Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34446
|
| Title: | 家庭支持方案對懷孕婦女組織承諾及產後復工的影響
The Impacts of Family-responsive Benefits on Pregnant Workers` Organizational Commitments and Return-to-work after Childbirth |
| Authors: | 吳雅惠
Wu,Ya Huei |
| Contributors: | 劉梅君
吳雅惠
Wu,Ya Huei |
| Keywords: | 懷孕歧視
家庭支持方案
工作＼家庭文化
產後復工
pregnancy discrimination
family-responsive benefits
work-family culture
return after childbirth |
| Date: | 2007 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-18 10:17:40 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 「懷孕」應該是正面、美好且有益於整體國家社會的事情，對雇主也是有利的，因她們也具有「再生產」的功能，讓雇主能有源源不絕的勞動力，可惜許多雇主對懷孕婦女的偏見仍然存在，對懷孕婦女工作能力與復工意願皆有所質疑，然而國外相關研究結果卻指出若雇主能夠摒棄偏見，從一開始就願意接受懷孕婦女，提供家庭支持方案，如工作調整、彈性工時或托育措施等協助懷孕婦女，不僅能減少員工在工作與家庭間的衝突，更可保留優秀女性人才、提升組織效率與員工生產力，進而創造「勞資雙贏」的局面。
因此，本研究以我國懷孕婦女為對象來瞭解組織內家庭支持方案的實施與提供，對懷孕員工的組織承諾及產後復工時機之影響。本研究結果發現如下：
一、懷孕婦女的組織承諾偏向普通程度，並未如雇主所認為對工作不忠誠。
二、組織提供的家庭支持方案越多，懷孕婦女的組織承諾越高。組織提供越多的家庭支持方案，會影響員工對組織的情感，這些好感會轉化成對組織的忠誠。
三、工作＼家庭文化對組織承諾皆具有正向預測力。因此，組織文化是對家庭友善的文化，有助於提昇懷孕婦女的組織承諾。
四、收入低的懷孕婦女，產後復工意願較低，即使願意復工，復工時機也比較晚。對收入低的懷孕婦女來說，離職或請繼續育嬰假的機會成本比較低，並衡量市場工資與托嬰費用後，選擇留在家中照顧新生兒減輕家庭經濟負擔。
五、工作＼家庭文化「主管支持」構面與懷孕婦女產後復工意願有顯著正相關，且具正向預測力。這顯示出當公司主管能夠很敏感的注意到有家庭責任之員工的需求，並能積極提供協助與支持，則其懷孕員工在產後會更願意復工。
六、雇主提供的產假越長，懷孕婦女有更多的時間休養，產後會更願意復工。
七、雇主提供無薪產假的懷孕婦女比雇主提供全薪產假者，產後復工時機較晚。
大體上，我國經驗研究在相當程度上是支持西方國家的研究結果，但我國家庭支持方案的實施狀況仍不夠普遍。家庭支持方案的提供的確可提昇懷孕婦女的組織承諾，有助於減少離職率，大幅降低企業招募和重新訓練的成本，故我國企業應該積極引進家庭支持方案，達到勞資雙贏的結果。
“Pregnancy” should be a positive, beautiful and beneficial thing to the society. It is also good to employers, because pregnant women provide a “reproductive” function, with which employers would not face the labor shortage. But many employers still have some prejudices against pregnant women. For instance, pregnant workers are considered not being able to concentrate on their jobs, and won’t come back to work after childbirth.
In accordance with the relevant findings of the study abroad, this study found employers can abandon their prejudices, and provide family-responsive benefits, such as job adjustments, flextime or childcare programs, it can not only reduce the work and family conflicts, but also retain the women laborforce, improve organizational efficiency and productivity, thereby creating a “win-win” situation. The major findings below:
1.Pregnant workers’ organizational commitments are as normal as workers in general are. Pregnant workers are not unfaithful to employers .
2.The more family-responsive benefits employers provide, the more loyalty pregnant workers would have.
3.Work-family culture has positive impact on to organizational commitments of pregnant workers. Pregnant workers’ organizational commitments will be enhanced when the corporate culture is family-friendly.
4.Pregnant workers in low wages tend to stay at home, and won’t return to work after childbirth. Even they will return, the timing they return would be delayed.
5.If supervisors are sensitive to employee’ family and personal concerns, the pregnant workers prefer returning to work after childbirth.
6.If employers provide longer maternity leaves, pregnant workers would have enough time to take a rest, and they would tend to return to work after childbirth.
7.Pregnant workers who got unpaid maternity leaves return to work later than who got paid maternity leaves.
In sum, this study supports the findings of western countries in a certain extent. But the family-responsive benefits are not popular in Taiwan. If organizations provide family-responsive benefits, pregnant workers’ organizational commitments will be enhanced. It can also reduce the turnover rate and the costs of recruitment and training. For the above reasons, the organizations in Taiwan should introduce family-responsive benefits and create a “win-win” situation. |
| Reference: | 一、中文部分
1.Folbre, Nancy著，許慧如譯（2002），心經濟˙愛無價，台北：新聞文化。
2.王麗容（1998），「女性勞動參與和企業內家庭政策（上）」，勞工行政，第124期，頁21-35。
3.何如玉（2005），人力資源彈性策略與組織績效、組織承諾之研究—以國內鋼鐵業為例，中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
4.李衍新（2003），員工組織政治知覺、組織承諾與組織公民行為關係之研究—以台灣電力公司台南區營業處為例，國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
5.吳娟娟（2001）國稅人員工作壓力、組織承諾與離職傾向之研究—以財政部台灣省中區國稅局為例，東海大學公共事務學程在職專班碩士論文。
6.李雪麗（1995），已婚職業婦女角色衝突、組織承諾與離職意願關係之研究，國立臺灣師範大學家政教育研究所碩士論文。
7.周玟琪（2005），提升婦女勞動參與及人力資源素質新策略，2005年中台灣人力資源研討會，參考網址：http://tcesa.evta.gov.tw/download.do?fileName=/d_upload_tcesa2_web/cms/file/A0/B0/C0/D0/E0/F535/87834bfa-e63c-4b22-95c8-cdfe810a5549.pdf
8.林清發（2002），主管向下影響行為與員工組織承諾之研究—公民營企業的比較分析，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所在職專班碩士論文。
9.侯堂柱（2001），轉換型領導、組織承諾與組織公民行為之關係─以台灣電子業為例，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
10.柯惠玲（1993），個人特質、事業發展環境與組織承諾關係之研究，國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
11.施慧敏（2006）組織變革與員工組織承諾及士氣間關聯性之研究—以國防部「精進案」為例，國立中山大學高階經營碩士學程在職專班碩士論文。
12.徐心怡（2001），女性工作者對企業內家庭親善政策需求之研究：工作—家庭衝突觀點，國立中正大學勞工研究所碩士論文。
13.徐永昌（1999），企業願景、企業文化、員工生涯發展與組織承諾之關係研究─以台灣製造業為例，國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
14.陳永富（2004），聯合報系地方記者工作價值觀與組織承諾關係之研究，明傳大學傳播管理研究所在職專班碩士論文。
15.曹采華（2002），員工特徵對工作滿意、組織承諾、組織公民行為、工作績效的影響—以派遣人員為例，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
16.郭淑芳（2005）薪資滿意對組織承諾與專業承諾之中介效果研究，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
17.陳寬政（2000）「新世紀之婚姻、生育與家庭問題與政策研討會論文集」，內政部人口政策委員會編。
18.黃英忠、余德成、林營松（1995）組織氣候、工作特性、人格特質、家庭因素、領導行為與組織承諾關係之研究—以楠梓加工出口區員工為例，人力資源管理學報，第5期，頁15-39。
19.張峰旗（2005），工作滿意、組織承諾與離職傾向關聯性之研究—以中小學教師為例，國立臺灣師範大學教育學系在職進修專班碩士論文。
20.楊靜利、李大正、陳寬政（2006）台灣傳統婚配空間的變化與婚姻行為之變遷，人口學刊，第33期，頁1-32。
21.劉梅君、嚴祥鸞（2007），勞委會委託專案。
22.蔡婷婷（2006），工作家庭政策、工作家庭衝突與組織承諾之研究，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所在職專班碩士論文。
23.賴宗飛（2004），全職與兼職員工在工作價值觀對工作滿足與組織承諾關聯性之比較研究—以中部某連鎖便利商店為例，國立中興大學企業館李岩就所碩士論文。
24.盧隆俊（2003），公務機關員工之薪資制度、福利制度及升遷制度之知覺與其工作態度關聯性之研究—以中山科學研究院為例，中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
25.蕭仔伶、盧美秀（1996）臨床護理人員之組織承諾、組織留任與專業留任的相關性研究，護理研究，第四卷，第2期，頁137-150。
26.蕭靜宜（1998），護理人員工作特徵、角色壓力、人格特質對組織與專業承諾之影響，東海大學管理研究所碩士論文。
二、外文部分
1.Allen, N. J. & Meyer, J. P. (1990).The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, Vol. 63, 1-18.
2.Barrow, L. (1999). Child care costs and the return-to-work decisions of new mothers. Economic Perspectives, Vol. 23, No. 4, 42-55.
3.Baughman, R., DiNardi, D. & Holtz-Eakin, D.(2003). Productivity and wage effects of familyfriendly fringe benefits. International Journal of Manpower, Vol.24, Issue 3, 247-259.
4.Becker, H. S. (1960).Notes on the Concept of Commitment. The American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 66, No. 1, 32-40.
5.Berger, L. M. & Waldfogel, J. (2004). Maternity leave and the employment of new mothers in the United States. Journal of Population Economics, Vol. 17, Iss. 2, 331-349.
6.Chester, N. & Kleiner, B. H. (2001). Pregnancy in the workplace. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Vol. 21, 137-147
7.Christensen, K. & Staines, G. (1990). Flextime: A viable solution to work-family conflict? Journal of Family Issues; 11: 455-476.
8.Croteau, A., Marcoux, S. & Brisson, C. (2006). Work Activity in Pregnancy, Preventive Measures, and the Risk of Delivering a Small-for-Gestational-Age Infant. American Journal of Public Health Vol. 96, No.5, May 2006, 846-855
9.Desai, S. & Waite, L. J. (1991). Women’s employment during pregnancy and after the first birth: Occupational characteristics and work commitment. American Sociological Review, Vol. 56, 551-566
10.Evans, J. M. (2001). Firms’ Contribution to the Recitation between Work and Family Life, Paris: OECD.
11.Glass, J. & Fujimoto, T. (1995). Employer Characteristics and the Provision of Family Responsive Policies. Work and Occupations, Vol.22, No.4, November 1995, 380-411
12.Goodstein, J. D. (1994). Institutional Pressures and Strategic Responsiveness: Employer Involvement in Work-Family Issues. The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 37, No. 2, 350-382
13.Greenstein, T. N. (1986). Social-psychological factors in perinatal labor-force participation. Journal of Marriage a d the Family, 48, 565-571.
14.Greenstein, T. (1989). Human capital, marital and birth timing, and the postnatal labor force participation of married women. Journal of Family Issues, 10, 359-382.
15.Greenberger, E., Goldberg, W. A., Hamill, S., O’Neil, R. & Payne, C. K. (1989) . Contributions of a supportive work environment to parents’ well-being and orientation to work. American Journal of Community Psychology, 17, 755-783.
16.Grover, S.L. & Crooker, K.J. (1995). Who appreciates family-responsive human resource policies. Personnel Psychology, Vol.48, 271-288.
17.Hayghe, H. V. (1997). Developments in women`s labor force participation. Monthly Labor Review, Vol.120, 41–46.
18.Hayghe, H. V. (1998). Employers and Child Care: What Roles Do They Play ? Monthly Labor Review, Vol. 111, 38-44
19.Heiland, F. & Macpherson, D. (2005). Do Family-Friendly Firms Perform Better? 參考網址：http://mailer.fsu.edu/~fheiland/southern04v6.pdf
20.Herbiniak, L. G. & Alutto, J. A. (1972). Personal and Role-Related Factors in the Development of Organizational Commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 17, No. 4, 555-573.
21.Hofferth, S. (1996). Effects of public and private policies on working after childbirth. Work and Occupations, Vol. 23, 378-404.
22.Hofferth, S. L. & Curtin, S. C. (2003). The Impact of Parental Leave Statutes On Maternal Return to Work after Childbirth in the United States.參考網址：http://www.popcenter.umd.edu/people/hofferth_sandra/papers/OECDref7.doc
23.Ingram, P. & Simons, T. (1995). Institutional and Resource Dependence Determinants of Responsiveness to Work-Family Issues. The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38, No. 5, 1466-1482.
24.Kamerman, S. & Kahn, A. (Eds.). (1978). Family policy: Government and families in fourteen countries. New York: Columbia University Press.
25.Kanter, R. S. (1968).Commitment and Social Organization: A Study of Commitment Mechanisms in Utopian Communities. American Sociological Review, Vol. 33, No. 4, 499-517.
26.Kingston, P. W. (1990). Illusions and Ignorance about the Family. Journal of Family Issues, Vol.11, No.4, 438-454.
27.Klerman, J. A., & Leibowitz, A. (1994). The work-employment distinction among new mothers. Journal of Human Resources, 29, 277-303.
28.Kohl, J., Mayfield, M. & Mayfield, J. (2005).Recent trends in Pregnancy discrimination law. Business Horizons Vol.48 No.5, 421-9
29.Konrad, A. M. & Mangel, R. (2000). The impact of work-life programs on firm productivity. Strategic Management Journal, Chichester:.Vol.21, Iss.12; 1225-1237
30.Lyness, K.S., Thompson, C.A., Francesco, A.M. & Judiesch, M.K. (1999). Work and Pregnancy: Individual and Organizational Factors Influencing Organizational Commitment, Timing of Maternity Leave, and Return to Work. Sex Roles, Vol. 41, No.7-8, 485-508
31.Mathieu, J. E. & Zajac, D. M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 108, No. 2, 171-194
32.McLanahan, S. ＆ Adams, J. (1987). Parenthood and Psychological Well-Being. Annual Review of Sociology,Vol.13, 237-57
33.McLaughlin, S.D. (1982) .Differential patterns of female labor-force participation surrounding the first birth. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 407-420.
34.Meyer, J. P. & Allen, N. J. (1984).Testing the “Side-Bet” Theory of Organizational Commitment: Some Methodological Considerations. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 69, No. 3, 372-378.
35.Middaugh, D. & Hester, C. (2006). Managing the Pregnancy employee. MEDSURG Nursing: August 2006, Vol.15 No.4, p.239
36.Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W. & Steers, R. M. (1982). Employee-Organization Linkages: The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism, and Turnover. Acadrmic Press.
37.National Council of Jewish Women. (1988). Employer sup ports for child care. New York: Author. Perlow L. A. (1995). Putting the work back into work/family. Group and Organization Management, 20, 227-239
38.Neal, M. B., Chapman, N. J., Ingersoll-Dayton, B., & Emlen, C. (1993). Balance Work and Caregiving for Children, Adults, and Elders. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
39.Poelmans, S.A.Y. (2003). The adoption of family-friendly HRM policies: Competing for scarce resources in the labour market. International Journal of Manpower, Vol. 24, No. 2, 128-147.
40.Porter, L. W., Steer R. M., Mowday, R. T. & Boulian, P. V. (1974). Organizational Commitment, job satisfaction and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 59, No. 5, 603-609.
41.Ross, C.E. & Mirowsky, J. (1988). Child Care and Emotional Adjustment to Wives` Employment. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, Vol.29, 127-138
42.Scheibl, F. & Dex, S. (1998). Should we have more family-friendly polices? European Management Journal, Vol.16, No.5, 586-599
43.Schwartz, F. (1989). Management Women and the New Facts of Life. Harvard Business Review. January-February, 65-76.
44.Stevens, J. M., Beyer, J. M.& Trice, H. M. (1978). Assessing Personal, Role, and Organizational Predictors of Managerial Commitment. The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 21, No.3, 380-396
45.Strachan, G. & Burgess, J. (1998). The Family-friendly workplace. International Journal of Manpower, Vol.19, No.4, 250-265.
46.Swiss, D. J. & Walker, J. P. (1993). Women an d the work /family dilemma: How today’s profession al women are confronting the maternal wall. New York: Wiley.
47.Varuhas, J., Fursman, L. & Jacobsen, V. (2003). Work and Family Balance: An Economic View. 參考網址：https://www.treasury.govt.nz/workingpapers/2003/twp03-26.pdf
48.Waldfogel, J. (1998). The Family Gap for Young Women in the United States and Britain: Can Maternity Leave Make a Difference? Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 16, No. 3, 505-545.
49.Werbel, J. (1998). Intent and choice regarding maternal employment following childbirth. Journal of Vocation al Behavior, 53, 372-385.
50.Wergeland, E. & Strand, K. (1997).Need for job adjustment in Pregnancy: Early prediction on work history. Institute of General Practice and Community Medicine, Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
51.Wiatrowski, W. J. (1994). Small Businesses and Their Employees. Monthly Labor Review, Vol. 117, 29-35
52.Wolcott, I. (1990). The structure of work of families. Family Matters, Vol.26, 32-38.
53.美國法院判決863 F. Supp.581(N.D.Ohio 1994)。
54.美國法院判決365 F. 3d 107(2004)。
55.美國平等就業機會委員會2006年4月的訴訟解決月報，參考網址：http://www.eeoc.gov/litigation/settlements/settlement04-06.html
三、政府統計資料
1.內政統計資訊服務網，內政國際指標，表24 主要國家總生育率。參考網址：http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/index.asp
2.內政部兒童局「建構友善托育環境—保母托育管理與托育費用補助實施計畫」。參考網址：http://www.cbi.gov.tw/chinese_version/1/content/printpage.jsp?contentNo=21431
3.行政院勞工委員會94年女性僱用管理調查，表50 事業單位資遣員工之考量條件（可複選）。參考網址：http://statdb.cla.gov.tw/html/woman/woman050.xls
4.行政院主計處95年人力運用調查報告，表2歷年子女年齡別有偶婦女勞動力參與率。參考網址：http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/data/dgbas04/bc4/mpwutility/95/mtable2.xls
5.行政院主計處95年人力運用調查報告，表14 子女年齡別有偶婦女勞動力參與率－按年齡與教育程度分。參考網址：http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/data/dgbas04/bc4/mpwutility/95/mtable14.xls
6.行政院勞工委員會95年女性僱用管理調查，表43 事業單位資遣員工之考量條件—按行業、員工規模、組織型態、地區別分。參考網址：http://statdb.cla.gov.tw/html/woman/94woman049.xls
7.行政院主計處96年人力運用調查報告，表15 就業者教育程度－按行業分。參考網址：http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/data/dgbas04/bc4/mpwutility/96/mtable15.xls
8.行政院主計處96年人力運用調查報告，表20 就業者主要工作情形－按教育程度分。參考網址：http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/data/dgbas04/bc4/mpwutility/96/mtable20.xls
9.行政院主計處96年人力運用調查報告，表53 受僱就業者每月主要工作之收入－按教育程度分。參考網址：http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/data/dgbas04/bc4/mpwutility/96/mtable53.xls
10.行政院主計處96年人力運用調查報告，表106 就業者運用指標－按從業身分與工作地點分。參考網址：http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/data/dgbas04/bc4/mpwutility/96/mtable106.xls
11.行政院勞工委員會96年女性僱用管理調查，表10 員工規模250人以上之事業單位提供托兒設施及托兒優惠情形—按行業、員工規模、組織型態、地區別分。參考網址：http://statdb.cla.gov.tw/html/svy95/9506010.xls
12.行政院勞工委員會96年女性僱用管理調查，表11 員工規模250人以上之事業單位沒有設立托兒所之主要原因—按行業、員工規模、組織型態、地區別分。參考網址：http://statdb.cla.gov.tw/html/svy95/9506011.xls
13.行政院勞工委員會統計處性別統計指標，表4-8 性別工作平等申訴案件—按申訴類別分。參考網址：http://statdb.cla.gov.tw/html/sex/rptmenusex3.htm |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
勞工研究所
94262011
96 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094262011 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [勞工研究所] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
