English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 87956/117187 (75%)
Visitors : 23347836      Online Users : 137
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 文學院 > 哲學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/44512
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/44512


    Title: 處於倫理內在性與宗教超越性之間:胡塞爾與海德格的宗教現象學之比較
    Other Titles: Between the Ethical Immanence and the Religious Transcendence: A Comparison between Husserl's and Heidegger's Phenomenology of Religion
    Authors: 汪文聖
    Contributors: 政大哲學系
    Keywords: 胡塞爾;海德格;奧古斯丁;宗教現象學;形式指引;道成肉身
    Husserl;Heidegger;Augustine;Phenomenology of Religion;Formal Indication;Incarnation
    Date: 2010-07
    Issue Date: 2010-09-21 13:15:45 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 海德格於1920年前後本著現象學的立場去反省當時的宗教哲學;同樣的,胡塞爾中晚期(20年代以後)的思想也具備著從倫理學到宗教的向度。本文對之做了比較對照,並將二者的立場向過去希臘與基督教的不同文化去溯源。此二文化可能產生的交集或衝擊亦反映在對胡塞爾與海德格哲學有某些影響的奧古斯丁思想裡。本文希望能對於海德格與胡塞爾的倫理與宗教思想做些背景的解釋。另外,本文將注意海德格所提出的一種形式指引的方法,它在面對「內在中的超越如何可能」的質疑中,扮演了一個正面解答的角色。這個方法在海德格的宗教現象學處理中固然舉足輕重,然而,在胡塞爾宗教論述中是否也呈現類似的方法,並得以適切地以處理屬於宗教的超越性?我們也見到在奧古斯丁亦有方法上的類似性來談論上帝。
    We see Heidegger made reflection on his contemporary philosophies of religion in 1920s, which was under his own phenomenological position. We also can see Husserl in his middle and late period (after twenties) developed a religious orientation departing from his ethical thinking and under his phenomenological position too. A comparison is made in this article, and the both positions are traced back to the difference of Greek and Christian cultures. Possible interconnection or impact between the both cultures was reflected in Augustine's thought that has shed some influence upon Husserl and Heidegger's philosophy. We hope in this article to be able to explain the background of their ethical and religious thinking. Furthermore, we take notice of "formal indication" as a method to be posited by Heidegger. It plays an important role to response the question in positive light: "How is possible the transcendence in the immanence?" This method is certainly essential in Heidegger's treatment of the phenomenology of religion; however, is it a similar method in Husserl's discussion about religion, in order to properly treat the transcendence belonging to religion? We also see a similar method of Augustinian discourse of God.
    Relation: 中央大學人文學報, 43, 227-264
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[哲學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    227-264.pdf2108KbAdobe PDF711View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback