a) Self-Determining Subjectivity and External Constraint,’ in Karl Ameriks and Jürgen Stolzenberg (eds.) International Yearbook of German Idealism 2005: German Idealism and Contemporary Analytic Philosophy, Walter De Gruyter Inc, pp.21-37 McDowell, J. (2005b) ‘Conceptual Capacities in Perception,’ in Günter Abel (ed.), Kreativität: 2005 Congress of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Philosophie, pp. 1065-79 McDowell, J. (2006a) ‘Response to Rovane,’ in McDowell and His Critics, pp.114-20 McDowell, J. (2006b) ‘Response to Dancy,’ in McDowell and His Critics, pp.134-41 McDowell, J. (2007a) ‘What Myth?’ Inquiry 50, pp.338-51 McDowell, J. (2007b) ‘Response to Dreyfus,’ Inquiry 50, pp.366-70 McDowell, J. (2008) ‘The Disjunctive Conception of Experience as Material for a Transcendental Argument,’ in Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, and Knowledge, pp.376-89 Martin, M. G. F. (2002) ‘The Transparency of Experience,’ Mind and Language 17, pp.376-425 Martin, M. G. F. (2004) ‘The Limits of Self-Awareness,’ Philosophical Studies 120, pp.37-89 Martin. M. G. F. (2006) ‘On Being Alienated,’ in Perceptual Experience, pp.354-410 Miller, A. (2002) ‘Introduction,’ in Alexander Miller and Crispin Wright (eds.) Rule-Following and Meaning, McGill-Queen’s University Press, pp.1-15 Nagel, T. (2007) ‘The Incompleteness of Objective Reality,’ in Brie Gertler and Lawrence Shapiro (eds.), Arguing about the Mind, Routledge, pp.36-49 Noonan, H. (2003) Personal Identity, Routledge, second edition Olson, E. (1999) The Human Animal: Personal Identity without Psychology, Oxford University Press, USA Olson, E. (2007) ‘There is No Problem of the Self,’ in Brie Gertler and Lawrence Shapiro (eds.), Arguing about the Mind, Routledge, pp.262-77 O’Shea, J. (2007) Wilfrid Sellars: Naturalism with a Normative Turn, Polity Press Parfit, D. (1984) Reasons and Persons, Clarendon Press, Oxford Parsons, C. (1980) Non-Existent Objects, Yale University Press Passmore, J. (1961) Philosophical Reasoning, New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons Pietroski, P. (2000) Causing Actions, Oxford University Press Quine, W. V. O. (1960) Word and Object, MIT Press Rorty, R. (1979) Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton University Press, Princeton Rosenberg, J. (2007) Wilfrid Sellars: Fusing the Images, Oxford University Press, USA Rouse, J. (2005) ‘Mind, Body, and World: Todes and McDowell on Bodies and Language,’ Inquiry 48, pp.36-61 Russell, B. (1917) ‘On the Notion of Cause,’ in his Mysticism and Logic, George Allen and Unwin, London, pp.132-51 Searle, J. (1983) Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind, Cambridge University Press Searle, J. (1987) ‘Indeterminacy, Empiricism, and the First Person,’ Journal of Philosophy 84, pp.123-46; reprinted in his Consciousness and Language (2002), Cambridge University Press, pp.226-50 Sellars, W. (1956) ‘Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind,’ in Herbert Feigl and Michael Scriven (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 1, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp.253-329 Sellars, W. (1962) ‘Philosophy and the Scientific Image of Man,’ in Robert Colodny (ed.), Frontiers of Science and Philosophy, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp.35-78 Shoemaker, S. (1970) ‘Persons and Their Past,’ American Philosophical Quarterly 7, pp. 269-85 Smith, A. D. (2002) The Problem of Perception, Harvard University Press Snowdon, P. (1980-1) ‘Perception, Vision, and Causation,’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 81, pp.175-92 Strawson, P. F. (1959) Individuals: an Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics, Methuen, London Strawson, P. F. (1966) The Bounds of Sense, Methuen, London Stroud, B. (1984) The Significance of Philosophical Scepticism, Clarendon Press, Oxford Thornton, T. (2004) John McDowell, McGill-Queen’s University Press Todes, S. (2001) Body and World, MIT Press Travis, C. (2004) ‘The Silence of Senses,’ Mind 113, pp.57-94 Tye, M. (2007) ‘Intentionalism and the Argument from No Common Content,’ in John Hawthorne (ed.) Philosophical Perspectives 21, Northridge: Ridgeview Publishing, pp.589-613 Williamson, T. (2000) Knowledge and Its Limits, Oxford University Press Wilson, G. (1994) ‘Kripke on Wittgenstein on Normativity,’ in Peter A. French and Howard Wettstein (eds.) Midwest Studies in Philosophy 19, pp.366-90; reprinted in Rule-Following and Meaning, pp.234-59 Wittgenstein, L. (1958) The Blue and Brown Books, Basil Blackwell, Oxford Wittgenstein, L. (1969) On Certainty, Basil Blackwell, Oxford Wittgenstein, L. (1978) Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics, Basil Blackwell, Oxford Wittgenstein, L. (2001) Philosophical Investigations, G. E. M. Anscombe (trans.), Blackwell Publishing Wright. C. (1989) ‘Wittgenstein’s Later Philosophy of Mind: Sensation, Privacy, and Intention’, presented at an American Philosophical Association symposium on Wittgenstein on December 30, 1989 Wright, C. (2002) ‘Human Nature?’ in Reading McDowell: on Mind and World, pp.140-59 Wyller, T. (2000) ‘Kant on I, Apperception, and Imagination,’ in Audun Fsti, Peter Ulrich, and Truls Wyller (eds.) Indexicality and Idealism, Mentis Publishing, pp.89-99
描述:	碩士國立政治大學哲學研究所 93154001 96
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093154001
数据类型:	thesis
显示于类别:	[哲學系] 學位論文

文件中的档案:

档案	描述	大小	格式	浏览次数
15400101.pdf		69Kb	Adobe PDF2	1203	检视/开启
15400102.pdf		202Kb	Adobe PDF2	2533	检视/开启
15400103.pdf		115Kb	Adobe PDF2	1693	检视/开启
15400104.pdf		195Kb	Adobe PDF2	1719	检视/开启
15400105.pdf		74Kb	Adobe PDF2	1327	检视/开启
15400106.pdf		116Kb	Adobe PDF2	1502	检视/开启
15400107.pdf		185Kb	Adobe PDF2	1593	检视/开启
15400108.pdf		177Kb	Adobe PDF2	1569	检视/开启
15400109.pdf		221Kb	Adobe PDF2	1454	检视/开启
15400110.pdf		209Kb	Adobe PDF2	1687	检视/开启
15400111.pdf		88Kb	Adobe PDF2	1728	检视/开启
15400112.pdf		120Kb	Adobe PDF2	1849	检视/开启

在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回馈