Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/48915
|
| Title: | 私募折溢價與私募後經營績效及市場反應之關聯性
Price discount (premium), performance and market reaction in private placement |
| Authors: | 王光世 |
| Contributors: | 張清福
王光世 |
| Keywords: | 私募
折(溢)價
經營績效
Private Placement
Price Discount
Price Premium
Performance |
| Date: | 2009 |
| Issue Date: | 2010-12-08 01:53:07 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究以民國91年至民國96年期間辦理私募案之上(市)櫃公司為研究對象，探究私募折溢價與私募後經營績效及市場反應之關聯性。
本研究將私募樣本區分為溢價組與折價組，溢價組於私募前後之營運績效均如預期般表現比折價組好，且溢價組與折價組於私募後之營運績效表現有更顯著的差異。同時，溢價組於私募後展現正向的市場反應，折價組於私募後則呈現負向的市場反應。
企業價值與成長機會高度相關，而溢價發行企業之成長機會對企業價值之影響程度較折價發行企業高。折(溢)價幅度與私募後營運績效、累計異常報酬間呈負(正)相關，顯示折溢價幅度可能反映出私募企業未來成長與風險之訊息。
This study examines the effects of price discount (premium) on performance and market reaction in private placement. Three main findings are as follows. After classifying the sample into two categories, premium and discount, this study finds that the operating performance of the premium group is better than that of the discount group both before and after the private placement. The difference is
especially significant after the private placement. Furthermore, the premium group shows positive market reaction after private placement while the discount group negative.
Firm value is highly related to growth opportunity, and the influence of growth opportunity on firm value of premium group is significantly higher than that of discount group. The results also show that the magnitude of price discount (premium) is negatively (positively) related to operating performance and cumulative abnormal return after private placement. This may indicate that the price discount (premium) reflects the signal of future growth and risk of the firm in private placement. |
| Reference: | 王盈涵，2008，企業私募之傾向、折價與宣告效果，國立中興大學財務金融系所碩士論文。
台灣工銀證券投顧承銷部，2005，私募有價證券之相關規定及市場現況分析，台灣工銀證券投顧研究報告。
吳炘昌、葉穎如，2009，從私募有價證券特性談我國監理之因應對策，證券暨期貨月刊，第二十七卷，第11期(11月)：22-35。
吳儀玲，2007，關係投資人之價值－公開發行股票公司之私募股票實證研究，國立清華大學計量財務金融學系。
李素雲，2007，股權私募前後經營績效差異之實證研究-以台灣上市櫃公司為例，中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
林嘉慧，2007，台灣上市公司私募股權現況與績效之探討，東吳大學商學院企業 管理學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。
許雪芳，2003，上市上櫃公司私募之研究，國立中山大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。
陸潤生，2006，私募宣告之資訊內涵，國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。
陸瀛謙，2008，私募折價幅度及私募前後異常報酬與應募人之關聯，國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。
蔡蓓華，2008，私募長短期績效探討，國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。
蕭巧玲，2009，證券交易法有價證券私募制度簡介，證券暨期貨月刊，第二十七卷，第11期(11月)：5-21。
Anderson, H. D., and L. C. Rose. 2007. Firm Quality and the Placement Price of Private Equity. Working paper, Massey University.
Barclay, M. J., and C. G. Holderness, and D. P. Sheehan. 2003. Private Placements
and Managerial Entrenchment. Working paper, Pennsylvania State University.
Christie, A. 1989. Equity risk, the opportunity set, production cost and debt. Working paper, University of Rochester.
Chung, K. H., and C. Charoenwong. 1991. Investment Options, Assets in Place, and the Risk of Stocks. Financial Management 20(3): 21-33.
Cho, M. H. 1998. Ownership structure, investment, and the corporate
value: an empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics 47(1): 103-121.
Chu, S. H. M., and G. H. Lentz, and E. Robak. 2005. Comparing the Characteristics and Performance of private equity offering frims with seasoned equity offering firms. Journal of Economics and Management 1: 57-83.
Chou, D. W., and M. Gomba, and F. Y. Liu. 2009. Long-run underperformance following private equity-The Role of Growth Opportunities. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 49: 1113-1128
Denis, D. J. 1994. Investment Opportunities and the Market Reaction to Equity Offerings. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 29: 159-175.
Heinkel, R., and E. Schwartz. 1986. Rights versus underwritten offerings: an
asymmetric information approach. The Journal of Finance 41: 1-18.
Hertzel, M., and R. L. Smith. 1993. Market Discounts and Shareholder Gains for Placing Equity Privately. Journal of Finance 48(2): 459-485.
Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (October): 305-360.
Lang, L. H. P. and R. H. Litzenberger. 1989. Dividend Announcements: Cash Flow Signalling vs. Free Cash Flow Hypothesis. Journal of Financial Economics 24(1) : 181-192.
Myers, S. C. 1977. Determinants of Corporate Borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics5: 147-145.
Myers, S. C., and N. S. Majluf . 1984. Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information That Investors Do Not Have. Journal of Financial Economics13: 187-221.
Morck, R., and A. Shleifer ,and R. W. Vishny. 1988. Management ownership and market valuation: an empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 293-315.
McConnell, J. J. and H. Servaes. 1990. Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership and Corporate Value. Journal of Financial Economics 27(2): 595-612.
Pilotte, E. 1992. Growth Opportunities and the Stock Price Response to New Financing. Journal of Business 65: 371-394.
Wruck, K. H. 1989. Equity Ownership Concentration and Firm Value: Evidence from Private Equity Financings. Journal of Financial Economics 23: 3-28.
Wruck. 2004. The choice of equity-selling mechanisms. Journal of Financial Economics 74: 93-119.
Wruck, K. H. and Y. L. Wu. 2009. Relationships, corporate governance, and performance: Evidence from private placements of common stock. Journal of Corporate Finance 15: 30-47. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
會計研究所
97353038
98 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097353038 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [會計學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
