English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 91280/121421 (75%)
Visitors : 25380571      Online Users : 78
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/41912
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/41912


    Title: 論公司法下董事會發行新股之權限與責任——以公司法第一五六條第五項股份交換制度為核心,兼論股東優先認股權之存廢
    Other Titles: Shareholders’ Preemptive Right and the Share Exchange Mechanism in Taiwan Company Law
    Authors: 朱德芳
    Chu, Te-Fang
    Contributors: 法律學系
    Keywords: 股份交換;優先認股權;敵意併購防禦措施;控制權之移轉;私募;發行新股;員工認股權憑證;員工庫藏股;股份轉換;閉鎖公司;受託義務;利益衝突
    Share exchange;Preemptive right;Anti-takeover mechanism;Change of control;Private placement;Issue of shares;Employees' stock option;Treasury stock;Close company;Fiduciary duty;Conflict of interest
    Date: 2010-06
    Issue Date: 2010-07-10 14:09:55 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 二○○一年增訂公司法第一五六條第五項所涉及的問題極為複雜,包括股東出資種類、董事會與股東會之分權、經營團隊與股東間之利益衝突、公司控制權移轉、股東優先認股權之存廢,以及公司負責人受託義務等面向。本文研究發現,股份交換制度排除了許多規範之適用,法規範密度的不一致卻將破壞現行規範架構體系。本文從董事會發行新股之動機出發,將股份交換依可能涉及之利益衝突態樣,區分為四種類型:【類型一】涉及公司控制權移轉之股份交換、【類型二】經營團隊用以作為敵意併購防禦措施之股份交換、【類型三】交易相對人為公司關係人之股份交換,以及【類型四】日常營運決策(ordinary business decision)之股份交換。本文針對不同類型之股份交換,逐一分析可能的規範模式,並提出修法建議,同時對於閉鎖型公司與開放型公司下董事於新股發行時之受託義務是否應為不同密度之法規範設計進行思考。本文重新思索與安排經營團隊於發行新股時之行為標準,以及董事會與股東會之分權設計,期能達到法規範促進有效率新股發行,遏止無效率新股發行之目的。
    First introduced in 2001, Section 156 (6) of the Taiwan Company Law, also called the share exchange mechanism, presents complex issues. The share exchange mechanism involves the fundamental issue in a company law: the conflict of interests between controlling shareholders and minority shareholders. It also engages in the policy debate between the shareholder primacy and the director primacy, the change of control transactions, the role of preemptive rights in protecting shareholders against dilution, and the directors’ fiduciary duty in the context of issuing stock. This paper first classifies the share exchange into four models with respect to the motives that directors carry in each particular model. These four models are: Model I share exchange involving change of control transactions; Model II share exchange as a defensive tactic; Model III share exchange with insiders of the company; Model IV share exchange classified as an ordinary business decision. This paper then proposes a comprehensive statutory reform. The purpose of this paper is to reconsider the role of statutes and the judiciary in the matter of stock issuing, and to establish a framework to encourage value-increasing stock issuing while preventing value-decreasing stock issuing.
    Relation: 法學評論 , 115 , 149-242
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    149-242.pdf920KbAdobe PDF1242View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback