English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88866/118573 (75%)
Visitors : 23556722      Online Users : 145
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 企業管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/34950
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/34950


    Title: 主題廣告、促銷活動與品牌層級之綜效研究 — 考慮產品類別之調節效果
    Research of synergies between feature advertisements, promotional activities, and brand tiers — considering the moderating effect of product type
    Authors: 張馨云
    Contributors: 張愛華
    張馨云
    Keywords: 主題廣告
    促銷活動
    品牌層級
    產品類別
    推廣組合
    feature advertisement
    promotional activity
    brand tier
    product type
    promotional mix
    Date: 2002
    Issue Date: 2009-09-18 13:24:16 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 推廣活動的種類繁多,但是究竟推廣組合的綜效如何,是值得探討的問題,近年來學界與實務界開始重視這個問題,提出「整合行銷溝通」(integrated marketing communication;簡稱IMC)之重要性,顯示在市場競爭日趨激烈的今日,規劃整合性的推廣策略才能有效運用行銷資源達到最大的綜效。
    因此本研究主要探討「促銷與否及活動類型」(價格促銷、贈品促銷、無促銷)、「品牌呈現方式」(直接比較、分開比較--有主題廣告)、「品牌層級」(高品質/高價格品牌、低品質/低價格品牌)對於「消費者選擇率之變化」的影響,並且加入「產品類別」(功能性產品、享樂性產品)作為調節變數。
    經過分析的結果發現:
    一、享樂性產品提供享樂性贈品的促銷效果比價格促銷的效果更佳,但不顯著。
    二、功能性產品提供功能性贈品的促銷效果與價格促銷的效果相若,甚至更好。
    三、在直接比較時,低品質/低價格品牌進行價格促銷的效果皆比高品質/高價格品牌的效果更佳。此發現與過去的研究結論相反。
    四、主題廣告與贈品促銷同時進行時(亦即在分開比較的情況下),低品質/低價格品牌進行價格促銷後所增加的選擇率與高品質/高價格品牌所增加的選擇率差不多,但在直接比較的情況下,低品質/低價格品牌所增加的選擇率卻明顯大於高品質/高價格品牌增加的選擇率,亦與過去的研究結論相反。
    五、在直接比較時,低品質/低價格品牌進行贈品促銷的效果比高品質/高價格品牌進行贈品促銷的效果佳。
    六、主題廣告與贈品促銷同時進行對高品質/高價格品牌較有利。
    七、不論是功能性產品或享樂性產品,贈品促銷的效果皆比價格促銷的效果佳。
    There are many kinds of promotional activities. It is a worthwhile problem to investigate the synergy between promotional mixes. Recently, the academia and business start to pay attention to this problem and brought up the importance of “Integrated Marketing Communication”. It means that only integrated promotional strategy can effectively utilize marketing resources to reach the greatest synergy in today’s increasingly competitive market.
    Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine the effects of “presence and types of promotion” (price promotion, premium promotion, and no promotion), the “types of presentation of the brand” (directly compare and separately compare — with feature advertisement), and “brand tier”(high quality/price brand and low quality/price brand)on ”the variation of consumer choice rate”, including the moderator of “product type”(functional product and hedonic product).
    The conclusions are as follows:
    1.The effect of hedonic premium of hedonic products is better than price promotion, but it’s not significant.
    2.The effect of functional premium of functional products is equal to price promotion and even better.
    3.When directly compared, the price promotion effect of low quality/price brand is better than that of high quality/price brand. This finding is opposite with the research conclusions drawn before.
    4.When feature advertisements and premium promotions are proceeding simultaneously(that is, in the separate comparison condition), the amount of increase in consumers’ choice rate after the price promotion is about the same for low quality/price brand and for high quality/price brand. However, in the direct comparison condition, the amount of increase in consumers’ choice rate is significantly greater for the low quality/price brand than that for the high quality/price brand. This finding is opposite from the research conclusions drawn before.
    5.In the direct comparison condition, the effect of premium promotion of low quality/price brand is better than that of high quality/price brand.
    6.Proceeding feature advertisements and premium promotions simultaneously is more advantageous for the high quality/price brand than for the low quality/price brand.
    7.For Both functional and hedonic product, the effect of premium promotion is better than price promotion.
    Reference: 中文部份
    1、朱家賢(民89),促銷性廣告、產品品牌聯想形象、消費者屬性對廣告效果影響之研究,東吳大學企業管理學系碩士論文
    2、呂芳洲(民86),品牌聯盟對品牌權益影響之研究,國立雲林科技大學企業管理研究所碩士論文
    3、林怡君(民91),贈品-主產品利益一致性與品牌權益對促銷效果影響之研究,國立臺灣大學商學研究所碩士論文
    4、高啟震(民84),品牌聯盟的品質訊號傳遞效果之研究,大同工學院事業經營學系碩士論文
    5、徐心怡(民89),消費者促銷知覺價值與促銷偏好程度之研究-產品類別干擾效果之探討,元智大學管理研究所碩士論文
    6、袁愛亭(民87),從產品互補性、品牌聲望一致性與訂價方式探討品牌聯盟之效果,輔仁大學管理學研究所碩士論文
    7、殷仲華(民86),品牌聯盟動機、聯盟型態與品牌權益關係之研究—資源基礎觀點之研究,中原大學企業管理學系碩士論文
    8、陳靜瑩(民84),影響消費者對品牌聯盟評價因素之研究,國立中央大學企業管理學系碩士論文
    9、康凱雯(民89),產品屬性、消費者評估參考點與評估情境對購買評價之影嚮,國立臺灣大學商學研究所碩士論文
    10、黃麗霞(民91),贈品促銷型式對消費者的知覺價值與購買意願之影響,國立臺灣大學商學研究所博士論文
    11、趙欣宜(民90),品牌聯盟對品牌權益之影響--以網路購物為例,實踐大學企業管理研究所碩士論文
    12、洪順慶,行銷管理學,新陸書局,2001
    13、周文賢,多變量統計分析SAS/STAT使用方法,智勝書局,2002
    14、iSURVEY行銷電子週報,<消費生活>謎一樣的洗髮精,2003/03/14
    15、iSURVEY行銷電子週報,<染髮產品>護髮/不乾澀躍升購買因素第三位,2002/01/18
    英文部份
    1、Aaker, David A. (1991), Managing Brand Equity. New York: The Free Press.
    2、Allenby, Greg M., and Peter E. Rossi (1991), “Quality Perceptions and Asymmetric Switching Between Brands,” Marketing Science, Vol.10(Sum), 185-204.
    3、Babin, Barry J., William R. Darden, and Mitch Griffin (1994), “Work and/or Fun:Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.20(Mar), 644-656.
    4、Bronnenberg, Bart J., and Luc Wathieu (1996),“Asymmetric Promotion Effects and Brand Positioning,” Marketing Science, Vol.15(4), 379-394.
    5、Bettman, James R., Mary Frances Luce, and John W. Payne (1998), “Constructive Consumer Choice Processes,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.25(3), 187-217.
    6、Biernat, Monica, Melvin Manis, and Diane Kobrynowicz (1997), ”Simultaneous Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Judgments of Self and Others,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.73(2), 254-269.
    7、Blair, Edward A. and E. Laird Landon Jr. (1981), “The Effects of Reference Prices in Retail Advertisements,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.45(Spring), 61-69.
    8、Blattberg, Robert C., and Kenneth J. Wisniewski (1989), “Price-Induced Patterns of Competiton,” Marketing Science, Vol.8(Fall), 291-309.
    9、Blattberg, Robert C., and Scott A. Neslin (1990), Sales Promotion Concepts, Methods, and Strategies, Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
    10、Blattberg, Robert C., Richard Briesch, and Edward J. Fox (1995), “How Promotions Work,” Marketing Science, Vol.14(Sum), 122-132.
    11、Bronnenberg, Bert J., and Luc Wathieu (1996), “Asymmetric Promotion Effects and Brand Positioning,” Marketing Science, Vol.15(4), 379-394.
    12、Campbell, Leland, and William D. Diamond (1990), “ Framing and Sales Promotion:The Characteristics of Good Deal,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol.7, No.4 , 25-31.
    13、Chandon, Pierre, Brian Wansin, and Gilles Laurent (2000), “A Benefit Congruency Framework of Sales Promotion Effectiveness,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.64(Oct), 65-81.
    14、Hugh, Davidson J. (1987), Offensive Marketing:How to Make Your Competitors Follow, 2nd ed. England:Gower Publishing Company Limited.
    15、Davis, Scott, J. Jeffrey Inman, and Leigh McAlister (1992),”Promotion Has a Negative Effect on Brand Evaluations—Or Does It? Additional Disconfirming Evidence,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.29(Feb), 143-148.
    16、Dodson, Joe A., Alice M. Tybout, and Brian Sternthal (1978),”Impact of Deals and Deal Retraction on Brand Switching,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.15(Feb), 72-81.
    17、Dommermuth, William P (1989), Promotion:Analysis, Creativity, Strategy, 2nd ed. Boston, Mass:PWS-Kent Publishing Company.
    18、Eskin, Gerald J., and Penny H. Baron (1977),”Effects of Price and Advertising in Test-Market Experiments,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.14(Nov), 499-508.
    19、Guiltinan, Joseph P. (1987) “The Price Bundling of Services:A Normative Framework” Journal of Marketing, 74-85
    20、Hardie, Bruce G.S., Eric J. Johnson, and Peter S. Fader (1993), “Modeling Loss Averson and Reference Dependence Effects on Brand Choice,” Marketing Science, Vol.12(Fall), 378-394.
    21、Heath, Timothy B., Gangseog Ryu, Subimal Chatterjee, Michael S. Mccarthy, David L. Mothersbaugh, Sandra Milberg, and Gary J. Gaeth (2000),“Asymmetric Competition in Choice and the Leveraging of Competitive Disadvantages,”Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.27(Dec), 291-308.
    22、Heath, Timothy B., and Subimal Chatterjee (1995),“Asymmetric Decoy Effects on Lower-Quality Versus Higher-Quality Brands:Meta Analytic and Experimental Evidence,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.22(Dec), 268-284.
    23、Hirscman, Elizabeth C., and Morris B. Holbrook (1982),”Hedonic Consumption:Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.46(Sum), 92-101.
    24、Holbrook, Morris B. (1994),”The Nature of Consumer Value”. In Service Quality:New Directions in Theory and Practice, R. T. Rust and R.L. Oliver(eds). Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications.
    25、Hsee, C.K. (1996),”Elastic justification: How unjustifiable factors influence judgments” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, Vol.66, 122-129.
    26、Hsee, Christopher K., and France Leclerc (1998), “Will Products Look More Attractive When Presented Separately or Together?” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.25(Sep), 175-86.
    27、Jordan, Kevin, and Peter W. English (1989),”Simultaneous Sampling and Length Contrast,” Perception & Psychophysics, Vol.46(6), 546-554.
    28、Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky (1979), “Prospect Theory:An Analysis of Decision Under Risk” Econometrica, Vol.47(2), 263-91.
    29、Lemon, Katherine N, and Stephen M Nowlis (2002),”Developing synergies between promotions and brands in different price-quality tiers,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.39(May), 171-185.
    30、Kotler, Philip (1998), Marketing Management:Analysis, Planning, Implementation, and Control, 9th Edition, New Jersey:Prentice-Hall Inc.
    31、Krishnamurthi, Lakshman, and S.P. Raj (1985),”The Effect of Advertising on Consumer Price Sensitivity,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.22(May), 119-129.
    32、Mano, Haim, and Richard L. Oliver (1993), “Assessing the Dimensionality and Structure of the Consumption Experience:Evaluation, Feeling, and Satisfaction, ” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.20(Dec), 451-466.
    33、Carl, Mela F., Sunil Gupta, and Donald R. Lehmann (1997), “The Long-Term Impact of Promotion and Advertising on Consumer Brand Choice,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.XXXIV(May), 248-261.
    34、Mulhern, F.J., and R.P. Leone (1991),”Implicit Price Bundling of Retail Products:A Multiproduct Approach to Maximizing Store Profitability,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.55(Oct), 63-76.
    35、Nowlis, Stephen M., and Itamar Simonson (1996),“The Effect of New Product Features on Brand Choice,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.33(1), 36-46.
    36、Nowlis, Stephen M., and Itamar Simonson (1997),”Attribute-Task Compatibility as a Determinant of Consumer Preference Reversals,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.34(2), 205-18.
    37、Nowlis, Stephen M., and Itamar Simonson (2000), “Sales Promotions and the Choice Context as Competing Influences on Consumer Decision Making,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol.9(1), 1-16.
    38、Papatla, Purushottam, and Lakshman Krishnamurthi (1996), “Measuring the Dynamic Effects of Promotions on Brand Choice,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.33(Feb), 20-35.
    39、Prentice, R. M. (1975),“The FCB Approach to Advertise/Promotion Spending,” in The Relationship Between Advertise and Promotion in Brand Strategy, R. A. Strang, ed., Cambridge:Marketing Science Institute, 75-90.
    40、Quelch, John A. (1989), Sales Promotion Management, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.:Prentice-Hall, Inc.
    41、Sethuraman, Raj, V. Srinivasan, Doyle Kim (1999),”Asymmetric and Neighborhood Cross-Price Effects:Some Empirical Generalizations,” Marketing Science, Vol.18(1), 23-41.
    42、Rao, Akshay R, Lu Qu, and Robert W Ruekert (1999),“Signaling Unobservable Product Quality Through A Brand Ally” Journal of Marketing Research, 258-269.
    43、Rao, Akshay R, and Robert W Ruekert (1994),”Brand Alliance as Signals of Product Quality,” Sloan Management Review, Vol.36(1), 87-97.
    44、Ritov, Ilana (2000),”The Role of Expectations in Comparisons,” Psychological Review, Vol.107(2), 345-57.
    45、Sethuraman, Raj (1996),“A Model of How Discounting HighPriced Brands Affects the Sales of Low-Priced Brands,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.33(4), 399-409.
    46、Shocker, Allan D, Rajendra K Srivastava, and Robert W Ruekert (1994),”Challenges and Opportunities Facing Brand Management:An Introduction to the Special Issue,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.31(May), 149-158.
    47、Simonin, B. L., and J. A. Ruth (1998),“Is a Company Known by the Company It Keeps? Assessing the Spillover Effect of Brand Alliance on Consumer Brand Attitudes,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.35(Feb), 30-42.
    48、Taylor, Shelley E. (1979),”The Generalizability of Salience Effects,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.37(3), 357-368.
    49、Viswanathan, Madhubalan, and Sunder Narayanan (1994),”Comparative Judgments of Numerical and Verbal Attribute Levels,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol.3(1), 79-101.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所
    90355038
    91
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090355038
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[企業管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    35503801.pdf13KbAdobe PDF856View/Open
    35503802.pdf9KbAdobe PDF942View/Open
    35503803.pdf13KbAdobe PDF824View/Open
    35503804.pdf21KbAdobe PDF1059View/Open
    35503805.pdf21KbAdobe PDF1297View/Open
    35503806.pdf53KbAdobe PDF6578View/Open
    35503807.pdf59KbAdobe PDF1330View/Open
    35503808.pdf102KbAdobe PDF4699View/Open
    35503809.pdf26KbAdobe PDF960View/Open
    35503810.pdf29KbAdobe PDF1563View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback