English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109951/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46278575      Online Users : 1546
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34544


    Title: 財產權與統一性─康德社會契約論之研究
    Property and Unity:A Study of Kant`s Social Contract Theory
    Authors: 周家瑜
    Contributors: 孫善豪
    周家瑜
    Keywords: 康德
    契約論
    財產權
    統一性
    原初契約
    霍布斯
    Kant
    social contract theory
    property
    unity
    original social contract
    Hobbes
    Date: 2005
    Issue Date: 2009-09-19 15:43:59 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文主旨是要說明:就《道德形上學》的論述而言,康德在何種意義上能夠被視為一個契約論思想家。本文將從兩條線索出發來理解康德所提出的契約論,這兩條線索分別是:康德的財產權理論、以及契約論中處理政治權威正當性時所必須面對的統一性問題。
    本文認為:康德所提出的作為理念的原初契約,是一種提供給已處身在政治社會之下的個人,去設想當下所面對的法律強制力之正當性的方式。藉由康德在《純粹理性批判》之中對於「理念」的界定,可以將賦予原初契約一個確實的契約作用:人民的同意。儘管是一個被想像的同意,但康德賦予它積極的意義即形塑公民為一個自主、自律的主體,因此,在這個面向上,本文認為康德提出了儘管與霍布斯、洛克、盧梭迥異但卻仍然極富意義的契約論。
    The purpose of this thesis is that Kant should be seen as a theorist of the social contract theory in the discourse of the Metaphysics of Morals. This thesis will perceive the social contract theory provided by Kant in accordance to two clues, including the theory of property and the problem of unity.
    The main point of the thesis is that the original social contract as an idea of reason is the method providing for the individual existing in the civil society of constructing the legitimacy of the political authority. By definition of “Idea” in Critique of Pure reason, Kant gives the original social contract a meaningful function: the consent of people. Though the consent is a concept imagined by the people, Kant gives it a positive meaning of forming the people to the independent subject in politics.
    In conclusion, this thesis claims that Kant provided a meaningful social contract theory different from other theorists in the social contract tradition, such as Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau.
    Reference: 西文著作
    Books
    Bobbio, N.
    1993 Thomas Hobbes and The Natural Law Tradition, The University of Chicago Press.
    Boucher, David and Kelly, Paul
    1994 The Social Contract from Hobbes to Rawls, London and New York Press.
    Gierke, Otto Von
    1966 The Development of Political Theory. translated by Bernard Freyd, New York: Norton & Company Press.
    Hobbes, Thomas
    1994 Leviathan, ed. Edwin Curley, Hackett Publishing Company.
    Lessnoff, Michael ed.
    1990 Social Contract Theory, Printed in Great Britain by Billing & Sons Ltd, Worcester, Basil Blackwell Press.
    Macpherson, C. B.
    1962 The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism, London:Oxford Univ. Press.
    Minogue, Kenneth.
    1980 The Concept of Property and Its Contemporary Significance. In J.R. Pennock & J.W. Chapman eds., Property ( NOMOS XXII ), New York: New York University Press.
    Mullholland, Leslie Arthur
    1990. Kant’s System of Rights. New York: Columbia University Press.
    1983.
    Macpherson, C. B.
    1978 The Meaning of Property. In C. B. Macpherson ed., Property, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
    Riley, Patrick.
    1982 Will and Political Legitimacy:A Critical Exposition of Social Contract Theory in Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, Kant, and Hegel. Harvard University Press.
    Kant’s Political Philosophy. New Jersey: Rowman & Allanheld.
    Shell, Susan.
    1980 The Rights of Reason:A study of Kant’s philosophy and Politics. London: University of Toronto Press.
    Williams, Howard.
    1983 Kant’s Political Philosophy. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
    Articles:
    Baynes, Kenneth.
    1989. "Kant on Property Right and the Social Contract." The Monist, Vol. 48, 433-53.
    Caygill, Howard.
    1995. A Kant Dictionary, Oxford:Blackwell.
    Day. J.P.
    1966. "Locke on Property." The Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 16, No.64, History of Philosophy Number.(Jul. 1966, 207-220.
    Dodson. Kevin E.
    1975. "Autonomy and Authority in Kant’s Rechtslehre." Political Theory, Vol. 25, No.1(Feb. 1997, 93-111.
    Flikshuh, Kartin.
    1999. "Freedom and Constraint In Kant’s Metaphysical Elements of Justice." History of Political Thought, Vol. XX, No.2, Summer 1999, 250-71
    1997. "On Kant’s Rechtslehre." Europea Journal of Philosophy , Vol. 5, Issue.1, 50-73
    Goerner. E. A.
    1975. "On Patrick Riley’s On Kant as the most Adequate of the Social Contract Theorist." Political Theory, Vol. 3, No.4 ( Nov., 1975 ), 467-468.
    Gregor, Mary
    1988. "Kant’s Theory of Property." Review of Metaphysics, No.41(June), 757-87.
    1993. "Kant on Obligation, Rights and Virtue." Annual Review of Law and Ethics, Bd. 1, 69-102.
    1995. " Natural Right or Natural Law?” Annual Review of Law and Ethics, Bd. 3, 11-35.
    Kant, Immanuel
    1990 Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, tr. H. J. Paton, New York:Harper & Row Publishers.
    1991 Kant:Political Writings, tr. H.B. Nisbet, ed. Hans Reiss, Cambridge Univ. Press.
    1996 The Metaphysics of Morals, edited by Mary Gregor.
    1997 Religion within the Limits of Reason Alone, tr. Theodore M. Greene and Hoyt H. Houston, Harper & Row Publishers.
    2000 Critique of Pure Reason, tr. Paul Guyer and Allen Wood, Cambridge Univ. Press.
    Ladd, John
    1984. "Kant’s Political Philosophy." Political Theory, No.41(Feb.), 124-27.
    Lewis W. Beck.
    1992. Ed.. Chadwick, Ruth F. Cazeux, Clive. Critical Assessments II.p. 399-411. London ; New York : Routledge.
    Locke, John
    1980 Second Treatise of Government, ed. C. B. Macpherson, Hackett Publishing Company.
    Lopata, Benjamin B.
    1973. "Property Theory in Hobbes." Political Theory, vol.1, No.2(May, 1973), 203-18.
    Ludwig, Bernd.
    1990. "The Right of a State in Immanuel Kant’s Doctrine of Right." Journal of the History of Philosophy,.28:3(July),403-15.
    Pitkin, Hanna.
    1964. "Hobbes’s Concept of Representation--I." The American Political Science Review, Vol. 58, No.2 ( Jun. ), 328-340.
    1964. "Hobbes’s Concept of Representation--II." The American Political Science Review, Vol. 58, No.4 ( Dec. ), 902-18.
    Riley. Patrick.
    1973. "On Kant as the most Adequate of the Social Contract Theorist." Political Theory, Vol. 1, No.4(Nov.,1973), 450-471.
    1978. "On Susan Shell’s “Kant’s Theory of Property”." Political Theory, Vol. 6, No.1(February,1978), 91-99.
    Riedel, Manfred.
    1981. "Transcendental Politics?Political Legitimacy and the Concept of Civil Society in Kant." Social Research, Vol. 48, 588-613.
    Rousseau, J. J.
    1983 Discourse on the Origin of Inequality in On the Social Contract and Discourses, tr. Donal A. Cress, Hackett Publishing Company, pp. 105-61.
    1983 On the Social Contract in On the Social Contract and Discourses, tr. Donal A. Cress, Hackett Publishing Company, pp. 15-103.
    Seebom, Thomas.
    1981. "Kant’s Theory of Revolution." Social Research, Vol. 48, 557-87.
    Shell, Susan.
    1978. "Kant’s theory of Property." Political Theory, Vol. 6, No.1 ( Nov.,1978 ), 75-90.
    Tierney, Brian.
    2001. "Kant on Property: The Problem of Permissive Law." Journal of History of Ideas, Vol. 48, 72, 301-12.
    Yang, Chih-Sheng.
    2005. "Right Has To Be Right: Why Hegel Presents His Ethics in A Philosophy of Right." Philosophy, Culture, & Traditions, Vol. 3, 105-113.
    中文譯著
    卡西勒(Cassirer, Ernst)
    1983《國家的神話》,黃漢青、陳衛平譯,台北:成均出版社。
    1984《啟蒙運動的哲學》,李日章譯,台北:聯經出版社。
    登特列夫( A.P.d’Entreves )
    2000《自然法─法律哲學導論》,李日章譯,台北:聯經。
    康德( Kant, Immanuel )
    1990 《道德底形上學之基礎》,李明輝譯,台北:聯經。
    1991 《法的形而上學原理》,沈叔平譯,北京:商務印書館。
    1997 《單純理性限度內的宗教》,李秋零譯,漢語基督教文化研究所。
    2002 《康德歷史哲學論文集》,李明輝譯,台北:聯經。
    2004 《純粹理性批判》,鄧曉芒、楊祖陶譯,台北:聯經。
    列奧‧史特勞斯( Strauss, Leo )
    2005《自然權利與歷史》,彭剛譯,台北:左岸。
    塔利( Tully, James )
    2001 《語境中的洛克》,梅雪芹,石楠,張煒等譯,上海:華東師範大學出版社。
    中文著作
    沈清松
    1995 〈盧梭社會契約論的評析:一個奠基性迷思的轉變〉,《民主理論:古典與現代》,張福建、蘇文流主編,中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所專書( 35 ),51─72。
    林國基
    2005《神義論語境中的社會契約論傳統》,上海:華東師範大學出版社。
    孫善豪
    1995 〈超驗幻象與拜物教〉,《哲學雜誌》,第十一期:208─223。
    2002 〈價值形式與統治形式:對社會契約論的一個馬克思式的理解〉,《政治與社會哲學評論》,第二期:47─83。
    許國賢
    1993 《馬克弗森─民主的政治哲學》,台北:東大圖書出版社。
    許漢
    1999 〈國家之理據與合法性 – 對於契約論的證立理論的一些初步反省〉於【台灣哲學會1999年會暨學術研討會】,台北。
    勞思光
    《康德知識論要義新編》,香港:中文大學出版社。
    蕭高彥
    2001 〈從共和主義到激進民主─盧梭的政治秩序論〉,《自由主義》,蔡英文、張福建主編,中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所專書( 49 ):1─24。
    2001 〈立法家、政治空間、與民族文化─盧梭的政治創造論〉,《政治科學論叢》,第十四期:25─46。
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    政治研究所
    92252017
    94
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0922520172
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[政治學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    52017201.pdf101KbAdobe PDF21053View/Open
    52017202.pdf42KbAdobe PDF21130View/Open
    52017203.pdf62KbAdobe PDF2981View/Open
    52017204.pdf90KbAdobe PDF2927View/Open
    52017205.pdf370KbAdobe PDF22328View/Open
    52017206.pdf318KbAdobe PDF21688View/Open
    52017207.pdf466KbAdobe PDF29141View/Open
    52017208.pdf125KbAdobe PDF21221View/Open
    52017209.pdf179KbAdobe PDF21406View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback