English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110119/141062 (78%)
Visitors : 46483510      Online Users : 1222
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/34252
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34252


    Title: 稅務行政訴訟形式與實體問題認知之差異—比較法官、律師及會計師
    The difference between the cognition of formality and substance in the tax litigation—Comparison among judges, lawyers& CPAs
    Authors: 傅馨儀
    Fu,Shin Yi
    Contributors: 陳明進
    Chen, Ming Chin
    傅馨儀
    Fu,Shin Yi
    Keywords: 稅務訴訟
    稅務訴訟代理人
    舉證責任
    稅務訴訟制度
    The tax litigation
    Attorney at tax litigation
    Onus probandi
    The tax litigation system
    Date: 2007
    Issue Date: 2009-09-18 09:08:20 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 我國稅務訴訟案件繫屬於行政法院,並佔行政法院約四成左右。因此若能達成稅務訴訟案件訴訟經濟之效果,對行政法院或訴訟代理人而言均相當重要。惟欲使法官清楚訴訟代理人對稅務案件的陳述重點需要某程度的訴訟技巧,才能配合法院達成訴訟經濟,並且達到會計事務所替當事人妥適處理個案的目標。本論文藉由重要議題之問卷訪問,尋求訴訟代理人律師及會計師與法官間順利溝通的平臺。本論文以法院行政救濟實務為主要討論架構,篩選數個重要議題,例如稅務訴訟案件個案須認定與查證何事項(包含會影響法官形成心證之因素、稅務訴訟案件之舉證責任及稅務訴訟案件法律適用與法律解釋方式等),並針對個案內容訴狀之撰寫方式,依照法院審究重點方向,以理則學的邏輯論述方式,討論稅務訴訟案件之形式與實體應著重之內涵,目的在提供實務界行政訴訟之訴訟代理人參考,以利進行稅務訴訟案件。
    本文文末另對稅務行政訴訟制度提出改革建議,諸如:增設訴訟輔導科以便利人民行使訴訟權;並為達成訴訟經濟,法官與稅務訴訟代理人均加強稅法會計知識之專業訓練課程;建議設置專業稅務訴訟法院與研議專家參審制等,作為改進稅務行政訴訟制度之參考。
    Tax litigation is in the administrative court in Taiwan, and occupies the administrative court approximately about 40%. If we can achieve effect of the tax affairs lawsuit economy, it is quite important to the administrative court or the legal representative (including lawyer and certified public accountant). We wants to achieve the lawsuit economy, and achieves the goal of the Public accounting firms for the litigant case, must let judges clear legal representative statements’ key point of the tax cases, those need lawsuit skill.
    This essay aim to those important topic to design questionnaire, By judges、attorney at law and accountant fill in the questionnaire, seeks between legal representative (attorney at law and accountant) and judge the communication platform. The thesis select several important topics, discuss composition in view of the case content, as well as the court investigates the key direction and how to using the logical elaboration way to describe dispute issues. In order to help judge and legal representative carries on the tax litigation cases.
    Finally this paper puts forward the reform proposal of tax administrative lawsuit legal system, such as: establishment Tax administrative lawsuit counseling branch, specialist training curriculum of Tax and accounting, the suggestion establishment specialized lawsuit court, the expert participates in the trial……etc.
    Reference: (專書)
    王昭正、朱瑞淵,1999,調查研究方法,初版,臺北,弘智文化。
    王建煊,2006,租稅法,第三十版,臺北:華泰出版。
    李平雄,1981,租稅爭訟與擧證責任,初版,台北:自版
    吳 庚,2001,行政法之理論與實用,第七版,臺北:作者自版。
    吳 庚,1999,行政爭訟法論,修訂版,臺北:作者自版。
    吳金柱,2007,租稅法要論,初版,臺北:五南出版。
    吳東都,2001,行政訴訟之舉證責任:以德國法為中心,初版,臺北:學林文化出版。
    翁岳生主編,2000,行政法(上)(下),第二版,臺北:翰廬出版。
    張進德,2006,租稅法與實例解說,第五版,臺北:元照出版。
    黃士洲,2005,掌握稅務官司的關鍵,初版,臺北:元照。
    黃士洲,2004,稅務訴訟的舉證責任,初版,中國北京,北京大學出版社。
    黃茂榮,2002,稅法總論(第一冊),初版,臺北:植根法學叢書。
    黃茂榮,1991,稅捐法論衡,初版,臺北:植根出版。
    黃俊杰,2004,納稅者權利保護,初版,臺北:翰廬出版。
    黃俊杰,2004,納稅人權利之保護,初版,中國北京,北京大學出版社。
    陳 敏,2003,行政法總論,三版,臺北:作者自版。
    陳計男,2000,行政訴訟法釋論,初版,臺北:作者自版。
    陳清秀,1999,行政訴訟法,初版,臺北:翰廬出版。
    陳清秀,2001,稅法總論,第二版,臺北:植根法學叢書。
    陳清秀,1993,稅法基本問題,初版,臺北:作者自版。
    陳清秀,1991,稅務訴訟之理論與實務,初版,臺北:作者自版。
    蔡志方,2001,行政救濟法新論,初版,臺北:元照出版。
    羅美棋,2001,如何辦理稅務行政救濟,初版,臺北,永然文化出版公司。
    葛克昌、陳清秀,2001,稅務代理與納稅人權利,初版,臺北,翰蘆圖書公司。
    葛克昌,1996,稅法基本問題,初版,臺北:月旦出版。
    葛克昌,1999,所得稅與憲法,初版,臺北:翰廬出版。
    盧欽滄,2001,稅務調查與間接證明法,初版,台北:文笙書局
    (期刊)
    洪家殷,2007,漏稅處罰訴訟案件舉證責任之研究,月旦財經法雜誌:19至30
    黃俊杰,2001,解釋函令作為課稅依據,月旦法學雜誌,第七十二期:50-62。
    鄭俊仁,2001,解釋函令作為課稅依據,月旦法學雜誌,第七十二期(5月):50-61。
    鄭俊仁,2001,行政程序法與稅法之相關規定,月旦法學雜誌,第七十二期(5月):62-71。
    簡素美,1991,我國現行租稅行政救濟制度之研究與展望,財稅研究,第23卷第2期(2月):179-197。
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    95353010
    96
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095353010
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    301001.pdf61KbAdobe PDF2702View/Open
    301002.pdf106KbAdobe PDF21041View/Open
    301003.pdf103KbAdobe PDF2801View/Open
    301004.pdf77KbAdobe PDF2818View/Open
    301005.pdf164KbAdobe PDF21281View/Open
    301006.pdf376KbAdobe PDF21800View/Open
    301007.pdf114KbAdobe PDF21268View/Open
    301008.pdf248KbAdobe PDF2885View/Open
    301009.pdf213KbAdobe PDF21038View/Open
    301010.pdf580KbAdobe PDF21497View/Open
    301011.pdf75KbAdobe PDF2974View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback