English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 92604/122928 (75%)
Visitors : 26908652      Online Users : 515
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54619


    Title: 人文學期刊引用類型分析初探
    Citation analysis of humanities
    Authors: 邱琦茹
    Chiu, Chi Ju
    Contributors: 蔡明月
    Tsay, Ming Yueh
    邱琦茹
    Chiu, Chi Ju
    Keywords: 人文學
    引用目的類型
    引用文獻分析
    humanities
    classification of citation
    citation analysis
    Date: 2011
    Issue Date: 2012-10-30 11:25:48 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 人文學是指與人類文化有關,或與分析、判斷人類價值和獨特的精神表現的研究方法有關的學科。本研究透過臺灣人文學引文索引核心期刊資料庫(THCI Core)與美國藝術與人文引文索引資料庫(A&HCI),選擇人文學5門學科權威期刊內2011年出版的文獻進行文獻引用之分析,探討並比較國內外人文學科引用文獻的性質與類型,藉以瞭解人文學科學者的引用特性。

    本研究結果如下:1.人文學引用文獻特性之分布現象:(1) 除語言學以期刊為主要引用資料類型外,人文學各學科引用資料類型以圖書為主;(2)除圖書與期刊外,文學、哲學與藝術偏重對博碩士論文的引用,歷史學則著重於檔案與報紙的使用,對於研究報告引用情形最少;(3)人文學參考文獻語文以中文為主,語言學之參考文獻以英文為多;(4)人文學引用文獻年代分布長遠,引用文獻半衰期平均為16.8年;2.人文學引用文獻位置與特性:(1)人文學學門以論述型文獻為主;(2)人文學論述型文獻對於引用文獻使用頻率以本文部分最多,結論最少;(3)人文學使用內容註現象頻繁;3.人文學引用類型都是以「首次作品」類型為多;4.語言學與其他人文學學門之引用文獻特質有所差異。

    本研究結果可應用於規劃圖書館或相關研究單位之館藏資源類型,了解人文學學者的學術資訊需求與特性,界定學門中重要的資料類型,以提供研究人員完善的資訊服務。同時可將研究分析結果應用於國內人文學引文資料庫之建置建議,提供人文學學者撰寫註釋與引用格式之相關資訊,用以作為資料庫建置人員之參考。
    Humanities, those branches of knowledge that concern themselves with human beings and their culture or with analytic and critical methods of inquiry derived from an appreciation of human values and of the unique ability of the human spirit to express itself. Via Taiwan Humanities Citation Index Core and Arts & Humanities Citation Index, this study select 2011 representative journals of five disciplines to analysis their citations, and explore and compare humanities citation type and characteristics as to observe humanities scholars’ citation behavior.

    The results are as follows: 1.The analysis of Citation and Reference in Humanities: (1) The humanities citation mostly refer to books except the discipline of language; (2) In addition to books and periodicals, the citation emphasis on dissertations and theses in the discipline of literature, philosophy and art, and History focuses on the use of files and newspapers; (3) The majority of citations were to Chinese materials; (4) The half-life of the cited journal in the humanities is average 16.8 years; 2. The position of citation in humanities literature and research features: (1)The ratio of describing research literature in humanities is higher;(2) Humanities scholars frequently use citations at the part of body, which seldom at the part of conclusion;(3) The content note usage in humanities is frequently phenomenon;3. The classification of citation in humanities is mostly “primary sources”; 4. The citation characteristics of Linguistics differ from other discipline of humanities.

    The results can be applied to planning the resource type to libraries or research units, realize the academic information needs and characteristics of humanities scholars, and defining important research sources to provide researchers complete information services. Meanwhile, the analysis can be used in proposals of building citation index database, providing scholars to write notes and citation format, and as the recommend for humanities’ database.
    Reference: 一、西文部分
    Archambault, E. and Gagné, E. Vignola. “The use of bibliometrics in the social sciences and humanities.” Science-Metrix, Final Report. Prepared for the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada(SSHRCC). (2004).
    Baird, Laura M. and Oppenheim, Charies. “Do Citations Matter?” Journal of information Science 20:1(1994):6-7.
    Bornmann, Lutz and Daniel, Hans-Dieter “What Do Citation Counts Measure? A Review of Studies on Citing Behavior.” Journal of Documentation64:1(2008):45-80.
    Brittain, John M. Information and Its Users:A Review with Special Reference to the Social Science. Bath, Somersetshire: Bath University Press,1970.
    Brooks, Terrence A. “Evidence of Complex Citer Motivations.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 37:1(1986):34-36.
    Brooks, Terrence A. “Private Acts and Public Objects: An Investigation of Citer Motivations.”Journal of the American Society for Information Science 36:4(1985):223-229.
    Budd, J. M. “Characteristics of Research Materials Used by American Literature Scholars: A Citation Studies.” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC,1985.
    Cano, V. “Citation Behavior : Classification, Utility, and Location. “ Journal of the American Society for Information Science 40:4(1989):284-290.
    Chubin, D.E. and Moitra, S.D. “Content Analysis of References: Adjunct or Alternative to Citation Counting?” Social Studies of Science 5:1(1975):423-441.
    Coffman, J. W. “A Bibliometric Analysis of a Selected Literature Dealing with the Humanities from ‘the Dictionary of the History of Ideas.” Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio,1985.
    Cole, S. “The Growth of Scientific Knowledge: Theories of Deviance as a Case Study.” In The Idea of Social Structure: Papers In Honor, edited by Robert K. Meton. New York :Harcourt, Barace, Jovanovich,1975.
    Cullars, J. “Citation Characteristics of French and German Literary Monographs.”Library Quarterly 59:4(1989):305-325.
    Egghe, L. and Rousseau, R. Introduction to Informetrics: Quantitative Methods in Library, Documentation and Information Science. New York: Elsevier Science Publishers, 1990.
    Frost, C. O. “The Use of Citations in Library Research: A Preliminary Classification of Citation Functions.” Library Quarterly 49:4(1979):339-414.
    Frost, C.O. “The Literature of Online Public Access Catalogs,1980-85:An Analysis of Citation Patterns.” Library Resources and Technical Services 33:4(1989):344-357.
    Garfield, Eugene. “Can Citation Indexing Be Automated? ” In Statistical Association Methods for Mechanized Documentation, edited by Mary E. Stevens, et. al. Washington D.C.: National Bureau of Standards, 1965.
    Griffith, Belver C. et al. “The Structure of Scientific Literatures. II: Toward a Macro and Microstructure for Science.”Science Studies 4(1974):339-365.
    Gross, P. L. K. and Gross, E. M. “College Libraries and Chemical Education.” Science 66(1927): 385-389.
    Hellqvist, Björn. “Referencing in the Humanities and its Implications for Citation Analysis.” Journal of the American society for information science and technology 61:2(2010):310-318.
    Herlach, Gertrud. “Citation Patterns: Mechanistically Identifiable Characteristics of Citation Links.” Master thesis, University of Chicago,1973.
    Hodges, T. L. “Citation Index:Its Potential for Bibliographic Control.” Ph.D. diss., University of California, Berkeley,1978.
    Hurt, C.D. “Conceptual Citation Difference in Science, Technology and Social Sciences Literature.” Information Processing and Management 23:1(1987):1-6.
    Hurt, C.D. “Methodology Citation Differences in Science, Technology and Social Sciences Literature.” Library and Information Science Research 7:4(1985):345-355.
    ISI.”ISI Web of Knowledge.” Accessed December 2,2011. http://thomsonreuters.com/.
    Knievel, Jennifer E. and Kellsey, Charlene. “ CITATION ANALYSIS FOR COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EIGHT HUMANITIES FIELDS.” Library Quarterly75:2(2005):142–168.
    Liu, Mengxiong. “A Study of Citing Motivation of Chinese Scientists.”Journal of Information Science 19:1(1993): 13-23.
    Liu, Mengxiong. “Citation Functions and Related Determinants : A study of Chinese Physics Publications.” Journal of Library and Information Science 19:1(1993):1-13.
    Lowe, M. S. “Reference analysis of the American Historical Review.” Collection Building 22(2003):13-20.
    MacRoberts, M. H. and MacRoberts, B. R. “Author Motivation for Not Citing Influences: A Methodological Note.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 39(1988): 432-33.
    MacRoberts, M. H. and MacRoberts, B. R. “Problems of Citation Analysis: A Study of Uncited and Seldom-Cited Influences.” Journal of the American Society for Information science and Technology61:1(2010):1-13.
    MacRoberts, M. H. and MacRoberts, B. R. “Problems of Citation Analysis.” Scientometrics 36:3(1996):435-444.
    Magee, Marguerite “How Research Biochemists Use Information:An Analysis of Use of Information from Cited References.” Master thesis, University of Chicago,1966.
    Murugesan, P. and Moravcsik, M. J. “Variation of the Nature of Citation Measures with Journals and Scientific Specialties.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 5:4(1975):323-441.
    Nederhof , A.J.“Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities: A review.” Scientometrics 66:1(2006),81–100.
    Peritz, B. C. “A Classification of Citation Roles for the Social Sciences and Related Fields.”Scientometrics 5(1983):303-12.
    Rowe, M.E. “ A Content Analysis of Citation to Four Prominent philosophers of Science in Selected sociology Journals.” Ph.D dissertation, North Texas University,1985.
    Smith, L.C. “Citation analysis.” Library Trends 30:1(1981):83-106.
    Stankus, Tony ed., Journals of the Century. New York, NY: Haworth Information Press, 2002.
    Talja, S. “Information sharing in academic communities: Types and levels of collaboration in information seeking and use.” New Review of Information Behavior Research 3(2002):143-60.
    Tang, Rong and Safer, Martin A. “Rated Importance of Cited Reference in Biology and Psychology Publications.” Journal of Documentation 64:2(2008):246-72.
    Turabian, Kate L. A Manual for Writers of Term Papers, Theses, and Dissertations, 6th ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.
    Voos, H. and Dagaev, K. S. “Are All Citation Equal? Or, Did We op cit Your Idem?” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 1:6(1976):19-21.
    Weinstock, M. “Citation Index.” In Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science. N.Y.: Marcel Dekker, 1971.
    Weintraub, K.J. “The humanistic scholar and the library.” Library Quarterly50:1(1980):22-39.
    Zuccala, Alesia and Leeuwen, Thed van. “Book Reviews in Humanities Research Evaluations.” Journal of the American society for information science and technology 62:10(2011):1979–91.












    二、中文部分

    Heinrich Rickert,涂紀亮譯。文化科學和自然科學。台北市:古風出版社,1987年。
    丁學東。文獻計量基礎。北京:北京大學出版社,1993年。
    人文及社會科學發展處人文處學門架構,<http://www.nsc.gov.tw/hum/public/Data/011179255771.xls>,檢索日期2011年11月29日。
    文史哲百科辭典。吉林省:吉林大學,1988年。
    方美芬。「1979-2002 年中國大陸閩粵地區發表臺灣文學論文文獻計量分析」。中華民國圖書館學會會報74(2005年6月):261-276。
    方萬全、林義正、林鎮國、張鼎國、楊儒賓、謝世民。「哲學學門國內專業學術期刊評比排序」。國科會專題計畫研究報告,2007年。
    王旭。「2008語言學門相關期刊排序」。國科會專題計畫研究報告,2008。
    王崇德。文獻計量學教程。天津:南開大學出版社,1990年。
    行政院國家科學委員會編。中華民國人文社會科學白皮書。台北市:行政院國家科學委員會,2000年。
    何光國。文獻計量學導論。台北市:三民,1994年。
    余寶琳。「多個偉大社會、一個渺小世界:高等教育界中的人文」。人文與社會科學簡訊12卷2期(2011年):150-159。
    吳美錚、徐雅各。「如何撰寫英文期刊或研討會論文摘要」。行政院農業委員會水產試驗所電子報49期,<http://www.tfrin.gov.tw/friweb/frienews/enews0049/p1.html>,檢索日期2011 年11 月28 日。
    呂長民。行銷研究:研究方法與實例應用。台北縣:前程企業管理有限公司,2001。年
    李少維。「臺灣地區宋代理學學位論文引用文獻分析與特性研究:一九五八至一九九九年」。中國文化大學史學研究所,碩士論文,1998年。
    林品章、柯志祥。「藝術學門第三次相關期刊排序研究成果報告」。國科會專題計畫研究報告,2000年。
    柯莉純。「傅柯對人文科學隻考古學解析初探」。國立政治大學哲學研究所,碩士論文,1994年。
    洪鎌德。人文思想與現代社會。台北市:揚智文化,1999年。
    美國大英百科全書公司聯合編輯。中文版簡明大英百科全書。台北市:台灣中華書局,1988年。
    哲學大辭典。上海市:辭書,1992年。
    馬鳳、武夷山。「關於論文引用動機的問卷調查研究」。情報雜誌28卷6期(2009年6月):9-14。
    崔燕慧。「臺灣地區文史哲研究者文獻使用特性調查分析」。國家圖書館館刊2期(1997年):43-67。
    常思敏。「參考文獻引用中的學術不端行為分析」。出版科學5卷15期(2007年):23-25。
    郭曉蘭。「引文及其自引與偽引」。現代情報4(2004年):150-151。
    陳光華、陳雅琦。「台灣人文學引文索引資料庫之建置」。圖書館學與資訊科學27卷1期(2001年):51-77。
    陳光華、楊康苓。「臺灣人文學引文索引核心期刊(THCI Core)及其初步分析」。人文社會科學簡訊12卷4期(2011年):81-101。
    陳光華、劉書硯。「臺灣人文學引文索引與其核心期刊」。兩岸學術期刊評鑑暨臺版產業發展學術研討會論文集(2008年):1-21。
    陳光華。「臺灣地區文學研究之引用分析」。圖書資訊學刊第7卷第1/2期(2009.06/2009.12):1-36。
    陳育芬。「推動國內人文及社會學期刊加入全球資料庫」。人文社會科學簡訊12卷3期(2011年):30-40。
    陳曉麗。「引文類型比較分析」。圖書與情報4(1998年):50-53。
    黃仁宏。實用中文excel 97。臺北市:松崗,1997年。
    黃寬重、劉錚雲、陳弱水、林麗月、呂妙芬等。「歷史學門國內期刊評比之研究」。國科會專題計畫研究報告,2008年。
    黃慕萱。「從臺灣學者引文角度看歷史學期刊及學者之評鑑」。圖書資訊學刊4:2(2010年):1-39。
    溫海英、陳耀華。「IMRAD格式結構要素和結構式摘要的寫作分析」。錦州醫學院學報19卷5期(1998年):50-53。
    葉國良、張寶三。「文學一學門國際暨國內期刊評比之研究」。國科會專題計畫研究報告,2006年。
    語言學辭典。臺北市:三民,2005年。
    劉青、張海波。「引用行為初探」。情報雜誌18 卷3 期(1999 年5 月):64-66。
    蔡明月。「引文索引與引文分析」。圖書館學與資訊科學31 卷1 期(2005年):45-53。
    蔡明月。資訊計量學與文獻特性。臺北市:國立編譯館,2003年。
    賴方中。「引文動機分析」。四川警察學校學報21卷5期(2009年):115-119。
    謝寶煖。「學術論文之註釋與參考書目」。國立中央圖書館臺灣分館館刊6卷3 期(2000 年3 月):15-38。
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    圖書資訊與檔案學研究所
    99155008
    100
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099155008
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[圖書資訊與檔案學研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML580View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback