English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88613/118155 (75%)
Visitors : 23493721      Online Users : 407
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35859


    Title: 區域創新系統下數位遊戲產業技術與知識網絡研究
    Technology and Knowledge Networks of Digital Game Industry in Regional Innovation System
    Authors: 蔡佩純
    TSAI ,PEI CHUAN
    Contributors: 邊泰明
    蔡佩純
    TSAI ,PEI CHUAN
    Keywords: 區域創新系統
    創新網絡
    數位遊戲產業
    知識網絡
    技術網絡
    Regional Innovation System
    innovative network
    Digital Games Industry
    knowledge network
    technology network
    Date: 2003
    Issue Date: 2009-09-18 16:14:08 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在創新系統中,產、學、研為新技術與知識積蓄的點,創新網絡中節點與節點之間的互動扮演重要的角色。區域內領導性廠商為了取得技術優勢,提供經費購買技術、引進技術等外部資源建立核心能力,在區域內形成產、學、研的技術聯盟組織,形塑區域特殊產業。各單位所交織形成的網絡動態為有助於區域創新活動的決定性因素。

    透過這樣的角度來檢視台灣,本研究以區域創新系統的角度出發,觀察「數位遊戲」這項新興產業在技術與知識網絡中,行動者之間彼此的互動連結。將廠商、相關研究機構、產業公協會、人才培育機構、大專院校與育成中心視為區域創新網絡的驅動角色,透過問卷調查與社會學中的網絡分析工具,觀察網絡中技術與知識的互動關係。本研究的主要結論如下:

    ㄧ、由本研究實證結果發現,台灣北部區域所形塑遊戲產業產官學研合作所環繞的創新氛圍十分強烈。北部區域中,又以台北縣中和「遠東世紀廣場科技園區」與台北市「南港軟體工業園區」分別為遊戲產業高度密集聚點。
    二、由於台灣數位遊戲產業各廠商之間的封閉性,各單位間技術與知識的互動關係偏低。廠商之間的網絡活動主要是以垂直性的關係為主,而非水平性的關係。廠商傾向倚賴國際之間網絡技術資源。
    三、知識網絡中越是有能力的單位,越可能處於技術網絡的核心位置。也就是原本在遊戲產業中處於優勢地位的單位,基於資訊流通與知識傳遞方便的優勢,技術能力的掌握能力亦強,少數特定單位重複扮演技術與知識互動的重要角色。本研究從網絡結構中證實了技術與知識的高度關係。
    四、技術網絡的連結模式呈現環環相扣的環狀結構,彼此交流與技術互動的相當頻繁與快速。知識網絡的星狀連結模式,具有明顯的核心單位,此類結構有利於知識的傳遞,處於散佈節點的單位居處特別重要的地位。
    In the innovation system, firms, schools and research institutes are new technology and knowledge storage places. The interactions between nodes play important roles in the innovation networks. In order to gain technology advantages, leading firms provide expenses to purchase and introduce technology to establish core ability. They form consortia with other firms, schools, and research institutes to build up regional specific industries in the regions. The dynamic network formed from the interaction of units is the main factor to facilitate regional innovative activities.
    This thesis is on the basis of Regional Innovation System (RIS) in Taiwan and takes “Digital Games” for example. Each actor interacts in the technology and knowledge networks in the RIS. Regarding firms, associate research institutes and industry associations as driving roles in the innovative networks, this thesis applies innovation networks surveys and the methodology of Social network analysis in Sociology to observe technology and knowledge interactions in the innovative networks. The major conclusions are as follows:

    First, “Far East Century Scientific Square” in Jhonghe City and “ Nan-Gang Software Industrial Park” in Taipei City are surrounded extremely strongly innovation milieu in the north of Taiwan.

    Secondly, owing to self-contained, digital games firms are deficient in interaction with each other. Activities in the networks are vertical relations almost, not horizontal ones. Firms tend to depending on international technology resources in the networks.

    The third, many competent actors basing on the advantage of information and knowledge transfer very quickly and conveniently in knowledge networks are located in the core of technology networks. A small number of firms repeatedly play the important role in technology and knowledge networks. From the network structure, this thesis proved technology and knowledge have a close relationship.

    Finally, technology networks display circular structures which exchange and transfer quite frequently and quickly; knowledge networks display star structure which have apparent core units and which are advantageous to transfer knowledge.
    Reference: ㄧ、中文部份
    王正熙,2001,台灣高科技產業董監事連結與控制型態之研究—以半導體產業為例,大葉大學事業經營研究所碩士論文。
    王俊閔,2002,產業網絡中社會鑲嵌與組織績效關係之探討,國立中興大學企業管理系碩士論文。
    王淑芬,1996,地方經濟體質與創新活動-台北都會區資訊電子業的個案研究,國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文。
    吳得勝、周孫陽,2002,科技園市帶動區域創新的關鍵成功要素:以韓國大德科學城為例,都市計畫的新典範,中華民國都市計劃學會,詹氏書局,PP75-101。
    吳毓淳,2002,誰在八卦?一個社會網絡分析,國立政治大學社會研究所碩士論文。
    吳濟華,1999,產業之創新擴散與區域發展:都會區產業行為研究,國科會NSC88-2415- H110-004。
    巫茂熾,2002,區域創新系統下中台灣精密機械產業創新之研究,東海大學工業工程經營資訊研究所。
    李仁芳,1998,產學研合作創新與國家競爭力,行政院國科會科學技術資料中心,PP1-44。
    李仁芳,1999,「打造台灣的創新競爭力-孕育技術創新的組織平台」,能力雜誌。
    李仁芳、溫肇東、梅國卿,1996,「產官學研合作成功的秘密-德國Baden-Wurttemberg科技邦」,政大科管所科技管理個案。
    汪宗憲,2003,「線上遊戲產業發展概況」,產業經濟,第261期,PP1-15。
    林俊格,2003,網絡策略、跨組織學習與價值創造關聯性-自行車領導廠商為例,國立雲林科技大學企業管理碩士班。
    施淑惠,2001,人際網絡對電腦態度之影響-以台北市政府基層公務員為例,元智大學資訊社會研究所碩士論文。
    胡瑋珊譯,2003,「創新經濟時代-9大經濟體成功崛起的經驗與模式」,傑夫•賽伯斯坦、丹尼爾•羅亞區博士原著,培生集團出版。
    候旭倉,2003,台灣遊戲產業的發展與創業團隊特性關係之研究,國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
    康信鴻、張淑昭、陳志忠,2002,「韓國政府軟體產業發展與台灣線上遊戲需求量預測之初探」,第三卷,第二期,PP27-60。
    張世勳,2001,地理群聚內廠商之網絡關係對其競爭力影響之研究-新竹科學園區之實證,朝陽科技大學,企業管理系碩士班。
    張和中,2000,「英國創新系統」,科技發展政策報導,PP1001-1006。
    張豐源,2003,「我國研發聯盟推動現況」,經濟情勢暨評論,第九卷,第二期,PP87-112。
    陳俊彰,2001,從網頁中發掘教師分佈圖,國立中山大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
    陳雲芳,2002,大學校園創新育成中心進駐之新興企業期技術資金的籌集和網路運作模式之研究,國立交通大學科技管理研究所。
    辜旗亮,2003,企業孵化器-上海五角場地區域成中心之研究,國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文。
    黃宗能、陳素娟,2003,「荷蘭應用研究機構TNO之經營策略及對我國之啟示」,經濟情勢暨評論,第八卷,第四期,PP122-141。
    黃國洲,2003,我國電腦遊戲產業之新產品開發策略之考量,元智大學資訊傳播學系網路傳播組碩士論文。
    楊政龍、金家禾,2002,「知識設施空間分部對台灣製造業創新成效之影響」,台灣土地研究,第四期,PP101-124。
    楊逸民,2000,資訊化組織員工人際關係網絡對工作滿足與組織承諾的影響--與科層式組織之比較,元智大學資訊社會研究所碩士論文。
    虞孝成,2001,「澳洲追求創新的新措施」,科技發展政策報導,PP1365-1369。
    蓋文啟,2002,「創新網絡-區域經濟發展新思維」,北京:北京大學出版社。
    劉仁傑、巫茂熾,2002,「全球區域創新系統趨勢-中台灣區域創新研究」,機械工業雜誌,第236期,PP203-211。
    劉孟俊、陳信宏,2001,「知識經濟下台灣資訊與IC產業之生產網絡化」,產業論壇,第三卷第二期,PP165-190。
    謝邦昌,2002,「台灣地區技術創新調查之前期研究」,科技發展政策報導,PP405-410。
    魏克儒,2002,創新與空間-產研地理鄰近性之探討,國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文。
    蘇顯揚,2003,「日本產學合作概況」,經濟前瞻,PP76-83。
    二、英文部分
    Attila, V. and J. A. Zoltan(2002), “Introduction to the special issue on regional innovation system,” International Regional Science Review 1:3-7.
    Borgatti, S. P. ,M. G. Everett and L. C. Freeman(2002), Ucinet 6 for Windows:Software for Social Network Analysis.
    Camagni, R. (Ed.)(1991),Innovation Networks. Spatial Perspectives. London, New York:Belhaven Press.
    Carlsson, B. and R. Stankiewicz(1991), “On the nature, function and composition of technological systems,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 1:93-118.
    Carlsson, B., S. Jacobsson, M. Holmen and A. Rickne(2002), “Innovation Systems:Annalytical and Methodological Issues,” Research Policy 31:233-245.
    Castilla, E.J.(2003)﹐“Networks of Venture Capital Firms in Silicon Valley,” Int. J. Technology Management 25(1/2):113-135.
    Chung, S. (2002)﹐“Building a national innovation system through regional innovation systems”﹐Technovation 22﹐pp.485-491.
    Claire, A. R.(1995)﹐“Methodologies for the evaluation of regional innovation potential,” Scientometrics 34(3):500.
    Collins, S. W.(2001), “Academic Research and Regional Innovation,” Industry&Higher Education 15(4):169-178.
    Cooke, P. (2002),“Biotechnology clusters,” International Regional Science Review 25(1):18.
    Diez, J. R.(2000), “The importance of public research institutes in innovative networks—empirical results from the metropolitan innovation systems Barcelona﹐Stockholm and Vienna ,” European Planning Studies 8(4):451-463.
    Diez, J. R.(2000),“Innovative networks in manufacturing﹕some empirical evidence from the metropolitan area of Barcelona,” Technovation 20:139-150.
    Diez, J. R.(2002), “Metropolitan innovation systems﹕a comparison between Barcelona﹐Stockholm﹐and Vienna,” International Regional Science Review 25(1):63-85.
    Doloreux, D.(2002),“What we should know about regional systems of innovation,” Technology in Society 24:243-263.
    Edquist, C. (Ed)(1997),Systems of innovation:Technologies Institutions and Organization. Frances Pinter, London.
    Faulkner, V. and J. Senker(1994), “Makecence of Diversity:Public-private sector research linkage in three technologies,” Research Policy 23:673-695.
    Frank, M. and F. Sekia(2003),“Territorial innovation models﹕a critical survey,” Regional Studies 3:289-302.
    Freeman, L. C. (1979), “Centrality in Social Networks: Conceptual Clarification,” Social Networks, 1: 215-239.
    Gelsing, L.(1992), Innovation and the development of industrial networks. In National systems of innovation:Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning, edited by B.-Å. Lundvall, 116-281. London Printer.
    Gemunden, H. G., P. Heydebreck and R. Herden(1992)“Technological interweavement:a means of achieving innovation success,” R&D Management 4:360.
    Hage, P. and F. Harary(1983), Structural models in anthropology. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
    Hanneman, R. A.(2001), Introduction to Social Network Methods. University of California, Riverside.
    Howells, J.(1999),“Regional systems of innovation﹖”In﹕Archibugi D.﹐Howells J. and Michie J.(Eds). Innovation Policy in a Global Economy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    Jeffery, L. F.﹐E. M. Porter and S. Stern(2002)“The determinants of national innovative capacity,” Research Policy 31:899-933.
    Katz, D. and R. L. Kahn(1996), The Social Psychology of Organization, Wiley.
    Knoke, D. and J. Kuklinski (1982), Network Analysis, Beverly Hills: Sage.
    Knut, K. and R. Sternberg(2000),“R&D cooperation in innovation systems—some lessons from the European Regional Innovation Survey(ERIS),” European Planning Studies 8(4):487-501.
    Lengrand, L. and I. Chatrie(1999), “Business Networks and the Knowledge-Driven Economy,” http://forum, europa.eu.int/irc/sme/euroinformation/info/data/sme/en/library/biznetl.pdf, pp.1-76.
    Lundvall, B-Å (Ed.)(1992), National Systems of Innovation:Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London Pinter.
    Marsden, P. and N. Lin(Eds.)(1982),Social structure and network analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage.
    Michael F.(2002), “Measuring the quality of regional innovation systems﹕a knowledge production function approach,” International Regional Science Review 25(1):86-101.
    Michie, J., J. Howells and D. Archibugi (Eds.)(1999),Innovation policy in a global economy. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, pp.67-93.
    OECD(2001), Innovation and Productivity in Services, Paris, OECD.
    Päivi O. and J. M. Edward(2002),“The evolution of technologies in time and space﹕from national and regional to special innovation systems,” International Regional Science Review 25(1):102-131.
    Patricia B. and W. Edwin(1998),“Regional innovation System:The role of governances in a globalized world-southeast brabant:a regional innovation system in trasition, ” UCL Press:65.
    Pier, P. P.(2003), “Institutional variety﹐networking and knowledge exchange﹕communication and innovation in the case of the Brianza Technology District,” Regional Studies 37(2):159-172.
    Rinaldo, E., S. Iammarino, V. Mastrostefano and A. Silvani(2002)﹐“Looking for regional systems of innovation﹕evidence from the Italian innovation survey,”Regional Studies 36(2):173-186.
    Saez, C. B.,T. G. Marco and E. H. Arribbas(2002)﹐“Collaboration in R&D with Universities and Research Centers﹕An Empirical Study of Spanish Firms,” R&D Management 32(4):321-341.
    Saxenian, A.(1994)﹐Regional Advantage:Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
    Scott, J.(2000), Social Network Analysis:A Handbook, Sage.
    Sternberg, R.(2000), “Innovation networks and regional development-Evidence from the European Regional Innovation Survey(ERIS):Theoretical concepts, methodological approach, empirical basis and introduction to the theme issue,” European Planning Studies 8:389-407.
    Stöhr, W. B.(1986)﹐“Regional innovation complexes,” Paper of The Regional Science Association 59:29-44.
    Taplin, J.(2002)“Multidimentional Scaling.” Available at http://www.imm.ecel.uwa.au/unit450461/lectures/.
    Zoltan, J. A. and V. Attila(2002)“Introduction to the special issue on Regional Innovation Systems,”International Regional Science Review 25(1):3-7.
    三、網站部份
    資策會資訊市場情報中心http://mic.iii.org.tw/index.asp
    2003數位內容產業白皮書
    「巴哈姆特」電玩資訊網站http://www.gamer.com.tw/
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    地政研究所
    91257014
    92
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0091257014
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[地政學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    25701401.pdf214KbAdobe PDF1157View/Open
    25701402.pdf212KbAdobe PDF1249View/Open
    25701403.pdf290KbAdobe PDF11198View/Open
    25701404.pdf163KbAdobe PDF2194View/Open
    25701405.pdf763KbAdobe PDF1854View/Open
    25701406.pdf73KbAdobe PDF1068View/Open
    25701407.pdf183KbAdobe PDF1370View/Open
    25701408.pdf228KbAdobe PDF1134View/Open
    25701409.pdf224KbAdobe PDF1022View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback