Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/38783
|
| Title: | 台灣跨族群工具性交友網絡研究
The research of cross-ethnic friendship and instrumental network in Taiwan |
| Authors: | 唐經硯 |
| Contributors: | 熊瑞梅
唐經硯 |
| Keywords: | 工具性網絡
階層線性模型
跨族群交往偏向程度
接觸脈絡 |
| Date: | 2009 |
| Issue Date: | 2010-04-09 17:45:01 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 在本論文中，研究者認為影響受訪者跨族群交友的主要因素主要可從兩方面來看，分別為兩者連繫的同質性、連繫強度、接觸場合、社經地位差序變項，以及受訪者個人的世代、族群、教育程度與跨族群交友偏向程度。透過1997年三期三次「台灣地區社會變遷調查」社會網絡與社區組調查資料，本論文使用階層線性模型（Hierarchical Linear Models，HLM），從受訪者與他人的兩者關係所形成的連繫層次，以及受訪者個人層次來對台灣跨族群交往的現象作進一步的分析。研究結果發現，受訪者個人特質，例如受訪者教育程度、所屬族群，較兩者連繫特質，例如兩者連繫強度、認識場合，更強烈地影響了跨族群連繫形成的可能性，這樣的結果在過去由於方法上的限制，無法得到驗證，透過此研究，可對台灣族群相關網絡研究在建立跨族群連繫的可能因素上，提供了不一樣的看法與解釋。
In this paper, I argued that what impacts the respondents constructing the cross-ethnicity ties can be treated from two perspectives. One is the tie-level, such as the homogeneity, tie strength, contact contexts, and socio-economical resources variables between two actors. The other is the individual-level, like the generations, ethnicities, levels of education, and the degrees of the preference for making cross-ethnic ties of the egos, that is, the respondents. I tested my hypotheses using the social network data in 1997, called Taiwan Social Change Survey (TSCS). Through building the hierarchical linear models, some advanced analysis could be done for understanding the cross-ethnic interaction phenomenon in Taiwan by considering the tie-level and the individual-level at the same time. The research results showed that when talking about the possibility of making cross-ethnic ties, personal characteristics, like levels of education, and ethnicities, are more important than tie characteristics, such as tie strength and meeting places of the two. However, this outcome cannot be examined in the past because of the methodological restrictions. Through this research, it provides different sights and explanations for discussing the possible reasons for constructing cross-ethnic ties in the social network researching area in Taiwan. |
| Reference: | 中文部分：
王甫昌，2002，〈族群接觸機會？還是族群競爭？：本省閩南人族群意識內涵與地區差異模式之解釋〉。《台灣社會學》4：11-74。
王甫昌，2003，《當代台灣社會的族群想像》台北: 群學。
邱皓政，2007，〈脈絡效果的階層線性模型分析：以學校組織創新氣氛與教師創意表現為例〉，教育與心理研究, 30(1)：5-35。
林南，2005，《社會資本：關於社會結構與行動的理論》上海: 上海人民出版社。
徐富珍、陳信木，2004，〈蕃薯＋芋頭＝台灣土豆？－台灣當前族群認同狀況比較分析〉。 台灣人口學會2004年年會曁「人口、家庭與國民健康政策回顧與展望」研討會會議論文。
張苙雲、廖培珊，2008，《台灣社會變遷基本調查第五期第三次調查報告》，行政院國科會資助，中央研究院社會學研究所執行。
陳端容、陳東升，2001，〈跨族群的社會連繫：工具理性行動邏輯與社會結構的辯證〉。 《台灣社會學刊》25：1-54。
黃毅志、章英華，2005，〈台灣地區族群交友界限之變遷：1970年與1997年的比較〉。《台灣社會學刊》35：127-179。
溫福星，2006，〈階層線性模型：原理、方法與運用〉，台北市: 雙葉。
溫福星、邱皓政，2009，〈多層次模型方法論：階層線性模式的關鍵議題與試解〉，臺大管理論叢，19(2)：263-294。
熊瑞梅，1994，〈影響情感與財務支持連繫的因素〉人文及社會科學集刊，6(2)，頁303-333。
──，2001，〈性別、個人網絡與社會資本〉，I收錄於邊燕杰、涂肇慶、蘇耀昌主編《華人社會的調查研究：方法與發現》，頁179-215，香港：牛津出版社。
謝雨生、吳齊殷、李文傑，2006，〈青少年網絡特性、互動結構和友誼態〉，《台灣社會學》11：175-236。
瞿海源，1998，《台灣社會變遷基本調查第三期第三次調查報告》，行政院國科會資助，中央研究院社會學研究所籌備處執行。
英文部分：
Blau, P. M. (1974). Inequality and Heterogeneity. New York: The Free Press.
Burt, R. S. (2001). Structural Holes versus Network Closure as Social Capital. In R. Burt, K. Cook & N. Lin (Eds.), Social Capital: Theory and Research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge: MA: Harvard University Press.
── (1993). The Rational Reconstructuion of Society. American Sociological Review, 58: 1-15.
Eder, D., & Hallinan, M. T. (1978). Sex Differences in Children`s Friendships. American Sociological Review, 43: 237-250.
Feld, S. L. (1981). The Focused Organization of Social Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 86(5), 1015-1035.
Fischer, C. S. (1982). To Dwell Among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Fischer, C. S., Gerson, K., Baldassare, M., Jackson, R. M., & Steuve, C. A. (1977). Networks and Places: Social Relations in the Urban Setting. New York: Free Press.
Fu, Yang.-Chih. (2009). The Immediate Returns on Time Investment in Daily Contacts: Exploring the Network-Overlapping Effects from Contact Diaries. In R.-M. Hsung, N. Lin & R. Brieger (Eds.), Contexts of Social Capital: Social Networks in Markets, Communities, and Families (pp. 327-347). London: Routledge.
Granovetter, M. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78: 1360-1380.
Homans, G. C. (1950). The Human Group. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Lin, Nan (2001). Social Capital: Atheory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Merton, R. K. (1954). Friendship as Social Process: A Substantive and Methodological Analysis. In M. Berger, T. Abel & C. Page (Eds.), Freedom and Control in Modern Society (pp. 18-66). New York: Van Nostrand.
Maccoby, E. E. (1998). The Two Sexes: Growing Up Apart, Coming Together Cambridge: MA: Belknap/Harvard University Press.
Marsden, P. V. (1987). Core Discussion Networks of Americans. American Sociological Review, 52: 122-131.
Marsden, P. V. (1990). Network Diversity, Substructures, and Opportunities for Contact. In C. Calhoun, M. W. Meyer & W. Richard (Eds.), Structures of Power and Constraint: Papers in Honor of Peter M. Blau (pp. 397-410). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27: 415-444.
Mollenhorst, G., Völker, B., & Flap, H. (2008). Social Contexts and Core Discussion Networks: Using a Choice-Constraint Approch to Study Similarity in Intimate Relationships. Social Forces, 86(3), 937-965.
＿＿＿. (2008). Social Context and Personal Relationships: The Effect of Meeting Opportunities on Similarity for Relationships of Different Strength. Social Networks, 30, 60-68.
Mollenhorst, G. (2009). Networks in Contexts: How Meeting Opportunities Affect Personal Relationships. Ipskamp Drukkers BV: Enschede.
Smith-Lovin, L., & M., M. (1993). You Are Who You Know: A Network Perspective on Gender. In P. England (Ed.), Theory on Gender/ Feminism on Theory (pp. 223-251). New York: Aldine.
Tuma, N. B., & Hallinan, M. T. (1979). The Effects of Sex, Race and Achivement on Schoolchildren`s Friendships. Social Forces, 57: 1265-1285.
Völker, B., Flap, H., & Mollenhorst, G. (2009). Changing Places: The Influence of Meeting Places on Recruiting Friends. In R.-M. Hsung, N. Lin & R. Breiger (Eds.), Contexts of Social Capital: Social Networks in Communities, Markets and Organizations. London: London.
Wellman, B., & Wortley, S. (1990). Different Strokes from Different Folks: Community Ties and Social Support. American Journal of Sociology, 96(3), 558-588.
Wellman, B., & Frank, K. (2001). Network Capital in a Multi-Level World: Getting Support from Personal Communities. In N. Lin, R. Burt & K. Cook (Eds.), Social Capital: Theory and Research. Chicago: Aldine De Gruyter. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
社會學研究所
96254005
98 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096254005 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [社會學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 400501.pdf | 4554Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 3502 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
