政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/34635
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109948/140897 (78%)
Visitors : 46093162      Online Users : 1102
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34635


    Title: 台灣社會學門的知識生產網絡機制：以2001~2006年社會學門學術期刊引用網絡為例
    The Network mechanism of scholarly productivity in Taiwan sociology: An Example of citation networks of sociological academic journals in 2001~2006
    Authors: 柯佩均
    Ko, Pei Chun
    Contributors: 熊瑞梅
    柯佩均
    Ko, Pei Chun
    Keywords: 期刊排序
    社會網絡
    引用網絡
    社會學門學術期刊
    規範論
    social networks
    structural equivalence
    citation networks
    sociological journals
    normative
    Date: 2007
    Issue Date: 2009-09-18 10:47:41 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 世界各國政府在知識經濟的潮流之下更加重視本土學術研究的品質，各國投注資源以提升學術研究水準、促進學術社群的國際化。台灣順應此種趨勢，近年制定各種學術政策與評鑑計畫，其中推動學術社群的知識生產品質，是國家政策中既定的一項重點目標。台灣社會學門的知識生產也受到國家施政方向的影響，國家科學委員會於 1997、2001與2006年執行三波的社會學門專業期刊排序計畫，針對社會學門的學術期刊進行評比。
    本研究著眼於此種學術場域的改變，將主要的研究關懷聚焦在學術社群的知識變遷；回顧科學社會學的研究傳統，引用行為是探查學社群知識生產的重要指標，引用代表學術知識傳遞與溝通的情形；而近年社會網絡分析（Social Network Analysis） 研究的興起，更擴充知識引用的研究方式與概念，採以引用網絡（Citation Networks） 分析知識結構與社群互動行為。本研究立基於社會網絡的研究概念，利用網絡分析工具試圖捕捉當代台灣社會學知識引用結構的現狀；社會學門的知識引用結構；究竟學術知識的引用會有何種變遷？引用的機制為何？
    本研究採用2007年第三波社會學門專業期刊排序資料，進行次級資料分析，研究問題環繞在2001~2006年引用網絡結構的多層次架構，開展出三項研究問題：
    （一）社會學門學術期刊引用網絡的現況，互引網絡結構的動態變化為何？
    （二）社會學門內部學者引用期刊的情形為何？社會學門各類型期刊的引用變遷又如何？
    （三）以社會學門期刊引用的產生是偏向於以內容為主的規範論或符合以社會關係為主的建構論的機制？
    研究結果分成三部份。第一，在期刊對期刊引用網絡層次部份，顯示學術期刊的引用網絡結構朝向集中化的趨勢，《台灣社會學》、《台灣社會學刊》成為引用結構中主要被引用的學術期刊組織，而且成為引用網絡結構中優勢地位的引用副團體。第二，社會學門學者引用學術期刊的雙元網絡層次，顯示社會學者與社會福利、社會工作學者的引用分流；社會學專業期刊與社會工作專業期刊的引用也存在著分流的情形。最後，《台灣社會學》、《台灣社會學刊》與《台灣社會研究季刊》的社會學者引用機制為內容為主的規範論。此三項結果顯示期刊排序制度施行社會學門的學術期刊，特定學術期刊的學術論文被其他期刊所肯定，產生引用結構的集中化變遷，同時社會學者與社會福利、社會工作學者對學科專業期刊分流引用也逐漸成形。而三種學術期刊內，社會學者的引用網絡影響來自於學者專長的相同與否，更是為台灣社會學的知識引用現狀，提出一個解釋的答案。
    Abstract
    In recent years, as the world has been trending toward a Knowledge-based Economy, governments worldwide have recognized the importance of academic research, providing resources to upgrade the academic research level in order to internationalize scholarly pursuit. Taiwan, as a latecomer to the concept of Knowledge-based Economy, has begun to constitute science and social science rules and evaluations for academic development.
    The study intends to capture the transformation of the academic field by examining citations. In early works in the science of sociology, citation was an important indication of scholarly productivity. Social network analysis (SNA) enriches the methodology, and makes the indication to the idea of citation networks. Based on the perspective of SNA, the study investigates the citation network database of sociological journals between 2001 and 2006, and the concurrent citation networks of sociologists from three prior sociological journals.
    The results include three parts: first, the structure of journals` citation networks shows the trend of centralization, and two academic journals attain privileged status by means of structural equivalence. Second, the dual network of authors and journals demonstrate the citation divisions of sociologists and social workers. The sociological professional journals and social worker professional journals also are divided by time. Finally, the citation mechanism of sociologists verifies the normative pattern. In conclusion, the analysis confirms the impact of social science policy, which influences the centralization of citation networks and the advantageous status of specific sociological journals. The sociologists` citation networks are related to the specialty similarities of scholars, not the social relations. The study gives a pioneer explanation of citation networks of Taiwanese sociology.
    Reference: 反思會議工作小組編（2005）全球化與知識生產。台北：群學。
    行政院國家科學委員會官方網站：http://web.nsc.gov.tw/default.asp 搜尋日期：2008年1月13日。
    行政院國家科學委員會（1997）行政院國家科學委員會八十六年年報。台北：行政院國家科學委員會。
    行政院國家科學委員會（2000）中華民國人文社會科學白皮書。台北：行政院國家科學委員會。
    張苙雲（2005）「社會學熱門與前瞻計畫」的初步所見。人文與社會科學簡訊。8(4)：1-7。
    劉曉芬 (2000)我國大學教師資格審查制度之硏究。台北：國立政治大學教育硏究所博士論文。
    賴鼎銘（2005）以國外幾種代表性的學術評鑑為例。見反思會議工作小組編，全球化與知識生產，頁31-66。台北：群學。
    湯志傑（2005）「本土」社會學傳統的建構與重構：理念、傳承與實踐。見謝國雄編（出版中），群學爭鳴：台灣社會學發展。
    章英華（2000）學術出版、評審與學術發展：一個社會學家的參與觀察。台灣社會學刊 23：1-23。
    章英華、黃毅志、呂寶靜（2000）台灣地區社會學、社會福利與社會工作專業期刊排序。台灣社會學刊 23：103-139。
    章英華、黃毅志、余漢儀、羅文輝（2002）社會學門專業期刊排序。台北：中央研究院社會學研究所。
    曾孝明（2001）台灣的知識經濟：困境與迷思。台北：群學。
    葉秀珍、陳寬政（1998）社會學與社會工作學術研究的現況與發展。台灣社會學刊 21：21-57。
    葉啟政（1995）社會學門的現況與發展—研討會紀錄。國科會專題研究成果報告，台灣大學社會學系執行。
    —（2001）社會學和本土化。台北：巨流圖書。
    —（2005a）觀念巴貝塔-當代社會學的迷思。台北：群學。
    —（2005b）缺乏社會現實感的指標性評鑑迷思。見反思會議工作小組編，全球化與知識生產，頁111-126。台北：群學。
    熊瑞梅（1995）社會網絡的資料蒐集、測量及分析。見章英華、傅仰止與瞿海源編，社會調查與分析，頁313-356。台北：中央研究院民族學研究所。
    熊瑞梅、杜素豪、宋麗玉與黃懿慧（2007）社會學門專業期刊排序。台北：中央研究院社會學研究所。
    瞿海源（1998）社會學課程內容與台灣社會研究。台灣社會學刊 21：1-20。
    蘇國賢（2004）社會學知識的社會生產：台灣社會學者的隱形學群。台灣社會學 8︰133-192。
    蕭新煌（1995）轉型的台灣社會學與轉型的台灣社會：個人的幾點觀察。中國社會學刊 18：1-15。
    Baldi, S. (1998) Normative versus Social Constructivist Processes in the Allocation of Citations: A Network-Analytic Model. American Sociological Review 63(6): 829-846.
    Breiger, R. (1976) Career Attributes and Network Structure- A blockmdel study of a biomedical research speciality. American Sociological Review 41: 117-135.
    Burt, R. (1976) Positions in Networks. Social Forces 55(1): 93-122.
    Burt, R. (1978) Stratification and Prestige Among Elite Experts in Methodological and Mathematical Sociology Circa 1975. Social Networks 1: 105-158.
    Burt, R., and Doreian, P. (1982) Testing a Structural Model of Perception: Conformity and Deviance with Respect to journal Norms in Elite Sociological Methology. Quality and Quantity 16: 109-150.
    Cappell, C., and Guterbock, T. (1992) Visible Colleges: The Social and Conceptual Structure of Sociology Specialties. American Sociological Review 57: 266-273.
    Carrington, J., Scott, J., and Wasserman, S. (2005) Models and Methods in Social Networks Analysis, USA: Cambridge.
    Carloan, V., (2008) The Structure of Education Research: The Multivocality in Promoting Cohesion in an article interlock networks. Social Networks 30:69-82.
    Clemens, E., Powell, W., Mcllwainw, K. and Okamoto, D. (1995) Careers in Print - Books, Journals, and Scholarly Reputations. American Journal of Sociology 101(2): 433-494.
    Cole, J and Cole, S. (1973) Social stratification in science, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Cole, S. (1983) The Hierarchy of the Sciences? The American Journal of Sociology 89(1): 111-139.
    Doreian, P. and Fararo, J. Thomas (1985) Structural Equivalence in a Journal Network. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 36(1): 28-37.
    Doreian, P., Batagelj, V., and Ferligoj, A. (2004) Generalized blockmodeling of two-mode network data. Social Networks 26(1): 29-53.
    Ennis, G. James (1992) The Social Organization of Sociological Knowledge: Modeling the Intersection of Specialties. American Sociological Review 57(2): 259-265.
    Freeman, Linton C. (1979) Centrality in Social Networks Conceptual Clarification. Social Networks 1: 215-239.
    Garfield, Eugene (1963) Citation Indexes in Sociological and Historical Research. American Documentation 14(4): 289-291.
    Hanneman, Robert and Riddle, Mark (2005) Introduction to social network methods. (on-line version)
    Hargens, Lowell L. and Howard Schuman (1990) Citation Counts and Social Comparisons: Scientists` Use and Evaluations of Citation Index Data. Social Science Research 19: 205-221.
    Hargens, L. L. (2000) Using the Literature: Reference Networks, Reference Contexts, and the Social Structure of Scholarship. American Sociological Review 65(6): 846-865.
    Kim, Hyo, Park, Han Woo, and Thelwall, Mike (2006) Comparing Academic Hyperlink Structures with Journal Publishing in Korea. Science Communication 27(4): 540-564.
    Leahey, Erin (2007) Not by Productivity Alone: How Visibility and Specialization Contribute to Academic Earnings. American Sociological Review 72: 533-561.
    Leydesdorff, L. (2004) Clusters and maps of science journals based on bi-connected graphs in Journal Citation Reports. Journal of Documentation 60(4): 371-427.
    Leydesdorff, L. (2007) Betweenness Centrality as an Indicator of the Interdisciplinarity of Scientific Journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58(9): 1303-1319.
    Lazegaa Emmanuel, Jourdab Marie-The´ re" se , Mounierc Lise, Stoferd Rafae¨ (2008) Catching up with big fish in the big pond? Multi-level network analysis through linked design. Social Networks 30: 159-176.
    Merton, K (1973) The Sociology of Science, USA: The University of Chicago Press.
    Moody, J. (2004) The Structure of a Social Science Collaboration Network: Disciplianry Cohesion from 1963 to 1999. American Journal of Sociology 69: 213-238.
    Negishi Masamitsu, Sun Yuan, Shigi Kunihiro (2004) Citation Database for Japanese Papers: A new bibliometric tool for Japanese academic society. Scientometrics 60(3): 333-351.
    Park Han Woo and Leydesdorff Loet (2008) Korean Journals in the Science Citation index: What Do They Reveal About the Intellectual Structure of S&T in Korea? Scientometrics, 75(3): 439-462.
    Poldony Joel M. (1993). A Status- Based Model of Market Competition. The American Journal of Sociology 98(4): 829-872.
    Podolny, J., Hannan M., and Stuart T. (1996). Networks, Knowledge, and Niches: Competition in the Worldwide Semiconductor Industry, 1984-1991. The American Journal of Sociology 102(3): 659-689.
    Price, Derek J. de Solla (1965). Networks of Scientific Papers. Science 149(3683): 510-515.
    Wassweman S. and Faust K. (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, USA: Cambridge University.
    White, H. D., Wellman, B., and Nazer, N. (2004) Does Citation Reflect Social Structure? Longitudinal evidence from the "Globenet" interdisciplinary research group. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 55(2): 111-126.
    Zhou and Leydesdorff, L. (2007) The citation impacts and citation environments of Chinese Journals in Mathematics. Scientometrics 72(2): 185-200.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    社會學研究所
    95254003
    96
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095254003
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Sociology] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    400301.pdf52KbAdobe PDF21218View/Open
    400302.pdf148KbAdobe PDF21150View/Open
    400303.pdf99KbAdobe PDF21241View/Open
    400304.pdf135KbAdobe PDF21289View/Open
    400305.pdf6449KbAdobe PDF22047View/Open
    400306.pdf178KbAdobe PDF21397View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback