English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 112721/143689 (78%)
造访人次 : 49670328      在线人数 : 408
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35871


    题名: 不動產估價師信心判斷行為之研究
    作者: 王士鳴
    贡献者: 陳奉瑤
    王士鳴
    关键词: 不動產估價
    行為研究
    過度自信
    Real Estate Appraisal
    Behavior Research
    Overconfidence
    日期: 2005
    上传时间: 2009-09-18 16:16:06 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 不動產估價師之主觀判斷在估價過程中占有舉足輕重的地位,尤以市場比較法中之案例選擇、比較項目之調整最為明顯。然而不動產估價既然非由機器所為,則不動產估價師之行為勢必會影響到其價值判斷。而不動產估價師於行為上之差異,極可能是因為心理層面的某些狀態所致,如過度自信。心理學上已針對許多領域專家之信心判斷進行探討,且均發現多數會有過度自信之情形發生,過度自信將導致人們表現於行為上,進而從事錯誤的決策。

    <br>本文嘗試以心理學上之行為研究方法,探討不動產估價師於進行不動產估價作業時其信心判斷情形,是否如同其他領域之專家一樣,會出現過度自信之情形。並且進一步探討不動產估價師過度自信與其外在行為表現和評估價值準確性之關係。
    <br>研究採實驗之方式進行。結果顯示我國之不動產估價師之信心判斷普遍存有過度之現象,而要求不動產估價師遵行估價規範進行估價作業,將有助於降低其過度自信。另外,研究亦發現不動產估價師之評估價值準確性並不會隨著蒐集案例數量之增加而提高,然其信心判斷卻會逐漸提升。最後,不動產估價師之過度自信,將導致其評估價值準確性降低。
    參考文獻: 中文文獻
    1.李易璇(2005),不動產估價人員估值決定行為之研究,國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文。
    2.美國估價協會(1999),不動產估價,第十一版,台北:宏大不動產鑑定顧問股份有限公司。
    3.張小燕(2005),從行為觀點檢視不動產估價中的市場比較法,國立台北大學不動產與城鄉環境學系碩士論文。
    4.張春興(1995),張氏心理學辭典,第二版,台北:東華書局。
    5.張能政(2004),不動產估價行為研究-行為理論之應用,國立台北大學不動產與城鄉環境學系碩士論文。
    6.許天威(2003),個案實驗研究法,台北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
    7.郭文俊(2001),酒後駕車風險知覺之資訊整合實驗,國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。
    8.陳順宇(2000),迴歸分析,第三版,華泰書局。
    9.程大器(2002),統計學理論與應用,初版,台北:智勝文化事業有限公司。
    10.彭兆禎(1993),過度自信之研究:問題困難度、抽樣方式與線索有效性對過度自信的影響,國立政治大學心理研究所碩士論文。
    11.廖咸興、李阿乙、梅建平(1999),不動產投資概論,第三版,台北:華泰書局。
    12.顏月珠(1986),實用無母數統計方法,初版。
    13.顏月珠(1992),無母數統計方法,初版。
    14.顏信輝、丁緯(2004),由心理學經驗法則觀點探討盈餘預測之偏誤類型:併論盈餘水準之影響,當代會計,第五卷,第二期,第139-174頁。
    15.蘇文賢(2000),應用大量估價法進行公告土地現值評估之研究,國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文。
    16.龔怡霖(2000)行為財務學-文獻回顧與未來發展,國立中央大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。
    英文文獻
    1.Arkes, H. R., Dawes, R. M., & Christensen, C. (1986), “Factors Influencing the Use of a Decision Rule in a Probabilistic Task,” Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, pp. 93-111.
    2.Barber, B. M., and Odean, T. (2001), “Boys will be Boys:Gender, Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment, ” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 116, No. 1, pp.261-292.
    3.Beyer, S. (1990), “Gender Differences in the Accuracy of Self-Evaluations of Performance,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, pp. 960-970.
    4.Christensen-Szalanski, J.J.J.,& Bushyhead, J.B. (1981), “Physicians’use of probabilistic information in a real clinical setting, ” Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 7, pp. 928-935.
    5.Clapp, J. M. (1990), “A New Test for Equitable Real Estate Tax Assessment,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 3, pp. 233-249.
    6.Deaux, K. & Farris, E. (1977), “Attributing Causes for One’s Own Performance: The Effects of Sex, Norms, and Outcome,” Journal of Research in Personality, 6, pp. 59-72.
    7.Diaz, J, & Hansz, J. A., “How valuers use the value opinions of others,” Journal of Property Valuation and Investment, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 256-60.
    8.Diaz, J. (1990a), “How Appraisers Do Their Work:A Test of the Appraisal Process and the Development of a Descriptive Model,” The Journal of Real Estate Research, Vol. 5, No.1, pp.1-15.
    9.Diaz, J. (1990b), “The process of selecting comparable sales, ” The Appraisal Journal, Vol. 4, pp.533-540.
    10.Diaz, J. (1997), “An Investigation into the Impact of Previous Expert Value Estimates on Appraisal Judgment,” The Journal of Real Estate Research, Vol. 13, No.1, pp.57-66
    11.Diaz, J., & Wolverton, M. L. (1998), “A Longitudinal Examination of the Appraisal Smoothing Hypothesis,” Real Estate Economics, Vol. 26, No 2, pp.349-358.
    12.Einhorn, H , & Hogarth, R. M. (1978), “confidence in judgment: persistence of the illusion of validity,” Psychological Review, 85, pp. 395-416.
    13.Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1977), “Knowing with certainty: The appropriateness of extreme confidence,” Journal of Experimental Psychology, 3, pp. 552-564.
    14.Gallimore, P. (1996), “Confirmation Bias in the Valuation Process: a Test for Corroborating Evidence,” Journal of Property Research, Vol.13, No.4, pp. 261-273.
    15.Gervais, S. & Odean, T. (1998), “Learning to Be Overconfident,” working paper, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.
    16.Griffin, D. G., & Tversky, A.(1992). The Weighting of Evidence and the Determinants of Confidence. Cognitive Psychology, 24, pp.411-435.
    17.International Valuation Standards Committee. (2005), “Inrernational Valuation Standards,”
    18.International Association of Assessing Officers. (1999), “Standard on Ratio Studies,” Assessment Journal, Sep/Oct. pp. 23-64.
    19.Isakson, H. R. (1986), “The Nearest Neighbors Appraisal Technique: An Alternative to the Adjustment Grid Methods,” AREUEA Journal, 14, pp.274-286.
    20.Jocoby, B. C, Weigl, R. W. & Fisher, K. C. (1976), “Pre-purchase Information Acquisition: Description of a process Methodology, Research Paradigm, and Pilot Investigation”. In Anderson, B. B. editor, Advance in Consumer Research, 3, pp. 306-314. Chicago: Association for consumer Research, University of Illinois.
    21.Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1973), “On the psychology of prediction, ” Psychological Review, 80,pp. 237-251.
    22.Keren, G. (1987), “Facing Uncertainty in the Game of Bridge:A Calibration Study,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, pp.98-114.
    23.Koriat, A., Lichtenstein, S., & Fischhoff, B. (1980), “Reasons for confidence,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, pp. 107-118.
    24.Lewellen, W. G., Lease, R. C., & Schlarbaum, G. G. (1977), “Patterns of Investment Strategy and Behavior among Individual Investors,” Journal of Business, 50, pp.296-333.
    25.Lichtenstein, S., Fischoff, B. (1977), “Do those who know more also know more about how much they know?” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 20, pp.159-183.
    26.Lichtenstein, S., Fischoff, B. (1980), “Training for calibration,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 26, pp.149-171.
    27.Lichtenstein, S., Fischoff, B. (1981), “The Effects of Gender and Instructions on Calibration,” Decision research Report 80-5. Eugene, OR, Decision Research.
    28.Lichtenstein, S., Fischoff, B.,& Phillips, L. D. (1982), “Calibration of probabilities:The state of the art to 1980,”In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky(Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty;Heuristics and bias, Cambridge:Cambridge Univ. Press.
    29.Lundeberg, M. A., Fox, P. W., & Punccohar, J. (1994), “Highly Confident but Wrong: Gender Differences and Similarities in Confidence Judgments,” Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol.86, No.1, pp. 114-121.
    30.Meehan, A. M. & Overton, W. F. (1986), “Gender Difference in Expectancies for Success and Performance on Piagetian Spatial Tasks,” Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 32, pp. 427-441.
    31.Murphy, A. H., & Winkler, R. L. (1984), “Probability forecasting in meteorology,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, pp. 489-500.
    32.Northcraft, A. & Neal, M. (1987), “Experts, Amateurs, and Real Estate: An Anchoring Perspective on Property Pricing Decisions,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, pp.84-97.
    33.Oskamp, S. (1965), “Overconfidence in case-study judgments,” The Journal of Consulting Psychology, 29, pp261-265.
    34.Paglin, M. & Fogarty, M. (1972), “Equity and the Property Tax: A New Conceptual Focus,” National Tax Journal, 25, pp.557-565.
    35.Russo, J. E., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1992), “Managing overconfidence,” Sloan Management Review, 33, pp.7-17.
    36.Sieck, W. R. (2000), “Overconfidence in judgment for repeatable events, ” Ph.D. Program,University of Michigan
    37.Tversky, A.& Kahnmane, D. (1974), “ Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristic and biases.,” In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky(Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty;Heuristics and bias, Cambridge:Cambridge Univ. Press.
    38.Yates, J. F., Lee, J.-W., & Bush, J. G. (1997), “General knowledge overconfidence: Cross-national variations, response style, and reality,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70, pp. 87-94.
    39.Yates, J. F., Lee, J.-W., & Shinotsuka, H. (1996), “Beliefs about overconfidence, including its cross-national variation,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, pp.138-147.
    40.Yates, J. F., Lee, J.-W., Shinotsuka, H., Patalano, A. L., & Sieck W. R. (1998), “Cross-Cultural Variations in Probability Judgment Accuracy: Beyond General Knowledge Overconfidence?” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 74, pp.89-117.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    地政研究所
    93257004
    94
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093257004
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[地政學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    25700401.pdf42KbAdobe PDF21214检视/开启
    25700402.pdf86KbAdobe PDF21595检视/开启
    25700403.pdf69KbAdobe PDF21249检视/开启
    25700404.pdf19KbAdobe PDF21139检视/开启
    25700405.pdf80KbAdobe PDF21401检视/开启
    25700406.pdf179KbAdobe PDF21651检视/开启
    25700407.pdf324KbAdobe PDF23422检视/开启
    25700408.pdf328KbAdobe PDF21696检视/开启
    25700409.pdf311KbAdobe PDF23238检视/开启
    25700410.pdf98KbAdobe PDF21418检视/开启
    25700411.pdf93KbAdobe PDF21585检视/开启
    25700412.pdf146KbAdobe PDF21471检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈