English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 112721/143689 (78%)
Visitors : 49549409      Online Users : 682
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/48930
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/48930


    Title: 客戶重要性對審計意見之影響--中國之實證研究
    The impact of client importance on audit opinion
    Authors: 賴宜渟
    Lai, Yi Ting
    Contributors: 戚務君
    Chi, Wu Chun
    賴宜渟
    Lai, Yi Ting
    Keywords: 客戶重要性
    審計品質
    經濟依存度
    審計公費
    client importance
    audit quality
    economic independence
    audit fees
    Date: 2009
    Issue Date: 2010-12-08 01:53:18 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: Chen et al.(2010)以中國審計市場為調查對象,研究會計師對簽證客戶的經濟依存度(以資產衡量)對審計品質的影響。他們發現在2001年以前經濟依存度會傷害審計品質;然而在2001年至2004年間,因中國法律規範的改善,而未發現經濟依存度的負面影響。基於近年中國資本市場的長足發展且審計公費成為公眾可取得之資訊,本文延伸他們的研究樣本期間(至2008年)並以實際的審計公費計算經濟依存度。實證結果發現,無論以整體事務所或合夥會計師來計算經濟依存度,Chen et al.(2010)的結論並未改變。
    Chen et al.(2010) examine how the legal and regulatory changes in China affect the relationship between client economic importance (measured by assets audited by audit firm ) and audit quality. They find that audit quality is negatively correlated with client importance from 1995 to 2000. Therefore, when the institutional environment became more investor friendly, started from 2001 to 2004, they do not find that audit quality negatively correlated with client importance anymore. Following Chen et al.(2010), this study extends the sample period to 2008 and I use ratio of client’s total audit fees to audit firm’s total revenue as proxies for client importance to examines whether the client importance affect audit quality in china. Based on the data for firms listed in Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges from 2004 to 2008, I do not find that audit partners compromise independence for economically important clients, no matter at the firm or the partner level.
    Reference: 一、中文部分
    包華瑜,2006,審計客戶重要性與審計質量的實證研究,福州大學會計學系碩士論文。
    白憲生與高月娥,2009,關於上市公司財務指標對非標準審計意見影響的研究,工業技術經濟,第6期:145-150。
    石紹炳,2008,審計師變更與審計意見購買的關係研究,技術經濟,第2期:120-127。
    呂偉與于旭輝,2009,客戶依賴、審計師獨立性與審計質量—來自上市公司的經驗證據,財貿研究,第3期:132-137。
    李爽與吳溪,2004,中國證券市場審計及相關服務收費信息首次披露的特徵及其含意,中國註冊會計師(2 月):50-58。
    李建然與陳政芳,2004,審計客戶重要性與盈餘管理:以五大事務所組別為觀察標的,會計評論,第38期:59-80。
    胡本源,2008,重要客戶損害了審計獨立性嗎?—來自中國證券市場的經驗證據,財貿研究,第5期:129-137。
    范宏書、陳慶隆與吳靜宜,2007,審計客戶重要性與會計師的產業專精程度對公司盈餘品質之影響:審計組別之證據,文大商管學報,第12卷第1期(6月):75-107。
    倪慧萍,2008,客戶重要性對審計品質影響的理論分析與經驗證據,南京審計學院學報,第5卷第4期(11月):45-49。
    唐霞,2008,客戶重要性與審計品質的關係研究,財會月刊,第2期:64-67。
    張天西、薛許君與林進安,2003,信息技術環境下的財務報告及信息披露研究,會計研究,第3期:47-52。
    張學謙與周雪,2007,審計意見、盈餘管理與審計師變更—來自中國證券市場的經驗數據分析,統計與決策,第22期:116-119。
    陳慶隆、武季蔚與陳育成,,會計師-審計客戶間相對協商力與審計意見之關係,輔仁管理評論,第14卷第1期:85-127。
    喻小明、聶新軍與劉華,2008,事務所客戶重要性影響審計質量嗎?—來自A股市場2003-2006年的證據,會計研究,第10期:66-74。
    費愛華,2006,非標準無保留審計意見的影響因素分析,統計與決策,第22期:110-113。
    楊炎杰與官月緞,2006,客戶重要性與非審計服務是否影響審計品質?Enron後的觀察,會計評論,第43期(7月):27-61。
    楊誠,2004,淺析我國當前會計師審計的獨立性,廣西大學梧州分校學報,第2期:13-15。
    劉嘉雯與王泰昌,2008,會計師任期與審計品質之關連性研究,管理評論,第27卷,第4期:1-28。
    劉學華與徐榮華,2008,持續經營有重大疑慮審計意見表達方式實證研究,雲南財經大學學報,第6期:110-115。
    潘克勤,2007,客戶重要性與審計品質,經濟經緯,第4期(7月):71-74。
    蔡春、楊麟、陳曉媛與陳鈺泓,2005,上市公司審計意見類型影響因素的實證分析—基于滬深股市2003年A股年報資料的研究,財經科學,第1期:95-102。
    二、英文部分
    Antle, Rick. 1984. Auditor Independence. Journal of Accounting Research 22(1):1-20.
    Bell, Timothy B. and Richard Tabor. 1991. Empirical Analysis of Audit Uncertainty Qualifications. Journal of Accounting Research 29(2):350-370.
    Beneish, Messod D. and Eric Press. 1993. Costs of Technical Violation of Accounting-Based Debt Covenants. Accounting Review 68(2):233-257.
    Carcello, J. V. and T. L. Neal. 2000. Audit committee composition and auditor reporting. The Accounting Review 75(4): 453-467.
    Chan, K. H., K. Lin, and P. L. L. Mo. 2006. A Political–economic Analysis of Auditor Reporting and Auditor Switches. Review of Accounting Studies 11(1):21-48.
    Chen, C., S. Chen, and X. Su. 2001. Profitability regulation, earnings management, and modified audit opinions: Evidence from China. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 20 (2): 9–30.
    Chen, C., X. Su, and R. Zhao. 2000. An emerging market’s reaction to initial modified audit opinions:Evidence from the Shanghai Stock Exchange. Contemporary Accounting Research 17 (3): 429–455.
    Chen, S., S. Y. J. Sun, D. Wu. 2010. Client importance, institutional improvements, and audit quality in china: an office and individual auditor level analysis. The Accounting Review 85(1):127-158.
    Chi W., H. Huang, and Y. Liao. 2004. Client importment, audit-client relationship, and abnormal accruals: an audit-partner based investigation. Working Paper, National Chengchi University.
    Chow, Chee W. and Steven J. Rice. 1982. Qualified Audit Opinions and Auditor Switching. The Accounting Review 57(2):326-335.
    Chung, H. S., and S. Kallapur. 2003. Client importance, nonaudit services, and abnormal accruals. The Accounting Review 78 (4): 931–955.
    Craswell, A. T., D. J. Stokes, and J. Laughton. 2002. Auditor independence and fee dependence. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33 (2): 253–275.
    Davis, Larry R., Billy S. Soo and Gregory M. Trompeter. 2009. Auditor Tenure and the Ability to Meet or Beat Earnings Forecasts. Contemporary Accounting Research 26(2):517-548.
    DeAngelo, L. E. 1981. Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics 3(3): 183-199.
    DeFond, K. Raghunandan, and K. R. Subramanyam. 2002. Do nonaudit service fees impair auditor independence? Evidence from going concern audit opinions. Journal of Accounting Research 40(4): 1247-1274
    DeFond, M. L., T. J. Wong, and S. Li. 2000. The impact of improved auditor independence on audit market concentration in China. Journal of Accounting and Economics 28 (December): 269–305.
    Dopuch, N., R. Holthausen, and R. Leftwich. 1987. Predicting audit qualifications with financial and market variables. The Accounting Review 62 (3): 431–454.
    Dye, Ronald A., Bala V. Balachandran and Robert P. Magee. 1990. Contingent Fees for Audit Firms. Journal of Accounting Research 28(2):239-266.
    Ferguson, A., J. R. Francis, and D. J. Stokes. 2003. The effects of firm-wide and office-level industry expertise on audit pricing. The Accounting Review 78(2): 429-448.
    Francis, J., and B. Ke. 2006. Disclosure of fees paid to auditors and the market valuation of earnings surprises. Review of Accounting Studies 11 (4): 495–523.
    Frankel, R., M. Johnson, and K. Nelson. 2002. The relation between auditors’ fee for nonaudit services and earnings management. The Accounting Review 77 (Supplement): 71–105.
    Gaver, J., and J. Paterson. 2007. The influence of large clients on office-level auditor oversight: Evidence from the property-casualty insurance industry. Journal of Accounting and Economics 43 (2–3): 299–320.
    Geiger, M. A., K. Raghunandan, and D. V. Rama. 1998. Costs associated with going concern modified audit opinions: An analysis of auditor changes, subsequent opinions, and client failures. Advances in Accounting 16: 117–39.
    Geiger, M. A., K. Raghunandan. 2002. Auditor Tenure and Audit Reporting Failures. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 21(1):67-78.
    Jensen, M. C. 1993. The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance 48(3): 831-880.
    Li, Chen. 2009. Does client importance affect auditor independence at the office level? Empirical evidence from going-concern opinions. Contemporary Accounting Research 26(1): 201-230.
    Lin, Z.Jun and Feng Chen. 2004. An Empirical Study of Audit‘Expectation Gap’ in The People`s Republic of China. International Journal of Auditing 8 (2):93-115.
    Loudder, Martha L., Inder K. Khurana, Roby B. Sawyers and Cindy Cordery. 1992. The Information Content of Audit Qualifications. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 11(1):69-82.
    Lys, T., and R. Watts. 1994. Lawsuits against auditors. Journal of Accounting Research 32 (Supplement):65–93.
    Mutchler, Jane F. 1985. A Multivariate Analysis of the Auditor`s Going-Concern Opinion Decision. Journal of Accounting Research 23(2):668-682.
    Mutchler, Jane F., William Hopwood. 1997. The Influence of Contrary Information and Mitigating Factors on Audit Opinion Decisions on Bankrupt Companies. Journal of Accounting Research 35(2):295-310.
    Palmrose, Z. V. 1986. Audit fees and auditor size: Further evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 24(2): 97-110.
    Public Company Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2009. Concept Release on Requiring the Engagement Partner to Sign the Audit Report. July 28, 2009: PCAOB Release No. 2009-005.
    Reynolds, J. K., and J. Francis. 2001. Does size matter? The influence of large clients on office-level auditor reporting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics 30 (3): 375–400.
    Shafer, William E., Roselyn E. Morris and Alice A. Ketchand. 1999. The Effects of Formal Sanctions on Auditor Independence. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 18(2):113-115.
    Simunic, D. A. 1984. Auditing, consulting, and auditor independence. Journal of Accounting Research 22:679-702.
    Wang, Q., T. J. Wong, and L. Xia. 2008. State ownership, the institutional environment, and auditor choice: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Economics 46 (1): 112–134.
    Watts, R. L. and J. L. Zimmerman. 1986. Positive Accounting Theory. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall Inc.
    Xiao, J. Z., Y. Zhang, and Z. Xie. 2000. The making of independent auditing standards in China. Accounting Horizons 14 (March): 69-89.
    Yang, L., Q. Tang, A. Kilgore, and J. Y. Hong. 2001. Auditor-government associations and auditor independence in China. The British Accounting Review 33(June): 175-189.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    97353043
    98
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0973530431
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback