English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 89683/119504 (75%)
Visitors : 23941758      Online Users : 74
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/52751


    Title: 台灣生技製藥公司海外直接投資進入模式之研究—以中國大陸市場為例
    Entry mode choices of foreign direct investments for Taiwan’s biotech-pharmaceutical company: an empirical study of China market
    Authors: 林書進
    Lin, Shu Chin
    Contributors: 洪叔民
    林書進
    Lin, Shu Chin
    Keywords: 生技製藥公司
    海外直接投資
    進入模式
    國際企業
    國際策略管理
    Biotech-pharmaceutical companies
    Foreign direct investment
    Entry mode
    International business
    International management
    Date: 2010
    Issue Date: 2012-04-17 09:13:02 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 近年來中國大陸以其廣大的市場及較低的人力成本優勢,成為外資及台商競相投資的市場,台灣各產業莫不以進入中國市場為營運發展的重要目標。國內生技製藥產業在這一波投資中國熱中,也嘗試從生產、銷售、行銷、代工及研發等不同面向切入,以掌握商機及尋求企業的永續經營與成長。

    本論文著眼於研究台商生技製藥公司在進入中國大陸市場時,所選擇的海外直接投資之進入模式分析。並以John H. Dunning對外投資之折衷理論為研究架構,從「所有權優勢」、「區位優勢」及「內部化優勢」等構面,來分析台灣生技醫藥公司的中國市場進入模式。藉由國內生技製藥公司的企業訪談及上市櫃公司公開資訊的分析,以及次級資料與公開報導的整理,以瞭解台商生技製藥公司在大陸的直接投資進入模式及影響投資決策的關鍵因素及公司優勢。
    本研究共訪談國內四家生技製藥公司。研究發現,生技製藥台商在中國市場的進入模式選擇,主要可能受到區位優勢決定因素的影響,而決定因素則可分為市場導向、資源取得導向及風險評估等三項。本研究將有助於瞭解國內生技製藥業,在中國進行跨國經營與投資的決策考量,並裨益國際企業領域及國際策略管理的理論與實務發展。
    Over the past years, China has attracted much investment from Taiwan companies and foreign companies due to its advantages of board markets and low-cost labors. Companies in Taiwan also set “enter China market “as a goal in their business planning. Upon this wave of “Invest China fever” , the domestic Biotech & pharmaceutical companies have no doubt approached their business target by entering China market through different operations, that is, production, sales, marketing, out-sourcing, and research & development, etc to catch the opportunities and sustainable growth of business

    The objectives of the study were to analyze the entry mode of China market Taiwan biotech & pharmaceutical companies have conducted their foreign direct investment (FDI). Based on the theory of the eclectic paradigm of FDI initiated by John H. Dunning as a research framework, from the perspectives of Ownership advantages, Location advantages, and Internalization advantages, the analysis for the entry mode of FDI and the Key factors as well as company advantages to affect the decision were employed to examine both the primary data and secondary data. Primary data consisted of the interviews of domestic pharmaceutical companies and the data statistics from the Market Observation Post System (Taiwan stock market). Meanwhile, secondary data was collected from the news and the reports of the journals, magazines, and the websites.

    Four Biotech-pharmaceutical companies were interviewed in this study. The result shows that Location advantages may be the major factors for FDI in China of Taiwan companies. The factors consist of market -oriented, resources -oriented, and risk assessment factors. This study will contribute the strategic considerations for Taiwan international companies that operate foreign Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical business in China. This study also suggests the strategy for the international business and international management both in theory and the practice.
    Reference: 一. 中文部份
    1. DJ財經知識庫,2010/ 7/10取自2010:http://www.funddj.com/kmdj/news/NewsViewer.
    2. ITIS醫藥產業年鑑2005。
    3. 中天生物科技公司,2010/7/15取自網站:http://www.microbio.com.tw
    4. 中時電子報,2010/7/30取自網站:http://news.chinatimes.com/tech/
    5. 中國化學製藥股份有限公司,2010/7/15取自網站: http://www.ccpc.com.tw
    6. 友華生技股份有限公司,2010/7/15取自網站:http://www.oep.com.tw/cht/index.aspx
    7. 永信藥品工業股份有限公司,2010/7/15取自網站:http://www.ysp.com.tw
    8. 司徒達賢,1995。資源基礎理論與企業競爭優勢關係之探討,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃成果報告。
    9. 行政院,2009。臺灣生技起飛鑽石行動方案,2010/8/30取自網站http://www.ey.gov.tw/ct.asp
    10. 吳宜靜,2005。中小企業赴大陸投資之市場進入模式與績效影響因素之折衷分析,碩士論文,銘傳大學國際企業學系碩士班。
    11. 杏輝醫藥集團,2010/7/18取自網站:http://www.sinphar.com
    12. 旭富製藥科技公司,2010/7/18取自網站:http://www.sci-pharmtech.com.tw/
    13. 林明定,2004。台灣生技醫藥產業中國佈局策略之研究,碩士論文,國立中山大學國際高階經營碩士學程碩士在職專班。
    14. 佳醫集團,2010/7/18取自網站:http://www.excelsior.com.tw/
    15. 信東生技股份有限,2010/7/18取自公司網站:http://www.sintong.com
    16. 美吾華公司,2010/7/19取自網站:http://www.maywufa.com.tw
    17. 周雅雲,2005。影響我國生物科技廠商財務績效之因素,碩士論文,東吳大學經濟學系。
    18. 晟德大藥廠,2010/7/18取自網站:http://www.centerlab.com.tw
    19. 翁啟惠,2007。生技製藥產業在台灣的發展,2007年總統府月會專題報告,中央研究院。
    20. 夏松喬,2007。海外直接投資對台灣生技廠商營運績效影響之研究,碩士論文,國立高雄大雄經濟管理研究所。
    21. 陳忠榮、楊志海,1999。台灣對外直接投資的決定因素---擴張型與防禦型的比較,經濟論文叢刊第27輯第2期。
    22. 臺灣神隆股份有限公司,2010/7/20取自網站:http://www.scinopharm.com.tw/
    23. 臺灣東洋藥品,2010/7/20取自網站:http://www.tty.com.tw
    24. 慧典市場研究報告網,2010/7/20取自網站http://www.hdcmr.com/
    25. 歐斐生,2002。台灣生技產業經營環境與經營分析模式的應用探討,碩士論文,國立成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班。
    26. 楊旻翰,1990。台灣生技產業前景及各國發展模式分析,碩士論文,國立中央大學企業管理研究所。
    27. 楊珮菁,2005。從Michael Porter與Philip Kotler理論看臺灣CGMP國資藥廠的經營策略,碩士論文,逢甲大學經營管理碩士在職專班。
    28. 蕭書綺,2004。企業資源與國際化動機對國際化進入時機影響之研究,碩士論文,銘傳大學國際企業學系碩士班。
    二. 英文部份
    1. Agarwal, S, & Ramaswami, S. N. (1992). Choice of foreign market entry mode: Impact of ownership, location and internalization factors, Journal of International Business Studies, 23(1): 1-27.
    2. Rugman, A. M. & Verbeke, A. (2002). Extending the theory of the multinational enterprise: Internalization and strategic management perspectives, Journal of International Business Studies, 34(1): 125-137.
    3. Farino, A. (2009). A brave new path for pharma, Pharmaceutical Technology, ABI/INFORM Global, 33(9): 90.
    4. Bagchi-Sen, S. (2007). Strategic considerations for innovation and commercialization in the US biotechnology sector, European Planning Studies, 15(6): 753-766.
    5. Baliga, B. R. & Jaeger, A. M. (1984). Multinational corporations: Control systems and delegation issues, Journal of International Business Studies, 15(2): 25-39.
    6. Bernstein Research. (2009). Global pharmaceuticals: Emerging markets should infuse badly needed revenues for years to come.
    7. Bower, D.J & Sulej, J.C. (2007). The India challenge: The evolution of a successful new global strategy in the pharmaceutical industry, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 19(5): 611-624.
    8. Buckley, P. J. & Casson, M. (1976). The future of the multinational enterprise. New York: Holmes & Meier.
    9. Jackson, D. (2010). The pharmaceutical market outlook to 2010, Business Insights.
    10. Cave, R.E. (1974). Causes of direct investment: Foreign firm’s shares in Canadian and United Kingdom manufacturing industries, Review of Economics and Statistics, 56(3): 279-293.
    11. Cave, R.E. (1982). Multinational enterprise and economics analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    12. Collis, D. J. & Rukstad, M. G. (2008). Can you say what your strategy is? Harvard Business Review, 86(4): 82-90.
    13. Contractor, F. J. (2007). Is international business good for companies? The evolutionary or multi-stage theory of internationalization vs. the transaction cost perspectives, Management International Review, 47(3): 453-475.
    14. Collis, D. J. & Montgomery, C. A. (1998). Creating corporate advantage, Harvard Business Review, 76(3): 70-83.
    15. Dunning, J. H. (1980). Towards an eclectic theory of international production: Some empirical tests. Journal of International Business Studies, 11(1): 9-31.
    16. Dunning, J. H. (1988). The eclectic paradigm of international production: A restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(1): 1-31.
    17. ERNST & YOUNG (2009), Beyond borders: Global biotechnology report 2009.
    18. Fayerweather, John (1969). “Canadian foreign investment policy” Califormia Management Review, 17(3): 74-83.
    19. Gaba, V., Pan, Y. and Ungson, G. (2002). Timing of entry in international market: An empirical study of U.S. fortune 500 firms in China, Journal of International Business Studies, 33(1): 39-55.
    20. Hamel, G. & Prahalad, C. K. (1989). Strategic intent, Harvard Business Review. 67(3): 63-78.
    21. Heenan, D. A., & Perlmutter, H. V. (1979). Multinational organization development: A social architecture perspective. Reading, Mass.: Addision- Wesley.
    22. Hill, C.W.L., & Jones, G.R. (1998). Strategic management theory: An integrated approach. (4th edition). Boston, USA: Houghton Mifflin Company,.
    23. Hitt, A.M., Ireland, R.D. and Hoskisson, R.E. (1997). Strategic management: Competitiveness and globalization (2nd edition). Minnesota, USA: West Publishing Company.
    24. Horst, T. (1972). Firms and industry determinants of the decision to invest abroad: An empirical study, Review of Economics and Statistics, 54: 258-266.
    25. Hymer, S. H. (1960). The international operations of national firms: A study of direct foreign investment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    26. IMS Health market prognosis, March 2009.
    27. Johanson, J. & Wiedersheim-Paul, F. (1975). The Internationalization of the firm- Four Swedish cases. Journal of Management Studies, 12(3): 305-322.
    28. Kojima, K. (1973). A macroeconomic approach to foreign direct investment, Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 14: 1-21.
    29. Lee, Cheng-Wen. (2007). Strategic alliances influence on small and medium firm performance, Journal of Business Research, 60(7): 731-741.
    30. Lieberman, M. B. & Montgomery, D. B. (1988). First-Mover advantages, Strategic Management Journal, 9: 41-58.
    31. Morris, M. H. & Kuratko, D. F. (2002). Corporate entrepreneurship. Mason, OH: South-Western College Publishers.
    32. Nirmalya, K. (2006). Strategies to fight low-cost rivals. Harvard Business Review. 84(12): 104-12.
    33. Ozawa, T. (1979). International investment and industrial structure: New theoretical implications from the Japanese experience, Oxford Economics Paper, 31(1): 72-92.
    34. Porter, M. E. (2008). The five competitive forces that shape strategy, Harvard Business Review, 86(1): 78-93.
    35. Porter, M. E. (1986). Changing patterns of international competition, California Management Review, 28(2): 9-38.
    36. Padmanabhan, P. & Cho, K. R. (1996). Ownership strategy for a foreign affiliate: An empirical investigation of Japanese firms, Management International Review, 36(1): 45-65.
    37. Robison, R.D. (1984). Internationalization of business: An introduction (2nd Edition). Hinsdale, Illinois: Dryden Press.
    38. Davis, S & Meyer, C., (2000). What will replace the tech economy? Time, 155(21):76-7.
    39. Stefanovic, S. (2008). Analytical framework of FDI determinants: Implementation of OLI model, FACTA UNIVERSITATIS, Economics and Organization, 5(3): 239-249.
    40. Tabata, Yorozu & Albani, Chris, (2008). Globalising clinical development in Japan, Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 14(I): 73-78.
    41. Teece J. David (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing, and public policy, Research Policy, 15: 285-305.
    42. Vernon, R. (1966). International investment and international trade in the product life cycle, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80: 190-207.
    43. Kim, W.C & Mauborgne, R. A., (2004). Blue ocean strategy, Harvard Business Review, 82(10): 76-84.
    44. Welch, Lawrence S. & Loustarinen, Reijo (1988). Internationalization: Evolution of a concept, Journal of General Management, 14(2): 34-55.
    45. Williamson, O. E. (1975). The transaction cost of economics: The governance of contractual relations, The Journal of Law and Economics, 22(2): 233-261.
    46. Williamson, O. E. (1981). The economics of organization: The transaction of cost approach, The American Journal of Sociology, 87(3): 548-577.
    47. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institution of capitalism. New York: Free Press.
    48. Williamson, O. E., Winter, S. G. & Coase, R. H. (1991). The nature of the firm: Origins, evolution and development. New York: Oxford University Press.
    49. Yang, J. Z. (1998). Key success factors of multinational firms in China, Thunderbird International Business Review, 40(6): 633-668.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    商管專業學院碩士學位學程(AMBA)
    96380038
    99
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096380038
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[管理碩士學程/商管專業學院碩士學位學程 AMBA] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    003802.pdf2025KbAdobe PDF3103View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback