| Reference: | Amadieu, F., Tricot, A., & Marin, C. (2009a). Interaction between prior knowledge and concept-map structure on hypertext comprehension, coherence of reading orders and disorientation. Interacting with Computers, In Press, Corrected Proof.
Amadieu, F., Tricot, A., & Marin, C. (2009b). Prior knowledge in learning from a non-linear electronic document: Disorientation and coherence of the reading sequences. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 381-388.
Anderson, J. (1995). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York: W. H. Freeman and company.
Antonenko, P. D., & Niederhauser, D. S. (2010). The influence of leads on cognitive load and learning in a hypertext environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 140-150.
Bower, G., & Morrow, D. (1990). Mental models in narrative comprehension. Science, 247(4938), 44.
Calisir, F., & Gurel, Z. (2003). Influence of text structure and prior knowledge of the learner on reading comprehension, browsing and perceived control. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(2), 135-145.
Chen, S. Y., & Macredie, R. D. (2002). Cognitive styles and hypermedia navigation: Development of a learning model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 3-15.
Comscore (2008). More than 10 Billion Videos Viewed Online in the U.S. in February. Retrieved 2011.4.18: http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Press_Releases/2008/04/US_Online_Video_Usage
ComScore (2010). YouTube Viewing Across Markets. Retrieved 2011.4.18: http://www.comscoredatamine.com/2010/09/youtube-viewing-hours-across-markets/
De Jong, T., & Van Der Geest, T. (2000). Characterizing web heuristics. Technical Communication, 47(3), 311-326.
De Jong, T., & Van der Hulst, A. (2002). The effects of graphical overviews on knowledge acquisition in hypertext. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(2), 219-231.
Dee-Lucas, D. (1996). Effects of overview structure on study strategies and text representations for instructional hypertext. Hypertext and cognition, 73-107.
DeStefano, D., & LeFevre, J.-A. (2007). Cognitive load in hypertext reading: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1616-1641.
Dillon, A. (2005). Multimedia Learning with Hypermedia The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 569-585). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dillon, A., & Gabbard, R. (1998). Hypermedia as an Educational Technology: A Review of the Quantitative Research Literature on Learner Comprehension, Control, and Style. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 322-349.
Eysenck, M., & Keane, M. (2003). 認知心理學 (李素卿, Trans.). 台北: 五南.
Foltz, W. P. (1996). Comprehension, Coherence and Strategies in Hypertext and Linear Text. In Jean-Francois Rouet & e. al (Eds.), Hypertext and cognition (pp. 109-136): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ford, N., & Chen, S. Y. (2000). Individual Differences, Hypermedia Navigation,and Learning: An Empirical Study. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9(4), 281-311.
Foss, C. L. (1989). Tools for reading and browsing hypertext. Information Processing Management, 25(4), 407-418.
Gagne, E. D., Yekovich, C. W., & Yekovich, F. R. (1985). The cognitive psychology of school learning: Little, Brown Boston.
Graesser, McNamara, D., & Louwerse, M. (2003). What do readers need to learn in order to process coherence relations in narrative and expository text. Rethinking reading comprehension, 82-98.
Hatch, T., & Grossman, P. (2009). Learning to Look Beyond the Boundaries of Representation: Using Technology to Examine. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 70-85.
Herman, D. (2004a). Story logic: Problems and possibilities of narrative: Univ of Nebraska Pr.
Herman, D. (2004b). Toward a transmedial narratology. In M.-L. Ryan (Ed.), Narrative across media: the languages of storytelling: Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.
Hofman, R., & van Oostendorp, H. (2002). Cognitive effects of a structural overview in a hypertext. British Journal of Educational Technology, 30(2), 129-140.
Kaltenbacher, M. (2004). Perspectives on Multimodality: From the early beginnings to the state of the art. [Article]. Information Design Journal & Document Design, 12, 190-207.
Kamalski, J., Sanders, T., & Lentz, L. (2008). Coherence Marking, Prior Knowledge, and Comprehension of Informative and Persuasive Texts: Sorting Things Out. [Article]. Discourse Processes, 45, 323-345.
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Koehler, M., Yadav, A., Phillips, M., & Cavazos-Kottke, S. (2005). What is video good for? Examining how media and story genre interact. Journal of Education Multimedia and Hypermedia, 14(3), 249-272.
Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with Media. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 179.
Kress, G. (1997). Visual and Verbal Modes of Representation in Electronically Mediated Communication: The Potentials of New Forms of Text. Page to Screen: Taking Literacy into the Electronic Era. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
Kress, G. (2004). Reading images: Multimodality, representation and new media. [Article]. Information Design Journal & Document Design, 12, 110-119.
Leonard, N. H., Scholl, R. W., & Kowalski, K. B. (1999). Information processing style and decision making. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(3), 407-420.
Locatis, C., Letourneau, G., & Banvard, R. (1989). Hypermedia and instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 37, 65-77.
Low, R., & Sweller, J. (2005). The modality principle in multimedia learning The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 147–158). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 125-139.
Mayer (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 31–48). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, & Gallini, J. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 715-726.
Mayer, R. (2005). Introduction to multimedia learning The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 1-16). New York: Cambridge University Press.
McDonald, S., & Stevenson, R. (1996). Disorientation in hypertext: The effects of three text structures on navigation performance. Applied Ergonomics, 27(1), 61-68.
McDonald, S., & Stevenson, R. (1998). Navigation in hyperspace: An evaluation of the effects of navigational tools and subject matter expertise on browsing and information retrieval in hypertext. Interacting with Computers, 10(2), 129-142.
McNamara, D., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22(3), 247-288.
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 358-368.
Narvaez, D., van den Broek, P., & Ruiz, A. (1999). The influence of reading purpose on inference generation and comprehension in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 488-496.
Nilsson, R. M., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). The effects of graphic organizers giving cues to the structure of a hypertext document on users` navigation strategies and performance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57(1), 1-26.
Potelle, H., & Rouet, J.-F. (2003). Effects of content representation and readers` prior knowledge on the comprehension of hypertext. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58(3), 327-345.
Protopsaltis, A., & Bouki, V. (2005). Towards a hypertext reading/comprehension model. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 23rd annual international conference on Design of communication: documenting and designing for pervasive information.
Reimann, P. (2003). Multimedia learning: beyond modality. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 245-252.
Rouet (1992). Cognitive processing of hyperdocuments: when does nonlinearity help? Paper presented at the ACM conference on Hypertext, Milan, Italy.
Rouet, & Potelle (2005). Navigational principles in multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 297-312). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ryan, M.-L. (2001). Can Coherence be saved? Selective Interactivity and Narrativity Narrative as Virtual Reality: Immersion and Interactivity in Literature and Electronic Media (pp. 242-271): Johns Hopkins University Press.
Salmeron, L., Baccino, T., Canas, J. J., Madrid, R. I., & Fajardo, I. (2009). Do graphical overviews facilitate or hinder comprehension in hypertext? Computers & Education, 53(4), 1308-1319.
Salmeron, L., Canas, J. J., Kintsch, W., & Fajardo, I. (2005). Reading Strategies and Hypertext Comprehension. [Article]. Discourse Processes, 40, 171-191.
Salmeron, L., Kintsch, W., & Canas, J. (2006). Coherence or interest as basis for improving hypertext comprehension. Paper presented at the Information Design Journal (IDJ). from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ufh&AN=21327151&lang=zh-tw&site=ehost-live
Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P. (2007). Learner control in hypermedia environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 285-307.
Schnotz, W. (2005). An integrated model of text and picture comprehension The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 49-69). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schnotz, W., & Bannert, M. (2003). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 141-156.
Sundar, S. (2000). Multimedia effects on processing and perception of online news: A study of picture, audio, and video downloads. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(3), 480-499.
Sweller, J. (2005). The redundancy principle in multimedia learning Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 159–168). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tripp, S. D., & Roby, W. (1990). orientation and disorientation in hypertext lexicon. Journal of computer based instruction, 17(120-124).
Vaughan, M., & Dillon, A. (2006). Why structure and genre matter for users of digital information: A longitudinal experiment with readers of a web-based newspaper. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(6), 502-526.
Zwaan, R. A., & Rapp, D. N. (2006). Discourse Comprehension. In M. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (2 ed., pp. 725-756): Elsevier Science & Technology.
李金鈴 (2008). 教師多媒體教學的呈現方式對低年級學童學習成效的影響---以動植物學習為例. 國立新竹教育大學, 新竹.
汪曼穎, & 王林宇 (2006). 注意力分配對圖像登錄之影響及其在教學上的應用方向. 教育心理學報, 38(1), 67-83.
林達森 (2003). 概念圖的理論基礎與運用實務. 花蓮師院學報, 17, 107-132.
施駿宏 (2009). 多媒體呈現方式與空間能力對國二學生「地震」與「海嘯」學習結果之影響. 國立中正大學, 嘉義.
徐易稜 (2001). 多媒體呈現方式對學習者認知負荷與學習成效之影響研究. 國立中央大學, 桃園.
陳烜之 (2007). 認知心理學. 台北: 五南.
陳雅惠 (2008). 探詢數位時代中敘事與媒介之關係. Paper presented at the 中華傳播學會年會.
陳綱佩, 張寶芳, & 洪瑞雲 (2007). 科學報導的閱讀理解與隱喻的角色. 中華傳播學刊, 11, 71-109.
陳韻如 (2003). 超文本資訊架構與閱聽人溝通脈絡、時間序列對於手持小螢幕瀏覽之影響. 國立交通大學, 新竹.
陳韻如, 林幼唯, & 陳建文 (2001). 電子報介面呈現方式對閱讀成效與使用態度之影響. Paper presented at the 中華傳播學會年會.
鍾蔚文 (1992). 從媒介真實到主觀真實: 正中書局. 流傳文化. 墨文堂文化.
|
