English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 112721/143689 (78%)
Visitors : 49577823      Online Users : 907
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34330


    Title: 軟體公司知識創造與能耐積蓄之平台建構
    Authors: 陳重嘉
    Chen, Chung-Chia
    Contributors: 李仁芳
    li, jen-fang
    陳重嘉
    Chen, Chung-Chia
    Keywords: 知識管理
    企業概念傘
    雙軌生涯制度
    知識創造
    能耐積蓄
    knowledge management
    concept umbrella
    dual career ladder
    knowledge creation
    capability building
    Date: 2005
    Issue Date: 2009-09-18 09:26:33 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 知識經濟的時代,企業最重要的資產是「人」與「知識」,如何運用與積蓄這兩項資產,對企業的持續競爭力有關鍵性的影響。本文以知識管理的文獻探討為基礎,從中萃取出攸關的議題,以問卷調查的方式來收集相關資料,並透過統計檢定方法來分析資料,以發掘事實。這些攸關的議題共有八項,分別為:一、鼓勵員工勇於表達自己意見與想法的文化(組織的文化),與員工勇於表達自己意見與想法的行為(組織的行為),彼此是否為正向相關。二、高階主管主動傳授知識與技能的行為(主管的行為),與員工彼此分享知識與技能的行為(部屬的行為),彼此是否為正向相關。三、金錢、名聲、交情與互惠,這四項影響「知識分享意願與行為」的因子,其影響力的強弱順序為何。如果我們能釐清這四項因子影響力的強弱順序,則可據此設計出更為有效的激勵制度,將知識分享所產生的綜效極大化。四、是否超過半數的受訪者,無法容忍一個問題的解決方案,是處於模稜兩可、曖昧不明的狀況。五、當理性的分析結果與當事人的直覺相互衝突時,是否超過一半的受訪者,選擇相信理性的分析結果。議題四與五,主要是由認知風格的差異,來探討人才的多樣性。六、是否超過一半的受訪者,認為管理階梯的社會評價較高,以及肯定技術階梯職位具有激
    勵效果。七、是否超過一半的受訪者,無法確定公司是否具有概念傘。八、個案公司的知識管理現況為何。

    根據上述八項議題所發掘而得的事實,以及個案訪談所得之資料,本文提出了一個能夠有效活絡知識創造與能耐積蓄的平台,該平台包含五大建構單元,分別為:一、建立優質文化。二、落實雙軌生涯制度。三、建立知識管理專員制度。四、建立系統化的流程來引導知識創造與能耐積蓄活動。五、落實知識管理的配套措施。我們相信,企業藉著由五大單元所建構而成的平台,必可建立企業獨有的環境與氛圍,以利企業核心能力的滋長。最後,本文期盼該平台能為企業界提供實踐的重點與方向,成為一個最佳實施例的範本,並對有志於知識管理的人士,提供智識上的啟發,如此則已達成本文之目的。





    關鍵詞:知識管理、企業概念傘、雙軌生涯制度,知識創造,能耐積蓄
    In this knowledge economic era, “people” and “knowledge” are very essential to keep the enterprises’ sustainable competence. Hence, based on the survey of books and papers about knowledge management, this thesis distills diverse perspectives and best practices into eight issues for further study, they are as follows: (1) Is there any positive correlation between “organizational culture” and “organizational behavior”? For an organizational culture that encourages people to express their opinions and ideas without any concerns, can we really have the distinguishable perception that people really behave so in this circumstance? (2) Is there any positive correlation between “managers’ behavior” and “subordinates’ behavior”? If managers are willing to mentor subordinates, willing to share their knowledge and skills, can it become a driving force to make subordinates behave the same? (3) As we know, money, reputation, friendship and reciprocal, all these four factors affect the extent of knowledge-sharing willingness and behavior, but can we figure out the strength order of these four factors? If we can, then we may devise a better, more effective incentive system to maximize the synergy of knowledge-sharing. (4) If the solutions to a problem are ambiguous and equivocal, is it true that more than half the people can not accept this situation? (5) If the rational analysis conflicts with your instinct, which one do you trust? The issue 4 and 5 are actually discussing the varieties of cognitive style. (6) For dual career ladder, is

    it true that more than half the people give higher evaluation to managerial ladder than technical one? Is it true that more than half the people regard the technical ladder as an incentive? (7) Is it true that more than half the people who are not clear about the concept umbrella of the company? (8) Based on nine indicators about knowledge management, conduct surveys of the four cases, and try to find out the strength and weakness of each case.

    By the data analysis and case studies, this thesis has found out several facts, and then proposes a platform for knowledge creation and capability building. The platform is composed of five units, they are as follows: (1) Instill good and appropriate cultures. (2) Put dual career ladder into practice. (3) Establish knowledge steward system. (4) Establish systematic procedure as the guide for the knowledge creation and capability building activities. (5) Find out the necessary auxiliary measures for knowledge management, put them into practice. With the platform constructed by the five units, we believe that each enterprise is able to construct a unique environment and atmosphere of its own, which in itself is beneficial to nurture and consolidate the core competence.

    Finally, we hope this thesis has shed light on the enterprises, and provided some intellectual stimuli for those people who are interested in knowledge management.


    Keyword: knowledge management, dual career ladder, concept umbrella, knowledge creation, capability building
    Reference: 中文部分
    □ 王美音(1998譯),知識創新之泉,遠流出版社。
    □ 尤克強(2001),知識管理與創新,天下文化出版社。
    □ 林惠玲與陳正倉(2003),應用統計學,雙葉書廊出版社。
    □ 林惠玲與陳正倉(2004),統計學 – 方法與應用(下冊),雙葉書廊出版社。
    □ 胡瑋珊(1999譯),知識管理(Working Knowledge),中國生產力。
    □ 柯承恩(2005),追求跨領域的交會點創新,商業週刊897期。
    □ 張玉文(2000譯),知識管理(Knowledge Management, HBR Press),天下文化出版社。
    □ 陳智文(2004譯),說故事的力量,臉譜出版社。
    □ 發現頻道DVD,大腦迷思(2001),協和國際發行。(Discovery Channel DVD, Brain Stormers(2001))
    □ 楊子江,王美音(1997譯),創新求勝,遠流出版社。
    □ 鄭惟厚(2002譯),統計學的世界,天下文化出版社。
    □ Drucker, Peter(1988,新時代、新組織,HBR。張玉文2000譯)
    □ Kleiner, Art and Roth, George(1997, 如何以經驗為良師,HBR。張玉文2000譯)
    □ Leonard-Barton, Dorothy, and Straus, Susaan(1997,左右腦並用,HBR。張玉文2000譯)
    □ Nonaka, Ikujiro(1991, 知識創造的企業,HBR。張玉文2000譯)
    英文部分
    □ Davenport, Thomas, and Prusak, Lawrence(1997) “Working Knowledge”, Harvard Business School Press.
    □ Garvin, David(2000) “Learning in Action”, Harvard Business School Press.
    □ Keller, Gerald, and Warrack, Brian(2000) “Statistics for Management and Economics”, Duxbury and Thomson Learning.
    □ Leonard-Barton, Dorothy(1995) “Wellsprings of Knowledge”, Harvard Business School Press.
    □ Leonard-Barton, Dorothy, and Sensiper, Sylvia(1998) “The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation”, California Management Review, pg 112.
    □ Nonaka, Ikujiro(2002) “A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation”, p437 ~ p462, “The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organization Knowledge”, Oxford University Press.
    □ Nonaka, I. and Konno, N (1998) “The Concept of ‘ba’: Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation.” California Management Review 40(3): 40-54.
    □ Smith, Heather, and McKeen, James(2003) “Instilling a Knowledge-Sharing Culture”, WP 03-11 Queen’s Centre for Knowledge-based Enterprises.
    □ Umemoto, Katsuhiro(2002) “Managing Existing Knowledge Is Not Enough”, p463 ~ p476, “The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organization Knowledge”, Oxford University Press.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    科技管理研究所
    92359027
    94
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0092359027
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[科技管理研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    35902701.pdf50KbAdobe PDF2645View/Open
    35902702.pdf138KbAdobe PDF2725View/Open
    35902703.pdf243KbAdobe PDF2833View/Open
    35902704.pdf281KbAdobe PDF2889View/Open
    35902705.pdf564KbAdobe PDF2776View/Open
    35902706.pdf925KbAdobe PDF21645View/Open
    35902707.pdf867KbAdobe PDF27796View/Open
    35902708.pdf575KbAdobe PDF21977View/Open
    35902709.pdf1432KbAdobe PDF21916View/Open
    35902710.pdf913KbAdobe PDF21087View/Open
    35902711.pdf107KbAdobe PDF21053View/Open
    35902712.pdf444KbAdobe PDF2746View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback