Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/49856
|
| Title: | 資訊科學先驅的共被引研究：以美國資訊科學學會最佳貢獻獎得主為例
A Co-citation Analysis on Information Science Pioneers：The Winners of Award of Merit of American Society for Information Science |
| Authors: | 黃瑞期
Huang, Ruei Chi |
| Contributors: | 蔡明月
Tsay, Ming Yueh
黃瑞期
Huang, Ruei Chi |
| Keywords: | 資訊科學
書目計量學
共被引分析
路徑搜尋網路分析
Bibliometrics
Information Science
Co-citation Analysis
PFNETs |
| Date: | 2008 |
| Issue Date: | 2010-12-09 10:58:57 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 偉大的科學家牛頓曾說：「如果我能比別人看的更遠，那是因為我站在巨人的肩膀上」。任何一個學科的發展，其創始和演進的過程中，必定有一群具有前瞻性與領導風格的研究者，憑藉著他們本身的才能與智慧、努力的奉獻和卓越的理念做出具體的貢獻，透過相同的理念奠定學科的根基，並促使學科興盛發展。
本研究採用書目計量學研究方法中的共被引分析法，以美國資訊科學學會所頒發「最佳貢獻獎」之得主為研究對象，並以1900年至2007年為研究範圍，進行資訊科學家之間的主題性分析。本研究旨在探討44位資訊科學先驅的共被引情況，以瞭解各位先驅和各領域主題的群集現象，進而探討資訊科學的知識結構。本研究透過Web Of Science資料庫分別對於44位資訊科學家與個人被引用最多之著作進行共被引次數檢索，製成共被引矩陣，除了瞭解資訊科學家與其被引用最多之著作的共被引強度外，並以KNOT軟體進行路徑搜尋網路分析，進一步探討資訊科學之主題分佈情況，並與前人所做的相關研究進行比較。
本研究結果歸納如下：
一、資訊科學先驅的被引用次數和共被引次數
(一)被引用次數和共被引次數高低的差異，較高者可強化連結強度，較低者可反應出不同的學科結構。
(二)共被引次數較普遍者，具有跨領域的特性。
二、資訊科學先驅的路徑搜尋網路分析
(一)資訊科學領域以五大領域為主要範疇。分別是以Salton, G所領軍的資訊檢索領域；Lancaster, FW所代表的圖書資訊學與圖書館教育、圖書館自動化與自動化系統、圖書館與資訊服務評鑑等領域；Garfield, E為核心的資訊計量學與引用文獻分析之領域；Belkin, NJ所代表的使用者研究與資訊尋求行為領域；Saracevic, T為主的圖書資訊科學概念與理論、圖書資訊科學史的領域。
(二)單篇被引用最多之著作的網路圖無法判別。
三、本研究與White, HD (2003a)研究結果之比較結果
(一)資訊科學領域的學科結構並無太大變動。
(二)資訊科學中心點的不同。本研究所得的網路圖是以Salton, G為圖形的中心點，而White, HD (2003a)則是以Lancaster, FW為圖形中心點。
四、資訊科學領域有跨學科之性質。透過分析結果可以發現資訊科學有跨領域的特性，在許多的資訊科學先驅本身的研究範疇不只侷限於資訊科學，甚且有跨越其他學科主題，例如：電腦科學、社會網絡分析、數學、統計學等。
Newton, one of the great scientists, said：「If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.」The development in any discipline, in the founding and evolution of the process , there must be a group of forward-looking with the leadership style of the researchers. They make concrete contribution by virtue of their own abilities and intelligence, outstanding efforts and dedication. They through the same idea lay the foundation of their subjects and flourish their disciplines.
This study aims at using co-citation analysis of bibliometrics, and regards the Winners of Award of Merit of American Society for Information Science as the research objects to analyze the relevance between and between information scientists, and the research years from 1900 to 2007. The main purpose of this study is to explore the co-citation counts of 44 information scientists to understand the pioneers and the major subjects in information science, and further explore the structure of scientific knowledge of information science. This study through the Web Of Science database retrieve the co-citation counts of 44 pioneers of information science and the most cited of their works to build co-citation matrix. The result let us understanding the co-citation strength of 44 pioneers of information science. We also use the KNOT software in the analysis of PFNETs, try to explore the subjects how to distribute in information science, and take the results compare to the results of the study by White, HD in 2003.
The results of the study reveal that:
1.Cited counts and co-citation counts of 44 pioneers of information science
(1)The difference between higher counts and lower counts. The higher counts can strengthen the connections between the network, the lows counts can response to the different structures of information science.
(2)The higher co-citation counts commonly have the characteristics of cross- discipline.
2.The PFNETs of 44 pioneers of information science
(1)The fields of information science divide into five main areas. Salton, G lead the field of information retrieval. Lancaster, FW represent the education of library science and information science, library automation and automated systems, the evaluation for library and information services etc.. Garfield, E as the core of the field of informetrics and citation analysis. Belkin, NJ represent the field of the users research and information-seeking behavior. Saracevic, T represent the field of library information science concepts and theories, the history of library and information science etc..
(2)The network map of the most cited works of 44 pioneers of information science cannot be differentiated.
3. Take the results compare to the results of the study by White, HD in 2003
(1)The field of information science disciplines have not much change in the scientific structure.
(2)Different focal point in the maps of information science. This study is based on the network map as Salton, G as focal point for the network, and White, HD (2003a) is based on the network map as Lancaster, FW as focal point for the graphics.
4. The field of information science has the nature of interdisciplinary. The results can be found through the co-citation analysis of information scientists on cross-cutting nature of information science. A pioneer in many areas of study itself is not limited to information science, and even likely to go beyond the subject of other disciplines, such as: computer science, social network analysis, mathematics, statistics etc.. |
| Reference: | 一、中文
何光國 (1994)。文獻計量學導論。台北市：三民書局。
李德竹教授七秩榮慶籌備小組 (2005)。資訊科學先驅=Pioneers of Information Science。台北市：文華圖書管理。
張鼎鍾 (1984)。資訊科學導論。台北市：中國圖書館學會。
陳鶴琴 (2005)。統計學辭典。台北市：貓頭鷹。
蔡明月 (2003)。資訊計量學與文獻特性。台北市：國立編繹館。
賴鼎銘 (2004)。資訊科學的思考。台北市：文華圖書管理。
吳嘉雯 (1999)。半導體文獻雙被引現象分析。未出版之碩士論文，淡江大學教育資料科學學系研究所，台北縣。
宋麗萍、徐引篪 (2005)。基於視覺化的作者同被引技術的發展。情報學報，24(2)，193-198。
李德竹、周利玲 (2000)。從Vannevar Bush “As We May Think” 談資訊科學與技術之演進與發展。圖書與資訊學刊，32，1-15。
孟連生 (1983)。中文科學引文分析。情報科學，3，11-21。
孟連生 (1996)。試論引文索引法的性質與功能。資訊傳播與圖書館學，3(1)， 15-19。
侯海燕、劉則淵、陳悅、姜春林、尹麗春、龐杰 (2006)。當代國際科學學研究熱點演進趨勢知識圖譜。科研管理，27(3)，90-96。
耿海英、肖仙桃 (2006)。國外共引分析研究進展及發展趨勢。情報雜誌， 12，68-72。
馬費成、宋恩梅 (2006)。我國情報學研究分析:以ACA為方法。情報學報，25(3)，259-268。
馬瑞敏、邱均平 (2005)。基於CSSCI 的論文共被引實證計量研究─以圖書館學、資訊科學為例。圖書情報知識， 107， 77-80。
張倩、潘雲濤 (2007)。基於Web of Science數據的圖書情報學研究聚類分析。情報雜誌，2，82-84。
陳光華、江玉婷、莊雅蓁、許雅淑 (1998)。引文分析研究發展現況。書府，18/19，15-47。
黃惠美 (2007)。臺灣地區圖書資訊學文獻高生產作者的引用圖像—以作者雙被引分析為例。中華民國圖書館學會電子報，5，1-14。
黃湃翔 (2002)。徑路搜尋法在高中學生物理學科知識結構測量上的應用。教育與社會研究，4(7)，1-33。
黃裕惠 (2003)。分子生物與遺傳學之文獻計量分析。未出版之碩士論文，國立台灣大學圖書資訊學研究所，台北市。
趙悅陽、崔雷 (2005)。專題文獻的同被引聚類分析在表現學科專業發展歷史的可靠性評價。情報學報，24 (4)。
劉林青 (2005)。繪製戰略管理研究的知識地圖：作者共被引分析。戰略管理，17(3)。
蔡明月 (2002)。從圖書館與資訊科學的遞嬗反思圖書館的定義。中華圖書資訊學教育學會會訊，19，22-33。
蔡明月 (2005)。引文索引與引文分析之探討。圖書館與資訊科學，31(1)，46。
蔡明月、吳嘉雯 (2001)。半導體期刊共被引研究。資訊傳播與圖書館學，8(2)，9-21。
羅思嘉 (2001)。引用文獻分析與學術傳播研究。中國圖書館學會會報，66，73-85。
CONCERT。Web of Science 簡介。建置日期：2000年1月31日，更新日期：2007年6月27日。上網日期：2007年11月28日，檢索自：http://www.stpi.org.tw/fdb/wos/index.html
謝焰盛 (1994)。「羅伯．撒克頓．泰勒」特寫。更新日期：2005年11月22日。上網日期：2008年3月19日，檢索自：http://www.tpl.gov.tw/TaipeiPublicLibrary/download/eresource/tplpub_periodical/articles/1104/110407.pdf
二、西文
Crane, D. (1972). Invisible colleges: Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Egghe, L. & Rousseau, R. (1990). Introduction to informetrics: Quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
Price, D. J. deS. (1963). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.
Ahlgren, P., Jarneving, B., & Rousseau, R. (2003). Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(6), 550-560.
Baker, D. R. (1990). Citation analysis: A methodological review. Social Work Research & Abstracts, 26(3), 3-10.
Bayer, A. E., Smart, J. C., & McLaughlin, G. W. (1990). Mapping intellectual structure of a scientific subfield through author cocitations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 444-452.
Bichteler, J., & Eaton, E. A. III (1980). The combined use of bibliographic coupling and cocitation for document retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 31(4), 278-282.
Black, A. (2006). Information history. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 40, 441-476.
Borko, H. (1968). Information science: What is it? American Documentation, 19(1), 3.
Borner, B., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W.(2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 179-255.
Braam, R. R. , Moed, H.F. , & van Raan, A.F.J. (1991). Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis. II: Dynamical aspects. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 42(4), 252–266.
Culnan, M. J., Oreilly, C. A., & Chatman, J. A. (1990). Intellectual structure of research in organizational-behavior, 1972-1984: A cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 453-458.
Ding, Y., Chowdhury, G., & Foo, S. (1999). Mapping the intellectual structure of information retrieval studies: An author co-citation analysis, 1987-1997. Journal of Information Science, 25(1), 67-78.
Herner, S. (1984). Brief history of information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 35(3), 157-163.
Garfield, E. (1989). Manfred Kochen: In memory of an information scientist pioneer qua World Brainist. Current Contents, 25, 3-14.
Gmur, M. (2003). Co-citation analysis and the search for the invisible colleges: A methodological evaluation. Scientometrics, 57(1), 27-57.
Gross, P. L. K., & Gross, E. M. (1927). College libraries and chemical education. Science, New Series, 66(1713), 385-389.
Lenoir, T. (1979). Quantitative foundations for the sociology of science: On linking blockmodeling with co-citation analysis. Social Studies of Science, 9(4), 455-480.
McCain, K. W. (1984). Longitudinal author cocitation mapping: The changing structure of macroeconomics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 35(6), 351-359.
McCain, K. W. (1986a). The paper trails of scholarship: Mapping the literature of genetics. Library Quarterly, 56(3), 258-271.
McCain, K. W. (1986b). Cocited author mapping as a valid representation of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(3), 111-122.
McCain, K. W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 433-443.
McCain, K. W. (1991). Mapping economics through the journal literature: An experiment in journal cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(4), 290-296.
Moya-Anegon, F., Vargas-Quesada B., & Herrero-Solana, V., et al.(2005). Domain analysis and information retrieval through the construction of heliocentric maps based on ISI-JCR category cocitation. Information Processing and Management, 41, 1520-1533.
Nadel, E. (1983). Commitment and co-citation: An indicator of incommensurability in patterns of formal communication. Studies of Science, 13(2), 255-283.
Nelson, M. (1994). In memoriam Jean Tague-Sutcliffe, 1931-1996. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(10), 866.
Paisley, W. (1990). An oasis where trails cross: The improbable cocitation networks of a multidiscipline. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 459-468.
Rousseau, R., & Zuccala, A. (2004). A classification of author cocitation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56 (6), 513-529.
Schildt, H. A., Zahra, S. A., & Sillanpaa, A. (2006). Scholarly communities in entrepreneurship research: A co-citation analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30 (3), 399-415 .
Small, H. (1973). Cocitation in scientific literature: A new measure of relation between 2 documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24 (4), 265-269.
Small, H. (1986). The synthesis of specialty narratives from co-citation clusters. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(3), 97-110.
Small, H. (1999). Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(9), 799–813.
Small, H., & Griffith, C. (1974). Structure of scientific literatures .1. identifying and graphing specialties. Science Studies, 4 (1), 17-40.
Smith, L. C. (1981). Citation analysis. Library Trends, 30(1), 83-106.
White, H. D. (1983). A cocitation map of the social indicators movement. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 34(5), 307-312.
White, H. D. (2003a). Pathfinder networks and author cocitation analysis: A remapping of paradigmatic information scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5), 423-434.
White, H. D. (2003b). Author cocitation analysis and Pearson’s r. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 54(13), 1250-1259.
White, H. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1981). Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(3), 163-171.
White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1989). Bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 24, 119-186.
White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline : An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327-355.
White, H. D., Lin, X., Buzydlowski, J.W., & Chen, C. M. (2004). User-controlled mapping of significant literatures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(Suppl 1), 5297-5302.
Wilson, C.S. (1999). Informetrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 34, 107-247.
Zhao, D. Z., & Strotmann, A. (2007).Can citation analysis of web publications better detect research fronts? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58 (9), 1285-1302 .
Zunde, P. (1971). Structural models of complex information sources. Information Storage and Retrieval, 7, 1-18.
ASIS A Project of SIG/HFIS (1999). Pioneers of information science in North America. Retrieved March 17, 2008, from http://www.libsci.sc.edu/bob/ISP/isp.htm
Bates, M. J. (2005). Marcia J. Bates. Retrieved March 26, 2008, from UCLA, Department of Information Studies Web site: http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/bates/
Belkin, N. J. (2004). Nicholas J. Belkin’s home page. Retrieved March 17, 2008, from Rutgers University, School of Communication, Information and Library Studies Web site: http://www.scils.rutgers.edu/~belkin/belkin.html
Computer Laboratory (2007). Karen Spärck Jones, FBA Professor Emerita of Computers and Information Honorary Fellow of Wolfson College 26 August 1935 – 4 April 2007. Retrieved March 28, 2008, from University of Cambridge, Computer Laboratory Web site: http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/misc/obituaries/sparck-jones/
Consroe, K. (1999). In memory. Retrieved March 13, 2008, from Cornell Unversity, Department of Computer Science Annual Report Web site: http://www.cs.cornell.edu/annual_report/1996/beginning/salton.html
Cramer, E. (1998). In memory of: Gerard Salton Professor PhD Harvard University, 1958. Retrieved March 13, 2008, from Cornell Unversity, Department of Computer Science Annual Report Web site：http://www.cs.cornell.edu/Info/Department/Annual95/Faculty/Salton.html
Cronin, B. (2008). Blaise Cronin’s homepage. Retrieved March 27, 2008, from Indiana University Web site: http://www.slis.indiana.edu/faculty/cronin
Drexel Visualization and Information Retrieval Research Group. Citation mapping and visualization. Retrieved December 15, 2007, from Drexel Unversity Web site：http://project.cis.drexel.edu/authorlink/
Garfield, E. (2001). From bibliographic coupling to co-citation analysis via algorithmic historio-bibliography. Retrieved October 15, 2007, from http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/papers/drexelbelvergriffith92001.pdf
Griffiths, J. M. (2006). José-Marie Griffiths, Ph.D. Retrieved March 25, 2008, from University of North Carolina, School of Information and Library Science Web site: http://sils.unc.edu/griffiths/
Hjørland, B. (2005). Core concepts in library and information science. Retrieved March 13, 2008, from http://www.db.dk/bh/core%20concepts%20in%20lis/home.htm
Interlink. (2008). The Knowledge Network Organizing Tool (KNOT) Software. Retrieved May 15, 2008 , from Interlink Web Site: http://interlinkinc.net/KNOT.html
Kraft, D. H. (2006). Donald H. Kraft. Retrieved May 29, 2008 , from Louisiana State University, Department of Computer Science Web Site: http://www.csc.lsu.edu/~kraft/
Maclay, K. (2003). Professor emeritus Patrick Wilson, librarian and philosopher, dies at 75. Retrieved May 25, 2008 , from UC Berkeley Web site: http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2003/09/24_wilson.shtml
Saracevic, T. (2008). Tefko Saracevic home page. Retrieved May 20, 2008 ,from Rutgers University, School of Communication & Information Web site: http://www.scils.rutgers.edu/~tefko/
Soergel, D. (2005). Dagobert Soergel’s personal website. Retrieved March 23, 2008, from http://www.dsoergel.com/
Summit, R. K.. Professional biography of Dr. Roger K. Summit Chairman Emeritus, Dialog., Retrieved March 18, 2008, from http://www.dialog.com/about/biographies/rogersummit_bio.pdf
Thomson Reuters. (2005). Henry Small - Scientific. Retrieved March 18, 2008, from http://scientific.thomsonreuters.com/press/experts/henry-small/
White, H. D.. Howard D. White’s home page. Retrieved March 18, 2008, from Drexel University Web site: http://www.cis.drexel.edu/faculty/HUD.Web/HUD.html |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
圖書資訊與檔案學研究所
95155012
97 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095155012 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [圖書資訊與檔案學研究所] 學位論文
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
