English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109950/140901 (78%)
Visitors : 46021510      Online Users : 964
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/36161


    Title: 證券交易所得稅與證券交易稅對股票價格的影響─時間序列分析法的應用
    The Effect of Capital Gains Tax and Transaction Tax on Stock Price - A Time Series Analysis
    Authors: 黃寶慧
    Huang, Pao-Hui
    Contributors: 毛慶生
    Mao, Ching-Sheng
    黃寶慧
    Huang, Pao-Hui
    Keywords: 證券交易所得稅
    證券交易稅
    股票價格
    股票報酬率
    週轉率
    ARCH-M模型
    capital gains tax
    transaction tax
    stock price
    stock return
    turnover rate
    ARCH-M model
    Date: 2000
    Issue Date: 2009-09-18 17:21:24 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究第一部份為確定性的資產訂價模型,探討證券交易所得稅與證券交易稅對股票價格的影響。如同資產價格方程式,其均衡價格為未來各期股利之貼現值的總和。所不同的是一般資產價格方程式之貼現率即為市場利率,但本研究特別引進資產存量動態調整方程式與政府預算限制式,說明除了市場利率以外,強調證券交易所得稅、證券交易稅與代表性個人之週轉率均為影響貼現率的主要因素。由於模型描述代表性個人具有遠瞻(forward-looking)的特性,所以當期暫時性的稅率變動不會影響股票價格,會影響股票價格的只有未來的租稅政策。另外,本研究亦得到與李嘉圖定理相似的中立性假說:只要租稅現值保持固定不變,即使資本利得稅與證券交易稅如何調整與變動,都不會影響其均衡價格。
    為了瞭解股票週轉率的函數型態。假設其為下一期股票報酬率與租稅的函數,以台灣地區1982年1月至2001年1月的月資料,使用兩階段的研究方法分別探討租稅對股票報酬率與週轉率的影響,目的是確認:租稅除了會直接的影響股票價格外,是否會透過週轉率而間接的影響股票價格。因此本研究第二部份摒除週轉率與政府政策為外生的假設,另以實證分析租稅對股票報酬率與週轉率的影響,以補基本理論模型之不足,並進行有趣議題之分析。
    首先由Ganger因果關係檢定得知:週轉率領先於政府訂定的證券交易稅稅率,亦即週轉率過去的落遲項會影響到當期的證券交易稅稅率;且由相關係數得知二者呈正相關。故政府訂定的證券交易稅稅率視過去的週轉率而定,過去的週轉率愈高,政府當期訂定的證券交易稅稅率愈高,以企圖抑制股市的不健全發展。再者,由於台灣股票報酬率的時間序列資料具有自我迴歸條件非均齊變異數(autoregressive condition heteroskedasticity,簡稱ARCH)的現象,故異於其他相關研究的實證方法,另經由比較各種ARCH族模型的實證結果,選取出一套考慮風險貼水(risk premium)之最佳配適的兩階段ARCH(1)-M模型進行實證分析。
    實證結果顯示:任何一個ARCH(1)-M的模型,皆存在顯著的風險貼水效果。而預期未來的與當期的證券交易稅對當期的股票報酬率均為直接的負面影響,但以前者影響較為顯著,後者的影響則視顯著水準而定,因此政府調降或調高當期的證券交易稅稅率,與股市之榮枯並無確定性的直接關係,此結果與一般學者的觀點不謀而合。此外,當期的週轉率租稅彈性為-0.0646,其值顯著為負,且絕對值小於一,表示缺乏彈性,雖然租稅會間接地透過週轉率影響股票價格,但影響並不大,而且政府若鑒於過去的週轉率太高,要以租稅抑制當期的股市投機風氣,其成效亦不彰。至於證券交易所得稅因宣告(或施行)的期間極為短暫,故對當期的股票報酬率影響不顯著。換言之,風險趨避程度、證券交易稅、預期報酬率、週轉率與股票價格之間具有相互連動的關係。是故,證券交易稅對股票價格的影響,視風險趨避程度、證券交易稅稅率、週轉率之租稅彈性與週轉率之預期報酬彈性而定。
    除此以外,本研究第三部份亦考慮政策的不確定性與政策的變動以建立不確定性的資產訂價模型,模擬分析結果顯示:若原先政府施行的租稅過程愈具持續性,則一旦政府的租稅政策瞬間改變時,投資人愈無法將股票價格-股利比值對租稅的反應,事先地考慮於股票投資的決策當中,所以租稅政策衝擊的反應較大。簡言之,投資人預期的稅率與實際施行的新稅率愈相近時,租稅政策衝擊的反應最小。因此第三部份的結果亦與第一部份的基本數學模型(認為當期暫時性之稅率變動不會影響當期的股票價格),以及第二部份的實證結果(發現當期證券交易稅稅率變動與當期股市之榮枯並無確定性之關係)相一致。

    第一章 緒論……………………………………………………………………001
    1.1 研究動機與目的………………………………………………………001
    1.2 研究方法………………………………………………………………004
    1.3 研究結構………………………………………………………………011
    第二章 我國證券交易課稅制度沿革…………………………………………014
    2.1 我國證券交易所得稅制度沿革………………………………………014
    2.2 我國證券交易稅制度沿革……………………………………………021
    2.3 各國證券交易課稅制度比較…………………………………………024
    第三章 證券交易課稅的文獻探討……………………………………………031
    3.1 證券交易所得稅的文獻探討…………………………………………031
    3.1.1 關於證券市場的文獻探討……………………………………031
    3.1.2 關於投資及儲蓄的文獻探討…………………………………040
    3.1.3 關於經濟效益的文獻探討……………………………………042
    3.1.4 關於稅制及稅收的文獻探討…………………………………046
    3.2 證券交易稅的文獻探討………………………………………………050
    3.2.1 國外文獻探討…………………………………………………050
    3.2.2 國內文獻探討…………………………………………………053
    第四章 確定性的資產訂價模型……………………………………………… 058
    4.1 基本理論模型…………………………………………………………058
    4.2 租稅效果………………………………………………………………064
    4.3 中立性的假說…………………………………………………………069
    第五章 台灣實證研究—資料處理與分析…………………………………… 073
    5.1 資料來源與說明………………………………………………………074
    5.2 檢定……………………………………………………………………076
    5.2.1 單根檢定—ADF 檢定…………………………………………076
    5.2.2 常態分配檢定…………………………………………………080
    5.2.3 自我相關檢定—Ljung-Box Q(L-B Q)檢定…………………081
    5.2.4 序列相關 LM 檢定……………………………………………082
    5.2.5 ARCH LM 檢定…………………………………………………082
    5.2.6 Granger 因果關係檢定………………………………………086
    5.2.7 當期股票報酬率與未來各期證券交易稅稅率的相關係數…093
    第六章 台灣實證研究—兩階段 ARCH 族實證模型………………………… 095
    6.1 基本條件平均數方程式的設定與分析………………………………095
    6.1.1 傳統自我迴歸模型……………………………………………095
    6.1.2 自我迴歸模型的殘差分析……………………………………096
    6.2 條件變異數方程式的設定……………………………………………101
    6.2.1 ARCH 模型……………………………………………………102
    6.2.2 ARCH-M 模型…………………………………………………103
    6.3 估計方法與檢定………………………………………………………105
    6.4 第一階段之股票報酬率的 ARCH 族模型估計與分析………………106
    6.4.1 實證模型………………………………………………………106
    6.4.2 實證結果與分析………………………………………………113
    6.5 兩階段模型的估計與分析……………………………………………114
    6.5.1 實證模型………………………………………………………114
    6.5.2 實證結果與分析………………………………………………119
    第七章 不確定性的資產訂價模型…………………………………………… 130
    7.1 不確定性的租稅政策與政策變動……………………………………130
    7.2 模型的模擬與分析……………………………………………………136
    第八章 結論與未來的研究方向………………………………………………151
    8.1 結論……………………………………………………………………151
    8.2 未來的研究方向………………………………………………………155
    附錄A 股票價格函數滿足終極條件的證明…………………………………158
    附錄 B 股票價格函數為單一固定點的證明…………………………………160
    參考文獻…………………………………………………………………………163
    This paper works out the effect of capital gains tax and stock transaction tax on share prices. In the generality of cases, the equilibrium share price is shown to equal the discounted sum of future dividends. In this paper, we emphasize that tax policy is a driving force in determining the discount rate and market turnover rate also plays an important role in determining the effects of policy. We show that temporary changes in policy have little effect on current stock price; only perceived policy in the future has price effect. We also show that a permanent shift in tax policy exerts only level effect, but no growth effect, on stock price.
    Using monthly data from Taiwan, our empirical results indicate that changes in stock turnover rate often leads changes in transaction tax, and both are positively correlated. This result implies that government policy often reacts to market volatility instead of the other way around. Since the data exhibit autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity, we employ a two stage ARCH(1)-M model as our empirical strategy. Our results show that the price effect of transaction tax is significant, with the expected change in future tax especially so. The results also indicate that expected stock returns have positive and important effects on market turnover rate. Overall, the policy effect on stock price depends on the tax rate, the degree of risk aversion, sensitivity of turnover rate to policy and the expected stock return.
    The analysis so far assumes that the tax policy is certain, when in fact it is hardly the case. The 1989 fiasco and the recent flip-flop of the government are vivid testimonies of the volatile nature of the government policy. The third part extends the model to a stochastic environment and examines the consequences when a long-standing unequivocal tax policy suddenly and unexpectedly shifts to a stochastic regime. This type of regime shift seems to characterize the recent experience in Taiwan.
    Our results show that the shape of the pricing function under stochastic regimes depend on the persistence of the tax process. For tax rates that are lower than the unconditional mean of the process, the price is lower than the certainty case because the expected tax rate is higher over this interval. As the tax process becomes more persistent, the expected duration of the tax rate lengthens and the pricing function becomes negatively sloped. Notice that the slope of the pricing function (i.e., the tax elasticity of the price-dividend ratio) is flatter than the certainty case because in a stochastic regime consumers always take into account the possibility of tax changes, no matter how small the probability is.
    Reference: 中文部分
    王甡(1995),「報酬衝擊對條件波動所造成之不對稱效果—台灣股票市場之實證分析」,證券市場發展季刊,第7卷第1期,第125-160頁。
    毛慶生與黃寶慧(2000),「證券交易所得稅與證券交易稅對股票價格的影響」,國立政治大學學報,第81期,第73-129頁。
    李明機(1997),「證券交易所得稅之研究」,國立政治大學財政研究所碩士論文。
    周玉津(1985),「證券交易稅、證券交易所得稅、土地稅與土地增值稅的透視」,中國稅務旬刊,第1461期,第7-10頁。
    林建甫與張焯然(1996),「ARCH族模型的估計與檢定的問題」,經濟論文叢刊,第24卷第3期,第339-355頁。
    林楚雄、劉維琪與吳欽衫(1997)「臺灣股票市場報酬的期望值與條件波動之關係」,交大管科學報, 第17卷第3期,第103-124頁
    林楚雄、劉維琪與吳欽衫(1999),「不對稱GARCH模型的研究」,管理學報,第16卷第3期,第479-515頁。
    高永長(1992),「證券交易所得稅與證券交易稅宜分別課徵」,稅務旬刊,第1484期,第12-15頁。
    財政部賦稅署(1999),世界主要國家對證券交易課稅規定比較表。
    倪衍森、王崇仁(1999),「財政政策對台灣股市之效率性分析」,交大管理學報,第19卷第2期,第31-54頁。
    Said, S. E. and D. A. Dickey (1984), “Testing for Unit Root in Autoregressive Moving Average Models for Unknown Order”, Biometrika, pp.599-608.
    Schwert, G. W. (1989), “Stock Volatility and the Crash of 87”, Review of Financial Studies, 3, pp.77-102.
    Schwert, W. G. and P. J. Seguin (1993), “Securities Transaction Taxes: An Overview of Costs, Benefits and Unresolved Questions”, Financial Analysis Journal, pp.27-35.
    Slemrod, J. (1982), “Stock Transactions Volume and the 1978 Capital Gains Tax Reduction”, Public Finance Quarterly, 10, pp.3-6.
    Somers, H. M. (September 1948), “An Economic Analysis of the Capital Gains Tax”, National Tax Journal, 1, pp.226-232.
    Stiglitz, J. E.(1983), “Some Aspects of the Taxation of Capital Gains”, Journal of Public Economics, 21, pp.257-294.
    Stokey, N. L. and R. E. Lucas, Jr. (with E. C. Prescott)(1989), Recursive Methods in Economic Dynamics, Harvard University Press.
    Summers, L. H. and V. P. Summers (1989), “When Financial Markets Work Too Well: A Cautious Case For a Securities Transactions Tax”, Journal of Financial Services Research, 3, pp.261-286.
    Umlauf, S. R. (1993), “Transaction Taxes and the Behavior of the Swedish Stock Market”, Journal of Financial Economics, 33, pp.227-240.
    Weiss, A. A. (1984), “ARMA Models With ARCH Errors”, Journal of Time Series Analysis, 5, pp.129-143.
    倪晶瑛(1989),股票交易成本與股價之相關性研究─以台股市場為實證,國立中興大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    Yitzhaki, S. (1979), “An Empirical Test of the Lock-in Effect of the Capital Gains Tax”, The Review of Economics and Statics, 61(4), pp.626-629.
    Zakoian, J. M. (1994), “Threshold Heteroskedastic Models”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 18, pp.931-955.
    Zowdrow, G. R. (1993), “Economic Analysis of Capital Gains Taxation; Realization, Revenue, Efficiency and Equity”, Tax Law Review, 48, pp.419-527.
    馬黛(1993),「台灣股市波動因素及穩定措施之研究─停板限制、信用交易保證金及證交稅對股市波動性之影響」,台灣股市結構與制度,第47-90頁。
    陳如芳(2000),證券交易所得稅對證券市場之影響,國立政治大學財務管理學系碩士論文。
    莊金維(1998),台灣股市時間序列特性與市場干預效果,國立政治大學財務管理學系碩士論文。
    莊義端(1991),臺灣股市崩盤之實證研究─以924為例,國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    許政祥(1999),證券交易稅調降對股市之影響,國立台灣大學會計研究所碩士論文。
    許寧佑(1992.8),「稅近於義,民可使也─觀證券交易稅率改採彈性稅率之可行性」,實用稅務,第10-12頁。
    郭祥兆與李憲杰(1995),「一般化自迴歸條件異質性變異數模型參數之選定、估計與檢定-以台灣加權股價指數為例」,成功大學學報,第30期,第53-71頁。
    黃柏農(1995),「多國性股票報酬率的統計特性及星期效果研究─自我相關條件異質性模型的應用」,中國財務學刊,第2卷第2期,第44-76頁。
    蔡姈燕(1995),證券交易所得稅對股票市場之影響,國立成功大學會計研究所碩士論文。
    蔣淑芬(1999.6),「租稅原則公平之探討─兼論證所稅與證交稅之課徵問題」,證交資料,第 1-11頁。
    劉曦敏與葛豐瑞(1996),「臺灣股價指數報酬率之線性及非線性變動」,經濟研究,第34卷第1期,第73-109頁。
    賴政昇 (1990),ARIMA干預分析理論架構與實務運用─以證所稅課徵為例,國立政治大學國際貿易研究所碩士論文。
    叢興瑜(2000),證券交易稅對台灣股票市場的影響-事件研究法之應用,國立中正大學國際經濟研究所碩士論文。
    <br>英文部分
    Akaike, H. (1969), “Fitting Autoregressive Models for Prediction”, Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 21, pp.243-247.
    Altig, D., A. J. Auerbach, L. J. Kotlikoff, K. A. Smetters and J. Walliser (October 1997), “Simulating U.S. Tax Reform”, NBER Working Paper No. W6248.
    Amihud, Y. and H. Mendelson (1992), “Transaction Taxes and Stock Values”, in: Lehn, K. and R. W. Kamphuis, Jr. (eds.), Modernizing U.S. Securities Regulation: Economic and Legal Perspectives-Economic and Legal Perspective, Irwin, pp.477-500.
    Auerbach, A. J. (1989), “Capital Gains Taxation and Tax Reform”, National Tax Journal, 42(3), pp.391-401.
    Auerbach, A. J., L. E. Burman and J. Siegel (February 1998), “Capital Gains Taxation and Tax Avoidance: New Evidence from Panel Data”, NBER Working Paper No. W6399.
    Auten, G. E. and J. J. Cordes (1991), “Policy Watch, Cutting Capital Gains Taxes”, Journal of Economic Perspective, 181, pp.181-192.
    Bertsekas, D. P. (1976), Dynamic Programming and Stochastic Control, N. Y.: Academic Press.
    Bessembinder, H. and P. J. Seguin (1992), “Futures-Trading Activity and Stock Price Volatility”, Journal of Finance, 47, pp.2015-2034.
    Black, F. (1976), “Studies of Stock Price Volatility Changes”, Proceeding of the 1976 Meetings of the Business and Economics Statistics Section, American Statistical Association, pp.177-181.
    Bollerslev, T. (1986), “Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity”, Journal of Econometrics, 31, pp.307-327.
    Bollerslev, T., R. Chou and K. Kroncr (1992), “ARCH Modeling in Finance: A Review of the Theory and Empirical Evidence”, Journal of Econometrics, 52, pp.5-59.
    Bollerslev, T., R. F. Engle and Nelson (1994), “ARCH Models”, Handbook of Econometrics, 5, pp.2960-3038.
    Brock, W. A. (1982), “Assets Prices in a Production Economy”, in J. J. McCall ed. The Economics of Information and Uncertainty, University of Chicago Press.
    Burman, L. E. and W. C. Randolpf (September 1994), “Measuring Permanent Responses to Capital-Gain Tax Changes in Panel Data”, The America Economic Review, 84, pp.795-809.
    Chirinko, R. S. (1987),“The Ineffectiveness of Effective Tax Rates on Business Investment”, Journal of Public Economics, 32, pp.369-388.
    Christie, A. (1982), “The Stochastic Behavior of Common Stock Variance: Value Leverage and Interest Rate Effects” , Journal of Financial Economics, 10, pp.407-432.
    Delong J. B., A. Shleifer, L. H. Summers and R. J. Waldann (1989), “The Size and Incidence of the Losses from Noise Trading”, The Journal of Finance, 44, pp.681-696.
    Dickey, D. A. and W. A. Fuller (1979), “Distribution of the Estimates for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, pp.427-431.
    Dickey, D. A. and W. A. Fuller (1981), “Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root”, Econometrica, 49, pp.735-779.
    Ding, Z., R. F. Engle and C. Granger (1993), “A Long Memory Property of Stock Market Returns and a New Model”, Journal of Empirical Finance, 1, pp.83-106.
    Eckstein, O. (1979), Public Finance, New Jersey : Prentice-Hall.
    Engle, R. F. (1982), “Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of UK Inflation”, Econometrica, 50, pp.987-1008.
    Engle, R. F., D. Lilien and R. Robins (1987), “Estimating Time Varying Risk Premia in the Term Structure: The ARCH-M Model”, Econometrica, 55, pp.391-407.
    Engle, R. F. and B. S. Yoo (1987), “Forecasting and Testing in Cointegrated Systems”, Journal of Econometric, 35, pp.143-159.
    Engle, R. F. and V. Ng (1993), “Measuring and Testing the Impact of News on Volatility”, Journal of Finance, 45, pp.1749-1777.
    Engle, R. F., V. Ng and M. Rothschild (1987), “Asset Pricing with a Factor ARCH Covariance Structure: Empirical Estimates for Treasury Bills”, Journal of Econometrics, 45, pp.213-238.
    Feenberg, D. and L. Summers (1990), “Who Benefits from Capital Gains Tax Reduction”, Tax Policy and Economy, 4, pp.1-24.
    Feldstein, M. (October 1993), “The Effect of Marginal Tax Rates on Taxable Income: a Panel Study of the 1986 Tax Reform Act”, NBER Working Paper No. W4496.
    Feldstein, M., J. Slemrod and S. Yitzhaki (1980), “The Effects of the Capital on The Selling of Corporate Stock and the Realization of Capital Gains”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94(4), pp.771-791.
    Feldstein, M. and S. Yitzhaki (February 1978), “The Effect of the Capital Gains Tax on the Selling and Switching of Common Stock”, Journal of Public Economics, 9(1), pp.17-36.
    Fornari, F. and A. Mele (1994), “Weak Convergence and Distributional Assumptions for the Asymmetric Power ARCH Model”, University of Paris X, mimeo.
    Fornari, F. and A. Mele (1997), “Sign-and Volatility-Switching ARCH Models: Theory and Applications to International Stock Markets”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 12, pp.49-65.
    French, R. K., G. W. Schwert and R. F. Stambaugh (1987), “Expected Stock Returns and Volatility”, Journal of Financial Economics, 19, pp.3-29.
    Fullerton, D. (1994), “Inputs to Tax Policymaking: the Supply Side, the Deficit and the Level Playing Field”, in Martin Feldstein, ed., American Economic Policy in the 1980s. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp.165-208.
    Gemmill, R. F. (1956), “The Effect of Capital Gains Tax on Asset Price”, National Tax Journal, 9, pp.289-301.
    Glosten, L., R. Jagannathan and D. Runkle (1993), “On the Relation Between the Expected Value and the Volatility on the Nominal Excess Returns on Stocks”, Journal of Finance, 48, pp.1779-1801.
    Gordon, R. H., and L. A. Bovenberg (July 1994), “Why is Capital so Immobile Internationally? : Possible Explanations and Implications for Capital Income Taxation ”, NBER Working Paper No. W4796.
    Gordon, R. and G. Vitor (April 2001), “Home Bias in Portfolios and Taxation of Asset Income”, NBER Working Paper No. W8193.
    Granger, C. and P. Newhold (1974), “Spurious Regressions in Econometrics”, Journal of Econometrics, 2, pp.111-120.
    Greene, W. H. (2000), Econometric Analysis, fourth edition, Preentice Hall.
    Guenther, D. A. (1994), “The Relation Between Tax Rates and Pre-Tax Returns Direct Evidence From the 1981 and 1986 Tax Rate Reductions”, Journal of Accounting and Economics 18, pp.379-393.
    Guenther, D. A. and M. Willenborg (1999), “Capital Gains Tax Rates and the Cost of Capital for Small Business: Evidence From The IPO Market”, Journal of Financial Economics, 53, pp.385-408.
    Haliassos, M. and A. B. Lyon (1993), “Progressivity of Capital Gains Taxation with Optimal Portfolio Selection”, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 4253, pp.506-516.
    Hamilton, J. D. (1994), Time Series Analysis, Princeton University Press.
    Hausman, J. and J. Poterba (Summer 1987), “Household Behavior and the Tax Reform Act of 1986”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1(1), pp.101-119.
    Henderson, Y. K. (1990), “Capital Gains Tax Rates and Stock Market Volume”, National Tax Journal, 43(4), pp.411-425.
    Holt, C. C. and J. P. Shelton (1962), “The Lock-In Effect of the Capital Gains Tax”, National Tax Journal, 15, pp337-351.
    Hu, S. Y. (1998), “The Effects of the Stock Transaction Tax on the Stock Market-Experiences from Asian Markets”, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 6, pp.347-364.
    Jang, H. J. (December 1994), “The Market Reaction to the 1986 Tax Overhaul: A Study of the Capital Gain Tax Change”, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 21(8), pp.1179-1193.
    Johnston, J. and J. Dinardo (1998), Econometric Method, Fourth Edition, McGraw-Hill.
    Keynes, J. M. (1936), The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money, New York: Harcourt Brace.
    Kovenock, D. J. and M. Rochschild (1987), “Notes on the Effect of Capital Gains Taxation on Non-Austrian Assets”, in Economic Policy in Theory and Practice, London: Macmillian.
    Kupiec, P. H. (1995), “A Securities Transactions Tax and Capital Market Efficiency”, Contemporary Economic Policy, 13, pp.101-112.
    Kupiec, P. H. (1996), “Noise Traders, Excess Volatility, and a Securities Transactions Tax”, Journal of Financial Services Research, 10, pp.115-129.
    Lamoureux. C. G. and W. D. Lastrapes(1990), “Heterskedasticity in Stock Returns Data: Volume versus GARCH Effects”, Journal of Finance, 45(1), pp.221-229.
    Lang, M. H. and A. S. Douglas (January 1999), “Capitalization of Capital Gain Tax : Evidence from Stock Price Reaction to the 1997 Rate Reduction”, NBER Working Paper No. W6885.
    Lucas, R. E., Jr. (1976), “Econometric Policy Evaluation: A Critique”, in Karl Brunner and A. H. Meltzer ed. The Phillips Curve and Labor Markets, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
    Lucas, R. E., Jr. (1978), “Asset Prices in an Exchange Economy”, Econometrica, 46, pp.1429-1445.
    Mackinlay, A. C. (1997), “Event Studies in Economics and Finance”, Journal of Economic Literature, 35, March, pp.13-39.
    Mandelbrot, A. and S. Turnbull (1990), “Pricing Foreign Currency Options with Stochastic Volatility”, Journal of Econometrics, 45, pp.239-266.
    Mandelbrot, B. (1963), “The Variation of Certain Speculative Prices”, Journal of Business, 36, pp.394-419.
    Mao, C. S. (1999), “Capital Gain Tax in an Endowment Economy”, manuscript.
    Mckenzie, K. J. and A. J. Thompson (1995), “The Impact of the Capital Gains Exemption on Capital Markets”, Canadian Public Policy, 21, pp.100-115.
    Mendoza, E. G. (April 2001), “The International Macroeconomics of Taxation and the Case Against European Tax Harmonization”, NBER Working Paper No. W8217.
    Mill, J. S. (1926), Principles of Politiced Economy, London: Longmans.
    Morse D.(1980), “Asymmetrical Information in Securities Markets and Trading Volume”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 15 (5), pp.1129-1148.
    Najand, M. and K. Yung (1991), “A GARCH Examination of the Relationship Between Volume and Price Volatility in Future Markets”, Journal of Future Markets, 11, pp.613-621.
    Nelson, D. (1990), “ARCH Models as Diffusion Approximations”, Journal of Econometrics, 45, pp.7-38.
    Nelson, D. (1991), “Conditional Heteroskedasticity in Asset Returns: A New Approach”, Econometrica, 59, pp.347-370.
    Nelson, D. and D. Foster (1994), “Asymptotic Filtering Theory for Univariate ARCH Models”, Econometrica, 62, pp.1-41.
    Phillips, P. and P. Perron (1988), “Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression”, Biometrika, 75, pp. 335-346.
    Poterba, J. M. (October 1987), “Tax Evasion and Capital Gains Taxation”, NBER Working Paper No. W2119.
    Rebelo, S. and G. Rouwenhorst (March 1989), “Linear Quadratic Approximations versus Discrete State Space Methods: A Numerical Evaluation”, manuscript, University of Rochester.
    Reese, W. A., Jr. (October 1998), “Capital Gains Taxation and Stock Market Activity:evidence from IPOs”, Journal of Finance, 53(5), pp.1799-1819.
    Description: 博士
    國立政治大學
    經濟研究所
    81258505
    89
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002000567
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[經濟學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2246View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback