English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 87924/117065 (75%)
Visitors : 23345941      Online Users : 61
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 文學院 > 哲學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/53550
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/53550


    Title: 人何以知而不行?-論以本真與團結責任為基礎的德行教育理念
    Why Don't We Do What We Should?——On Virtue Education and its Foundations in Judgments of Responsibility of Authenticity and Solidarity
    Authors: 林遠澤
    Lin, Yuan-ze
    Contributors: 政大哲學系
    Keywords: 德行教育;知行問題;責任判斷;道德發展理論;柯爾伯格
    Date: 2010-08
    Issue Date: 2012-09-11 09:05:18 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 德行教育預設我們能做出正確的道德判斷,並加以貫徹實行。知而不行的事實,使得道德自律的可能性遭到質疑。以價值灌輸或行為規訓做為保證知行一致的教育手段,這種德行教育的迷思普遍存在。首先批判來自知行雙軌論的教育學迷思,並透過柯爾伯格(Lawrence Kohlberg)的知行同軌論,說明知行不一致的現象其實只代表:道德判斷是道德行動之必要但非充分條件。借助布萊西(Augusto Blasi)與蒂爾曼•哈貝馬斯(T.Habermas)對於道德行動之充分條件的探究,最後將指出,以自我本真與群體團結做為基礎的責任判斷,才是德行教育真正的基礎。
    The virtue education presupposes that we can do what we should. But in the fact we don’t always do so. Some psychologists therefore throw their doubt upon the possibility of moral autonomy and admit indoctrination and discipline as inevitable means of virtue education. This paper criticizes the myth of "two-track theory" of moral development and shows the moral judgment can be regarded only as the necessary but not the sufficient conditions of moral action. Through an explication of Blasi’s and T.Habermas’ "single-track theory" of moral development I try to identify the judgments of responsibility of authenticity and solidarity as true foundations of virtue education.
    Relation: 哲學分析(上海社科院哲學研究所),1(2), 103-119
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[哲學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback