English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88531/118073 (75%)
Visitors : 23457104      Online Users : 106
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/38821


    Title: 臺北縣新莊市中港大排水岸城鄉個案分析:公民參與觀點
    Jhonggang Drainage Cannel Waterside City Case study in Sinjhuang,Taipei:From the Point of View of Citizen Participation
    Authors: 陳炳宏
    Contributors: 蕭武桐
    陳炳宏
    Keywords: 環境正義
    利害關係人
    公民參與
    environmental justice
    stakeholder
    citizen participation
    Date: 2007
    Issue Date: 2010-04-09 18:11:15 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究是國內少數以公民參與的觀點,探討環境正義落實,並以實際政策規劃佐以驗證。過去台灣公民參與政策規劃實例不多,甚至公民參與政策規劃意願薄弱,因為許多民眾不相信政府會採納他們的意見,總保持旁觀態度。同時,國內政策規劃模式並沒有提供公民參與機制,民眾不熟悉政策制定流程,也沒有相對專業背景,造成雙向溝通地方座談會流於形式。
    政策規劃應以民眾為最主要利害關係人考量,利害關係人的意見應在政策規劃時就須納入考量並給予相對回應,以獲得政策合法性及追求政策支持度。環境正義的落實必須依賴政策的落實,同時也提供利害關係人相對的資訊,以供作出最有利判斷,否則推動環境正義的行動,僅淪為空談。本研究以臺北縣新莊市中港大排整治個案為研究背景,將規劃過程政府與當地民眾如何互動,詳實記錄並分析。冀望透過本計畫執行,能提供未來政府決策參考。同時能激起民眾公民意識覺醒,提升公民參與政策規劃意願,進而落實環境正義。

    關鍵字:環境正義、利害關係人、公民參與
    This research is one of the few researches which aims to discuss the application of environment justice and verify it with a real example of policy planning from the point of view of citizens participation. In the past, there are few examples of citizen participating in policy-making. Moreover, citizens are not willing to take part in public policy-making, for the public doesn’t believe the government will adopt their opinions, is not familiar with the process of policy-making and doesn’t have professional knowledge about policy-making. As a result, the local forums between the government officials and the public cannot produce positive outputs.
    Policy planning should regard the public as main stakeholder and the opinions of the “stakeholders” should be taken into account to get the legitimacy of policies and their support form the public. The application of environment justice depends on the application of policy. The government should offer the “stakeholder” necessary information so that the public is able to make the best judgment. Otherwise, the actions to carry out environmental justice will be in vain.
    Taking the renovation of Zhong-Kang Drainage channel in Xin Zhuang as a example, this research records and analyzes how people in Xin Zhuang interact with the government during the process of policy-making in details. This research aims to become a model for the government in future by the execution of the project. Meanwhile, the research would like to activate the awareness of citizenship and increase the public’s willingness to participate policy in planning and carry out the justice of environment.

    Key word: environmental justice, stakeholder, citizen participation
    Reference: 一、中文部份
    王力平,2003,《金門島栗喉蜂虎(Merops philipennus)營巢地選擇與繁殖生物學研究》,國立臺灣大學森林學研究所碩士論文。
    王芳筠 ,2004,《環境影響評估制度中公民參與機制之研析》, 暨南大學公共行政與政策學系碩士論文。
    朱志宏,1999,《公共政策》,修訂初版,台北:三民書局。
    余致力,2000,〈論公共行政在民主治理過程中的正當角色:黑堡宣言的內涵、定位與啟示〉,《公共行政學報》,第4期, 1-29頁。
    余致力,2001,《民意與公共政策:一般民眾與關注民眾政策意見異同之比較研究》,政策分析的理論與實務研討會,世新大學行政管理系。
    吳瓊恩,2001,〈公共行政學發展的歷史〉,《行政學》,台北:三民。
    李永展,2005,《邁向永續典範的移轉-在地環境正義的政策實踐與學習》,人文價值與生命關懷通識課程實施研討會,高雄樹德科技大學。
    李美華譯,1998,Earl Babbie,《社會科學研究方法》,台北:時英。
    林水波,1999,《公共政策新論》,初版,台北:智勝文化事業公司。
    林水波、王崇斌,1999,〈公民參與與有效的政策執行〉,《公共行政學報》,第三期, 175-202 頁。
    林博文,2001,《從地區行銷論城市形象的塑造管理》,海峽兩岸公共管理學術研討會。
    林博文,2002,《地方政府之行銷研究》,地方自治變革與地方政府功能提昇學術研討會。
    林博文,2004,〈地方政府之行銷研究〉,《行政管理論文選集》,第十八集,台北:銓敘部。
    林嘉誠,2003,〈電子化政府與轉型中的公共服務典範〉,《研考雙月刊》,第27卷,第1期, 16-29頁。
    邱鴻遠,1998,《哈瑪星水岸地區再開發之觀光策略研究──從當地居民觀點探討》,中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。
    紀駿傑、王俊秀 ,1996 ,〈環境正義:原住民與國家公園衝突的分析〉,《台灣的社會學研究:回顧與展望論文集》,台中:東海大學。
    胡幼慧,1996,《質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》,台北:巨流。
    胡幼慧,2008,《質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》,台北:巨流。
    胡至沛,1998,《回應性政策評估理論之研究──兼論台北縣老人年金政策》,中興大學公共政策研究所碩士論文。
    孫秀如,2004 (彙編),〈環境正義:人人平等享受環境資源與生存空間〉,《環境小百科,台灣環境資訊協會》,第 40 卷,第 4 期, 1-24 頁。
    翁興利,1996,〈政策論證與政策制定:以核四興建為例〉,《公共政策學報》,第十七期,193-216 頁。
    翁興利、施能傑、官有垣、鄭麗嬌等,1998,《公共政策》,初版二刷,蘆洲空中大學出版。
    鬼頭秀一,1996,《自然保護を問い直 す》,東京:ちくま新書。
    張紹勳,2001,《研究方法》,台中:滄海書局。
    陳志泰,2007,《不同利害關係人對組織績效指標重要性 認知差異之研究-以營建機電工程業為例》,中原大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
    陳建寧,1999,《公民文化與地方發展初探》,中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。
    陳桂香,1996,《公共政策與民眾參與:環境影響評估過桯中民眾參與制度之研究》,國立中興大學公共行政及政策研究所碩士論文。
    陳敦源、蕭乃沂,2001,〈臺北市政府接受人民施政意見反應機制之研究〉,《市政專題研究報告第 310 輯》,臺北市,研究發展考核委員會。
    陳裕琛,2007,《台北縣民力參與警察業務之研究》,政治大學行政管理碩士學程碩士論文。
    彭國棟,1999,〈淺談環境正義〉,《自然保育季刊》,第28期。
    黃東益,2003,《民主商議與政策參與-審慎思辯民調的初探》,台北:韋伯文化。
    黃東益,2003,《審慎思辯、政治資訊與政策偏好的轉變-美國全國性及地方性審慎思辯意見調查結果的探討》,台北:韋伯文化。
    黃素琴,2000,《我國內地稅組織結構之探討-利害關係人的觀點》,交通大學經營管理研究所碩士論文。
    楊秀娟,2000,〈政府機關對民眾關心議題如何納入政策〉,《研考雙月刊》,第 24 卷 1 期,3-8 頁。
    葉至誠.葉立誠,1999,《研究方法與論文寫作》,第一版第二刷,台北:商鼎文化出版社。
    廖英賢,2002,《振興地方策略形成之利害關係人研究-澎湖設置觀光賭場爭議之個案分析》,國立中山大學。
    鄭玉惠,2000,《集體行動與地域性再建構--美濃反水庫運動為例》,國立師範大學地理研究所碩士論文。
    蕭武桐,1998,《生活智慧vs.現代管理》,台北:佛光。
    蕭武桐,1998,《行政倫理》,台北:國立空中大學。
    蕭武桐,2001,《公務倫理》,台北:智勝。
    蕭武桐,2005,新世紀新管理組織核心價值與領導,台北市政府心靈管理研討會,36-37頁。
    戴元峰,2006,《國家決策輔助諮詢系統之研究-以國際科技政策觀測系統為例》,政治大學社會科學學院行政管理碩士學程碩士論文。
    薛舟、徐麗紅譯,李明博,《2006,1%的可能韓國首爾李明博的夢想奇蹟》,台北:達觀。
    魏鏞,1994,《公共政策》,台北:國立空中大學。
    羅紹麟.童秋霞,2000,〈自然資源經營之利害關係人分析-以林務局主管人員之意見為例〉,《林業研究季刊》,第二十二卷第四 期,45-58 頁。
    藤原保信,1991,《自然観の構造と環 境倫理学》,東京:御茶ノ水書房。
    二、英文部份
    Abe, J. M., P. E. Dempsey, and D. A. Bassett, 1998. Business Ecology, Giving your organization the natural edge. Butterworth-Heinemann.
    Barber, B. R.,1984. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkley: University of California Press.
    Baumgartner, F.R & Jones, B.D ,1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics,Chicago: Chicago University Press.
    Been, V., 1995. Market Force, Not Racist Practices, May Affect the Siting of Locally Undesirable Land Uses. Envir- onmental justice. J. S. Petrikin. San Diego, Calif.: Greenhaven Press: p. 128.
    Bendix, J., Liebler, C.M., 1999. Place, distance, and environmental news: geographic variation in newspaper coverage of the spotted owl conflict, Annals of the Association of American Geographers,89(4): 658-676.
    Bernard, Harvey R, 1988. Research Methods in Cultural Anthropology, Newbury Park: Sage.
    Blumer, H. ,1969. Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and Method.Englewood Cliffs, N J: Prentice-Hall.
    Coleman, S. and J.G.otze, 2001. Bowling Together: Online Public Engagement in Policy Deliberation. London: Hansard Society. http://bowlingtogether.net/bowlingtogether.pdf(accessed July 31, 2004)
    Daft, R.L., 2001. Organization Theory and Design, Mason, South-Western College.
    Dryzek, P., 1989. Policy Science and Democracy, Polity 12(1): 97-118.
    Fischer, Richard, 1994. An Overview of Performance Measurement, Public Management, 96(9):S2-S8.
    Grimble, R. and K, Wellard, 1997. Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: a review of principle, contexts, experiences and opportunities. Agricultural System 55(2).
    Grimble, R., Chan, M. K., Aglionby, J. and Quan, J., 1995. Trees and Trade-offs: a Stakeholder Approach to Natural Resource Management, Gatekeeper Series no.52, London: IIED.
    Gutmann, A. and D.Thompson , 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
    Hartman, C. L. and E. R., Stafford, 1997. Green alliances: building new business with environmental groups. Long Range Planning 30(2):184-196.
    Hayward, T., 2005. Constitutional environ- mental rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Hofrichter, R., (ed.), 1993. Toxic Struggles: The Theory and Practice of Environmental Justice. Philadelphia: New Society Publishers.
    Johnson, J., 1998. “Arguing for Deliberation: Some Skeptical Considerations.” In Jon Elster (ed.), Deliberative Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Jorgensen, Danny L, 1989. Participant Observation: A Methodology for Human Studies. Newbury Park: Sage.
    Keehley, Patricia, Medlin, Steven, MacBride, Sue & Longmire Laura, 1997. Benchmarking for Best Practices in the Public Sector California : Jossey Bass.
    Marini, F., ed., 1971. Toward a New Public Administration:The Minnowbrook Perspective. Chandler Publishing Company.
    Newman, P. W. G., 1999. Sustainability and cities: extending the metabolism model. Landscape and Urban Planning 44:219-226.
    OECD., 2001. Citizens as Partners: Information Consultation, and Public Participation in Policy Making. Paris: OECD.
    Pastor Jr, M., J. Sadd, et al., 2001. Which came first? Toxic facilities, minority move-in, and environmental justice. Journal of Urban Affairs 23 (1): 1.
    Patton, Michael Quinn, 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, 2nd ed. Newbury Park : Sage.
    Schlosberg, D., 2004. Reconceiving environ- mental justice: Global movements and political theories. Environmental Politics 13(3): 517.
    Smith, S. R. and H. Ingram, 1993. “Public policy and Democracy” In Helen Ingram and Steven Smith (eds), Public Policy and Democracy,pp. 1-14.Washington D.C.: Brookings.
    Tietenberg, T., 2003. Environmental and natural resource economics. Reading, Mass. Harlow, England, Addison-Wesley.
    Todd, H. and C. Zografos, 2005. Justice for the Environment: Developing a Set of Indicators of Environmental Justice for Scotland. Environmental Values 14(4): 483-501.
    United Church of Christ, 1987. Toxic Wastes and Race in the United States: A National Report on the Racial and Socioeconomic Characteristics of Communities Surrounding Hazardous Waste Sites. New York.
    Weinberg, A. S., 1998. The Environmental Justice Debate: A Commentary on Methodological Issues and Practical Concerns. Sociological Forum 13(1): 25-32.
    Whitelegg, J., 1993. Transport for a Sustainable Future: The case for Europe. Belhaven Press.
    Williams, R. W., 2005. Getting to the Heart of Environmental Injustice: Social Science and its Boundaries. Theory and Science 16 (1).
    Young, I.M., 2001. Activist Challenges to Deliberative Democracy. Political Theory, Vol. 29, No. 5: 670-690.
    Young, M. D., 1992. Sustainable Investment and Resource Use. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. The Parthenon Publishing Group Limited.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    行政管理碩士學程
    95921053
    96
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0959210531
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[行政管理碩士學程(MEPA)] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    053101.pdf112KbAdobe PDF761View/Open
    053102.pdf112KbAdobe PDF753View/Open
    053103.pdf114KbAdobe PDF830View/Open
    053104.pdf62KbAdobe PDF788View/Open
    053105.pdf118KbAdobe PDF1022View/Open
    053106.pdf396KbAdobe PDF1289View/Open
    053107.pdf324KbAdobe PDF1648View/Open
    053108.pdf399KbAdobe PDF1118View/Open
    053109.pdf586KbAdobe PDF2091View/Open
    053110.pdf1091KbAdobe PDF4544View/Open
    053111.pdf230KbAdobe PDF945View/Open
    053112.pdf211KbAdobe PDF1262View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback