過去研究證實個人與組織適配對於員工工作態度與行為具有顯著相關,其中包括 組織承諾、離職意願、工作績效、組織公民行為等,但在甄選實務中,卻鮮少研究探 討個人與組織適配性測驗的有效性。因此,本研究藉由執行同時效度的研究,希望提 供個人與組織適配性甄選工具之效度證據;此外,亦希望延伸過去甄選研究,檢視個 人與組織適配性測驗的使用,相較於現行企業普遍使用之人格測驗是否具有遞增效度。 在甄選實務上,雇主不只需雇用績效表現佳的員工外,也要注意員工是否願意認 同組織的價值觀。本研究透過為期一年的計畫,擬針對一家中型高科技廠商200 位員 工(包括中、高階主管、人力資源部門、以及全體員工)進行實地訪問並蒐集實證資 料,除完整參考過去學者建議以Q-sort 的方式發展個人與組織適配性測驗外,亦探討 個人與組織適配性工具之效標關連效度,以及在控制人格測驗分數後,個人與組織適 配性測驗的分數,對員工的態度與行為是否仍具有遞增效度。 因此,藉由嚴謹的甄選工具發展與資料蒐集程序,本研究結果不僅可為「個人與 組織適配性測驗」提供更多的效度證據,並在實務上有助於高科技企業甄選人才時的 參考。 Past research has demonstrated that objective person-organization fit (P-O fit) is significantly related to employee outcomes, such as organizational commitment, job performance, and so on. However, in the selection literature, few studies have examined the utility of P-O fit as a selection tool. Therefore, using a concurrent validation design, we will examine the criterion related validity and the incremental validity of an objective measure of P-O fit beyond the validity of the personality test for predicting organization commitment and job performance for a group of high-tech professional employees. Two hundred employees from one single high-tech company will be invited to participate in this study. A one-year study will be implemented. Results of the present study will provide more practically-relevant evidence to the selection literature concerning the predictability of the P-O fit measure.