政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/52758
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 109952/140903 (78%)
造访人次 : 46046755      在线人数 : 820
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻
    政大機構典藏 > 文學院 > 哲學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/52758


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/52758


    题名: 表象與意識結構：克里果與佛教的意識理論比較
    Representation and the structure of consciousness: A comparison of Kriegel’s and Buddhist theory of consciousness
    作者: 張陌耘
    贡献者: 林鎮國
    張陌耘
    关键词: 克里果
    表象
    意識
    成唯識論
    日期: 2011
    上传时间: 2012-04-17 09:14:15 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本論文探討克里果(Uriah Kriegel)與佛教《成唯識論》關於表象與意識結構之理論及相關議題與爭點。
    參考文獻: 專書：
    Blackmore, S. (2004). Consciousness: An Introduction. Oxford [England]: Oxford University Press.
    Block, N., O. Flanagan, and G. Güzeldere, eds. (1997). The Nature of Consciousness: Philosophical Debates. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Braddon-Mitchell, D. and F. Jackson (2006). Philosophy of Mind and Cognition: An Introduction. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell.
    Brook, A. (1994). Kant and the Mind. Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press.
    Cummins, R. (1989). Meaning and Mental Representation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Dennett, D. (1991). Consciousness Explained. Boston: Little, Brown.
    Fodor, J. A. (1981). Representations: Philosophical Essays on the Foundations of Cognitive Science. Sussex, Eng.: Harvester Press.
    Gallagher, S. and D. Zahavi (2008). The Phenomenological Mind: An Introduction to Philosophy of Mind and Cognitive Science. London: Routledge.
    Kim, J. (2006). Philosophy of Mind, 2nd edition. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
    Kriegel, U. (2009). Subjective Consciousness: A Self-Representational Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Kriegel, U. and K. Williford, eds. (2006). Self-epresentational Approaches to Consciousness. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
    Metzinger, T., ed. (2000). Neural Correlates of Consciousness: Empirical and Conceptual Questions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Metzinger, T. (2003). Being No One: The Self-Model Theory of Subjectivity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Petitot, J., F. J. Varela, B. Pachoud, and J. Roy, eds. (1999). Naturalizing Phenomenology: Issues in Contemporary Phenomenology and Cognitive Science. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    Rosenthal, D. M. (2005). Consciousness and Mind. Oxford [England]: Oxford University Press.
    Sokolowski, R. (2000). Introduction to Phenomenology. Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press.
    von Eckardt, B. (1993). What is Cognitive Science? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Williams, P., ed. (2005). Buddhism: Critical Concepts in Religious Studies. Vol. V. London: Routledge.
    Zahavi, D. (1999). Self-Awareness and Alterity: A Phenomenological Investigation. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.
    Zelazo, P. D., M. Moscovitch, and E. Thompson, eds. (2007). The Cambridge Handbook of Consciousness. Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press.
    釋演培 (1989)。《成唯識論講記》。臺北市：天華。
    霍韜晦 (1980)。《安慧三十唯識釋原典譯註》。香港：中文大學。
    吳汝鈞 (2000)。《佛教的概念與方法》(修訂版)。臺北市：臺灣商務。
    吳汝鈞 (2002)。《唯識現象學(一)：世親與護法》。臺北市：臺灣學生。
    吳汝鈞 (2006)。《佛學研究方法論》(三版)。臺北市：臺灣學生。
    張澄基 (1973)。《佛學今詮》。臺北市：慧炬。
    倪梁康 (2002)。《自识与反思: 近现代西方哲学的基本问题》。北京市：商務印書館。
    倪梁康[注釋] (2005)。《新譯八識規矩頌》。臺北市：三民。
    羅時憲[删注] (1992-93)。《成唯識論述記删注》。香港九龍：佛教法相學會。
    井上玄真(著)；白湖旡言(譯) (2011)。《唯識三十論講話》(再版)。臺北市：新文豐。
    橫山紘一(著)；許洋山(譯) (2002)。《唯識思想入門》。臺北市：東大。
    期刊／論文：
    Arnold, D. (2005). Is Svasaṃvitti Transcendental? A Tentative Reconstruction Following Śāntarakṣita. Asian Philosophy 15: 77-111.
    Block, N. (1990). Inverted Earth. Philosophical Perspectives 4: 52-79. Reprinted in Block et al. (1997).
    Block, N. (1999). Sexism, Racism, Ageism, and the Nature of Consciousness.
    Philosophical Topics 26 (1): 39-70.
    Harman, G. (1990). The Intrinsic Quality of Experience. Philosophical Perspectives 4: 31-52. Reprinted in Block et al. (1997).
    Johnston, M. (1989). Dispositional Theories of Value. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 63: 139-174.
    Kellner, B. (2011). Self-awareness (svasaṃvedana) and Infinite Regresses: A Comparison of Arguments by Dignāga and Dharmakīrti. Journal of Indian Philosophy 39: 411–426.
    Kern, I. (1988). The Structure of Consciousness According to Xuanzang. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 19: 282-295.
    Kern, I. (1992). Object, Objective Phenomenon and Objectivating Act According to the ‘Vijñaptimātratāsiddhi’ of Xuanzang. In D.P. Chattopadhyaya, L. Embree, and J. Mohanty, eds., Phenomenology and Indian Philosophy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
    MacKenzie, M. (2004). Self-Awareness: Issues in Classical Indian and Contemporary Western Philosophy. (doctoral dissertation).
    MacKenzie, M. (2007). The Illumination of Consciousness: Approaches to Self-Awareness in the Indian and Western Traditions. Philosophy East & West 57: 40-62.
    MacKenzie, M. (2008). Self-Awareness without a Self: Buddhism and the Reflexivity of Awareness. Asian Philosophy 18 (3): 245 – 266.
    McGinn, C. (1988). Consciousness and Content. Proceedings of the British Academy 74: 219-239. Reprinted in Block et al. (1997).
    Paul, L. A. (2002). Logical Parts. Noûs 36: 578-596.
    Shoemaker, S.(1982). The Inverted Spectrum. Journal of Philosophy 79 (July): 357-381. Reprinted in Block et al. (1997).
    Tye, M. (2007) Philosophical Problems of Consciousness. In M. Velmans and S. Schneider, eds., The Blackwell Companion to Consciousness. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell.
    梁益堉 (2007)。“Conceptualism and Phenomenal Character”(概念論與現象特性)。《國立臺灣大學哲學論評》第34期：129-174。
    姚治華 (2006)。論陳那的自證說。《現象學與人文科學》3期：51-83 (余振邦正文中譯)。
    陳一標 (2003)。唯識學「行相」(AkAra)之研究。「第一屆印度學學術研討會」會議論文。
    倪梁康 (2006)。唯識學中「自證分」的基本意涵。《現象學與人文科學》3期：85-110。
    倪梁康。最終意識與阿賴耶識──對現象學與唯識學所理解的深層心識結構的
    比較研究。
    倪梁康。客體化行為與非客體化行為的奠基關係問題──從唯識學和現象學的
    角度看“識”與“智”的關係。
    耿寧 (1994)。從現象學的角度看唯識三世。中國文哲研究通訊第四卷第一期：6-14。
    何宗興。陳那自證理論的分析與闡釋。
    http://www.plm.org.hk/e_book/xz-1255.pdf
    趙東明 (2006)。陳那「自證」理論探析──兼論《成唯識論》及窺基《成唯
    識論述記》的觀點。圓光佛學學報第十期。
    釋仁宥。陳那「自證」理論之初探。「台灣哲學學會2008年學術研討會」會議論文。
    佛教原典：
    會本：《成唯識論》、述記、三種述。(2005)。佛陀教育基金會。
    --護法造 玄奘譯《成唯識論》
    --窺基《成唯識論述記》
    --窺基《成唯識論掌中樞要》
    --慧沼《成唯識論了義燈》
    --智周《成唯識論演秘》
    Hattori, M. (1968). Dignāga, on Perception, being the Pratyakṣapariccheda of Dignāga`s Pramāṇasamuccaya from the Sanskrit fragments and the Tibetan versions. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    哲學研究所
    96154002
    100
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096154002
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[哲學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    400201.pdf1268KbAdobe PDF21862检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈