English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 112721/143689 (78%)
造访人次 : 49547496      在线人数 : 985
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34754


    题名: 地方財政表現對政黨輪替的影響:以台灣21縣市長選舉為例(1989-2005)
    The Effect of Fiscal Performance on Party Rotation of Local Government Elections in Taiwan:1989-2005
    作者: 陳政勤
    贡献者: 張勝文
    陳政勤
    关键词: 縣市長選舉
    政黨輪替
    財政表現
    經濟投票
    local government election
    party rotation
    fiscal performance
    economic voting
    日期: 2005
    上传时间: 2009-09-18 11:05:29 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本文討論台灣縣市長選舉中,財政健全程度及收入支出決算狀況會如何影響選舉結果。以台灣21個縣市在1989年至2005年間共5屆的縣市長選舉為實證研究,探討縣市長選舉結果出現政黨輪替的可能因素,在經濟投票及政治意識形態的研究方向以外,就縣市政府財政表現的角度進行分析。實證模型採用Probit model進行估計,本文實證假定為:如果縣市長致力於提升財政健全或是提供符合選民需要的公共支出時,便不容易出現政黨輪替。由實證結果發現,在財政變數方面,選舉年財政健全度及選前一年歲出成長率提高時,有助於執政黨持續執政。然而,選前二年竊案發生率較高的縣市,反而使執政黨被輪替的機率提高。對於與總統相同政黨的縣市長而言,只有在面對較高的選前一年全國及地方失業時,容易受到拖累而出現政黨輪替。競選連任的縣市長具有優勢。桃竹苗區與中彰投區相較其他地區而言,顯然較容易出現政黨輪替。
    By the five campaigns from 1989 to 2005 of the 21 local jurisdictions (includes 16 counties and 5 townships) in Taiwan, this paper discusses how fiscal health, revenue and expenditure conditions affect the election results. We analysis that the possible factors that cause election results to appear party rotation. Except for economic voting and other political factors, we mainly examine if fiscal performance results in party rotation. We adopt the Probit model to setup our empirical model. Our hypothesis is that party rotation possibly happens if local officers do not devote in fiscal health or fiscal policy that voters need. For the fiscal variables, the empirical evidence shows that increasing fiscal health in election year and total expenditures growth rate in one year before election help incumbents persist in political power. However higher crime rate on burglaries and larcenies in two year before election will reduce the probability in party rotation. If the president and incumbents are the same party affiliation, incumbents will be implicated while national and local unemployment rate worsen. Besides, incumbents who run for reelection will be in dominant position. The jurisdictions in the northeast and middle areas of Taiwan compare to the others, it is more possible to occur party rotation.
    參考文獻: 中文部分:
    曾巨威(2004),「地方財政能力與教育經費負擔之分攤機制」,人文及社會科學集刊,16卷2期,頁197-239。
    黃上紡(1996),「選舉與經濟-政治性景氣循環」,美歐月刊,11卷5期,頁51-66。
    黃智聰與程小綾(2005),「經濟投票與政黨輪替-以台灣縣市長選舉為例」,選舉研究,12卷2期,頁45-78。
    黃耀輝(2003),「強化財政紀律是改善財政的關鍵」,經濟前瞻,90期,頁48-51。
    傅彥凱(2006),「地方政府預算制定之政治經濟分析:政治預算循環的觀點」,選舉研究,13卷1期,頁119-162。
    蔡吉源與林健次(2005),「台灣中央與地方財政關係-制度與歷史的觀察(1952-2003)」,財稅研究,37卷5期,頁137-154。
    蔡吉源(2006),「當前地方財政困難及其解決方向」,財稅研究,38卷3期,頁127-149。
    英文部分:
    Akhmedov, A. and Zhuravskaya, E. (2004). “Opportunistic Political Cycles: Test in a Young Democracy Setting.” Quarterly of Journal Economics 119, 1301-1338.
    Alesina, A. and Perotti, R. (1995). “The Political Economy of Budget Deficit.”
    IMF Staff Paper 42, 1-31.
    Alesina, A., Perotti, R. and Tavares. J. (1998). “The Political Economy of Fiscal Adjustments.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1, 197-248.
    Atkinson, A. B. and Stiglitz, J. E. (1980). Lectures on Public Economics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Brender, A. and Drazen, A. (2004). “Political Budget Cycles in New versus Established Democracies.” NBER Working Paper Series 10539.
    Brender, A. and Drazen, A. (2005). “How Do Budget Deficits and Economic Growth Affect Reelection Prospects? Evidence from a Large Cross-section of Countries.” NBER Working Paper Series 11862.
    Brender, A. (2003). “The Effect of Fiscal Performance on Local Government Election Results in Israel: 1989-1998.” Journal of Public Economics 87, 2187-2205.
    Drazen, A. and Eslava, M. (2005). “Election Manipulation via Expenditure Composition: Theory and Evidence.” NBER Working Paper Series 11085.
    Easaw, J. and Garratt, D. (2000). “Elections and UK Government Expenditure Cycles in the 1980s: An Empirical Analysis.” Applied Economics 32, 381-391.
    Fiorina, M. (1981). Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    Fisher, R. C. (1996). State and Local Public Finance. Chicago: Richard D Irwin.
    Frey, B. S. and Schneider, F. (1978). “An Empirical Study of Political-Interaction in the United States.” Review of Economics and Statistics 60, 174-183.
    Fujita, M. (1989). Urban Economic Theory: Land Use and City Size. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Gonzalez, M. (2002). “Do Changes in Democracy Affect the Political Budget Cycles? Evidence from Mexico.” Review of Development Economics 6, 204-224.
    Greene, W. H.(2003). Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
    Happy, J. R. (1992). “The Effect of Economic and Fiscal Performance on Incumbency Voting: the Canadian Case.” British Journal of Political Science 22, 117-130.
    Hendrick, R. (2004). “Assessing and Measuring the Fiscal Health of Local Governments.” Urban Affairs Review 40, 78-114.
    Hochman, O., Pine, D., and Thisse, J.-F. (1995). “On the Optimal Structure of Local Government.” American Economic Review 85, 1224-1240.
    Khemani, S. (2001). “Decentralization and Accountability: Are Voters More Vigilant in Local than in National Elections?” The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series 2557.
    Kneebone, R. D. and McKenzie, K. J. (2001). “Electoral and Partisan Cycles in Fiscal Policy: An Examination of Canadian Provinces.” International Tax and Public Finance 8, 753-774.
    Kramer, G. H. (1971). “Short-Term Fluctuation in U.S. Voting Behavior, 1896-1964.” American Political Science Review 65, 131-143.
    Ladd, H. F. and Yinger, J. (1991). America’s Ailing Cities: Fiscal Health and the Design of Urban Policy. Updated edition, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    Levitt, S. D. (1997). “Using Electoral Cycles in Police Hiring to Estimate the Effect of Police on Crime.” American Economic Review 87, 270-290.
    Long, J. S. (1997). Regression Models for Categorical and Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Saga Publication.
    Lowry, R. C., Alt, J. E., and Ferree, K. E. (1998). “Fiscal Policy Outcomes and Electoral Accountability in American States.” American Political Science Review 92, 759-774.
    MacDonald, J. A. and Sigelman, L. (1999). “Public Assessments of Gubernatorial Performance-A Comparative Analysis.” American Politics Quarterly 27, 201-215.
    Molina, J. (2001). “The Electoral Effect of Underdevelopment: Government Turnover and Its Causes in Latin-American, Caribbean and Industrializes Countries.” Electoral Studies 20, 427-446.
    Musgrave, R. A. and Musgrave, P. B. (1980). Public Finance in Theory and in Practice. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Niemi, R. G., Stanley, H. W., and Vogel, R. J. (1995). “State Economies and State Taxes: Do Voters Hold Governors Accountable?” American Journal of Political Science 39, 936-957.
    Oates, W. (1972). Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
    Peltzman, S. (1987). “Economic Conditions and Gubernatorial Elections.”
    American Economic Review 77, 293-297.
    Peltzman, S. (1992). “Voters as Fiscal Conservatives.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 107, 327-361.
    Poterba, J. M. (1994). “State Responses to Fiscal Crises: The Effect of Budgetary Institutions and Politics.” Journal of Political Economy 102, 799-821.
    Rogoff, K. (1990). “Equilibrium Political Budget Cycles.” American Economic Review 80, 21-36.
    Rogoff, K. and Sibert, A. (1988). “Elections and Macroeconomic Policy Cycles.” Review of Economic Studies 55, 1-16.
    Rosen, H. S. (2002). Public Finance. Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
    Schuknecht, L. (2000). ”Fiscal Policy Cycles and Public Expenditure in Developing Countries.” Public Choice 102, 115-130.
    Stein, R. M. (1990). “Economic Voting for Governor and U.S. Senator: The Electoral Consequences of Federalism.” Journal of Politics 52, 29-53.
    Tiebout, C. M. (1956). ”A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures.” Journal of Political Economy 64, 416-424.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財政研究所
    93255021
    94
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0932550211
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[財政學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    55021101.pdf64KbAdobe PDF2790检视/开启
    55021102.pdf67KbAdobe PDF2750检视/开启
    55021103.pdf14KbAdobe PDF2718检视/开启
    55021104.pdf65KbAdobe PDF2734检视/开启
    55021105.pdf137KbAdobe PDF21075检视/开启
    55021106.pdf162KbAdobe PDF21140检视/开启
    55021107.pdf142KbAdobe PDF21375检视/开启
    55021108.pdf182KbAdobe PDF21048检视/开启
    55021109.pdf189KbAdobe PDF21493检视/开启
    55021110.pdf85KbAdobe PDF2920检视/开启
    55021111.pdf95KbAdobe PDF2926检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈