English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 112721/143689 (78%)
Visitors : 49510102      Online Users : 973
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 財務管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/34081
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34081


    Title: 勞退保證投資收益率制度及制度轉換選擇權之研究
    The Selection of Rate of Return Guarantee and the Choice between Defined Contribution and Defined Benefit for Labor Pension Plan in Taiwan
    Authors: 李翎竹
    Lee, Ling-Chu
    Contributors: 李志宏
    Lee, Jie-Haun
    李翎竹
    Lee, Ling-Chu
    Keywords: 保證投資收益率制度
    制度選擇
    個人偏好
    選擇權評價
    制度轉換選擇權
    蒙地卡羅模擬
    退休基金
    資產配置
    Investment return guarantee
    Institutional design
    Personal preference
    Option pricing
    Switching option
    Monte-Carlo Simulation
    Pension fund
    Asset allocation
    Date: 2006
    Issue Date: 2009-09-17 19:24:21 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 我國勞工退休金新制自2005年7月1日開始實施,由過去的確定給付制改為具有確定提撥特色的「個人帳戶制」。對於勞工而言,確定提撥制和過去確定給付制不同之處在於承擔退休金投資風險的責任將由雇主轉由個人承擔。如何透過退休機制的設計以降低退休金的投資風險是近年來的重要議題,因此本文主要從個人偏好與風險的觀點探討保證投資收益率制度與制度轉換選擇權等兩個降低確定提撥制投資風險的重要配套措施。
    在本論文的第一篇研究中發現,資產配置與國際投資對保證成本的影響頗大,在個人可選擇資產配置的情況下,高投資風險的資產選擇將造成政府未來龐大的或有負債。為了解決政府保證成本過高造成代內與代間的財富移轉,本文從使用者付費與個人效用的觀點探討保證投資收益率制度的設計,發現藉由設立保證投資收益上限可提升風險趨避者、損失趨避者與後悔趨避者等偏好下的預期效用,且能降低個人管理下方風險所需的提撥成本與退休計畫參加者所需繳交的保證費用,故建議政府可將投資收益率上限納入保證投資收益率制度,供退休計畫參加者選擇合於本身偏好的保證收益率上限。
    在近來許多國家的公、民營退休體系由過去以確定給付制改為確定提撥制,為了降低在確定提撥制下的退休金投資風險,在美國的佛羅里達州之公務人員退休體系中,存在著可供個人選擇是否轉換到確定給付制的機制。在我國勞退新制中除了從過去的確定給付制改為確定提撥制外,亦輔以「年金保險制」供勞工選擇與轉換,若年金保險制具有確定給付制的特徵,則勞工等於是擁有一個從確定提撥轉換轉到確定給付制的選擇權,因此制度選擇權的探討對我國而言亦是相當地重要。在本論文的第二篇研究中發現,當風險趨避程度越高則轉換至確定給付制的機率越高,轉換到確定給付制的高峰期會出現在開始工作的初期與屆臨退休之際等兩段期間。隨著工作期間的延長,個人轉換到確定給付制的機率越低,但仍可有效地提升退休金的所得替代率與達到降低退休金下方風險的效果,在加入退休制度初期不得轉換的限制之後,會降低轉換到確定給付制的機率。
    The Labor Retirement Pension Act enacted in 2005 introduced defined contribution (DC) pension plan for substituting the traditional defined benefit (DB) pension plan. In the defined contribution pension plan, the investment risk is transferred to the participants. However, the design of rate of return guarantee makes the investment risk less severe for participants. In the first essay, we find that the asset allocation and foreign investment have large impact on the guarantee cost: the high risky investment may result in large potential liability of the government in the future if participants have the investment portfolio choice. This study develops a framework to analyze design of rate of return guarantee from the financial engineering and user paid principle view. We find that the cap of investment return guarantee not only increases the expected utility of risk aversion, loss aversion and regret aversion, but also decreases the contribution cost to participant associated with managing the downside risk.
    Around the world, the defined contribution (DC) plans have been the primary trend of pension reform in the both public and private sector. In an attempt to decrease the investment risk associated with DC plan, the public employees are provided with an option to buy back DB plan in the Florida State of U.S.A. In the second essay, we find that the higher level of risk aversion is, the higher probability to buy back DB plan is. During the employee’s early years of service and as the employees near retirement, the probability to exercise the option is the highest. The probability to exercise the option is decreasing with the years of service being increasing; the option also increase the pension replacement rate as well as decrease the downside risk of pension. The probability to exercise the option is lower, when the option to buy back the DB plan is prohibited during the employee’s early years of service.
    Reference: 符寶玲,1999,「退休金制度與管理」,華泰書局,台灣。
    黃介良、李翎竹、陳秋蓉,2003,「投資收益保證制度之探討—以退撫基金為例」,證券市場發展季刊,第十五卷,第四期,37-68。
    Albrecht, Peter, Joachim Coche, Raimond Maurer and Ralph Rogalla, 2006, “Understanding and AllocatingImplications of Optimal Investment Risks in Policies for Hybrid Pension Plans: Sponsor and Member Perspectives,” Pension Research Council Working Paper, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.
    Allen, Everett T., Joseph J. Melone, Jerry S. Rosenbloom and Jack L. Vanderhei, 1997, “Pension Planning: Pension, Profit-sharing, and Other Deferred Compensation Plans,” New York: The Mcgraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
    Barber, B.M. and T. Odean, 1999, “The Courge of Misguided Convictions,” Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 56, No. 6, 41-55.
    Barberis, Nicholas and Huang, Ming, 2001, “Mental Accounting, Loss Aversion, and Individual Stock Returns,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 56, Iss. 4, 1247-1292.
    Bell, David, 1982, “Regret in Decision Making under Uncertainty,” Operations Research, Vol. 30, Iss. 5, 961-981.
    Bell, David, 1983, “Risk Premium for Decision Regret”, Management Science, Vol. 29, Iss.10, 1156-1166.
    Berkelaar, A., R. Kouwenberg, and T. Post, 2004, “Optimal Portfolio Choice under Loss Aversion,” Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 86, Iss. 4, 973-987.
    Braun, M. and A. Muermann, 2004, “The Impact of Regret on the Demand for Insurance,” Journal of Risk and Insurance, Vol.71, No.4, 737-767.
    Dodonova, Anna, 2003, “Applications of Regret Theory to Asset Pricing,” Working paper, University of Iowa.
    Feldstein, Martin, 2005, “Reducing the Risk of Investment-Based Social Security Reform,” NBER working paper series, No. 11084.
    Feldstein, Martin and Elena Ranguelova, 2000, “Accumulated Pension Collars: A Market Approach to Reduce the Investment-Based Social Security Reform,” NBER working paper series, No.7861.
    Feldstein, Martin and Elena Ranguelova, 2001, “Individual Risk in An Investment-Based Social Security System”, American Economic Review, Vol. 91, No. 4, 1116-1125.
    Forsyth, Peter A., Kenneth R. Vetzal, and Heath A. Wildcliff, 2003, “Hedging Segregated Fund Guarantees,” In Olivia S. Mitchell and Kent Smetters, eds., The Pension Challenge: Risk Transfers and Retirement Income Security. Oxford University Press. 214-237.
    Gneezy, U. and Potters, J., 1997, “An Experiment on Risk Taking and Evaluation Periods.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 112, No.2, 631-645.
    Gomes, Francisco J., 2005, “Portfolio Choice and Trading Volume with Loss-Averse Investors,” Journal of Business, Vol. 78, No. 2, 675-706.
    Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky, 1979, “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk,” Econometrica, Vol. 47, No. 2, 263-291.
    Larrick, R. P. & Boles, T. L., 1995, “Avoiding Regret in Decisions with Feedback: A Negotiation Example,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 63, Iss. 1, 87-97.
    Lanchance, Marie-Eve and Olivia S. Mitchell, 2003, “Guarantee Individual Accounts,” American Economic Review, May, 257-260.
    Loomes, G., R. Sugden, 1982, “Regret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice under Uncertainty,” Economic Journal, Vol. 92, No. 368, 805-824.
    Mankiw, N. Gregory, and Stephen P. Zeldes, 1991, “The Consumption of Stockholders and Non-stockholders,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 29, Iss. 1, 97-112.
    Maurer, Raimond and Christian Schlag. 2002. “Money-Back Guarantees in Individual Account Pensions: Evidence from the German Pension Reform.” Centre for Financial Studies Working Paper No. 2002/03, JohanWolfgang Goethe-Universit¨at, Frankfurt am Main.
    Meyer, D.J., and Meyer J. 1999, “Risk References in the Asset Pricing Model,” Working Paper, Michigan State University.
    Mitchell, Olivia S., Gary R. Mottola, Stephen P. Utkus, and Takeshi Yamaguchi, 2006, “The Inattentive Participant: Portfolio Trading Behavior in 401(k) Plans,” American Risk and Insurance Association Meetings, Washington, DC.
    Muermann, Alexander, Olivia S. Mitchell, and Jacqueline M. Volkman, 2005, “Regret, Portfolio Choice, and Guarantees in Defined Contribution Schemes,” Pension Research Council Working Paper WP-2005-17, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.
    Nataraj, Sita and John B. Shoven, 2003, “Comparing the Risks of Social Security with and without Individual Accounts,” American Economic Review, Vol. 93, No. 2, 348-353.
    Odean, Terrance, 1998, “Are Investors Reluctant to Realize Their Losses?” Journal of Finance, Vol. 53, Iss.5, 1775–1798.
    Pennacchi, G., 1999, “The Value of Guarantees on Pension Fund Returns,” Journal of Risk and Insurance, Vol. 66, No. 2, 219-237.
    Poterba, J.M., 2004, “Portfolio Risk and Self-directed Retirement Saving Programmes,” The Economic Journal, Vol. 114, Iss. 494, C26–C51.
    Shefrin, Hersh and Meir Statman, 1985, “The Disposition to Sell Winners Too Early and Ride Losers Too Long: Theory and Evidence”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 40, No. 3, 777-790.
    Smetters, Kent, 2002, “Controlling the Cost of Minimum Benefit Guarantees in Public Pension Conversions,” The Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, Vol. 1, No.1, 9-34.
    Snorre, L., 2004, “Relative Guarantees,” The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory, Vol. 29, Iss. 2, 187-209.
    Tversky, Amos and Daniel Kahneman, 1992, “Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Vol. 5, No. 4, 297-323.
    王儷玲、楊曉文、黃泓智、李永琮,2006,「勞退新制下個人帳戶制與年金保險制轉換選擇權價之研究」,財務金融學刊,即將刊登。
    林苡辰,2004,「勞工退休金條例草案之轉換選擇權的評價與分析」,國立中央財務管理研究所碩士論文。
    陳芬苓、張森林,2006,「附加年金制的遠期契約價值與政策意涵分析」,證券市場發展季刊,第十八卷,第一期,1-30。
    林忠機、張傳章、陳依仁,2005,「天然資源專案投資計畫之評價-動態選擇權模擬法」,證券市場發展季刊,第十七卷,第四期,87-120。
    Agnew, Julie, Pierluigi Balduzzi, and Annika Sunden, 2003, “Portfolio Choice and Trading in Large 401(k) Plan,” American Economic Review, Vol.93, No. 1, 193-215.
    Feldstein, Martin, 2005, “Reducing the Risk of Investment-Based Social Security Reform,” NBER working paper series, No. 11084.
    Feldstein, Martin and Elena Ranguelova, 2001, “Individual Risk in an Investment-Based Social Security System”, American Economic Review, Vol. 91, No. 4, 1116-1125.
    Karlsson, Anders and Lars L. Norden, 2004, “Home Sweet Home: Home Bias and International Diversification among Individual Investors,”EFA 2004 Maastricht Meetings Paper No. 3363.
    Lanchance, Marie-Eve and Olivia S. Mitchell, 2003, “Guarantee Individual Accounts,” American Economic Review, Vol. 93, No. 2, 257-260.
    Lanchance, Marie-Eve, Olivia S. Mitchell and Kent Smetters, 2003, “Guaranteeing Defined Contribution Pensions: The Option to Buy Back A Defined Benefit Promise,” The Journal of Risk and Insurance, Vol. 70, No. 1, 1-16.
    Longstaff, F. A., and E. S. Schwartz, 2001, “Valuing American Options by Simulation: A Simple Least-Squares Approach," The Review of Financial Studies, 14, 1, 113-147.
    Milevsky, Moshe A. and S. David Promislow, 2004, “Florida`s Pension Election: From DB to DC and Back,” The Journal of Risk and Insurance, Vol. 71, No. 3, 381-404.
    Nataraj, Sita and John B. Shoven, 2003, “Comparing the Risks of Social Security with and without Individual Accounts,” American Economic Review, Vol. 93, No. 2, 348-353.
    Pulley, Lawrence B. , 1981, “A General Mean-Variance Approximation to Expected Utility for Short Holding Periods,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 16, No. 3, 361-373.
    Description: 博士
    國立政治大學
    財務管理研究所
    90357504
    95
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0903575041
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[財務管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    57504101.pdf45KbAdobe PDF2777View/Open
    57504102.pdf77KbAdobe PDF2810View/Open
    57504103.pdf68KbAdobe PDF2766View/Open
    57504104.pdf74KbAdobe PDF21123View/Open
    57504105.pdf127KbAdobe PDF21095View/Open
    57504106.pdf321KbAdobe PDF21344View/Open
    57504107.pdf336KbAdobe PDF21567View/Open
    57504108.pdf83KbAdobe PDF2958View/Open
    57504109.pdf72KbAdobe PDF21372View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback