English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 112721/143689 (78%)
Visitors : 49518196      Online Users : 130
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 傳播學院 > 新聞學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/49518
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49518


    Title: 線上審議民主的要件與實踐
    The condition and practice of online deliberative democracy
    Authors: 施盈廷
    Shih,YingTing
    Contributors: 方念萱
    施盈廷
    Shih,YingTing
    Keywords: 網際網路
    審議民主
    維基
    辯論百科
    internet
    deliberative democracy
    wiki
    Debatepedia
    Date: 2009
    Issue Date: 2010-12-08 12:56:25 (UTC+8)
    Abstract:   本文從理論的基礎出發,試圖要反駁當下審議民主實踐,忽略了審議民主所「應該」強調的,並不是將審議民主視為是取得決策的一種工具或方法,而是必須將審議民主視為是一套有別於自由民主的思想。審議民主「應該」關注的,不是決策的正當性,而是如何深化民主。為此,本文回頭去找尋審議民主被提出的起點,並重新描繪審議民主轉向的核心價值是深化民主,而不是作出決策。這迫使理論必須從重新思考,如何從藉由「審議」取得決策正當性,往深化民主的方向移動,而且也同時讓審議民主理論所觸及的範圍,從「審議」形式的決策本身,擴及到一個完整不間斷的民主過程。
      一旦確認審議民主是「深化民主」的「過程」,那麼充當實踐的配套措施(即本文所稱的「中介畛域」的適當運作),也應該由此理論基礎所引導。為此,本文從深化民主過程所需的理論概念中,推導出可進一步落實中介畛域的實踐要件,分別是開放性、連貫性、互為主體性和累積性。另一方面,為了防堵民主實踐上可能出現的困境,所以也針對「網路的巴爾幹化」、「論述失敗」與「易受主流意識操弄」三個困境,提出相對應的「有效性」、「簡易性」及「動態的脈絡化」三個要件。事實上,本文所提的七個要件,「共同」構成了本文所理解的審議民主在實踐時,其「理論」面向上所應具備的內涵,這些內涵非專屬於本文所檢視的辯論百科,而是適用於各種形式的審議民主程序。
      最後,本文更進一步將上述七個要件細分成十四個細項。這十四個細項是試圖對應理論所指引的七個要件,並進而回應理論上所要求的「深化民主過程」的核心價值。或者說,這些細項可被當成是審議民主實踐機制設置上的最基本要求,雖然確保這十四個細項的審議民主實踐機制,無法保證最後的結果一定能達到理想境界,但我們至少可以相信,依循這些細項的機制,是試圖往深化民主──而不是取得決策正當性──的方向前進。當然,這十四個細項不是為了窮盡可能性或成為標準答案,而是在筆者能力範圍內所能提出的具體檢視方式,而提出這些具體的檢視方式,也分別有著實踐與理論上的各別意涵。
      在實踐上,這十四個細項的提出是為了要指出,審議民主「理論」不應該一直停留在理論的層次,我們探索審議民主理論的最終目的之一,就是要實踐它,因此,從實踐層次來進行探究,並指出可能的實踐方式確有其必要性。另一方面,從理論上來看,本文所提的檢視細項不僅是為了要提供未來研究參考,更重要的是,這種實踐層次的闡明是為了凸顯出,未來的審議民主理論必須在理論與實踐之間找到明確的連結。換言之,應如何在實務的層次上施作審議民主是重要的,讓施作結果得以對理論進行回饋與修正也是重要的,但唯有理論與實踐之間能夠不斷地互相進行補充、修正,審議民主理論才有可能為民主作出真正貢獻,而本文正是試圖經由審議民主,與已被實作的辯論百科,為這種連結作出描繪。
    This paper tries to illustrate that deliberative democracy is not a decision-making method but a kind of thoughts. The core element of deliberative democracy is not about the legitimacy of policies but the process of deepening democracy. It means that deliberative democracy theory should widen its possible contribution from only a decision-making method to a complete process of deepening democracy.
    When we regard deliberative democracy as a process, then we should develop accompanying measures (so-called “intermediate realm” in this paper) for the real-life practice. For achieving this purpose, this paper infers four elements, that is, openness, coherence, inter-subjectiveness and cumulativeness, from theoretical foundations on the one side. For avoiding three another predicaments of democratic practice, that is , cyberbalkanization, discourse failure and the dominating ideology, this paper also proposes three accompanying elements, that is, effectiveness, simpleness and dynamic contextualization on the other hand. All these seven elements, applying to all kinds of deliberative democracy practice apart from Debatepedia which we take as an example in this paper, constitute the content of intermediate realm for deliberative democracy practice.
    This paper in a further step divides these seven elements into fourteen items in order to respond to the core value of deliberative democracy, i.e. deepening democracy. In other words, these items are the basic requirement for real-life deliberative democracy practice. These fourteen items have no intention to include all possibilities of democratic practice but merely to provide some concrete examination methods in my sphere. These examination methods have their practical and theoretical meaning at the same time.
    In practice, these fourteen items means deliberative democracy theory should not stay as a theory is. If democracy theory is an ideal for our better life, we then should realize it and, that is more important, develop some methods to realize it. In terms of theory, this paper reveals the close relationship between deliberative democracy theory and its practice. That means it is important to know how to realize deliberative democracy, it is also important to know how to improve democracy theory. But these two situations can only be done when we can find a valid connection between them. This paper takes Debatepedia as an example to describe how this kind of connection could be possible.
    Reference: 中文部分
    台灣網路資訊中心(2009)。台灣網路資訊中心網路使用調查。Available at: http://www.twnic.net.tw/download/200307/0901a.doc。
    周宣光、曾德宜(2008)。〈Web 2.0與政府部門資訊應用創新〉。《研考雙月刊》,32(1): 19-27。
    林國明(2007)。〈審議民主實踐的多元模式〉。《臺灣民主季刊》,4(3): 191-95。
    陳東升(2006)。〈審議民主的限制─台灣公民會議的經驗〉。《臺灣民主季刊》,3(1): 77-104。
    曾國祥(2007)。〈審議民主的道德限制—柏林論政治自由與政治判斷〉。《臺灣民主季刊》,4(4): 71-108。
    英文部分
    Adonis, A. and Mulgan, G. (1994), Back to Greece: the scope for direct democracy, Demos Quarterly, 3, 1-28.
    Argument: "Dominion" makes humans stewards; no right to harm/exploit animals(2009, Nov 12). In Debatepedia. Retrieved November 12, 2009, http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php/Argument:_%22Dominion%22_makes_humans_stewards%3B_no_right_to_harm/exploit_animals
    Being_critical_versus_critical_thinking(2009, Nov 11). In Debatepedia. Retrieved November 11, 2009, from http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php/Being_critical_versus_critical_thinking
    Bickford, S. (1996). The Dissonance of Democracy: Listening, Conflict and Citizenship. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
    Blake, J. (2001). WikiWikiWeb. Computerworld, 35, 5, 66.
    Bohman, J. (1997). Deliberative democracy and effective social freedom: Capabilities, Resources, and Opportunities. In J. Bohman and W. Rehg (Ed.) Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics (pp. 321–348). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    Bohman, J. (1998). Survey article: The coming of age of deliberative democracy. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 6, 4, 400-426.
    Bohman, J., and Rehg, W. (1997). Introduction. In J. Bohman and W. Rehg (Ed.) Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics (pp. ix–xxx). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    Broida, R. (2005). New Ways to Web. PC Magazine, 24, 16, 28-31.
    Brown, R. (1986). Social psychology: The second edition. New York: Free Press.
    Buss, T. F., Redburn, S., and Guo, K. (2006a). Expanding and deepening citizen participation. In Terry F. Buss, F. Stevens Redburn, and Kristina Guo. (Ed.). Modernizing democracy (pp. 29-48). New York: M. E. Sharpe.
    Buss, T. F., Redburn, S., and Guo, K. (2006b). Modernizing democracy. In Terry F. Buss, F. Stevens Redburn, and Kristina Guo. (Ed.). Modernizing democracy (pp. 3-28). New York: M. E. Sharpe.
    Challborn, C. and Reimann, T. (2005). Wiki Products: A Comparison. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 6(2). Retrieved March 29, 2006 from: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/viewArticle/229/312
    Cochenour, D. (2006). Is There a Wiki in Your (Library) Future? Colorado Libraries, 32, 1, 34-6.
    Coglianese, C. (2006). Citizen participation in rulemaking: past, present, and future. Duke Law Journal, 55, 943-968.
    Cohen, J. (1997). Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In James Bohman and William Rehg. (Ed.). Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reasons and Politics (pp. 67-92). Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
    Community_forum(2009, Nov 13). In Debatepedia. Retrieved November 13, 2009, from http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php/Community_forum
    Cone, E. (2005). A Sticky Wiki. CIO Insight, 54, 17.
    Core_elements_of_debate(2009, Nov 12). In Debatepedia. Retrieved November 12, 2009, from http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php/Core_elements_of_debate
    Dahlberg, L. (2007). The internet and discursive exclusion: From deliberative to agonistic public sphere theory. In Lincoln Dahlberg and Eugenia Siapera, (Ed.). Radical democracy and the internet: Interrogating theory and practice (pp. 128-147). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Dahlgren, P. (2007). Civic Identity and net activism. In Lincoln Dahlberg and Eugenia Siapera, (Eds.). Radical democracy and the internet: Interrogating theory and practice (pp. 55-72). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Davey, Lynn (1991). The application of case study evaluations. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2(9). Retrieved December 24, 2009 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=2&n=9
    Debate: Gays in the US military(2009, Nov 13). In Debatepedia. Retrieved November 13, 2009, from http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php/Debate:_Gays_in_the_US_military
    Debate:_Animal_testing&oldid=4095(2009, Nov 15). In Debatepedia. Retrieved November 15, 2009, from http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php?title=Debate:_Animal_testing&oldid=4095
    Debate:_Animal_testing&oldid=99389(2010, Feb 5). In Debatepedia. Retrieved February 5, 2009, from http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php?title=Debate:_Animal_testing&oldid=99389
    Debate:_Animal_testing(2009, Nov 15). In Debatepedia. Retrieved November 15, 2009, from http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php/Debate:_Animal_testing
    Debate:_Bush_v._Gore(2010, Jan 29). In Debatepedia. Retrieved January 29, 2010, from http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php/Debate:_Bush_v._Gore
    Debate:_Death_penalty(2009, Nov 13). In Debatepedia. Retrieved November 13, 2009, from http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php/Debate:_Death_penalty
    Debate:_Single-payer_universal_health_care(2009, Nov 13). In Debatepedia. Retrieved November 13, 2009, from http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php/Debate:_Single-payer_universal_health_care
    Debate_Digest_cue(2010, Mar 26). In Debatepedia. Retrieved March 26, 2010, from http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php/Debate_Digest_cue
    Debatepedia.org(2009, Nov 13). In Facebook. Retrieved November 13, 2009, from http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=19125768640
    Debatepedia.org(2010, Mar 26). In Debatepedia. Retrieved March 26, 2010, from http://www.facebook.com/group.php?v=wall&ref=search&gid=19125768640
    Debatepedia:About(2009, Nov 13). In Debatepedia. Retrieved November 13, 2009, from http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php/Debatepedia:About
    Debatepedia:Argument_pages(2009, Nov 12). In Debatepedia. Retrieved November 12, 2009, from http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php/Debatepedia:Argument_pages
    Debatepedia:Community_forum(2009, Nov 17). In Debatepedia. Retrieved November 17, 2009, from http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php/Debatepedia:Community_forum
    Debatepedia:Debate_Pages(2009, Nov 14). In Debatepedia. Retrieved November 14, 2009, from http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php/Debatepedia:Debate_Pages
    Debatepedia:Discussion_Pages(2009, Nov 12). In Debatepedia. Retrieved November 12, 2009, from http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php/Debatepedia:Discussion_Pages
    Debatepedia:Editing_policies(2009, Nov 17). In Debatepedia. Retrieved November 17, 2009, from http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php/Debatepedia:Editing_policies
    Debatepedia:FAQ(2009, Nov 12). In Debatepedia. Retrieved November 12, 2009, from http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php/Debatepedia:FAQ
    Debatepedia:Feature_article(2009, Nov 12). In Wikipedia. Retrieved November 12, 2009, from http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php/Debatepedia:Feature_article
    Debatepedia:Help Desk(2009, Nov 11). In Debatepedia. Retrieved November 11, 2009, from http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php/Debatepedia:Help_Desk
    Debatepedia:Internships(2009, Nov 29). In Debatepedia. Retrieved November 29, 2009, from http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php/Debatepedia:Internships
    Debatepedia:Manipulating_debate_pages(2009, Nov 13). In Debatepedia. Retrieved November 13, 2009, from http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php/Debatepedia:Manipulating_debate_pages
    Debatepedia:Media Kit(2008, July 31). In Debatepedia. Retrieved July 31, 2008, from http://wiki.idebate.org/index.php/Debatepedia:Media_Kit
    Debatepedia:Mission(2009, Nov 14). In Debatepedia. Retrieved November 14, 2009, from http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php/Debatepedia:Mission
    Debatepedia:Stewards(2009, Nov 11). In Debatepedia. Retrieved November 11, 2009, from  http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php/Debatepedia:Stewards
    Debatepedia:Sub-debate_sections(2009, Nov 13). In Debatepedia. Retrieved November 13, 2009, from http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php/Debatepedia:Sub-debate_sections
    Debatepedia:Volunteer!(2009, Nov 13). In Debatepedia. Retrieved November 13, 2009, from http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php/Debatepedia:Volunteer!
    Debatepedia_User_Guide(2009, Nov 17). In Debatepedia. Retrieved November 17, 2009, from http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php/Debatepedia_User_Guide
    Dickerson, C. (2004a). Is Wiki Under Your Radar?. InfoWorld, 26, 45, 26.
    Dickerson, C. (2004b). Wiki Goes to Work. InfoWorld, 26, 46, 28.
    Domínguez, J. I., & Jones, A. (2007). Building and sustaining a contemporary democratic state. In J. I. Domínguez & A. Jones (Ed.). The construction of democracy: Lessons from practice and research (pp. 3-19). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
    Downey, J. (2007). Participation and/or deliberation? In Lincoln Dahlberg and Eugenia Siapera, (Ed.). Radical democracy and the internet: Interrogating theory and practice (pp.108-127). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Drosterij, G. (2007). Mind the Gap: Three Models of Democracy, One Missing; Two Political Paradigms, One Dwindling. Contemporary Political Theory, 6, 1, 45–66.
    Dryzek, J. S. (1990). Discourse democracy: Politics, policy and political science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Dryzek, J. S. (2000). Deliberative Democracy and Beyond, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Dryzek, J. S. and Niemeyer, S. (2006). Reconciling Pluralism and Consensus as Political Ideals, American Journal of Political Science, 50, 3, 634-649.
    Egnstrom, M. E. and Jewett, D. (2005). Collaborative Learning the Wiki Way. TechTrends, 49, 6, 12-15 & 68.
    Elster, J. (1997). The Market and the Forum: Three Varieties of Political Theory, In J. Bohman and W. Rehg (Ed.) Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics (pp. 3–34). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    Elster, J. (1998). Introduction. In J. Elster (Ed.) Deliberative Democracy (pp. 1-18). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Evans, P. (2006). The Wiki Factor. BizEd, 5, 2, 28-32.
    Fichter, D. (2004). Technology Trends for Intranet Librarians. Online, 28, 6, 45-8.
    Goodnoe, E. (2005). Wikis make Collaboration Easier. Informationweek, 1053, 54, 56-8.
    Green, D. T. and Pearson, J. M. (2005). Social Software and Cyber Networks: Ties That Bind or Weak Associations within the Political Organization? Paper presented at Thirty-eighth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-38), Los Alamitos: IEEE Press.
    Guttmann, A. and Thompson, D. (2004). Why deliberative democracy? Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
    Habermas, J. (1987). The Theory of Communication Action. Boston: Beacon Press.
    Habermas, J. (1996a). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    Habermas, J. (1996b). Three normative models of democracy. In S. Benhabib. (Ed.). Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political (pp.22-30). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    Hand, J. (2007). Between agonistic and deliberative politics. In L. Dahlberg & E. Siapera. (Ed.). Radical democracy and the internet: interrogating theory and practice (pp. 89-107). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Hans, V. P. and Vidmar, N.J. (1986). Judging the jury. New York: Plenum.
    Hendriks, C. M. (2006). When the Forum Meets Interest Politics: Strategic Uses of Public Deliberation, Politics Society, 34: 571-602.
    Holtz, S. (2005). The impact of new technologies on internal communication. Strategic Communication Management, 10, 1, 22-25.
    James A. West and Margaret L. West(2008). Using Wikis for Online Collaboration: The Power of the Read-Write Web. Jossey-Bass.
    Kahn, R. and Kellner, D. (2007). Globalization, technopolitics, and radical democracy. In Lincoln Dahlberg and Eugenia Siapera, (Ed.). Radical democracy and the internet: Interrogating theory and practice (pp. 17-36). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Klobas, J. (2006). Wikis: Tools for Information Work and Collaboration. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.
    Leuf, B. and Cunningham, W. (2001). The Wiki Way: Quick Collaboration on the Web. Boston: Addison Wesley.
    Levine, P., Fung, A., & Gastil, J. (2005). Future directions for public deliberation. In J. Gastil and P. Levine. (Ed.). The deliberative democracy handbook: Strategies for effective civic engagement in the 21st century (pp.271-288). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Louridas, P. (2006). Using Wikis in Software Development. IEEE Software, 23, 2, 88-91.
    MacNeil / Lehrer Productions. (2007). Deliberative Opinion Polls. Retrieved June 13, 2008, from http://www.pbs.org/newshour/btp/articles/about_polls.html
    MacPherson, C. B. (1965). The real world of democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Manin, B. (1987). On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation. Political Theory, 15, 3, 339-368 .
    Mattison, D. (2003). Quickiwiki, Swiki, Twiki, Zwiki and the Plone wars: wiki as a PIM and collaborative content tool. Searcher, 11, 4, 32-48.
    McCallen, J. (2005). How Communication Tools Are Changing. Public Management, 87, 8, 4.
    Miller, N. (2005). Wikipedi and the Disappearing “Author”. Etc., 62, 1, 37-40.
    Muldoon, K. (2005). A Cataloger’s Guide to Blogs and Wikis. Direct, 17, 3, 36.
    O’Reilly, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0. Retrieved September 9, 2006, from http://www.oreilly.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html
    Oates, S. and Gibson, R. K. (2006). The internet, civil society and democracy. In Sarah Oates, Diana Owen and Rachel K. Gibson. (Ed.). The internet and politics: Citizens, voters ad activists (pp. 1-19). London and New York: Routledge.
    Parkinson, J. (2006). Deliberating in the real world: Problems of legitimacy in deliberative democracy. Oxford: university Press.
    Past_Daily_Debate_Digest_topics(2009, Nov 12). In Wikipedia. Retrieved November 12, 2009, from http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php/Past_Daily_Debate_Digest_topics
    Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Peters, B., Sifft, S., Wimmel, A., Brüggemann, M., & Kleinen-Von Königslöw, K. (2005). 7 national and transnational public sphere: The case of the EU. European Review, 13, 1, 139-160.
    Pincione, G., & Tesón, F. (2006). Rational choice and democratic deliberation: A theory of discourse failure. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Prominent_categories(2009, Nov 12). In Wikipedia. Retrieved November 12, 2009, from http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php/Prominent_categories
    Rethemeyer, R. K. (2007). The Empires Strike Back: Is the Internet Corporatizing Rather than Democratizing Policy Process? Public Administration Review, 67, 199-215.
    Rousseau, J. J. (1968). The Social Contractor Principles of Political Right. Translation, introduction: M. Cranston, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
    Rupley, S. (2005). Wikis at Work. PC Magazine, 24, 1, 90.
    Sanders, L. (1997). Against deliberation. Political Theory, 3: 347-376.
    Saward, M. (2001). Reconstructing Democracy: Current Thinking and New Directions. Government and Opposition, 36, 4, 559–581.
    Schumpeter, J. [1942]1976. Capitalism, Socialism and democracy. Reprint, London: Allen and Unwin.
    Schwartz, L., Clark, S., Cossarin, M., & Rudolph, J. (2004). Educational Wikis: features and selection criteria. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5(1). Retrieved March 29, 2006 from: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/viewArticle/163/244
    Simeon, R., & Trugeon, L. (2007). Constitutional design and the construction of democracy. In J. I. Domínguez & A. Jones (Ed.). The construction of democracy: Lessons from practice and research (pp. 79-102). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
    Skaalid, B. (1999). Multimedia & Web Page Design Principles. Retrieved November 13, 2009, from http://www.usask.ca/education/coursework/skaalid/page/design/webdsgn.htm
    Special:Confirmemail(2009, Nov 11). In Debatepedia. Retrieved November 11, 2009, from http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php/Special:Confirmemail
    Special:Ipblocklist(2009, Nov 11). In Debatepedia. Retrieved November 11, 2009, from http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php/Special:Ipblocklist
    Special:Popularpages(2010, Feb 5). In Debatepedia. Retrieved February 5, 2009, from http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php/Special:Popularpages
    Special:Recentchanges(2009, Nov 29). In Debatepedia. Retrieved November 29, 2009, from http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php?title=Special:Recentchanges
    Special:Statistics(2010, Feb 5). In Debatepedia. Retrieved February 5, 2009, from http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php/Special:Statistics
    Special:Version(2008, July 31). In Debatepedia. Retrieved July 31, 2008, from http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php/Special:Version
    Sunstein, C. R. (2003). The law of group polarization. In Fishkin, J. S., & Laslett, P. (Ed.). Debating deliberative democracy (pp.80-101). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
    Support_Wikipedia2(2009, Nov 29). In Wikipedia. Retrieved November 29, 2009, from http://wikimediafoundation.org/w/index.php?title=Support_Wikipedia2/en&oldid=42221
    Talk:Debate:_Creationism_vs_evolution_in_schools(2010, Feb 20). In Debatepedia. Retrieved February 20, 2010, from http://debatepedia.idebate.org/en/index.php/Talk:Debate:_Creationism_vs_evolution_in_schools
    Udell, J. (2005). Year of Enterprise Wiki. InfoWorld, 27, 1, 38-9.
    Universal_health_care(2009, Nov 12). In Wikipedia. Retrieved November 12, 2009, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_health_care
    User:Jing(2010, Feb 20). In Debatepedia. Retrieved February 20, 2010, from http://debatepedia.idebate.org/en/index.php/User:Jing
    User_talk:Brooks_Lindsay(2010, Feb 20). In Debatepedia. Retrieved February 20, 2010, from http://debatepedia.idebate.org/en/index.php?title=User_talk:Brooks_Lindsay&oldid=94469
    User_talk:Matthew.graham26(2010, Feb 20). In Debatepedia. Retrieved February 20, 2010, from http://debatepedia.idebate.org/en/index.php/User_talk:Matthew.graham26
    User_talk:Shredyourfaceoff(2010, Feb 20). In Debatepedia. Retrieved February 20, 2010, from http://debatepedia.idebate.org/en/index.php/User_talk:Shredyourfaceoff
    Van Alstyne, M. and Brynjolfsson, E. (2005). Global village or cyberbalkans? Modeling and measuring the integration of electronic communities. Retrieved 17 July 2008 from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID756445_code253298.pdf?abstractid=756445&mirid=1
    Wagner, C. (2004). WIKI: A Technology for Conversational Knowledge Management and Group Collaboration. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 13, 265-89.
    Walhof, D. R. (2005). Bringing the deliberative back in: Gadamer on conversation and understanding. Contemporary Political Theory, 4, 154-174.
    Welcome to Debatepedia!(2008, July 31). In Debatepedia. Retrieved July 31, 2008, from http://wiki.idebate.org/index.php/Welcome_to_Debatepedia%21
    Welcome_to_Debatepedia!(2009, Nov 29). In Debatepedia. Retrieved November 29, 2009, from http://wiki.idebate.org/en/index.php/Welcome_to_Debatepedia!
    Wiki(2009, Nov 11). In Widipedia. Retrieved November 11, 2009, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki
    Wikinews interviews Brooks Lindsay, founder of Debatepedia(2009, Dec 22). In Wikinews. Retrieved December 22, 2009, from http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Wikinews_interviews_Brooks_Lindsay,_founder_of_Debatepedia
    Wikipedia:The_perfect_article(2009, Nov 12). In Wikipedia. Retrieved November 12, 2009, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:The_perfect_article
    Young, I. (1996). Communication and the other: beyond deliberative democracy. In Benhabib, S. (Ed.). Democracy and Difference (pp. 120-136). Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
    Description: 博士
    國立政治大學
    新聞研究所
    90451505
    98
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0904515051
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[新聞學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    51505101.pdf2342KbAdobe PDF21308View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback