English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140891 (78%)
Visitors : 46251076      Online Users : 1207
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 文學院 > 哲學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/37232
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/37232


    Title: 論唯物消除論
    A Critique of Elimanative Materialism
    Authors: 邱盛揚
    Chiu, Sen Yang
    Contributors: 藍亭
    Lane, Tim
    邱盛揚
    Chiu, Sen Yang
    Keywords: 唯物消除論
    通俗心理學
    命題態度
    Eliminative Materialism
    Folk Psychology
    Propositional Attitude
    Date: 2008
    Issue Date: 2009-09-19 12:46:46 (UTC+8)
    Abstract:   本篇論文的主要目的是要藉由批判Paul Churchland版本的唯物消除論當中的論證之相關蘊含以及前提,來分析其立場的缺失與不足之處。而為了要達到這個目的,我便將本論文的構成主軸分成兩個部分:第一個部分是由第一章以及第二章所構成,其主要談論過去Churchland (1981)所宣稱的消除論立場以及其論證架構,在這裡除了整理過去眾多哲學家對於他的論證的一些批判與反駁的觀點之外,我也提出自己對於過去消除論之三個主要困境的主張。第二個部分則是由第三章以及第四章所構成,其主要是針對Churchland (2007)現在的唯物消除論之新進觀點來展開論述。當中除了分析他消除論立場的一致性之外,同時也去分析並討論他所提供之支持消除論的新論證,我將之稱作為「動物認知論證」(animal cognition argument) 。我將指出,由於Churchland在該論證當中隱含了一個重要的預設,因而使得該新論證的途徑未必可以合理地推得出其原有的消除論立場。
    Reference: 1. Baker, Lynne Rudder. 1988. Cognitive suicide. Reprinted in John Heil eds. 2004. Philosophy of mind: a guide and anthology. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 401-415.
    2. . 1993. Eliminativism and an argument from science. Mind and Language 8: 180-188.
    3. Bogdan, Radu. 1988. Mental Attitudes and Common Sense Psychology: The Case Against Elimination. Noûs 22: 369-398
    4. Bermúdez, José Luis. 2000. Personal and Subpersonal: A Difference without a Distinction. Philosophical Explorations 2: 63-82.
    5. . 2003. Thinking without Words. Philosophy of mind series. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    6. . 2005. Arguing for eliminativism. In Brian Keeley eds. Paul Churchland Contemporary philosophy in focus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 32-65
    7. . 2006. Philosophy of psychology contemporary readings. Routledge contemporary readings in philosophy. New York: Routledge.
    8. Bertolet, Rod. 1994. Saving eliminativism. Philosophical Psychology 7: 87-100.
    9. Campbell, Keith. 1993. What Motivates Eliminativism? Mind and Language 8: 206-210.
    10. Churchland, Paul M. 1979. Scientific realism and the plasticity of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    11. . 1981. Eliminative Materialism and the Propositional Attitudes. Journal of Philosophy 78: 67-90.
    12. . 1989. Folk Psychology and the Explanation of Human Behavior. Philosophical Perspectives 3: 225-241.
    13. . 1989. Theory, Taxonomy, and Methodology: A Reply to Haldane`s "Understanding Folk". Reprinted in Paul Churchland and Patricia Smith Churchland. 1998. On the contrary critical essays, 1987-1997. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press: 17-24.
    14. . 1992. Activation Vectors versus Propositional Attitudes: How the Brain Represents Reality. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research : 419-424.
    15. . 1993. Folk Psychology. Reprinted in Paul Churchland and Patricia Smith Churchland. 1998. On the contrary critical essays, 1987-1997. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press: 3-15.
    16. . 2005. Functionalism at Forty: A Critical Retrospective. Reprinted in Paul Churchland. 2007. Neurophilosophy at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 18-36.
    17. . 2007. The Evolving Fortunes of Eliminative Materialism. In Brian McLaughlin and Jonathan Cohen eds. Contemporary debates in philosophy of mind. Malden: Blackwell: 160-181.
    18. Churchland, Patricia S. 1982. Mind Brain Reduction - New Light from the Philosophy of Science. Neuroscience 7: 1041-1047.
    19. . 1986. Neurophilosophy: toward a unified science of the mind-brain. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
    20. . 1994. Can Neurobiology Teach Us Anything about Consciousness? Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 67: 23-40.
    21. . 2005. A neurophilosophical slant on consciousness research. Progress in Brain Research 149: 285-293.
    22. Clark, Andy. 1989. Beyond Eliminativism. Mind and Language 4: 251-279.
    23. . 1993. The Varieties of Eliminativism: Sentential, Intentional and Catastrophic. Mind and Language 8: 223-233.
    24. . 1996. Dealing in futures: Folk psychology and the role of representations in cognitive science. In Robert N. McCauley eds. The Churchlands and their critics. Cambridge, Mass, Blackwell Publishers.
    25. Davies, Martin. 1994. The Mental Simulation Debate. Philosophical Issues 5: 189-218.
    26. Dennett, Daniel Clement. 1981. True Believers: the Intentional Strategy and Why it Works. Reprinted in Daniel Dennett. 1987. The intentional stance. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press: 13-35.
    27. . 1981. Three Kinds of Intentional Psychology. Reprinted in Daniel Dennett. 1987. The intentional stance. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press: 43-68.
    28. . 1991. Real Patterns. Journal of Philosophy 88: 27-51.
    29. Feyerabend, Paul. 1963. Materialism and the Mind-Body Problem. Review of Metaphysics 17: 49-66.
    30. Fodor, Jerry A. 1987. Psychosemantics: the problem of meaning in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
    31. Fricker, Elizabeth. 1993. The Threat of Eliminativism. Mind and Language 8: 253-281.
    32. Goldman, Alvin. 1989. Interpretation Psychologized. Mind and Language 4: 161-185.
    33. Gordon, Robert. 1986. Folk psychology as Simulation. Mind and Language 1: 158-171.
    34. . 1992. The Simulation Theory: Objections and Misconceptions. Mind and Language 7: 11-34.
    35. Graham, George. 1987. The Origins of Folk Psychology. Inquiry 30: 357-379
    36. Greenwood, John. 1991. The Future of folk psychology: intentionality and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    37. Hannan, Barbara. Don’t Stop Believing : The Case Against Eliminative Materialism. Mind and Language 8: 165-179.
    38. Haselager, W. F. G. 1997. Cognitive science and folk psychology: the right frame of mind. London: Sage Publications.
    39. Horgan, Terence. 1993. The Austere Ideology of Folk Psychology. Mind and Language 8: 282-297.
    40. Horgan, Terence and Tienson, John. 1995. Connectionism and the Commitments of Folk Psychology. Philosophical Perspectives 9: 127-152.
    41. Horgan, Terence and Woodward, James. 1985. Folk Psychology is Here to Stay. The Philosophical Review 94: 197-226.
    42. Jackson, Frank and Pettit, Philip. 1990. In Defense of Folk Psychology. Philosophical Studies 59: 31-54.
    43. Kitcher, Patricia. 1984. In Defense of Intentional Psychology. The Journal of Philosophy 81: 89-106.
    44. Hannan, Barbara. 1993. Don`t Stop Believing: The Case Against Eliminative Materialism. Mind and Language 8: 165-179.
    45. Lahav, Ran. 1992. The Amazing Predictive Power of Folk Psychology. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 70: 99-105.
    46. Lycan, William G. 1999. Mind and cognition: an anthology. Blackwell philosophy anthologies, 8. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Publishers.
    47. . 2005. A particularly compelling refutation of eliminative materialism. In David Johnson and Christina Erneling eds. The Mind As a Scientific Object: Between Brain and Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
    48. Lycan, William and Pappas, George. 1972. What Is Eliminative Materialism? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 50: 149-159.
    49. Marr, David. 1982. Vision: a computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
    50. McCauley, Robert. 1996. The Churchlands and their critics. Cambridge, Mass, Blackwell Publishers.
    51. Pinker, Steven. 1994. The Language instinct. New York: W. Morrow and Co.
    52. Ramsey, William and Stich, Stephen and Garon, Joseph. 1990. Connectionism, eliminativism, and the future of folk psychology. Philosophical Perspectives 4: 499-533.
    53. Rorty, Richard. 1965. Mind-Body Identity, Privacy, and Categories. Review of Metaphysics 19: 24-54.
    54. Sterelny, Kim. 1993. Refuting Eliminative Materialism on the Cheap? Mind and Language 8: 306-315.
    55. Stich, Stephen. 1978. Autonomous Psychology and the Belief-Desire Thesis. Reprinted in John Heil eds. 2004. Philosophy of mind: a guide and anthology. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 365-381.
    56. . 1998. Deconstructing the mind. The philosophy of mind series. New York: Oxford University Press.
    57. Stich, Stephen and Nichols, Shaun. 1993. Folk Psychology: Simulation or Tacit Theory? Philosophical Issues 3: 225-270.
    58. Trout, J. D. 1991. Belief attribution in science: Folk psychology under theoretical stress. Synthese 87: 379-400.
    59. Wilkes, Kathleen. 1991. The Relationship Between Scientific and Common Sense Psychology. Synthese 89: 15-39.
    60. Wright, Crispin. 1993. Eliminative materialism: Going concern or passing fancy? Mind and Language 8: 316-326.
    61. . 1995. Can there be a rationally compelling argument for anti-realism about ordinary ("folk") psychology? Philosophical Issues 6: 197-221.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    哲學研究所
    93154013
    97
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093154013
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[哲學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    15401301.pdf110KbAdobe PDF2868View/Open
    15401302.pdf129KbAdobe PDF2812View/Open
    15401303.pdf127KbAdobe PDF2767View/Open
    15401304.pdf156KbAdobe PDF21110View/Open
    15401305.pdf239KbAdobe PDF21845View/Open
    15401306.pdf258KbAdobe PDF21567View/Open
    15401307.pdf243KbAdobe PDF21218View/Open
    15401308.pdf229KbAdobe PDF21487View/Open
    15401309.pdf154KbAdobe PDF2871View/Open
    15401310.pdf110KbAdobe PDF21218View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback