Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34715
|
| Title: | 再生能源發展政策工具之獎勵基礎
A Study of Policy Base to Promote Renewable Energy Production |
| Authors: | 王馨珮
Wang, Hsin Pei |
| Contributors: | 蕭代基
Shaw, Dai Gee
王馨珮
Wang, Hsin Pei |
| Keywords: | 最適控制理論
淨能源
研究發展
邊做邊學
Optimal control theory
Net energy
R&D
Learning-by-doing |
| Date: | 2006 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-18 10:59:46 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本文以最適控制理論證明，獎勵再生能源產出之政策，應以再生能源淨能源產出做為獎勵的基礎，而非現行以再生能源總能源產出做為獎勵基礎之模式。這裡的淨能源產出，指的是再生能源廠商生產出之再生能源，減去生產再生能源時所用的能源投入。本文首先將社會最適情況下的總能源產出分別與以淨能源產出和總能源產出為獎勵政策基礎之價格與數量政策下之總能源產出作比較，提出獎勵再生能源產出的政策，需以淨能源產出做為獎勵的基礎，而非現行以總能源產出作為基礎的政策，接著，在以淨能源產出為基礎的政策下，探討環境外部性與防治成本以及研究發展的議題。
By the optimal control theory, this paper proves that policies on encouraging the production of renewable energy should be based on its net output or net energy instead of on its gross output or gross energy. Here net energy is defined as the surplus of renewable energy output minus energy input from its production. This paper first compares the optimal gross output of the renewable energy under the social optimal condition with the gross outputs under the price-based policy instrument and the quantity-based policy instrument based on net energy output and gross energy output, respectively, suggesting that policy instruments used to encourage the production of renewable energy should be based on its net output instead of on its gross output. Finally, it probes the cases of environmental externality and R&D based on the net output of renewable energy. |
| Reference: | 林益豪，2007。「再生能源經濟政策工具之研究」。碩士論文，政治大學經濟研究所。
邱育慈，2006。「走進低碳社會，台灣準備好了嗎？」，『科學人』。10月。34-40。
張鼎煥、呂威賢，2005。「我國再生能源法規制度探討」，『永續產業發展雙月刊』，22輯，頁32-43。經濟部工業局。
鄭宇君，2006。「建立再生能源補貼機制之經濟分析」。碩士論文，台北大學自然資源管理所。
蕭代基，2007。「最佳的、次佳的與不佳的再生能源發展政策」，『經濟前瞻』。4月。35-37。
Ackermann, T., G. Andersson and L. Soder, 2001. “Overview of Government and Market Driven Programs for the Promotion of Renewable Power Generation,” Renewable Energy. 22:197–204.
Agnolucci, P., 2005. “Use of Economic Instruments in the German Renewable Electricity Policy,” Energy Policy. 34:3538-3548.
Burned by the sun. (2007, February 22). Can Biofuels Save Europe, or the Planet? [Electronic Version]. The Economist. Retrieved July 18, 2007, from http://www.economist.com/world/europe/displaystory.cfm?story_id=8744686.
Chakravorty, U., A. Leach, and M. Moreaux, 2006. “Optimal Resource Extraction with Learning-by-doing in a Substitute Technology.” Working paper no. 1-26, Department of Economics College of Business, University of Central Florida., School of Business, University of Alberta, Canada., Universite de Toulouse, France.
Cleveland, C.J., R. Costanza, C. A.S. Hall, and R. Kaufmann, 1984. “Energy and the U.S. Economy: A Biophysical Perspective,” Science Vol. 225, No. 4665, pp. 890-897.
Connor, P.M., 2003. UK renewable energy policy: a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 7 : 65–82.
Farrell, A.E., Richard J. Plevin, Brian T. Turner, A.D.Jones, Michael O’Hare, Daniel M. Kammen. 2006. “Ethanol can Contribute to Energy and Environmental Goals,”
Finon, D. and P. Menanteau, 2004. “The Static and Dynamic Efficiency of Instruments of Promotion of Renewables,” Energy Studies Review. 12：53-81.
Hammerschlag, R., 2006. “Ethanol`s Energy Return on Investment: A Survey of the Literature 1990-Present,” Environmental Science Technology. 40:1744-1750.
Hill, Jason, E. Nelson, D. Tilman, S. Polasky and D. Tiffany, 2006. “ Environmental, Economic, and Energetic Costs and Benefits of Biodiesel and Ethanol Biofuels,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science. 103:11206-11210.
Huettner, David A., 1976. “Net Enegy Analysis: An Economic Assessment,” Science. 192:101-104.
International Energy Agency, 2002. Reforming Energy Subsidies. Paris: International Energy Agency.
International Energy Agency, 2004. Renewable Energy: Market and Policy Trends in IEA Countries. Paris: International Energy Agency.
International Energy Agency, 2006. Energy Policy of IEA Countries—the United Kingdom . Paris: International Energy Agency.
International Energy Agency, 2007. Energy Policy of IEA Countries—Germany. Paris: International Energy Agency.
International Energy Agency, 2007. Renewables in Global Energy Supply. Paris: International Energy Agency.
Jensen, S. G. and K. Skytte, 2003. “Simultaneous Attainment of Energy Goals by Means of Green Certificates and Emission Permits,” Energy Policy. 31: 63-71.
Koplow, D., 2006. Biofuels—At What Cost? Government Support for Ethanol and Biodiesel in the United State. Cambridge: Earth Track Inc. 取自http://www.earthtrack.net/earthtrack/library/biofuels_subsidies_us.pdf
Mats, N., and S. Thomas., 2006. “Using the Market at a cost: How the Introduction of Green Certificates in Sweden Led to Market Inefficiencies,” Utilities Policy. 15: 49-59.
Menanteau, P., D. Finon, and M.-L. Lamy, 2003. “Prices Versus Quantities: Choosing Policies for Promoting the Development of Renewable Energy,” Energy Policy. 31： 799–812.
Montero, J.-P., 2002. “Price Versus Quantities with Incomplete Enforcement,” Journal of Public Economics. 85:435-454.
Moore, C., Ihle, J., 1999. Renewable Energy Policy outside the United States. Renewable Energy Policy Project, Washington.
Morthorst, P. E., 2001. “Interactions of a Tradable Green Certificate Market with a Tradable Permits Market,” Energy Policy. 29：345-353.
Niven, R.K., 2005. “Ethanol in Gasoline：Environmental Impacts and Sustainability Review Article,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 9：535-555.
Pimentel, D., 1991. “Ethanol Fuels: Energy Security, Economics, and the Environment,” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 4:1-13.
Pimentel, D., 2003. “Ethanol Fuels: Energy Balance, Economics, and Environmental Impacts Are Negative,” Natural Resources Research. 12:127-134.
Pimentel, D. and T.W. Patzeck, 2005. “Ethanol Production Using Corn, Switchgrass,and Wood; Biodiesel Production Using Soybean and Sunflower.” Natural Resource Research. 14:65-76.
Pimentel, D. and T.W. Patzeck, 2006. “Green Plants, Fossil Fuels, and Now Biofuels,” Bioscience. 56(11): 875.
Pimentel, D. and T.W. Patzeck, 2007. “Ethanol Production: Energy, Economics, and Environmental Losses.” Reviews of Environmental Contamination & Toxicology. 189:25-41.
Righelato, R. and Dominick V. Spracklen, 2007. “Carbon Mitigation by Biofuels or by Saving and Restoring Forests?,” Science Vol. 317, No. 5840, pp. 902.
Shapouri, H., J.A. Duffield, and Michael Wang, 2002. The Energy Balance of Corn Ethanol: An Update: USDA, Office of Energy Policy and New Uses, Agricultural Economics. Rept. No. 813. 14 p.
The Power and Interest News Report, 2007. U.S. Energy Policy Begins to Shift. 取自 http://www.pinr.com/report.php?ac=view_report&report_id=611&language_id=1
Wald, Matthew L., 2007. “Is Ethanol for the Long Haul?,” Scientific American. January. 42-47.
Weitzman, Martin L. 1974. “Price vs. Quantities,” Review of Economics Studies. 41: 477-491.
網站資料：
台灣環境新聞特刊：http://e-info.org.tw/news/taiwan/special/2005/tasp2005-051.htm
再生能源網：http://re.org.tw
行政院主計處：http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=1535&ctNode=99
行政院農委會農糧署：http://www.afa.gov.tw/peasant_index.asp?CatID=681
國際能源總署：http://www.iea.org
經濟部能源局：http://www.tier.org.tw
環境資訊中心：http://e-info.org.tw/column/eccpda/2004/ec04051801.htm
美國能源部：http://www.energy.gov
英國商業部：http://www.berr.gov.uk/
Global Subsidies Initiative: http://www.globalsubsidies.org |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
財政研究所
94255018
95 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094255018 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [財政學系] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
