English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 89327/119107 (75%)
Visitors : 23820844      Online Users : 126
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/51374


    Title: 住宅品質變化對房價指數之影響-新推個案 vs. 中古屋
    Housing quality change on price indexes: new housing projects vs. existing housing cases
    Authors: 陳相甫
    Chen, Hsiang Fu
    Contributors: 張金鶚
    江穎慧

    Chang,Chin Oh
    Chiang,Ying Hui

    陳相甫
    Chen, Hsiang Fu
    Keywords: 房價指數
    住宅品質
    特徵價格
    housing price index
    housing quality
    hedonic price
    Date: 2010
    Issue Date: 2011-10-05 14:47:17 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 過往研究編製房價指數時多在品質固定或控制下,觀察房價的波動趨勢,對於住宅品質的改變如何影響房價則少有說明。而住宅品質為生活品質的一部分,亦為購屋者消費或投資時所關心,然住宅價格與品質間存在何種關係並不清楚,若認為高價格的住宅即代表高品質,則可能存在做出錯誤決策的風險。
    本研究利用特徵價格法,探討台北市與台北縣於2000年至2009年間,新推個案與中古屋交易市場住宅品質的改變與房價關係。實證結果發現台北市的標準住宅的品質因改變程度較新北市小,故其對房價指數的波動不如在新北市中明顯。另外,台北市新推個案與中古屋住宅的區位條件無明顯衰退之情形,產品品質亦無明顯的提升;新北市新推個案與中古屋住宅的區位條件皆呈現衰退現象,但新推個案的產品品質則有提升趨勢,而中古屋住宅則是下降的趨勢。
    最後,分析住宅價格與品質間的相關性,實證結果發現,新北市的新推個案住宅與台北市的中古屋住宅存在正相關,顯示在此兩種次市場中,支出更多價格購屋亦獲得更好的住宅品質。
    Most of the existing housing price indexes empirical studies are under quality-constant or quality-control, because housing quality change is difficult to measure. In these cases, one does not concerned about that price index, if one interested in consumption or investment.
    We use hedonic price model discusses the relationship of housing price and housing quality about new housing projects and transacted house during 2000 and 2009 in Taipei City and New-Taipei City. The empirical results show that due to degree of change in housing quality of representative house in Taipei City smaller than in New-Taipei City, so the volatility of the price index was significantly better in New-Taipei City.
    In addition, the Taipei City housing “location condition” no recession , and no obvious improvement of “structural quality”; New housing projects and transacted house in New-Taipei City, respectively, increase and decline, but the location condition are present recession.
    Furthermore, we find that there is positive correlation between housing price and quality in Taipei City’s transacted house market and New-Taipei City’s new housing projects market. In these two sub-markets, consumer spending more housing prices and get better housing quality.
    Reference: 1. 林秋瑾,1994,『穩健性特徵房屋價格模式之探討--異常點分析』,行政院國家科學委員會。
    2. 林秋瑾,2004,『住宅價格指數編定之研究』,行政院經建會研究計畫。
    3. 林祖嘉、林素菁,2010,「台灣地區月房價指數的建立」,『中華民國住宅學會第十九屆年會論文集』。
    4. 林惠玲、陳正倉,2009,『應用統計學』,雙葉書廊。
    5. 張金鶚,1995,『台灣地區住宅價格指數之研究』,行政院經建會研究計畫。
    6. 張金鶚,2003,『房地產投資與市場分析--理論與實務』,台北市: 張金鶚。
    7. 張金鶚、楊宗憲、洪御仁,2008,「中古屋及預售屋房價指數之建立、評估與整合--台北市之實證分析」,『住宅學報』,17(2):13-34。
    8. 陳建仁、張金鶚,1992,「台北都會區住宅品質標準之研究」,『建築學報』,7:21-38。
    9. 曾善霞、張金鶚,1991,「臺北市住宅品質指標之研究」,『都市與計劃』,18(1):83-106。
    10. 劉秀玲、張金鶚,1993,「房地產品質、價格與消費者物價指數之探討」,『國立政治大學學報』,67(2):369-400。
    11. 賴美蓉,2003,「台灣三大都市住宅品質之分析」,『台灣土地金融季刊』,40(1):23-45。
    12. Adair, A., McGreal, S., Smyth, A., Cooper, J., & Ryley, T., 2000, “House Prices and Accessibility: The Testing of Relationships Within The Belfast Urban Area”, Housing Studies, 15(5): 699-716.
    13. Bailey, M. J., Muth, R. F., & Nourse, H. O., 1963, “A Regression Method for Real-Estate Price-Index Construction”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58(304): 933-&.
    14. Bourassa, S. C., Hoesli, M., & Sun, J., 2006, “A simple alternative house price index method”, Journal of Housing Economics, 15(1): 80-97.
    15. Boyle, P. J., & Lathrop, E. S., 2009, “Are Consumers' Perceptions of Price-Quality Relationships Well Calibrated?”, International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33(1): 58-63.
    16. Crone, T. M., Nakamura, L. I., & Voith, R., 2009, “Price and Productivity Measurement: Volume 1 -- Housing”, Trafford Press.
    17. Epple, D., 1987, “Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets - Estimating Demand and Supply Functions for Differentiated Products”, Journal of Political Economy, 95(1): 59-80.
    18. Evans, G. W., 2003, “The built environment and mental health”, Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 80(4): 536-555.
    19. Follain, J. R., & Malpezzi, S., 1980, “Dissecting housing value and rent: Estimates of hedonic indexes for thirty-nine large SMSAs”, Washington, D.C: Urban Institute.
    20. Gavett, T. W., 1967, “Quality and A Pure Price Index”, Monthly Labor Review, 90(3): 16-20.
    21. Griliches, Z., 1971, “In Price Indexes and Quality Change”, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    22. Hansen, J., 2009, “Australian House Prices: A Comparison of Hedonic and Repeat-Sales Measures”, Economic Record, 85(269): 132-145.
    23. Hjorth-Andersen, C., 1984, “The Concept of Quality and The Efficiency of Markets for Consumer Products”, Journal of Consumer Research, 11(2): 708-718.
    24. Hwang, M., & Quigley, J. M., 2004, “Selectivity, quality adjustment and mean reversion in the measurement of house values”, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 28(2-3): 161-178.
    25. Lancaster, K. J., 1966, “A New Approach to Consumer Theory”, Journal of Political Economy, 74(2): 132-157.
    26. Lichtenstein, D. R., & Burton, S., 1989, “The Relationship Between Perceived and Objective Price-Quality”, Journal of Marketing Research, 26(4): 429-443.
    27. Mulder, C. H., 2007, “The family context and residential choice: A challenge for new research”, Population Space and Place, 13(4): 265-278.
    28. Ortuzar-Gana, J. C., & Alfranca-Burriel, O., 2010, “Current and Regular Prices Hedonic Models for The Wine Industry”, Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 8(4): 873-886.
    29. Rosen, S., 1974, “Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition”, Journal of Political Economy, 82: 35-55.
    30. Sirmans, G. S., Macpherson, D. A., & Zietz, E. N., 2005, “The Composition of Hedonic Pricing Models”, Journal of Real Estate Literature, 13(1): 3-43.
    31. Smits, A., & Michielin, F., 2010, “Housing Values of Adult Children and their Parents. Is the Quality of Housing Transmitted between Generations? ”, Housing Studies, 25(4): 463-481.
    32. Stengos, T., & Zacharias, E., 2006, “Intertemporal Pricing and Price Discrimination: A semiparametric Hedonic Analysis of The Personal Computer Market”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 21(3): 371-386.
    33. Thibodeau, T. G., 1995, “House price indices from the 1984-1992 MSA American housing surveys”, Journal of Housing Research, 6(3): 439-481.
    34. Triplett, J. E., 1969, “Automobiles and Hedonic Quality Measurement”, Journal of Political Economy, 77(3): 408-417.
    35. Wallace, N. E., 1996, “Hedonic-Based Price Indexes For Housing: Theory, Estimation and Index Construction”, Economic Review, 34-48.
    36. Zabel, J. E., 1999, “Controlling for quality in house price indices”, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 19(3): 223-241.
    37. 清水千弘,2007,「住宅関連情報の整備と消費者保護」,『季刊住宅金融』,2:18-27。
    38. 清水千弘、唐渡広志,2007,『不動産市場の計量経済分析』,朝倉書店。
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    地政研究所
    98257017
    99
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098257017
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[地政學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    701701.pdf1200KbAdobe PDF1297View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback