Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/35878
|
| Title: | 個別估價與大量估價準確性之研究
The Study on Accuracy of Appraisers and Mass Appraisal |
| Authors: | 楊依蓁
Young, I-Jan |
| Contributors: | 陳奉瑤
Chen, Fung-Yiao
楊依蓁
Young, I-Jan |
| Keywords: | 估值準確性
個別估價
大量估價
accuracy of valuation
appraiser
mass appraisal |
| Date: | 2005 |
| Issue Date: | 2009-09-18 16:17:08 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 隨著電腦及統計模型的發展、原本用於稅賦評估工具的大量估價逐漸受到重視。美國更利用完善的國家層級資料，將大量估價改良為自動估價模型（Automated Valuation Model, AVM）。由於估值估算快速、成本低廉及龐大的資料庫等優點，受到美國私部門的歡迎。另一方面，不動產市場仍有存在著個別估價的客觀性的質疑，而估價行為學也證實了個別估價有偏離估價程序的可能。市場上存在著兩者的支持者，但由於兩者特性迥然不同，甚難比較。
本研究以一致的資料庫及衡量標準，將交易價格做為市場價值表徵，以估值的準確性作為衡量兩者的準則，找出兩者的特性及適用範圍。實證結果顯示當勘估標的數量達到一定程度，可忽略不動產的異質性時，個別估價與大量估價準確性並沒有顯著的差異。但個別估價準確性的分配較大量估價集中、且偏誤程度也較低。個別估價較不受不動產特性的影響，適用的範圍較廣；而大量估價較易受到不動產特性影響，適用範圍視資料庫的內容而定。另一方面，個別估價的估價認知具有時間性，表示不動產估價師需更新估價認知，以保持高度的估值準確性。此說明了國內不動產市場的變化快速及國內不動產估價師的專業能力。
With the development of computer and statistical model, the mass appraisal as assessment tool has been paid attention gradually. Americans utilize the national data to develop Automated Valuation Models (AVMs).For its advantages of faster valuation , less cost and huge database, mass appraisal is used as assessment but also appraisal tool . On the other hand, the real estate market stills have query with objectivity of individual appraisers. The study of appraisers’ behavior suggest that the possibility of deviate from standard procedure of appraising. In a matter of fact, the real state market is filled with supporters of appraisers and mass appraisals. Because of these different characteristic, it’s difficult to compare with.
This research will trade selling-prices to seek for the market value form with unanimous database and criterion, regard accuracy of valuation as and weigh the criterion of the two, and find out the characteristic of the two and scope of application .Although the result showed that the accuracy is no difference between appraiser and mass appraisal significantly when the amount of real estates is large enough to neglect heterogeneity. Compare with mass appraisal, the distribution of appraiser’s accuracy is more centralized and the standard deviation is smaller. The accuracy of appraiser is steady, and the scope of application is relatively wide. But the accuracy of mass appraisal is affected by the characteristic of real estate, and the scope of application depends on content of the database.On the other hand, the appraisal cognition has timeliness, it shows appraiser needs to upgrade the appraise cognition and the market condition , in order to keep the valuation accuracy of the height. This has stated the fast-change market and domestic the professional ability of appraisers. |
| Reference: | 1. Black, R. and Diaz, J., 1996,The Use of Information
Versus Asking Price in the Real Property Negotiation
Process, Journal of Property Research, vol.13 no.2,
pp287-297.
2. Bloom, G.F. and Harrison, H.S., 1978, Appraising the
Single Family Residence, American Institution of Real
Estate, Chicago.
3. Blundell, G.F. and Ward, C.W.R , 1999, The Accuracy
of Valuation-Expectation and Reality Unpublished
Paper, Department of Land Management, The University
of Reading.
4. Brown, G.,1985, Property Investment and Performance
Measurement: Reply, Journal of Valuation, vol.4
Iss.1, pp33-44.
5. Brown, G., Matysiak, G.A. and Shepherd, M., 1998,
Valuaton Uncertainty and the Millison Report,
Journal of Property Research,vol.15, pp1-13.
6. Cole, R.,1988, A New Look at Commercial Real Estate
Returns, Ph.D.Dissertation, University of North
Carolina at Chapel Hill. Ann Arbor, MI, University
Microfilms International.
7. Collateral Assessment and Technologies Committee,
2005, System Risks in Residential Property
Valuations: Perception and Reality, CATA.
8. Crosby, N., Lavers, A. and Murdoch, J., 1998,
Property Valuation Variation and the “Margin of
Error” in UK, Journal of Property Research, vol.15
Iss.4, pp1-13.
9. Clapp, J. M.,1990, A Methodology for Constructing
Vacant Land Price Indices, AREUEA Journal, vol.18
Iss.3, pp274-293.
10. Dell, G., 2004, AVMs: The Myth and the Reality；the
Problem and the Solution, Valuation Insights and
Perspectives, vol. 9 Iss. 3, pp12-17.
11. Diaz, J. , 1990a, How Appraisers do Their Work: a
Test of the Appraisal Process and the Development of
a Descriptive Model, The Journal of Real Estate
Research, vol.5 Iss.1, pp1-15.Diaz, J., 1990b, The
Process of selecting Comparable Sales , The Appraisal
Journal, vol.4, pp533-540.
12. Diaz, J., Gallimore, P. and Levy, D., 2004,
Multicultural Examination of Valuation Behaviour,
Journal of Property Investment and Finance, vol.22
no4, pp339-346.
13. Evans, A. W.,1995, The Property Market: Ninety Per
Cent Efficient?, Urban Studies, vol.32 Iss.1, pp5-
29.
14. Fisher, J. D. ,2002, Real Time Valuation, Journal of
Property Investment and Finanace, vol.20 Iss.3, pp
213-222.
15. Gallimore, P.,2002,”The Components of Appraisal
Accuracy”,Real Estate Valuaiton Theory, Kluwer
Academic Publishers,Norwell, Massachusetts.
16. Geltner, D. ,1989b, Estimating Real Estate’s
Systematic risk from Aggergate Level Appraisal-Based
Returns, AREUEA Journal, vol.17 Iss 4, pp463-481.
17. Gwin, C. R and Maxam, C. L, 2002, Why do Real Estate
Appraisals Nearly Always Equal Offer Price:A
Theoretical Justification, Journal of Property
Investment and Finanace, vol. 20 Iss.3, pp 242-253.
18. Havard, T.,1999, Do Valuers Have a Great Tendency to
Adjust a Previous Valuation Upwards or Downwards,
Journal of Property Investment and Finanace, vol. 17
no.4, pp365-373.
19. Hutchison, N, MacGergor, B., Nanthakumaran, N.,
Adair, A. and McGreal, S., 1996, Variations in the
Capital Valuation of UK Commercial Property, Royal
Institution of Chartered Surveyors, London.
20. Joans, D./IPD, 1997,The Variance in Valuations:
Interim Report 1997 , Drives Jonas/Investment
Property Databank, London.Kinnard, W.N , 2001, New
Thinking in Appraisal Theory, The Appraisal Journal,
vol.69 Iss.3, pp235-244.
21. Kinnard, W. N, 2001, New Thinking in Appraisal
Theory, The Appraisal Journal, vol.69 Iss.3, pp235-
244.
22. Kummerow, M., 1997, Logical Steps in Property
Valuation, The Appraisal Journal, vol.65 Iss.1, pp25- 31.
23. Levy, D. and Schuck, E.,1999, The Influence of
Client on Valuations, Journal of Property
Investment and Finanace, vol. 17 no.4, pp197-201.
24. Loans, D./IPD, 1988,The Variance in Valuations,
Drives Jonas/Investment Property Databank,
London.
25. Loans, D./IPD, 1990,The Variance in Valuations: 1990
update, Drives Jonas/Investment Property Databank,
London.
26. Matysiak, G. and Wang, P., 1995, Commercial Property
Market Prices and Valuation : Analyzing the
Correspondence, Journal of Property Research, vol.12
Iss.3, pp181-202.
27. Morgan, E., 1993, Are Valuation a Good Proxy for
Prices?, Unpublished dissertation, Oxford Brookes
University, UK.
28. Nguyen, N. and Cripps, A., 2001, Predicting Housing
Value：a Comparison of Multiple Regression Analysis
and Artificial Neural Networks, The Journal of Real
Estate research, vol.22 Iss.3, pp313-316.
29. Northcraft, G. B and Neale, M. A,
1987,Experts,Amateurs, and Real Estate: An
Anchiring-and-Adjustment Perspective on Property
Pricing Decision, Organizational Behavior and Human
Decision Processes, vol. 39 Iss.1, pp84-9.
30. Quan, D. and Quigley, J, 1991,Price Formation and
the Appraisal Fuction in Real Estate Market,
Journal of Property Investment and Finanace, no.4,
pp127-146.
31. Vanderford, S. E., Mimura Y. and Sweancy, A. L.,
2005, A hedonic price comparison of manufacture and
site-built homes in the Non-MSA USA, The Journal of
Real Estate Research, vol.27 Iss.1, pp83-104.
32. 李易璇，2005，不動產估價人員估值決定行為之研究，國立政治大學
地政系碩士論文。
33. 汪駿旭，2005，不動產估價人員授課互影響之研究，國立政治大學地
政系碩士論文。
34. 周文賢，2002，多變量統計分析：SAS與STAT使用方法，智勝文化：
台北市。
35. 美國估價協會，宏大不動產鑑定股份有限估價事務所不動產估價、瑞
普國際物業估價事務所譯，1999，不動產估價，宏大不動產鑑定顧問
股份有限估價事務所：台北市。
36. 徐銘潔、張子傑，2003，應用統計學，鼎茂圖書出版股份有限估價事
務所：台北市。
37. 財團法人台灣不動產資訊中心，（2004），電腦大量估價技術之檢討
與模式之建立案：電腦大量估價實證模式建構，中美經濟社會發展基
金計畫編號 79-1-356-3-k4002-03。
38. 張小燕，2005，從行為觀點檢視不動產估價中的市場比較法，國立台
北大學不動產與城鄉環境研究所碩士論文。
39. 張劭勳、張紹評、林秀娟，2001，SPSS For Windows 統計分析.
初等統與高等統計，松岡電腦圖書資料股份有限公司：台北市。
40. 張能政，2003，不動產估價行為研究-行為理論應用，國立台北大
學地政研究所碩士論文。
41. 陳順宇，2000，迴歸分析，華泰書局：台北市。
42. 陳億茹，2004，拍賣制度、市場機制與法拍屋價格之分析，國立政治
大學地政系碩士論文。
43. 彭昭英，2003，SAS與統計分析，儒林圖書有限公司：台北市。
44. 鍾陳佳，2002，住宅法拍屋屬性與拍定價格關係之研究-以台中市12
樓以上之集合住宅為例，逢甲大學土地管理研究所碩士論文。
45. 蘇文賢，2001，應用大量估價法進行公告土地現值評估之研究，國立
政治大學地政系碩士論文。 |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
地政研究所
93257013
94 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093257013 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [地政學系] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
