Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35731
|
| Title: | 台灣中游石化業績效、開放程度與匯率轉嫁之探討
Performance, Openness And Exchange Rate Ppass-Through In Taiwan`s Mistream Petrochemical Iindustry |
| Authors: | 王淑卿
Shu Ching,Wang |
| Contributors: | 王國樑
王淑卿
Shu Ching,Wang |
| Keywords: | 績效
開放程度
匯率轉嫁 |
| Date: | 2006 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-18 15:52:47 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本論文分為三個主題,分別探討外國貿易對台灣中游石化業績效,開放程度與匯率轉嫁之影響（此欄無法空白,故填入簡單說明）
The dissertation is a collection of three separate but related papers which are devoted to the empirical studies of Taiwan’s midstream petrochemical industry. In addition to the introductory chapter, three papers are presented respectively in chapters 2 through 4. The empirical results in chapter 2 confirm the causalities derived from the theoretical model, and demonstrate that there do exist simultaneous relationships among domestic firms’ PCM, domestic concentration, import and export shares in Taiwan’s midstream petrochemical industries. Specifically, domestic concentration affects domestic firms’ PCM positively while import share, export share, import concentration and country concentration of exports affect domestic firms’ PCM negatively. Domestic firms’ PCM, import share and import concentration affect domestic concentration positively while market size affects domestic concentration negatively. Domestic concentration and cost differential affect import share positively while domestic firms’ PCM, export share, import concentration and capacity utilization affect import share negatively. Domestic firms’ PCM, import share and import concentration affect export share negatively. In addition, the results also imply domestic firms seem to be in a situation of collusion during the period of 1989-1997, and the collusive behavior probably has originated from their subsidiary or old employer-employee relationship. In chapter 3, the regression results confirm the causalities derived from the theoretical model, and demonstrate that there do exist simultaneous relationships among domestic firms’ PCM, domestic concentration and the openness to trade in Taiwan’s midstream petrochemical industries. Specifically, domestic concentration affects domestic firms’ PCM positively while openness and import concentration affect domestic firms’ PCM negatively. Domestic firms’ PCM, openness, import share, import concentration and capacity utilization affect domestic concentration positively while market size affects domestic concentration negatively. Domestic concentration and import share affect openness positively while domestic firms’ PCM and import concentration affect openness negatively. Based on the derived causalities, the above empirical results imply that the interactive relationship among domestic firms as well as that between domestic and foreign firms might both be collusive during the period of 1989-1997, and the collusive behavior probably has originated from their subsidiary or old employer-employee relationship. In chapter 4, we have found that firms from the two largest importing nations of midstream petrochemicals in Taiwan, the US and Japan, have exercised market power in Taiwan market during our sample period. However, our data seems to suggest that other causes of incomplete pass-through were important for Japan and US imports. Observing the differences between Japanese and the US import behavior, cost increases for Japanese firms have a lower effect than US firms on equilibrium price, that could be explained by the desire of Japanese manufacturing firms to build up their shares in Taiwan during the period. In addition, the result indicates that the Japanese firms in Taiwan have more market power than US firms. According to theory model, this result also implies that elasticity of exchange rate pass-through of Japanese firms is smaller than the US firms’. |
| Reference: | Alba, J.and Papell, D. (1998) Exchange Rate Determination and Inflation in Southeast Asian Countries, Journal of Development Economics , 55, 421–437.
Anaya, G. (2000) Exchange Rate Pass-through and Partial Dollarization: is There a Link? CREDPRWorking Paper, vol. 81.
Antzoulatos, A. and Yang, J. (1996) Exchange Rate Pass-Through in U.S. Manufacturing Industries: A Demand-Side Story, International Trade Journal, 10, 325-52
Bennenbroek, N. and Harris, R. I. D. (1995) An Investigation of the Determinants of Profitability in New Zealand Manufacturing Industries in 1986-87, Applied Economics, 27, 1093-1101.
Bernhofen, D.M. and Xu, P. (2000) Exchange Rates and Market Power: Evidence from the Petrochemical Industry, Journal of International Economics, 52, 283-297.
Bhattacharya, M. (2002) Industrial Concentration and Competition in Malaysia Manufacturing, Applied Economics, 34, 2127-2134.
Blonigen, B. A. and Haynes, S. E. (2002) Antidumping Investigations and the Passthrough of Antidumping Duties and Exchange Rates, American Economic Review, 92, 1044-1061.
Bradford, C. and Chakwin, N. (1993) Alternative Explanations of the Trade-Output Correlation in East Asian Economies, OECD Development Centre Technical Paper No. 87.
Brander, J. and Krugman, P. (1983) A Reciprocal Dumping Model of International Trade, Journal of International Economics, 15, 313-321.
Campa, J. and Goldberg, L. (2006) Pass-Through of Exchange Rates to Consumption Prices: What Has Changed and Why, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Staff Report 261.
Campa, J., Goldberg, L. and Gonzalez-Minguez, J. (2005) Exchange Rate Pass-through to Import Prices in the Euro Area, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Staff Report 219.
Carlton D. W. and Perloff, J. M. (1994) Modern Industrial Organization, Addison-Wesley.
Chou, T. C. (1986) Concentration, Profitability and Trade in a Simultaneous Equation Analysis: The Case of Taiwan, The Journal of Industrial Economics, 34, 429-443.
Clark, R. and Davies, S.W. (1982) Market Structure and PCMs, Economica, 49, 277-287.
Cubbin, J. (1983) Apparent Collusion and Conjectural Variation in a Differentiated Oligopoly, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 1, 155-163.
Dei, F. (1990) A Note on Multinational Corporations in a Model of Reciprocal Dumping, Journal of International Economics, 29, 161-171.
Delorme, C.D., Klein, P. G., Kamerschen, D. R. and Voeks, L. F. (2002) Structure, Conduct and Performance: A Simultaneous Equations Approach, Applied Economics, 35, 13-20.
Dollar, D. (1992) Outward-oriented developing economies really do grow more rapidly: evidence from 95 LDCs 1976–1985, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 40, 523–544.
Dowling, J.M., Rana, B. (1985) Inflationary effects of Exchange Rate changes in Asian LDCs. Review of Economics and Statistics, 67, 496-500.
Easterly, W. (1993) How Much Do Distortions Affect Growth?, Journal of Monetary Economics, 32, 187-212.
Edwards, S. (1993) Openness, trade liberalization, and growth in developing countries, Journal of Economic Literature, 31, 1358–1393.
Esposito, L. and Esposito, F. F. (1971) Foreign Competition and Domestic Industry Profitability, Review of Economics and Statistics, 53, 343-353.
Feder, G. (1983) On Exports and Economic Growth, Journal of Development Econom-ics, 12, 59-73.
Feenstra, R. (1989) Symmetric pass-through of tariffs and exchange rates under imperfect competition: an empirical test. Journal of International Economics, 27, 25–45.
Fischer, S. (1991) Growth, Macroeconomics, and Development, in Olivier Jean Blanchard and Stanley Fischer, eds., NBER macroeconomics annual 1991. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 329-64.
Fischer, S. (1993) The Role of Macroeconomic Factors in Growth, Journal of Monetary Economics, 32, 485-512.
Frankel, J. and Romer, D. (1999) Does trade cause growth?, American Economic Review, 89, 379–399.
Frankel, J., Parsley, D. and Wei, S.J. (2005) Slow Passthrough Around the World: a New Import for Developing Countries? National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, vol. 11199.
Garcia, C.J. and Restrepo, J.E. (2001) Price Inflation and Exchange Rate Pass-through in Chile. Central Bank of Chile Working Paper, vol. 128.
Gelfand, M. D. and Spiller, P. T. (1987) Entry Barriers and Multiproduct Oligopolies– Do They Forebear or Spoil? International Journal of Industrial Organization, 7, 101-113.
Geroski, P. A. (1982) Simultaneous Equations Models of the Structure-Performance Paradigm, European Economic Review, 19, 145-158.
Gil-Pareja, Salvador (2000) Exchange Rates and European Countries Export Prices: An Empirical Test for Asymmetries in Pricing to Market Behavior, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 136, 1-23.
Go, G. L., Kamerschen, D. R. and Delorme, C. D. (1999) Market Structure and PCMs in Philippine Manufacturing Industries, Applied Economics, 31, 857-864.
Goldberg, P. and Verboven, F. (2001) Market Integration and Convergence to the Law of One Price: Evidence from the European Car Market, CEPR Discussion Paper 2926.
Goldberg, P.K. and Knetter, M. (1997) Goods prices and exchange rate: what have we learned? Journal of Economic Literature , 35, 1243–1272.
Goldfajn, I. and Werlang, S.R.C. (2000) The Pass-through from Depreciation to Inflation: A Panel Study. Banco Central Do Brasil Working Paper, vol. 5.
Gollop, F. and Roberts, M. (1979) Firm Interdependence in Oligopolistic Markets, Journal of Econometrics, 10, 313-331.
Gron, A. and Swenson, D.L. (1996) Incomplete exchange-rate pass-through and imperfect competition: the effect of local production. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 71–76.
Harrison, A. (1996) Openness and growth: a time series, cross-country analysis for developing countries, Journal of Development Economics, 48, 419– 447.
Harrison, A., and Hanson, G. (1999) Who gains from trade reform? Some remaining puzzles, Journal of Development Economics, 59, 125– 154.
Hay, D. A. and Morris, D. J. (1991) Industrial Economics and Organisation: Theory and Evidence, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Helpman, E. (1991) Growth, Technological Progress, and Trade, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 445-502.
Jacquemin A., de Ghellinck, E. and Huveneers, C. (1980) Concentration and Performance in a Small Open-Economy, Journal of Industrial Economics, 29, 131-144.
Jacquemin, A. (1982) Imperfect Market Structure and International Trade: Some Recent Research, Kyklos, 35, 75-93.
Kalirajan, K. P. (1993) On the Simultaneity Between Market Concentration and Profitability: The Case of a Small-Open Developing Country, International Economic Journal, 7, 31-48.
Khalizadeh-Shirazi, J. (1974) Market Structure and PCMs in United Kingdom Manufacturing Industries, Review of Economics and Statistics, 56, 67-76.
Kormendi, R. and Meguire, P. (1985) Macroeconomic Determinants of Growth: Cross-Country Evidence, Journal of Monetary Economics, 16, 141-163.
Lee, J. (1993) International trade, distortions, and long-run economic growth. IMF Staff Papers 40 (2), 299– 328.
Lopez, E. and Lopez, R. A. (1996) Market Structure and the Impact of Imports on Price Cost Margins, Review of Industrial Organization, 11, 107-113.
Marazzi, M., Sheets, N. and Vigfusson, R. et al. (2005) Exchange Rate Pass Through to US Import Prices: Some New Evidence,” Federal Reserve Board of Govenors, International Finance Discussion Paper no. 833, April.
Martin, S. (1993) Advanced Industrial Economics, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
McDonald, J. D. (1999) The Determinants of Firm Profitability in Australian Manufacturing, The Economic Record, 75, 115-126.
McGee, J. S. (1988) Industrial Organization. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Menon, J. (1995) Exchange rate pass-through, Journal of Economic Surveys, 9, 197–321.
Metin-Özcan, K., Voyvoda, E. and Yeldan, E. (2000) On the Patterns of Trade liberalization, Oligopolistic Concentration and Profitability: Reflections from post-1980 Turkish Manufacturing, Department of Economics Discussion Paper No: 00-12, Bilkent University, Ankara.
Michaely, M. (1977) Exports and Growth: An Empirical Investigation, Journal of Development Economics, 4, 49-53.
Nolle, D. E. (1991) An Empirical Analysis of Market Structure and Import and Export Performance for US Manufacturing Industries, Quarterly Review of Economics and Business, 31, 60-78.
Olivei, G. P. (2002) Exchange Rates and the Prices of Manufacturing Products Imported into the United States, New England Economic Review, 3–18.
Oustapassidis, K. and Vlachvei, A. (1999) Profitability and Product Differentiation in Greek Food Industries, Applied Economics, 31, 1293-1298.
Pagoulatos, E. and Sorensen, R. (1976) Domestic Market Structure and International Trade: An Empirical Analysis, Quarterly Review of Economics And Business, 16, 45-49.
Pagoulatos, E. and Sorensen, R. (1981) A Simultaneous Equation Analysis of Advertising Concentration and Profitability, Southern Economic Journal, 47, 728-741.
Pollard, P. and Coughlin, C. (2005) Pass-through Estimates and the Choice of Exchange Rate” Federal Reserve Bank of Saint Louis, Working Paper, 2003-004C.
Pugel, T. A. (1978) International Market Linkages and U.S. Manufacturing: Prices, Profits, and Patterns, Cambridge: Ballinger.
Pugel, T. A. (1980) Foreign Trade and U.S. Market Performance, Journal of Industrial Economics, 29, 119-129.
Rodriguez, F. and Rodrik, R. (2000) Trade policy and economic growth: a skeptic’s guide to the cross-national evidence. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 261–325.
Rodrik, D. (1995) Trade and Industrial Policy Reform, in J. Behrman and T.N. Srinivasan.,. Handbook of Development Economics, volume III.
Sachs, J. and Warner, A. (1995) Economic reform and the process of global integration, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1–118.
Sibert, A. (1992) Exchange Rate, Market Structure, Prices and Imports, Economic Record, 68, 233-239.
Spiller, P. T. and Favaro, E. (1984) The Effects of Entry Regulation on Oligopolistic Interaction: The Uruguayan Banking Sector, Rand Journal of Economics, 15, 244-254.
Stalhammar, N. (1991) Domestic Market Power and Foreign Trade: The Case of Sweden, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 9, 407-424.
Thompson, A. (2002) Import Competition and Market Power: Canadian Evidence, The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 13, 40-55.
Urata, S. (1979) Price-Cost Margins and Foreign Trade in U.S. Textile and Apparel Industries, Economics Letters, 4, 279-282.
Wang, K. L. (1997) The Influence of Increased Foreign Competition on Profitability and Concentration in the Taiwan Petrochemistry Industry, Academia Economic Papers, 25, 45-68.
Wang, K. L. and Wu, C. S. (1999) Exchange Rate Pass-Through and Industry Characteristics: The Case of Taiwan’s Exports of Midstream Petrochemical Products, in: Takatoshi Ito and Anne O. Krueger, eds., Changes in Exchange Rates in Rapidly Developing Countries: Theory, Practice, and Policy Issues, 211-230, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Yalcin, C. (2000) PCMs and Trade Liberalization in Turkish Manufacturing Industry: A Panel Data Analysis, The Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey, Research Department Discussion Paper.
Yang, J. (1997) Exchange Rate Pass-through in US Manufacturing Industries, Review of Economics and Statistics, 79, 95–104.
Yanikkaya, H. (2003) Trade openness and economic growth: a cross-country empirical investigation, Journal of Development Economics, 72, 57-89. |
| Description: | 博士
國立政治大學
經濟研究所
89258502
95 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0089258502 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [經濟學系] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
