Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||The Granger Causality between Economic Growth and Income Inequality in Post-Reform China|
|Issue Date: ||2009-09-17 18:01:11 (UTC+8)|
根據之前的文獻，經濟成長和不平等之間可能相互影響，但影響方向卻不確定。本論文研究方法採用Granger因果檢定，估計成長與分配的因果關係以及影響方向。本研究採用Toda and Yamamoto (1995)所提出的向量自迴歸程序，對Granger因果模型進行卡方檢定的統計推論。Toda和Yamamoto證明，研究者能夠估計一個k+dmax階的向量自迴歸模型，其中dmax是時間數列變數最大整合階數，k為落差期數。然而，進行統計推論時，研究者只需利用卡方統計量檢驗前k階的迴歸係數是否顯著，而不需檢驗最後的dmax階迴歸係數。利用此研究方法，本論文發現以下結果：一、經濟成長會正面且顯著地影響不平等；二、不平等不會影響到經濟成長；三、實證結果是穩健的，其不因使用不同的所得不平等指數或落差期數而有所變化。
Ever since economic reform has been carried out in China, its economic growth rate has been remarkable. Its annual growth rate of per capita GDP was about 8.07% for the period 1978-2002, but its income inequality level presented a different moving trend during this time. In the 1980s, it seemed that economic reform decreased this inequality successfully, but the situation of income distribution started to deteriorate beginning in 1990. The purpose of this study is to research if the relationship between economic growth and inequality exists in post-reform China.
According to previous literature, economic growth and inequality can influence each other, but their influential directions are uncertain. This study adopts the Granger-causality test as a methodology to estimate their relationship and influential directions. This study tests Granger-Causality with the chi-square statistic, which was proposed by Toda and Yamamoto (1995). They wrote that researchers could estimate a (k+dmax)th-order VAR where dmax is the maximal order of integration. Only the first k coefficients have to be jointly tested with the chi-square statistic, and the last dmax coefficients are ignored. This study finds the following results: (i) growth positively influences inequality; (ii) inequality does not influence growth; and (iii) the results are sturdy no matter what inequality index or what lag lengths are used in the empirical test.
The result (i) can be attributed to the biased central government policy. Differencing from previous studies, which focused on democratic or undemocratic economies, this study researches a transitional economy. It could be the reason why this study finds no evidence of the effect of inequality on growth.
The policy implications of this study are that China’s government has to give up biased policies and increase the incentives of investing in inland regions. Besides, in order to promote sustainable economic growth, some policies like fiscal transfers, which can reduce inequality quickly, are not recommended.
|Reference: ||Ahluwalia, M. (1976), “Inequality, Poverty and Development.” Journal of Development Economics, 3, 307-342.|
Alesina, A. and R. Perotti (1994), “The Political Economy of Growth: A Critical Survey of the Recent Literature.” World Bank Economic Review, 8(3), 351-371.
Alesina, A. and R. Perotti (1996), “Income Distribution, Political Instability, and Investment.” European Economic Review, 40(6), 1203-1228.
Barro, R. (1999), “Inequality, Growth, and Investment.” NBER Working Paper, No.7038.
Broadman, Harry G. and Xiaolun Sun (1997), “The Distribution of Foreign Direct Investment in China.” World Economy, 20(3), 339-361.
Cai, Fang, Dewen Wang and Yang Du (2002), “Regional Disparity and Economic Growth in China: The Impact of Labor Market Distributions.” China Economic Review, 13, 197-212.
Chang, Gene H. (2002), “The Cause and Cure of China’s Widening Income Disparity.” China Economic Review, 13, 335-340.
Chen, J. and B. Fleisher (1996), “Regional Income Inequality and Economic Growth in China.” Journal of Comparative Economics, 22, 141-164.
Clarke, G. (1995), “More Evidence on Income Distribution and Growth.” Journal of Development Economics, 47(2), 403-427.
Deininger, Klaus and Lyn Squire (1998), “New Ways of Looking at Old Issues: Inequality and Growth.” Journal of Development Economics, 57, 259-287.
Dickey, David and Wayne Fuller (1979), “Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 427-31.
Dickey, David and Wayne Fuller (1981), “Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root.” Econometrica, 49, 1057-1072.
Enders, Walter (2004), Applied Econometric Time Series, 2nd Edition, Massachusetts: John Wiley & Sons.
Forbes, K. (2000), “A Reassessment of the Relationship between Inequality and Growth.” American Economic Review, 90(4), 869-887.
Friedman, Benjamin and Kenneth Kuttner (1992), “Money, Income, Prices, and Interest Rates.” American Economic Review, 82, 472-492.
Galor, O. and J. Zeira (1993), “Income Distribution and Macroeconomics.” Review of Economic Studies, 60(1), 35-52.
Granger, Clive (1969), “Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods.” Econometrica, 37, 424-438.
Gujarati, D. (1995), Basic Econometrics, 3rd Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Herrmann-Pillath, Carsten, Daniel Kirchert and Jiancheng Pan (2002), “Disparities in Chinese Economic Development: Approaches on Different Levels of Aggregation.” Economic Systems, 26, 31-54.
Huang, J-T, A-P Kao and C-C Kuo (2003), “The Inequality of Regional Economic Development in China between 1991 and 2001.” Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 1(3), 273-285.
Huang, J-T and A-P Kao (2003), “Labor Force Participation and Juvenile Delinquency in Taiwan－A Time Series Analysis,” WEA International's Pacific Rim Conference, the Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica, January 9-12, 2003.
Janvry, A. and E. Sadoulet (2000), “Growth, Poverty, and Inequality in Latin America: A Causal Analysis, 1970-94.” Review of Income and Wealth, 46(3), 267-287.
Johansen, Soren (1988), “Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12, 231-254.
Johansen, Soren and Katerina Juselius (1990), “Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration with Application to the Demand for Money.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52, 169-209.
Jones, Derek C., Cheng Li and Ann L. Owen (2003), “Growth and Regional Inequality in China during the Reform Era.” China Economic Review, 14, 186-200.
Kakwani, N. and H. Son (2002), “Pro-Poor Growth and Poverty Reduction: The Asian Experience.” Background Paper in the State of Progress towards the Achievements of the Millennium Development Goals in Asia and the Pacific Region, Bangkok: The Poverty Center, Office of the Executive Secretary, ESCAP.
Kaldor, N. (1956), “Alternative Theories of Distribution.” Review of Economic Studies, 23(1), 83-100.
Kanbur, R. and X. Zhang (1999), “Which Regional Inequality? The Evolution of Rural-Urban and Inland-Coastal Inequality in China from 1983 to 1995.” Journal of Comparative Economics, 27, 686-701.
Keidel, Albert (2001), “China’s GDP Expenditure Accounts.” China Economic Review, 12, 355-367.
Krongkaew, Medhi and Nanak Kakwani (2003), “The Growth –Equity Trade-off in Modern Economic Development: The Case of Thailand.” Journal of Asian Economics, 14, 735-757.
Kuznets, S. (1955), “Economic Growth and Income Inequality.” American Economic Review, 45(1), 1-28.
Lee, J. (2000), “Changes in the Source of China’s Regional Inequality.” China Economic Review, 11, 232-245.
Lewis, W. (1954), “Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labor.” Manchester School of Economic and Society Studies, 22, 139-191.
Li, Hongyi and Heng-Fu Zou (1998), “Income Inequality is not Harmful for Growth: Theory and Evidence.” Review of Development Economics, 2(3), 318-334.
Li, S. (1997), “The Search for Determinants of Catching Up: Theory, the East Asian Experience and the Chinese Case.” China Economic Review, 8(2), 137-155.
Lundberg, Mattias and Lyn Squire (2003), “The Simultaneous Evolution of Growth and Inequality.” Economic Journal, 113, 326-344.
Maddison, Angus (1998), Chinese Economic Performance in the Long Run, Paris: OECD.
Mookherjee, D. and A. Shorrocks (1982), “A Decomposition Analysis of the Trend in UK Income Inequality.” Economic Journal, 92, 886-902.
Mosconi, R. and C. Giannini (1992), “No-Causality in Cointegrated Systems: Representation, Estimation and Testing.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 54, 399-417.
Papanek, G. and O. Kyn (1986), “The Effect on Income Distribution of Development, the Growth Rate and Economic Strategy.” Journal of Development Economics, 23, 55-65.
Persson, T. and G. Tabellini (1994), “Is Inequality Harmful for Growth?” American Economic Review, 84(3), 600-621.
Pindyck, R. and D. Rubinfeld (1991), Econometric Models and Econometric Forecasts, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Psacharopoulos, George, Samuel Morley, Ariel Fiszbein, Haeduck Lee and William C. Wood (1995), “Poverty and Income Inequality in Latin America during the 1980s.” Reviews of Income and Wealth, 41(3), 245-264.
Raiser, M. (1997), “Subsidizing Inequality: Economic Reforms, Fiscal Transfers and Convergence across Chinese Provinces.” Working Paper in European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
Rambaldi, A. and H. Doran (1996), “Testing for Granger Non-Causality in Cointegrated System Made Easy.” Working Paper in Econometrics and Applied Statistics, Department of Econometrics, University of New England.
Ravallion, Martin (1998), “Does Aggregation Hide the Harmful Effects of Inequality on Growth?” Economics Letters, 61, 73-77.
Ravallion, Martin and Shaohua Chen (1997), “What can New Survey Data Tell Us about Recent Changing in Distribution and Poverty?” World Bank Economic Review, 11(2), 357-82.
Ravallion, Martin and Shaohua Chen (1999), “When Economic Reform is Faster than Statistical Reform: Measuring and Explaining Income Inequality in Rural China.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(1), 33-56.
Rawski, Thomas G. (2001), “What is Happening to China’s Statistics?” China Economic Review, 12(4), 347-354.
Scully, G. (2002), “Economic Freedom, Government Policy and the Trade-off between Equity and Economic Growth.” Public Choice, 113, 77-96.
Shan, Jordan and Fiona Sun (1998a), “Domestic Saving and Foreign Investment in Australia: A Granger Causality Test.” International Economic Journal, 12(4), 79-87.
Shan, Jordan and Fiona Sun (1998b), “On the Export-Led Growth Hypothesis for the Little Dragons: An Empirical Reinvestigation.” Atlantic Economic Journal, 26(4), 353-71.
Shan, Jordan and Ken Wilson (2001), “Causality between Trade and Tourism: Empirical Evidence from China.” Applied Economics Letters, 8(4), 279-83.
Shorrocks, A. (1980), “The Class of Additively Decomposable Inequality Measures.” Econometrica, 48(3), 613-626.
State Statistical Bureau (Various Year), China Statistical Yearbook, Beijing: Chinese Statistical Press.
State Statistical Bureau (1998), Comprehensive Statistical Data and materials on 50 Years of New China, Beijing: Chinese Statistical Press.
State Statistical Bureau (Various Year), Hainan Statistical Yearbook, Beijing: Chinese Statistical Press.
State Statistical Bureau (Various Year), Tibet Statistical Yearbook, Beijing: Chinese Statistical Press.
Stock, James and Mark Watson (1988), “Testing for Common Trends.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 1097-1107.
Toda, H. and P. Phillips (1993), “Vector Autoregressions and Causality.” Econometrica, 61(6), 1367-1393.
Toda, H. and T. Yamamoto (1995), “Statistical Inference in Vector Autoregressions with Possibly Integreated Processes.” Journal of Econometrics, 66, 225-250.
Tsui, K-Y (1991), “China’s Regional Inequality, 1952-1985.” Journal of Comparative Economics, 15, 1-12.
Tsui, K-Y (1996), “Economic Reform and Interprovincial Inequalities in China.” Journal of Development Economics, 50, 353-368.
Venieris, Y. and D. Gupta (1986), “Income Distribution and Sociopolitical Instability as Determinants of Savings: A Cross-Sectional Model.” Journal of Political Economy, 94(4), 873-883.
Wang, Shaoguang and Angang Hu (1999), The Political Economy of Uneven Development: The Case of China, New York: M. E. Sharpe.
Wang, Xiaolu and Lian Meng (2001), “A reevaluation of China’s Economic Growth.” China Economic Review, 12, 338-346.
Xu, Z. (1996), “On the Causality between Export Growth and GDP Growth: An Empirical Reinvestigation.” Review of International Economics, 4, 172-184.
Yang, Dennis Tao (1998), “Urban-Biased Policies and Rising Income Inequality in China.” American Economic Review, 89(2), 306-310.
Zhang, Jie and Gustav Kristensen (2001), “The Paradox of Unequal Regional Investment and Equal Regional Economic Growth in China.” Annals of Regional Science, 35, 637-653.
|Source URI: ||http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0091260004|
|Data Type: ||thesis|
|Appears in Collections:||[東亞研究所 ] 學位論文|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.