English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 112721/143689 (78%)
Visitors : 49666637      Online Users : 568
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/53848


    Title: 保險財務監理有效性之模擬測試
    Other Titles: Simulation Tests on the Effectiveness of Insurance Solvency Regulation
    Authors: 蔡政憲
    Contributors: 政治大學風險管理與保險系
    行政院國家科學委員會
    Keywords: 財務監理;模擬測試;清償能力;有效性
    Financial supervision;Simulation test;Solvency;Effectiveness
    Date: 2000
    Issue Date: 2012-10-22 15:43:21 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 預防保險公司破產一向是保險財務監理的首要工作之一，最直接的預防方法是設定保險公司的最低資本額要求。傳統的作法是設立固定的最低資本額要求，美國目前採用的是風險基礎資本，而風行於銀行業及證券業的則是涉險值。本文的目的，是探討這三種資本要求對台灣產險公司所能提供的破產預警能力。研究的方法是根據台灣市場的特性，模擬一間有代表性的產險公司未來的財務狀況，然後據以衡量各種資本要求破產預警的能力。我們發現不論是固定的最低資本額要求，RBC，或VaR 都有破產預警的能力，不過錯誤率仍然偏高。其中，固定最低資本額要求的效力最差，有最高型一及型二錯誤率，預測正確率也最低。RBC 與VaR 的破產預警能力則互有高低，RBC 雖較能事前偵測出破產的跡象，但其發出假警報的機率也比較高，總體的預測正確率也比VaR 低。
    The top priority of solvency regulation has always been the prevention of insurers’ insolvencies. The most intuitive way to make such prevention is setting up minimum capital requirements. Traditionally, minimum capital requirements are constant. The United States currently adopts the risk-based capital requirements, while value at risk prevails in the banking and securities industries. The purpose of this paper is to examine the effectiveness of the above three capital requirements in providing early warnings against insolvencies for the property-casualty insurance industry in Taiwan. We first simulate numerous financial positions for a representative insurer in the cyber world similar to the markets of Taiwan and then examine the early warning capabilities of alternative capital requirements. We find that all of the three capital requirements have early warning capabilities significantly different from random guesses, although error rates are high. Constant minimum capital requirements are the worst among the three requirements for the highest type I and type II error rates and the lowest hit ratio. The advantage of VaR over RBC is not fully supported by this paper because VaR has higher type I error rate, even though VaR has lower type II error rate and higher hit ratio than RBC has.
    Relation: 應用研究
    學術補助
    研究期間:8808 ~ 8907
    研究經費:222仟元
    Data Type: report
    Appears in Collections:[風險管理與保險學系] 國科會研究計畫

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    892416H004 (1).pdf58KbAdobe PDF21208View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback