English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110751/141676 (78%)
Visitors : 47397083      Online Users : 667
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35743


    Title: 從公司治理與產業前景角度檢視盈餘與股價溢酬之關係
    From corporate governance and industry foresight to examine the relationship between earnings and stock price premium
    Authors: 陳威任
    Chen,Wei Jen
    Contributors: 沈中華
    Shen,Chung-Hua
    陳威任
    Chen,Wei Jen
    Keywords: 公司治理
    產業前景
    兩兆產業分析
    corporate governance
    industry foresight
    industry analysis
    Date: 2003
    Issue Date: 2009-09-18 15:54:34 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究之動機起於麥肯錫顧問公司的調查報告,報告中提到,若企業有良好的公司治理制度,投資者願意支付多一些以持有該公司股票。本研究從公司治理和產業前景兩個角度切入,並參考國內外文獻選出四個代表性的公司治理變數以及從國內券商和金融商情機構所公開之產業研究報告中,建立產業景氣循環相對位置之虛擬變數,目的是量化質性的報告,期望能理出一條脈絡。

    根據本研究實証結果可知,就公司治理變數方面,僅有代表資訊揭露品質的指標即”是否有發行海外存託憑證”,此變數與股價溢酬關係為正向且顯著。因此,當我們還在對財務報表的會計師查核簽證感到質疑之時,或是証期會尚未將上市櫃資訊評鑑工作步入正軌之時,本研究所採用之海外存託憑證變數,似乎是現階段可供參考且實用的代表指標;至於所選用之其他公司治理變數,不論董監持股、管理者持股或是否設有獨立董監,都對股價溢酬的影響顯得關係不大,也呼應了行政院對証交法關於獨立董監的設立,採日本以鼓勵自願的做法而非強迫。

    就產業前景而言,預測本來就是一件很不容易的工作,更何況是瞬息萬變的高科技產業,由本研究得出的結論恰好與反市場心理法則不謀而合,或許是分析師錯把許多數據指標誤認為是領先指標,並依此對未來前景做預測;但也有可能是現今的投資者都非常的精明,善用反市場心理法則來投資操作,姑且不論問題是出在分析師或是聰明的投資者,但根據本研究,至少發現對兩兆產業而言,若是將產業研究報告建議當作投資的唯一圭臬,似乎並不是明智之舉。
    The motivation of the thesis origin from the reports of McKinsey consulting company. According to the reports that institutional investors would willing to pay premium to hold the stock if the company build up well corporate governance institutions. The thesis decide to incise from corporate governance and industry foresight, and then find four representative variables of corporate governance and constitute dummy variables of industry recycle position. The aim is trying to understand which variable would affect premium through earnings-transmitting effect.

    Based on the empirical results, with view of corporate governance, the quality of information transparency (whether issue deposit receipt or not) is positive and significant to premium. Consequently it seems to be a practical index when we get confused to the reality of financial reports, moreover, the other variables about corporate governance are nonsignificant including the holding of director and supervisor、the managerial holding or whether constitute the independent director and supervisor. The conclusions about whether constitute independent director and supervisor consist with the act of government which considers that modifying direction of the security law is free to choose instead of forcing every company to do so.

    With the view of industry foresight, it’s not a piece of cake to predict how it’s going in the future. According to the results that psychological rule of anti-market seems to be a usable method.

    Keywords:Corporate Governance、industry foresight、industry analysis
    Reference: 王興毅,2003,「我國IC製造業現況與趨勢:回顧2002展望2003」,經濟部技術處ITIS專案辦公室,頁13-26
    史欽泰,2001,「我國IC產業的發展史與未來展望」,科技發展政策報導
    曲威光,2003,「奈米科技產業技術實務」,台北市:新陸書局
    沈中華,2004,「投資前的第一堂金融課」,台北市:天下文化
    李文惠,2002,「公司治理的角度看銀行風險承擔問題之研究」,中山大學財務管理學研究所碩士未出版之碩士論文。
    吳蕙雯,2002,「公司治理對IPOs承銷價與上市後股價表現影響之研究」,輔仁大學金融研究所未出版之碩士論文。
    林永松,1993,「在不同長短之累計期間下盈餘對股票報酬解釋能力之比較」,國立台灣大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
    林育雅,1994,「我國上市公司董事會特性與盈餘操縱現象之研究」,台灣大學會計研究所未出版之碩士論文。
    柯承恩,2000,我國公司監理體系之問題與改進建議(上)(下)。會計研究月刊,
    第173期,頁75-81;第174期,頁79-83。
    翁淑育,2000,「台灣上市公司股權結構、核心代理問題及公司價值之研究」,輔仁大學金融研究所未出版碩士論文。
    孫文雄,2004,「財訊股市萬用手冊-產業百科全書」,台北市:財訊文化。
    孫文雄,2003,「IC、LCD投資入門-股市總覽」,台北市:財訊文化。
    專題調查,2002,「液晶顯示器產業及我國液晶顯示器產業之發展機會」,一銀產經資訊,第448期,頁1-44
    陳韻如,1999,「盈餘與股價VAR模型之實證研究-台灣上市電子業」,朝陽科技大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
    葉銀華、李存修、柯承恩,2002,「公司治理與評等系統」,台北市:商智文化。
    黃婷瑜,2002,「會計資訊與股價關聯性研究-成長型與價值型公司之比較」,淡江大學會計研究所未出版之碩士論文。
    張俊雄,2001,「上市公司年度營收與盈餘預測和股票市場之實證分析-以電子業為例」,東華大學國際經濟研究所未出版之碩士論文。
    張訓華,1990,「股權結構、董事會組成與企業當年度財務績效—以77年度會計報酬率為準」,東吳大學管理學研究所未出版之碩士論文。
    楊俊中,1998,「股權結構與經營績效相關性之研究」,台灣大學會計研究所未出版之碩士論文。
    劉容慈,2002,「整合公司治理、會計資訊與總體經濟敏感度之財務危機模型」,輔仁大學金融研究所未出版之碩士論文
    劉紹樑,2002,「從莊子到安隆— A+公司治理」,台北市:天下雜誌。
    Alkhafaji, A.F., 1990, “Effective Board of Directors: An Overview”, Industrial Management and Data System, Vol.90, pp.18-26
    Ball, R., and P. Brown, 1968, “An empirical evaluation of accounting income number ”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol.6, pp.159-178.
    Beaver, W. ,H. Lambert, and S. G. Ryan, 1987, “The Information Content of Security Prices-A Second Look”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol.9, pp.139-157
    Berle, A., and G. C.Means, 1932, The Modern Corporation and Private Property, New
    York: MacMillan.
    Cadbury , A., 1999, ”What are the Trends in Corporate Governance?How will They Impact Your Company?”, Long Range Planning, Vol.32, pp.12-19
    Claessens, S., S. Djankov, J. Fan, and H. P. Lang, 2002, “Disentangling the Incentive and Entrenchment Effects of Large Shareholdings”, Journal of Financial, vol57, pp.2741-2770
    Claessens, S., Djankov, S., and L. Lang, 2000, “East Asian Corporations: Growth,
    Financing, and Risks “, Emerging Markets Quarterly, Vol.4, No.1, pp.37-56.
    Fan, J., T. Wong, 2002, ”Corporate Ownership Structure and the Informativeness of Accounting Earnings in East Asia”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp.401-425
    Giancarlo , C., P. Pesenti , and N. Roubini, 1998, ”What Caused the Asian Currency and Financial Crisis?”, The World Bank: Working Paper
    Gompers, P., J. Ishii, and A. Metrick, 2001, “Corporate Governance and Equity Prices,” NBER Working Paper, No. 8449.
    Gregory, M., and L. Renneboog, 2000,”Insider Control by Large Investor Groups and Managerial Disciplining in Listed Belgian Companies”, Managerial Finance, Vol.26, pp.22-41
    Greenspan, C., N. Mark, and S. David, 1998, “ Winning at Mergers and Acquisitions: The Guide to Market-Focused Planning and Integration”, New York:John Wiley & Sons, pp.46
    Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling, 1976, “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, pp.305-360.
    Johnson, S., P. Boone, A. Breach, and E. Friedman, 2000, “Corporate Governance in the Asian Financial Crisis”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.58, pp.141-186.
    Krugman, P., 1998, “Saving Asia: It`s Time to Get Radical”, Fortune
    La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny, 2002, “Investor protection and corporate valuation”, Journal of Financial, Vol.57, pp.1147-1170
    Leland, H. E.,and D. Pyle., 1977, “Informational asymmetries, financial structure ,and financial intermediation”, Journal of Finance, Vol.32, pp.371-387
    Mitton, T., 2002, ”A Cross-Firm Analysis of the Impact of Corporate Governance on the East Asian Financial Crisis”, Journal of Financial Economics , Vol.64, pp. 215-241
    Morck, R., A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny, 1988, “Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.20, pp.293-315.
    Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 1999, “OECD Principles of Corporate Governance”
    Pound, J., 1988, “Proxy Contests and the Efficiency of Shareholder Oversight”,
    Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.20, pp.237-265.
    Radelet, S., and J. Sachs, 1998, ”The Onset of east Asian Financial Crisis”, NBER Working Paper 6680.
    Rajan, R., and L. Zingales., 1998, “Which Capitalism? Lessons from the East Asian Crisis”, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Vol.11, pp. 40-48.
    Shleifer, A., and R.Vishny, 1986,“Large shareholders and corporate control”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol.94, pp.461-488.
    Wade, R., and F. Veneroso, 1998, “The Asian Crisis: The High Debt Model Versus the Wall Street-Treasury-IMF Complex”, New Left Review, No.228, pp.3-22
    World Bank, 1999, “Corporate Governance: A Framework for Implementation-Overview
    “ The World Bank, Washington D.C.
    Yeh, Y. H., T. S. Lee, and T. Woidtke, 2001, “Family Control and Corporate Governance: Evidence for Taiwan”, International Review of finance, Vol.2, pp.21-48
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    經濟研究所
    91258002
    92
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0091258002
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[經濟學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    25800201.pdf77KbAdobe PDF2615View/Open
    25800202.pdf101KbAdobe PDF2684View/Open
    25800203.pdf111KbAdobe PDF2798View/Open
    25800204.pdf113KbAdobe PDF2742View/Open
    25800205.pdf236KbAdobe PDF21187View/Open
    25800206.pdf258KbAdobe PDF21285View/Open
    25800207.pdf422KbAdobe PDF21831View/Open
    25800208.pdf210KbAdobe PDF21349View/Open
    25800209.pdf251KbAdobe PDF2891View/Open
    25800210.pdf139KbAdobe PDF2819View/Open
    25800211.pdf134KbAdobe PDF21192View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback