政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/36286

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46321462 Online Users : 705

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

Scope

please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results

please goto advance search for comprehansive author search

Adv. Search

Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer

Goto mobile version

政大機構典藏 > 社會科學學院 > 國家發展研究所 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/36286

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/36286

Title:	我國憲法違憲審查與國會自律之研究 The Judicial Review and Legislative Self-discipline Studies in The Constitution of R.O.C.
Authors:	項程華 Hsiang, Cheng-Hua
Contributors:	法治斌 Fa, Jyn-Pin 項程華 Hsiang, Cheng-Hua
Keywords:	憲法違憲審查國會自律 Constitution Judicial review Legislative self-discipline
Date:	1997
Issue Date:	2009-09-18 17:53:47 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	本文首先對於長久以來質疑司法權的民主正當性的看法從古典民主理論與修正民主理論兩者的基本差異進行分析發現古典民主理論受到許多新興理論的挑戰其當初理論的許多基本假設其實與許多人類共同經驗有相當大的認知差異修正民主理論較能真正反應政治實際運作的景象也為現代多數政治學者所接受只要司法違憲審查的權力能夠受到民主多數的同意與其制度能夠受到多數民意隨時的改變司法違憲審查權也能獲得民主正當性本文以先進民主國家的美國憲政運作為對象分別從總統固有的行政權司法裁判權國會的立法否決權以及獨立管制委員會幾個部份分析結果發現權力分析理論在解釋與適用上可分別採取形式論的途徑與功能論的途徑來進行為了了解我國憲政運作的實際情況本文以大法官解釋為研究對象權力分析為研究理論透過形式論與功能論為兩個研究途徑分析近五十年大法官所為四百二十多件解釋相互交叉比對所得到的二十一種關係類型經過分析發現整體而言大法官所採取的解釋途徑是相當平均的但是差異是發生在與司法權相關的關係上形式論解釋途徑的使用明顯超過功能論本文亦發現這種途徑的特性往往使其被用於不同意見書中以反對司法權介入某種憲政爭議上這也適度的反證多數的司法院大法官對違憲審查權的行使是較積極的我國國會議員在具有特權及國會自律的保障下往往導致權力之濫用然而國會自律功能極為不彰對於民意代表的行為幾乎束手無策而毫無拘束力但是司法權基於該項原則卻自我設限而給予迴避因此本文的主張在政治哲學的價值導引下採取權力分立功能論的解釋途徑對於民意代表的特權及國會自律加以司法上的監督以維護憲政制度的良性運作 The question to the judicial power is in the view to democratic legitimacy, the analysis from the basic difference between "classic democracy" and "reformed democracy theory". there are many challenges to the assumptions ofthe "classic democracy theory", which beyond human common experience. Most ofthe political scientist are able to accept "reformed democracy theory". If the power of judicial review is basis on people consent and changed by most of the people anytime, the power of judicial review is owned democratic legitimacyIn the functional approach of constitution explanation which should make thejudicial power into legislative discipline area.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學中山人文社會科學研究所 82261008 86
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#B2002001970
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[國家發展研究所] 學位論文

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
index.html	0Kb	HTML2	328	View/Open

All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - Feedback